A lot has been said about the recent freezing of the account of Gov. Fayose by the "almighty" without recourse to constitutional provision.

I decided not to quickly join the charade because of the uselessness of PDP and their attempt to introduce grazing in our communities, however, It will be unjust not to lend a voice to this full blown tyranny, this state of nature, especially when it concerns a governor who have been the leading voice of the opposition and who have been standing for what is right.

Apathy in such circumstance is as good as evil. What is interesting is not that those who think it is cool for the judge presiding over the "certificateless Ness" of the president to adjourn the case sine die, are now happy with this development, it appears that even Gov. Ayodele Fayose does not know the exact section which protects him.


Section 308 of the 1999 constitution prohibits any form of prosecution of a sitting governor but recourse to the present case by citing that section will not be obvious to the large group of illiterate followers of Hitler.

It will be difficult explaining the illegality of the freezing of the account of the Governor citing only that section. The supporters will try to make a distinction between prosecution and investigation. I have seen some of them pasting the laughable excuse from Magu.

This is where the EFCC Act itself comes in and EFCC has lawyers working there. Can they explain to me the federal high court they sought powers from before freezing of the account of the Governor?

This is where section 308 now comes in handy. To freeze an account, you have to come by way of motion exparte to a federal high court. Can you take Fayose to court? No Why? S.308 prevents it.

Is it Fayose ' s fault that you decided to have section 308? No Those of you presently advocating for the automatic removal of section 308 without any formal constitutional amendments are comedians. So we should now delete that section from our memory simply because you want Fayose punished?


How about get the section removed first, then go after Fayose? That way, those of us who are aggrieved over what the president have been done can also sue him.


It is called fairness.

We're already in it. Let's accommodate it.


After all its our money. Let him recover the recoverable.


The justice here is, let it be holistic. No sacred cow...

IykeChukz:
Hi

Helo Bro.

I decided not to quickly join the charade because of the uselessness of PDP and their attempt to introduce grazing in our communities, however, It will be unjust not to lend a voice to this full blown tyranny, this state of nature, especially when it concerns a governor who have been the leading voice of the opposition and who have been standing for what is right.


OP I read the bolded and lost all respect for you. How can a known election rigger, thief and liar be "standing for what is right". Pls nobody is buying your horse shite! Fayose shld go and pay people their salary shikena.

Premium time 20 June 2014: the account of the governor and entire state was frozen during. Investigation.

Immunity did not cover investigation.

Supreme court judgement Fawehinmi vs Tinubu.

The Immunity clause covers the President and Governor from prosecution and not investigation. Fayose's account was closed under investigation. You wouldnt want him to move money out and stall investigation.

On the other note, Adamawa state Account under governor Nyako was CLOSED during an investigation process during the reign of Jonathan.

The rise of a tyrant the fall of a tyrant surely

limitless777:

Can they explain to me the federal high court they sought powers from before freezing of the account of the Governor?

This is where section 308 now comes in handy. To
freeze an account, you have to come by way of
motion exparte to a federal high court.
Can you take Fayose to court? No
Why? S.308 prevents it.

@bolded 1. Good question. It is up to Fayose to write to EFCC demanding to know the court that approved the freeze order. He can choose to appeal the decision at a court of law if he so wishes. EFCC cannot freeze any account within or outside Nigeria without the express approval of the appropriate court of law.

@bolded 2.

Ex parte /ˌɛks ˈpɑːrtiː/ is a Latin legal term meaning "from (by or for) [the/a] party". An ex parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the controversy to be present. In Australian, Canadian, U.K., South African, Indian and U.S. legal doctrines, ex parte means a legal proceeding brought by one person in the absence of and without representation or notification of other parties. It is also used more loosely to refer to improper unilateral contacts with a court, arbitrator or represented party without notice to the other party or counsel for that party.

A court order issued on the basis of an ex parte proceeding, therefore, will necessarily be temporary and interim in nature, and the person(s) affected by the order must be given an opportunity to contest the appropriateness of the order before it can be made permanent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte

limitless777:
A lot has been said about the recent freezing of
the account of Gov. Fayose by the "almighty"
without recourse to constitutional provision.


I decided not to quickly join the charade because of
the uselessness of PDP and their attempt to
introduce grazing in our communities, however, It
will be unjust not to lend a voice to this full blown
tyranny, this state of nature, especially when it
concerns a governor who have been the leading
voice of the opposition and who have been standing
for what is right.


Apathy in such circumstance is as good as evil.
What is interesting is not that those who think it is
cool for the judge presiding over the
"certificateless Ness" of the president to adjourn
the case sine die, are now happy with this
development, it appears that even Gov. Ayodele
Fayose does not know the exact section which
protects him.



Section 308 of the 1999 constitution prohibits any
form of prosecution of a sitting governor but
recourse to the present case by citing that section
will not be obvious to the large group of illiterate
followers of Hitler.


It will be difficult explaining
the illegality of the freezing of the account of the
Governor citing only that section. The supporters
will try to make a distinction between prosecution
and investigation. I have seen some of them
pasting the laughable excuse from Magu.


This is where the EFCC Act itself comes in and
EFCC has lawyers working there. Can they explain
to me the federal high court they sought powers
from before freezing of the account of the
Governor?


This is where section 308 now comes in handy. To
freeze an account, you have to come by way of
motion exparte to a federal high court.
Can you take Fayose to court? No
Why? S.308 prevents it.


Is it Fayose ' s fault that you decided to have
section 308? No
Those of you presently advocating for the
automatic removal of section 308 without any
formal constitutional amendments are comedians.
So we should now delete that section from our
memory simply because you want Fayose punished?



How about get the section removed first, then go
after Fayose? That way, those of us who are
aggrieved over what the president have been done
can also sue him.



It is called fairness.

you and your brother Fayose, accussed Buhari of being a dictator. And he is dealling with your brother now you are complaining. I taught Fayose said he is very powerful, why is he crying.

I SUPPORT BUHARI OUR LOVELY DICTATOR

limitless777:
A lot has been said about the recent freezing of
the account of Gov. Fayose by the "almighty"
without recourse to constitutional provision.


I decided not to quickly join the charade because of
the uselessness of PDP and their attempt to
introduce grazing in our communities, however, It
will be unjust not to lend a voice to this full blown
tyranny, this state of nature, especially when it
concerns a governor who have been the leading
voice of the opposition and who have been standing
for what is right.


Apathy in such circumstance is as good as evil.
What is interesting is not that those who think it is
cool for the judge presiding over the
"certificateless Ness" of the president to adjourn
the case sine die, are now happy with this
development, it appears that even Gov. Ayodele
Fayose does not know the exact section which
protects him.



Section 308 of the 1999 constitution prohibits any
form of prosecution of a sitting governor but
recourse to the present case by citing that section
will not be obvious to the large group of illiterate
followers of Hitler.


It will be difficult explaining
the illegality of the freezing of the account of the
Governor citing only that section. The supporters
will try to make a distinction between prosecution
and investigation. I have seen some of them
pasting the laughable excuse from Magu.


This is where the EFCC Act itself comes in and
EFCC has lawyers working there. Can they explain
to me the federal high court they sought powers
from before freezing of the account of the
Governor?


This is where section 308 now comes in handy. To
freeze an account, you have to come by way of
motion exparte to a federal high court.
Can you take Fayose to court? No
Why? S.308 prevents it.


Is it Fayose ' s fault that you decided to have
section 308? No
Those of you presently advocating for the
automatic removal of section 308 without any
formal constitutional amendments are comedians.
So we should now delete that section from our
memory simply because you want Fayose punished?



How about get the section removed first, then go
after Fayose? That way, those of us who are
aggrieved over what the president have been done
can also sue him.



It is called fairness.

to hell with fairness.
they must all sweat out our stolen yams

blackpanda:
I decided not to quickly join the charade because of the uselessness of PDP and their attempt to introduce grazing in our communities, however, It will be unjust not to lend a voice to this full blown tyranny, this state of nature, especially when it concerns a governor who have been the leading voice of the opposition and who have been standing for what is right.


OP I read the bolded and lost all respect for you. How can a known election rigger, thief and liar be "standing for what is right". Pls nobody is buying your horse shite! Fayose shld go and pay people their salary shikena.

is he lying
did he not rig
did he not loot
can he pay salaries
if you live in a glass hous,do not throw stones

Some people are magnanimously dense when it comes to rational conversation.

While the OP was trying frantically to make sense out his nonsense, he already bared his gross ignorance by asking 'which court grants the order to freeze an account of a suspect'.

Constitution is not what is being played here, it's the law. And while you act like you have a big brain and was making sense, you forgot that you can approach a judge in his office and collect an injunction without conveying a full house!

The money was traced to that account and was frozen just like others, pls, I pray, what is so hard to understand?

It's easy to spot a fool especially when they open their mouths in writing.

IykeChukz:
We're already in it. Let's accommodate it.


After all its our money. Let him recover the recoverable.


The justice here is, let it be holistic. No sacred cow...