Strangulating the constitution Was at its peak Now at CCT by Umar Assuming the powers of Appeal and supreme courts consecutively without beign call to order

Section 3(d) of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act states that the Bureau shall refer any breach or non-compliance to the Tribunal. However, where the person concerned makes a written admission of the breach, no reference to the Tribunal shall be necessary.

The case against Asiwaju Bola Tinubu was dismissed in 2011, by this same judge Umar in this same Tribunal on the grounds that he was not given an opportunity to deny or admit to any breach before he was brought before the tribunal

what did the judge say?

That he had judged in error in 2011 and he had since realized his error and departed from it.

The question is whether a Tribunal of first instance has the power to reverse itself. Nowhere was that found in the constitution, Strange and fatal to the legal institution in Nigeria
Only one thing stands out;
1) Clash of the Confraternities at force which umar represent the 'trigger puller' at all cost even daring the proceedures

2) Tinubu belongs to a 'Higher Confraternity ruling Occult' which simply means the same rule cannot apply to both saraki and Tinubu, thats simple

NB; Expect insults as replies, while the subject matter will be snubbed, but its the real truth

what is good for the goods(tinubu/afonja) is also good for the ganger(SARAKI/ALIMI)

TANTUMERGO007:
what is good for the goods(tinubu/afonja) is also good for the ganger(SARAKI/ALIMI)

But the reverse is what is happening right now, and its fatal to the judiciary.

The OP is being delusional.

The CCT never reversed itself.

The CCT simply refused to be persuaded by its previous ruling. This is because the decision of a court of coordinate jurisdiction (including itself) is not binding on any court.


When you say "reverse itself", what you mean is that the CCT went back to say , okay go and bring Tinubu back, because I have changed my mind. No, only an appeal court can make it change its mind on Tinubu' case. But on any other case, a court can make a new decision based on further clarification.

Even the supreme cannot revers itself on any matter in a case, but it is at liberty to refuse being persuaded by its ruling on mr A's case when dealing with mr B

CACAWA:
The OP is being delusional.

The CCT never reversed itself.

You CACAWA seem to be like a lunatic that danced unclad tying corn around his waste

The CCT simply refused to be persuaded by its previous ruling.

That is because 'umar' the chairman is playing a script.

This is because the decision of a court of coordinate jurisdiction (including itself) is not binding on any court.

You Fail to Tell Us that the chairman 'Admitted Error'' in the earlier Ruling that exonerate Tinubu, Did the Chairman briefed the EFCC and The CCB of the error Since 5yrs Ago and Not until Counsel to Saraki opt for the same Advantage in a similar case before the chairman 'umar' woke up from his slumber to tell us that 'he had mede error' and was silence about the error so as to protect Tinubu from re-arraingnment?

When you say "reverse itself", what you mean is that the CCT went back to say , okay go and bring Tinubu back, because I have changed my mind

That is not what i mean, you are trying to force your dubious opinion on my assertion to paint it your own color,
when i say "reverse itself" it was to the 'extent that' The chairman 'Admitted Error'' in the earlier Ruling that exonerate Tinubu,(2)And Criminally went mute about it, or reserving his new stand ''of ruling in error'' until the middle of a similar case.