neocortex:

The fact that the soviet couldn't attack some countries then doesn't mean they don't want to. In fact the atrocities committed by them
is still very much fresh in those countries. If not being able to attack some countries is the yardstick for
balance of power, I can also claim that the inability of US to invade North korea, China and Iran is a plus to them.
World power has neither been balanced nor absolute.

scully95:


let me quickly correct you because you are so full of massive brainwash and propaganda.. The soviet never attacked a country first... The attacks have alwasy been from the west. The most recent history was when the Ottoman Empire formed a collision with France and Britian and tried to take Crimean penisular from Russia...

You live in a different world..

Missy89:


Who started the Winter war of 1939 , Czechoslovakia invasion of 1968 , Invasion of Georgia in 1921 ,Invasion of Azerbaijan 1920 to name a few?

Lets take a look at Azerbaijan

The invasion of Soviet troops in Azerbaijan was carried out according to the standard Bolshevik scenario: local revolutionary committee raises real or "virtual" uprising of the workers and immediately turned for help to the Red Army. Under this scheme, operated for over 50 years - the invasion in 1956 in Hungary, in 1968 in Czechoslovakia, etc.

April 28 Baku Revolutionary Committee appealed to the People's Commissars of the RSFSR. However, the "aid" began to have a day earlier - The 11th Army, consisting of the 26 th, 28 th, 32 th Infantry Division and 2nd Cavalry Corps (. A total of over 30 thousand people) invaded the territory of Azerbaijan

http://militera.lib.ru/h/shirokorad_ab3/21.html

Hmm, That shite smells like "American style color revolution" / Crimea referendum

scully95:


Well, if you speak of the Finland, that was horrible that even the fins do not understand till today what it was all about.. about Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia.. You speak as if it was Soviet alone. This was made possible by Warsaw Pact, Bulgaria, Hungary, East Germany,Poland andagain the soviet. Their allies were very much involed here even more than the soviets that stopped the political liberalisation reforms. I know eveything about the Brezhnev Doctrine. It was agasint the doctrine back then. That means today is anti russia that you have in western Ukraine now.. Back then, it was not possible. A donbass being killed back then was never possible.. Ok

Then, Russia would have taken the war to even Polish doorstep for backing kiev of today against the Donbass or Luganks..

Missy89:


Well Fins know fully well what the war what it was about. Land grab by Russia.( Russia demanded the mineral rich Petsamo region and wanted a buffer for Leningrad) That is why they fought with determination and humiliated the Soviet Union.

[quote author=Missy89 post=44442131]
If you try to blame the US for NATO's action in Yugoslavia and Libya, Please do the same for SU in Czechoslovakia. If America is NATO, Warsaw pact is Russian.

As per the rest of your post. I dont get it

scully95:


let me quickly correct you because you are so full of massive brainwash and propaganda.. The soviet never attacked a country first... The attacks have alwasy been from the west. The most recent history was when the Ottoman Empire formed a collision with France and Britian and tried to take Crimean penisular from Russia..

Again they fought till the last blood and it was controlled for a while by the alliance then, but was taken back by the soviets. Over 15ok Russians died defending the crimean penisular. Now how did they get here. Ask the Mongloids. Russia in its doctrine will never attack you first and has bever attacked first.
There is a reason why the Napeloan lost, hitler too, Ottoman Empire (the Turks). It is the same reason the anglozionist empire will fall.
Again Crimean penisular has rejoined Russia today.. A big blow to the dieing anglozionist empire and itspuppets or vassals..


lol.. to World power has neither been balanced nor absolute. ..

You live in a different world..

neocortex:


It is so easy for you to talk about brainwash when you don't know that you are its first casualty.

I had assumed I am debating with an informed person but I was wrong. "Russia never attacked first in most cases except in a very extrme" , that is the most ridiculous statement ever made.

So you are ignorant of the "winter wars" , "Russian -georgian war" and the recent Crimea anexation.

In fact what is making NATO presence more acceptable to Europe is the threat from Russia who might wake up one day to take over any country it want.

And you also twisting history, Russia would have been laid to waste by Hitler if not for the multiple frontiers the west had engaged him in fighting.

Imagine your enemy chasing you away from your capital.

That is a big shame isn't it ?

Appleyard:


O Cyprus! Soulja of light! Apostle of truth! Thou, whose dynamic trumpeting heralded the independence of the Foreign Affairs Dept. Of Nairaland What else can i say? Thou have chosen a fine sword to a strong gentleman like me, and the lyrical postulations of thy factual analysis is the motivational spirit that has embolden my linguistic ego; ditto thy unrelentless and inspirational strings of ode that has further greased my Apostolic elbow, ironed my analytical character, and sabathically added ghetton to my punditary career.

O Cyrus! Let it be known to thee this day that, the chronological credibility of your analytical prowess is awesomely irredescent, and your flawless witticism is irresistable and mesmerizing - an unclad phenomenon to the eyes of the zombie-fied midgets, causing a melee amongst them that seeks redemption from the foursquare prison of western zombiefication.

Therefore, O Cyprus, be thou ready to oblige my invocations when duty calls, and when danger threatens from the darkness mist of US disciples of mendacity.
The soliciting for thine knowlegde is absolutely sacrosant, as sanctionf by the Order-in-Council, chaired by SirShymmex, undertaken by Nairaminted, reviewed by Scully95, encouraged by Underground, Biblically finetuned by Zoharariel, and mercilessly implemented by Tkester, Fineguy11, Capip, Bonechamberlain, and many more of those offsprings of the truth seeker.

Till then, Soulja! I remain thy loyal comrade, a fellow bearer of the cross and purpose of thy 43rd ballistic undercover regiment: THE DON KILLUMINATIS!

Chukazu:


I don't know your school of thought.

it may interest you to know that Russia has more nuclear warheads than USA, China's economy has already overtaken US economy so what advantage?

HapyOne:


Well I appreciate the way you analyze things which I confess is quite brilliant of you.
About the ranking thing, US has always been number one most of the time....check military ranking sites and you will see what am saying here.
Well Uncle Sam doesn't need to show off but the reality is, out of the top 5 most powerful military nation Uncle Sam hasn't been the one that has showed up most...from it's high watery defense budget, aircraft carriers, stealth technology, Nuclear arsenal upgrade, the F-35s, mine hunting drones/ship and several others. I guess they are the one that show off here, remember the incident at the South China Sea about the unnecessary patrol....it was US showing itself.
I do understand your proverb.


[quote author=HapyOne post=44431952]
Am pretty sure you know who will win right.

ghostofsparta:


And from your statement about the US being the one who shows of the most, believe me when I tell you they just only reveal the ones they want the world to see, to have their appetites whetted so they can have a reason to keep purchasing, trying to reach, imitating to beat them thus perpetually driving the millitary-indutstrial complex back home in the US while at the same time driving Yankee's "hanker for war". If I show you a type 49 weaponry, I am doing that to wow you, have it in mind that I am already developing type 55 when type 50-55 are breathing somewhere.

Missy89:


Who started the Winter war of 1939 , Czechoslovakia invasion of 1968 , Invasion of Georgia in 1921 ,Invasion of Azerbaijan 1920 to name a few?

Lets take a look at Azerbaijan

The invasion of Soviet troops in Azerbaijan was carried out according to the standard Bolshevik scenario: local revolutionary committee raises real or "virtual" uprising of the workers and immediately turned for help to the Red Army. Under this scheme, operated for over 50 years - the invasion in 1956 in Hungary, in 1968 in Czechoslovakia, etc.

April 28 Baku Revolutionary Committee appealed to the People's Commissars of the RSFSR. However, the "aid" began to have a day earlier - The 11th Army, consisting of the 26 th, 28 th, 32 th Infantry Division and 2nd Cavalry Corps (. A total of over 30 thousand people) invaded the territory of Azerbaijan

http://militera.lib.ru/h/shirokorad_ab3/21.html

Hmm, That shite smells like "American style color revolution" / Crimea referendum

HapyOne:


If you were talking of the Isrealites I will totally not doubt what you were saying but the US...Nah, they have to show the world what they got. Especially in this era of unending arms race, people need to know what you got so they can buy from you. When the f-35s came out, you know how many countries asked for it. I don't believe the US have any jet higher than the f-35s currently locked somewhere else. People need to know the best you got that's the way you solve the arms race and pour fear into your rivals and even alies self. Why do you think the Russians send their most advanced jet to Syria because they need to sell it and show off its capability in real battle.
If you don't show off nobody will buy especially when you are a super power.

Missy89:


Lol do you see the part where i said "TODAY"?

By the way, America did not win any war with nukes