Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,191,010 members, 7,942,632 topics. Date: Saturday, 07 September 2024 at 01:41 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Business / NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? (2507 Views)
First Bank Is The Most Unreliable Bank In Nigeria / NEPA/PHCN Should Pay Their Staff On Commission / Nepa/phcn Website (2) (3) (4)
NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by Ka: 10:47am On May 27, 2005 |
'Cheap and unreliable' vs. 'Expensive and reliable' I saw this article yesterday. Just in case Vanguard yank the article, here it is in its entirety: FG hikes electricity tariff July Now I support the electricity company's move to hike prices, because the current regime is simply not sustainable - there's no way that the company will have enough money to maintain their equipment and guarantee their customers reliable electricity supply if they are charging less than it costs them to generate the electricity in the first place. But I get the impression that the average Nigerian will look at this as yet another conspiracy to make life more difficult for the common man, because Nigerians seem to be in love with buying artificially cheap goods. When I say 'artificially cheap', I mean it is cheap because the organisation offering the good is not selling it at what it would really cost to make the good, and it is doing this either because the organisation is a government company with nothing to lose, or because it has been forced by government to sell the good at that price, or something else. The point is, selling a good at an artificially cheap price means that there usually isn't enough of it to go around. This is because the organisation producing the good is losing more than it makes, so in effect it is throwing away money. And of course, this means that there is only so much of a good that it can produce, so in the end a scarcity develops, and alongside this also develops a black market where the good is sold at many more times than the artificial price. We've seen this in Nigeria in the past in the olden days of NITEL when it was difficult getting a phone and you had to bribe officials to get a line at many more times the price. More recently, we've seen this during fuel crises where the NNPC can't maintain the subsidy on fuel and a scarcity develops. In fact, one of the reasons that there is acute scarcity of electricity in Nigeria these days is because the Nigerian Gas Company (which supplies NEPA gas to run its generating plant) is disagreeing with NEPA how much they should sell their gas to NEPA for. The NGC want to sell it at the same (higher) price they sell it on the general market; NEPA doesn't have the money to pay for this, because they have been 'throwing' their money away by charging Nigerians artificially cheap prices for electricity. On the other hand, if an organisation sells its goods at a price that allows it to recover the amount it spent on making it, then it means that it will have even more money to continue to making the good. The price may be higher, but there won't be any sustained scarcity. You can see an example of this in the private phone sector where there usually is very little difficulty in getting a GSM or fixed wireless line. So my questions are these: Am I right or wrong to say that Nigerians would rather have a situation where a good was artificially cheap even though it was scarce than a situation where the good was more expensive and it was widely available? Would you yourself rather have a situation where a good was artificially cheap even though it was scarce than a situation where the good was more expensive and it was widely available? |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by Namio1(f): 10:53am On May 27, 2005 |
Why would I prefer an artificially cheap but scarce product? |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by Ka: 10:59am On May 27, 2005 |
Na mi o: Because it's cheap? Because its cheapness matters more to you than the hassle of getting it? I don't know. |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by Allenpowered(m): 11:07am On May 27, 2005 |
I feel your idea Ka, all you want is a good service by the Power company. The reality of the whole thing as I'm always quick to point out is that things that work well in other countries don't seem to work in Naija.What is the guaantee that when there is an increase in tariff there wo't be more corrupt managers to embezzle the money Of course no one would go to the market to but unreliable product for himself,its the constraint on resources that make people do that. Also, fundamental questions should be asked from the NEPA management: what has been done to this great amount of money spent on power generation,no results...then why should an average Nigerian expect anything better when they pay more... |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by Ka: 1:11pm On May 27, 2005 |
Allenpowered: I hear what you're saying Allenpowered, and I agree that this is true in some cases, but I don't think this is true for all cases. What I would love would be for people to stop concluding that something that works abroad "will never work in Naija" and try to find out [I]specifically[/I] why it won't work. But I digress. What is the gua[are]antee that when there is an increase in tariff there wo't be more corrupt managers to embezzle the money There's no guarantee - they might and they might not, although measures can be taken to prevent this. But I can guarantee you that if the company doesn't get any extra money, services will remain as bad as they are. Of course no one would go to the market to bu[why] unreliable product for himself,its the constraint on resources that make people do that. True, but when I her Nigerians' comments, I wonder whether they understand the saying that [I]'the soup wey sweet, na money cook am'[/I]. Also, fundamental questions should be asked from the NEPA management: what has been done to this great amount of money spent on power generation,no results...then why should an average Nigerian expect anything better when they pay more... Well, there appears to be quite a bit of work in building new generating plants and refurbishing transmission infrastructure, and we won't see the effect of this for a while yet. But as I have said already, without any extra revenue, nothing good will happen. The government certainly isn't interested in pouring extra money into a company that should be generating its own money, so that money will have to come from Nigerian customers. Anyway, Nigerians aren't forced to use NEPA/PHCN/whatever it calls itself tomorrow - if you wish, you can buy a generator and disconnect yourself from the grid. |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by dominobaby(f): 3:07pm On Jun 01, 2005 |
I'd rather have an expensive and reliable good than the reverse. It's just that Nigerians would like inexpensive things though unreliable or even scarce just because there is a lot of poverty in the land. But then, as Allenpowered said, they could just say it would be reliable/readily available when in actual fact, they are just out there to make money. But I think it is just good we be optimistic about the whole stuff and hope they really keep to their words. |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by Seun(m): 10:05am On Jun 02, 2005 |
In an Interview, the Daily Sun asked Engineer Joseph Makoju, "what does it really cost to build a power station?" His response follows: [I]"A standard project showed that on the average, for every megawatt, every new capacity, you are talking about half a million dollar per megawatt. So, if you want to put in 10 megawatts, that is $5 million. If you want to put in 100 megawatts, that’s $50 million. "Now, if I am telling you as we are sitting down here that our supply, everything is about 3,000; our installed capacity, let's say 4,000 installed. And I am saying the demand is about 6,000; if we say we want to close the gap between demand and supply, it means you need 2,000 more megawatts at half a million dollar per megawatt. That would be $1,000 million. "Convert to naira and everybody will collapse. But that is the truth of the matter."[/I] Source: I almost kill myself on this job, says NEPA boss, Eng Joseph Makoju So it will cost 140 |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by Ka: 6:57pm On Jun 02, 2005 |
So it will cost 140 trillion naira to build enough power stations meet up with our country's current demand for electricity. I think you mean 140 billion naira. But look at it another way... we have (conservatively) about 20 million working persons in Nigeria. Let's say that each person pays (conservatively) 10,000 naira per year for their electricity, then this means that in a year, the electricity companies will get 200 billion naira. Assuming that they use 20% (or 40 billion naira) of that for building power stations, then in over three years, the money spent on power stations will have been recouped. So what does this tell us? If the distribution companies are able to sort out their revenue collection problems, there shouldn't be a problem with money to build the electricity infrastructure. And as I'm never tired of saying, privately run companies are more likely to do a better job of collecting revenue that publicly owned ones. So bring on privatisation! |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by Seun(m): 7:31pm On Jun 02, 2005 |
140 billion naira doesn't sound like so much money to me. |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by kodewrita(m): 3:07pm On Jun 06, 2005 |
nice to hear the statistics but the manager did not tell us the kind of power station he meant. below is a quote from an article on wind power The initial cost of wind power is high. Installing a 1500-kW turbine with a 77-m rotor diameter and design life of 20 years costs $1.5 million, (Jacobson). Although this investment will save money in the long-run, the initial cost can be too high for many. On the bright side, just like all technologies, with more research and development, the cost of turbines and their installation should eventually decrease. while wind power is more environmentally friendly and requires less maintenance we don't hear of other technologies other than gas turbines which by the way are not cheap. what the above tells us is that compared to $5million for every MW, we get $1million per MW for wind energy. while this might still sound high. its more affordable and can be used anywhere unlike the gas turbines that require pipelines and stuff. I even heard NLNG prefers to sell gas to commercial customers rather than NEPA who buy it at N24 per litre compared to maybe N180 per litre commercially so expect a huge rise in tarriffs when they do start. |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by obong(m): 2:21pm On Jun 26, 2005 |
i like the idea of wind and solar power. They are initially expensive but better ont he evironment and wallet in the long run. |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by Tobi(m): 4:42pm On Aug 18, 2005 |
Well, i think wind powered energy will b nice in Nigeria but we should also not forget abt the availability of enough wind to turn the roto. I think its only at the coastal states that we can get enough wind to achieve this. The alternative is gas. Nigeria i heard is the 4th largest producer of gas and its regrettable to know that we flare almost 80% of our gas. have u seen Portharcourt from a plane night? U'll count almost 7 flare points making the whole place light up like going to watch a match in the stadium at night. Half of that gas could be used to power the turbines. Egbin Thermal station in Lagos, is on gas, but politics will not make them send gas uninterrupted to the station. I was discussing this with some1 and the guy was wondering how gas can be piped from the west, east or north where the power stations will be. But hey...Nigeria is laying Pipe from South to service West Africa then go to North of Africa b4 it ends in Europe through the desert. I heard that will be the most ambitious pipe network in the world. If we can do that then laying pipes from south to anywhere is no big deal. |
Re: NEPA/PHCN: Cheap and unreliable vs. Expensive and reliable? by EzegeNdiigbo: 7:27pm On Feb 08, 2021 |
Abulo getin yea 0gwuEgo |
(1) (Reply)
Unsolicited Mails From Proshareng.com / Pls How Can I Double 250k In A Month / Lets Create A Facebook Page
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 44 |