Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,211,624 members, 8,012,099 topics. Date: Sunday, 24 November 2024 at 09:23 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1039157 Views)
President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 7:29am On Jul 22, 2016 |
chinese8107: Nice painting. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 11:52am On Jul 22, 2016 |
China made 120 mm PGM smart Mortar shells range > 6km milimeter wave rader guidence.pic 1 or laser guidence pic 2
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:22pm On Jul 22, 2016 |
CHINESE NORINCO W90 203mm /45 howitzer max firing rannge 40-50 km can be tracked or wheeled, PGM / sub-munition capable,
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:53am On Jul 23, 2016 |
The idea of the PL-01 is to try and eliminate the infrared, radar and visual signature of the traditional tank to a large degree, while also relying on guile to take identity masking a step further. In addition, the PL-01 concept aims at bringing to market a tank packed with relevant modern features, many of which already exist off the shelf, while others are still on the developmental horizon. The PL-01 attempts its almost magical infrared signature reduction via the installation of temperature controlled wafers that blanket its exterior. This chameleon's skin of sorts, allows the tank's skin to match the infra-red signature of its surroundings. It does this by processing what small infrared sensors mounted around the tank detect, and then displays a pattern on the tank's honeycomb-like covering that best matches the infrared data collected. As a result, the tank all but disappears to infrared sensors. Even more outstanding, these wafers can also be used like pixels, as each can be manipulated in temperature. This allows for the tank to use active infrared camouflage, such as tiger stiping its infrared signature in the jungle, or making it flat like the sand in the desert. The PL-01 also lowers its infrared signature through cooling and dispersing the exhaust from its 940 hp diesel engine. The PL-01's proposed active infrared camouflage system can even go a step further, from concealment to trickery. The tank can even make itself look like a car or another common object, via matching the temperature of its surroundings and then displaying a preprogrammed image on its temperature controlled wafers. This is an amazing countermeasure that, if reliable, can make enemy detection and the creation of a firing solution almost impossible during nighttime operations for a large percentage of any enemy's anti-tank weapon systems. The PL-01 tank is also said to be almost entirely coated with radar absorbing material, and the vehicle's very low-profile and faceted design is said to reduce radar returns in a sizeable manner. This could be quite valuable, as detection of armored formations via standoff strategic platforms using ground moving target indicator (GMTI) radar will increasingly be proliferated throughout the world. The PL-01 is also quite intuitive and efficient with its general design, as it only uses three crew, and has an auto-loading system in its turret that carriers 16 rounds (24 more are stored in the hull). The turret, which is unmanned, is modular in nature, and may allow for different turrets, with different capabilities, to be to be interchanged if need be. The PL-01 was designed to field a 105mm or 120mm smoothbore cannon, that will be capable of firing sabot, high explosive, or guided missile rounds. In addition to the main gun, the PL-01 will have a 7.62mm coaxial gun internally mounted turret right next to the main gun, in a similar configuration to the Abrams, as well as a detachable remotely controlled 7.62 or 50 caliber independent gun turret system. The PL-01 will also sport active defenses in the form of a Trophy like system, where electronic actively scanned array (AESA) radars will be installed around the turret. Once a high-speed projectile is detected moving at a threatening vector, the system will fire one of its countermeasure rockets to intercept and detonate infront of the incoming projectile, thus killing it, or greatly decreasing its kinetic energy, before impacting the tank. Also, laser detection sensors will be distributed around the tank so that early warning of an imminent enemy attack could initiate automatic ejection of infrared and laser masking smoke mortars, which are mounted flush with turret to keep the tank's radar signature low. The PL-01 basic tank will come stock with level 5 ceramic-composite armor installed on its frontal hemisphere, with level four armor on its flanks. Additional plug and play armor is said to also be an option for working in extremely high-threat environments, such as urban battlefields. Currently the PL-01 weighs in at about 33 tons, with the additional armour it is projected to weigh close to 39 tons. This would put it in at about 3/5's the weight of an Abrams and about ten tons lighter than the fully loaded Russian T-90 main battle tank. source http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/is-polands-stealthy-pl-01-the-tank-of-the-future-1554395391 |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 12:49am On Jul 24, 2016 |
AVIC showed the harrier hawk I drone in UK.It has 5 hard point can carry missles a cluster bomb or recon pod 16 hours air endurance.It looks just like a trainer . |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 3:43am On Jul 24, 2016 |
chinese8107:Nigeria is trying to convert her old trainers to these |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:27am On Jul 24, 2016 |
[img]http://defence.pk/attachments/2-jpg.314758/[/img] China V750 helicopter drone and H300 drone and AV500 drone https://www.yahoo.com/tech/china-unveils-first-armed-drone-231551247.html
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:20am On Jul 24, 2016 |
INTEGRATED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS : 1.an automated Air Defense command and control center for controlling and monitoring of Air Defense Operations. In network centric warfare era, RASP(recognizable air situation picture) information is required to be made available at the appropriate level for taking tactical decision. These levels are 1.strategic level 2.Operational level 3.tactical level The information sharing involves sharing of the information among navy, army and civil radar network. The system will receive data from different types of homogeneous/ heterogeneous radars, reports from mobile observation posts and data from various other Air Force Airbases or Civilian agencies viz Air Traffic Control, Air Force Movement Liaison Unit etc. to create real time comprehensive recognized air situation picture (RASP) at the Command & Control Center (C & C Center). The connectivity of sensors/agencies from/to the C&C Center will connected on a redundant high speed wide area network based on IP protocol. the automated Air Defense command and control should have the following features 1.Adaptable to legacy systems 2.High availability rate 3.Open architecture and state of the art HMI 4.Upgrade ability and expand ability 5.Situational awareness and Analysis 6.Generation of Recognized, accurate, updated and complete real time Air Situation Picture (RASP) for local as well as centralized air space control and surveillance Threat Evaluation on the basis of Identification of track. 7.Integration of various types of radars and adaptable to user legacy systems. 8.System generated solution for Weapon assignment including Surface to Air Guided Weapons, AAA and aircraft (Fighter aircraft interception control) 9.Automation of tactical functionalities viz. Interception, Aircraft recovery, Threat evaluation, PAD (Passive Air Defense) warning etc. 10.Automatic track Identification based upon flight plan and IFF data with manual override 11.Interception solution & commands for defender aircraft against target. 12.Flight Plan ingestion & collision resolution. 13.Surveillance alert generation. 14.Simulation of exercise environment through multi identity tracks. 15.Dissemination of weapon control orders & other tactical commands to weapon units. 16.Record & Replay of operator actions as well as ASP situations. 17.Air Defense Resource Planning, management & deployment including radar coverage area analysis 18.Post mission analysis 19.Air tasking order processing etc at the minimum the idea is to provide an appropriate solution to identify the track information in the Air. 1.To produce a “Recognized Air Situation Picture” (RASP) by using the information received from different radars and other assets. 2.To provide a perfect WA solution for enemy aircraft/missiles using different interception tactics (for Combat Air Patrol), SAM missiles and AAA. 3.To achieve automation in the Air-Defense hierarchy of the concerned air force. WHAT IS THE CHARACTERISTICS OF A MODERN GOOD SAM 1.High Mobility 2.High Resistance to Jamming 3.Optimal Missile Range and corresponding Radar Power 4.Lower Band Operating Frequencies 5.Advanced Digital Signal and Data Processing 6.Defensive Counter Measures and Emitting Decoys 7.Low Probability of Intercept Techniques 8.Digital Data links/Network Centric Setup 9.Dual Missile Seekers 10.Ability for Interception of PGMs etc SAM missiles are not standalone much depends on the radars supporting it. The limit of the interception range of a modern surface-to-air missile system can be easily estimated. Given the radar performance parameter R0, which is the maximum range for initial detection of a target with a radar cross section of one square meter, the detection range for a target with a radar cross section σ, is: R det (σ)=R0·σ1/4 After initial detection, there is a time delay or reaction time during which a firm track is established, the target is identified, and the missile is launched. The time dependence of the target range, as measured from the radar, is: R target (t)=[[{R2 det (σ)-altitude2}½- V target .t]2 +altitude2]½ here 2 stands for square ½ stands for square root altitude = target altitude V target = target speed R det(σ) = radar detection range for a target with a radar cross section σ Again the time dependence of the range of the intercepting surface-to-air missile, as measured from the radar is R SAM (t)=V SAM ·(t−τ delay ) here V SAM = surface-to-air missile average speed t delay = time delay or reaction time By setting these two equations equal, R SAM (t) = R target (t), the maximum potential interception range, as limited by surface-to-air missile fly-out, can then be calculated as a function of several variables. these kind of calculations and analysis are required to set up Weapon Engagement Zones WEZs which are a critical part of air defense planning because they represent the defense posture against the air and missile threats. WEZ is an airspace of defined dimensions within which the responsibility for engagement of air threats normally rests with a particular weapon system and can be sub divided into the following (a) FEZ In AD, that airspace of defined dimensions within which the responsibility for engagement of air threats normally rests with fighter aircraft. (b) HIMEZ In AD, that airspace of defined dimensions within which the responsibility for engagement of air threats normally rests with high-altitude SAMs. (c) LOMEZ In AD, that airspace of defined dimensions within which the responsibility for engagement of air threats normally rests with low- to medium-altitude surface-to-air missiles. (d) SHORADEZ In AD, that airspace of defined dimensions within which the responsibility for engagement of air threats normally rests with SHORAD weapons. It may be established within a low- or high-altitude missile engagement zone. (e) JEZ In AD, that airspace of defined dimensions within which multiple AD systems (SAMs and aircraft) are simultaneously employed to engage air threats. Again air defense includes includes various types of defensive coverage depending on operational requirements (a) Area Defense. Area defense uses a combination of weapon systems (e.g. aircraft and SAMs) or various combinations of airborne and ground-based sensors and shooters to defend broad areas. (b) Point Defense. Point defense protects limited areas, normally in defense of vital elements of forces or installations. For example, a SAM or AAA unit positioned to protect an airfield is considered point defense. (c) Self-Defense. Self-defense operations allow friendly units to defend themselves against direct attacks or threats of attack through the use of organic weapons and systems. The right of self-defense is inherent to all ROE and weapons control procedures. which again in turn requires (a) Determination Of Surveillance Coverage Areas. Defended airspace must be under continuous surveillance to facilitate early warning. The planner should use a combination of air-, surface-, and space-based detection assets to achieve this requirement. Adequate early warning of air and missile attacks provides the reaction time necessary for friendly forces to seek shelter or take appropriate action. Early warning of hostile air and missile attacks is vital for a layered defense. (b) Development of the Active AMD(air and missile defense) Fire Plan. The objective is to provide the required level of protection specified in the critical asset list. Defense resources involve applying a mix of the following six employment guidelines, because not all may be required or possible to defend dependent upon the threat and defensive counter-air assets available: 1. Mutual Support. Weapons are positioned so that the fires of one weapon can engage targets within the dead zone of the adjacent weapon systems. For gun systems, this dead zone is usually small. For missile systems, the dead zone may be large and mutual support is a critical element. Mutual support can also cover non-operational units or units at lower states of readiness. 2. Overlapping Fires. Weapons are positioned so that their engagement envelopes overlap. Because of the many altitudes from which the enemy can attack or conduct surveillance operations, defense planners must apply mutual supporting and overlapping fires vertically and horizontally. 3. Balanced Fires. Weapons are positioned to deliver an equal volume of fires in all directions. This is necessary for AD in an area where the terrain does not canalize the enemy or when the avenue of approach is unpredictable. 4. Weighted Coverage. Weapons are positioned to concentrate fires toward the most likely threat direction of attack. Based on the tactical situation, a commander may risk leaving one direction of attack unprotected or lightly protected to weight coverage in a more likely direction. 5. Early Engagement. Sensors and weapons are positioned to maximize early warning and to engage and destroy aircraft and missiles before they acquire and fire on or damage the defended asset. 6. Defense in Depth. AMD sensors and weapons are positioned to enable multiple engagement opportunities and deliver an increasing volume of fire as an enemy air or missile threat approaches the protected asset. Defense in depth reduces the probability that “leakers” will reach the defended asset or force. again, steps must be taken for reduction of Enemy targeting effectiveness of ur assets via 1.Mobility. Mobility reduces vulnerability and increases survivability by complicating enemy surveillance and reconnaissance efforts to pinpoint locations of targets. Mobility may be coupled with concealment to “hide” assets. 2.Deception. Deception misleads adversaries by manipulating, distorting, or falsifying friendly actions. Deception may be used to cause an enemy to waste munitions on false targets, deceive their combat assessment process, and falsely influence their decision makers by feeding their intelligence collectors what appears to be credible information.Deception may deny the enemy the ability to gain correct tactical, operational, and strategic information when using their reconnaissance and surveillance systems. 3.Emission Control/Communications Security. Communications security and an emission control program for infrared, electromagnetic, and acoustic signature reduction can deny the enemy sensor and reconnaissance assets timely acquisition and ID of friendly target systems (eg C2 nodes). 4.Camouflage and Concealment. Practice visual signature reduction measures that can “hide” or deny accuracy in locating friendly targets/target systems. These measures may be conducted continuously or in response to specific warnings. Timely intelligence concerning the overflight by enemy satellite and aircraft collection systems is important to the effort. Those measures also may be coupled with deception measures to further complicate chances of effective enemy attacks. 5.Redundancy. A principal means of preserving combat power is duplication of critical nodes, capabilities, and systems that are particularly vulnerable to air and missile attack and for which other passive measures may be less appropriate. Redundancy includes dual, contingency, or backup capabilities that can assume primary mission functions (in whole or in part) upon failure or degradation of the primary system. Of primary concern are “soft” targets such as C2 nodes and sensors (antennae) and fixed sites such as airfields and ground stations for airborne sensors. 6.Dispersal. Dispersal reduces target vulnerability by decreasing concentration and making a target system less lucrative. Combined with mobility and deception, dispersal increases enemy uncertainty as to whether a particular location is occupied and, if so, whether it will be occupied when the attack is executed. etc |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:36am On Jul 24, 2016 |
The VNIIRT 34Ya6E Gazetchik E series of systems combine a MAWS and radiating decoy capability intended to defeat seekers in anti-radiation missiles, with a capability to deploy aerosols and chaff to defeat radar and electro-optical targeting systems and guided munition seekers. The system provides the following capabilities: Missile Approach Warning System (MAWS) to detect inbound ARMs. Chaff dispenser to defeat MMW weapon seekers. Aerosol (smoke) generator to defeat electro-optical seekers / sensors. Decoy emitter operating in the band of the defended emitter. The system is keyed to emit by the radar system it is defending. modern versions are much more capable |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:36am On Jul 24, 2016 |
[img]http://thaimilitaryandasianregion.files./2016/07/meteor.jpg?w=625[/img] Meteor is a next generation, active radar-guided, beyond visual range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM) system. The missile is being developed by MBDA Systems for six European nations. Meteor can be launched as a stealth missile. It is equipped with enhanced kinematics features. It is capable of striking different types of targets simultaneously in almost any weather. The Meteor is equipped with a two way datalink, which allows the launch platform to provide updates on targets or re-targeting when the missile is in flight. The datalink is capable of transmitting information such as kinematic status. It also notifies target acquisition by the seeker. The Meteor is installed with an active radar target seeker, offering high reliability in detection, tracking and classification of targets. The missile also integrates inertial measurement system (IMS). The missile has a range in excess of 100km. It is designed for a speed greater than Mach 4. The missile has a large no escape zone. The manufacturer has boasted of a “no-escape zone” three times that of the U.S.-made AIM-120 AMRAAM — likewise classified. The no-escape zone is an aerial combat term for a cone-shaped area — determined by the missile’s capabilities — from where a targeted aircraft cannot escape solely using its own maneuverability. [img]http://thaimilitaryandasianregion.files./2016/07/descriptif-meteor.jpg?w=625[/img] |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:41am On Jul 24, 2016 |
Russian emitting decoy system, developed to protect the selected radar from anti radiation missile (ARM) attacks |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 11:18am On Jul 24, 2016 |
Odunayaw:. Yes . A cost effective move,for COIN don't need to buy very expensive air plane. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 8:30pm On Jul 24, 2016 |
NORINCO develops CT3 command and reconnaissance vehicle key operational functions of the CT3 can be summarised as tactical command, battlefield reconnaissance, target indication, and information processing. The overall layout of the CT3 is similar to other members of the VN1 family of vehicles with the driver seated front left, commander to the immediate rear, and the diesel powerpack to the right. The area to the rear of the commander's position has been raised to provide greater internal volume for its specialised battlefield mission. Mounted on the roof is a telescopic mast fitted with a complete suite of sensors, including a thermal imager that has a detection range of 8 km and an identification range of 3.5 km. A high-definition colour video camera provides a detection range of 12 km and an identification range of 7 km. The mast is also fitted with a laser rangefinder with a maximum range of 10 km, which the company claims can be employed as a target designator for precision-guided munitions. A Ku-band tactical radar completes the sensor suite, offering a quoted maximum target detection range of 12 km and a minimum detection range of 200 m. http://www.janes.com/article/62410/norinco-develops-ct3-command-and-reconnaissance-vehicle |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 8:35am On Jul 25, 2016 |
chinese8107: Do you work with NORINCO.? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 8:50am On Jul 25, 2016 |
bidexiii:No |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:29pm On Jul 25, 2016 |
nemesis2u: China North Industries Corporation (NORINCO) has released details of its latest SWS2 self-propelled anti-aircraft gun/surface-to-air (SPAAG/SAM) system, which it is now offering for export. It is based on an 8x8 VN1 armoured platform that is also used for a number of other applications. The hull and turret are of all welded steel armour and provides protection from small arms fire and shell splinters. The complete SWS2 system has a gross vehicle weight (GVW) of 23 tonnes and is operated by a crew of three consisting of commander, gunner and driver. Mounted on the middle of the platform is a remote controlled turret, which is armed with a 35 mm revolver cannon and a pod of four SAMs. Turret traverse is 360° with gun elevation from -2° to 85° while SAM elevation is from -5° to 70°. It would appear that SAM reloads are not carried so the SWS2 will have to depend on resupply vehicles for missile replenishment. The 35 mm revolver cannon has a maximum slant range of 4,000 m and a maximum effective height of 3,000 m with 400 rounds of ammunition being carried. NORINCO is currently marketing a complete family of 35 mm ammunition including high-explosive incendiary (HEI), high-explosive incendiary-tracer (HEI-T), and semi-armour piercing HEI-T (SAPHEI-T) with all of these having a muzzle velocity of 1,175 m/s and fitted with a self-destruct fuze. In addition it can fire the recently developed Programmable Time Fuze Pre-fragmented (PTFP) round, which has a muzzle velocity of 1,050 m/s. This contains more than 100 spin-stabilised tungsten sub-projectiles and is optimised to engage smaller targets such as unmanned aerial vehicles and is equivalent to the Rheinmetall Air Defence 35 mm Advanced Hit Efficient And Destruction (AHEAD) ammunition. This 35 mm ammunition can also be fired by the Chinese PG99 35 mm anti-aircraft gun (AAG), truck-mounted CS/SA1 twin 35 mm AAG, and the Rheinmetall Air Defence 35 mm KD series twin towed 35 mm AAG. SWS2 AHEAD CS/SA-1 PG99 or without missles against ground or air target, rate of fire 500 rounds/min |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:37pm On Jul 25, 2016 |
one of the 2 pictures available The Arihant class (Sanskrit, for Killer of Enemies) is a class of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines built for the Indian Navy. They were developed under the US$2.9 billion Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) project to design and build nuclear-powered submarines. Not many know this fact that the Arihant submarines where first designed to be SSN but later after the nuclear tests and Indian adoption of NFU doctrine a hump was added to make it into a SSBN. it is actually a baby boomer. Arihant is the first ballistic missile submarine to have been built by a country other than one of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council [img]http://2.bp..com/-Jh0dlSY5n7w/Vh6AiLGdTtI/AAAAAAAAE1M/bLnHdXkWIxY/s1600/20u3dzk.png[/img] The submarines are 112 m long with a beam of 11 m, a draught of 10 m, displacement of 6,000 tonnes and a diving depth of 300 m. The complement is about 95, including officers and sailors. The boats are powered by a single seven blade propeller powered by an 83 MW (111,000 hp) pressurised water reactor and can achieve a maximum speed of 12–15 knots (22–28 km/h) when surfaced and 24 knots (44 km/h) when submerged. The submarines have four launch tubes in their hump and can carry up to 12 K-15 Sagarika missiles with one warhead each with a range of 750 km or 4 K-4 missiles with a range of 3,500 km. the first boat of these class the INS ARIHANT is operational and on active duty. INS Aridhaman is the next ship in the class, and will be larger and have 8 missile launch tubes to carry up to 8 K4/24 K15 missiles and a more powerful pressurized water reactor than INS Arihant. 3-4 ships of these class is planned. A larger follow on class to the arihant class is being designed, these new boats will be capable of carrying 12 to 16 ballistic missiles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_feco6vn7E 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:40pm On Jul 25, 2016 |
chinese8107 dont u understand english , how many times i have to tell u to remove pictures from my posts u quote , i get banned by the anti spam bot. remove the pictures from my quote now |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 6:15pm On Jul 25, 2016 |
LD2000 max fire range 3000 m rate of fire 4000 rounds/min can be attached with or without SAM |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 6:24pm On Jul 25, 2016 |
nemesis2u:I thought leaving only one pic was no problem |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:39pm On Jul 25, 2016 |
is LD2000 in active service? i have noticed quite a large no of weapon systems being developed are not accepted into chinese military. they end up as export versions |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 6:50pm On Jul 25, 2016 |
nemesis2u:in limited service since 2005. yes,China defense industry has too much surplus of choices,sometimes one version just equipped,another new or upgrade version is coming to compete. Some version is designed for export only,customized or tailer made according to customer's need. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:56pm On Jul 25, 2016 |
post info on chinese fast attack missile boats if u can |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 8:28pm On Jul 25, 2016 |
LD3000 main gun rate of fire 11000 rounds/minute muzzle velocity 1250m/s is under development and testing
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 6:10am On Jul 26, 2016 |
type 022 stealth fast attack missle boat , 40 knots, 8x C802/C803 , AK630 CIWS,and MANPAD 2 Likes
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:33am On Jul 26, 2016 |
SPO-15 “Beryoza” Radar Warning Receiver The RWR display indicates any threat radars illuminating (“painting”) the aircraft. Information is presented as symbols representing the type and direction to the threat. Six illuminated symbols at the bottom of the display notify the pilot of the threat radar type. The system indicates both enemy and friendly radars. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 2:54pm On Jul 26, 2016 |
chinese8107:jeez mehn...Can any general in PLA memorize all dz hardwares You Chinese must b very proud of ur homeland |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 3:23pm On Jul 26, 2016 |
Odunayaw: one person only need to pay attention in his own field,though there are some open sources of those weapons. not everybody satisfied,many citizen compare China with US,still talk trash about China.more people care more about their own wealth&wellfare than the country. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:33pm On Jul 26, 2016 |
[img]http://s.aolcdn.com/dims5/amp:8b7c7ee53c01e9f31b422d05f3043cb6ff42a73e/q:100/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fo.aolcdn.com%2Fhss%2Fstorage%2Fmidas%2F1d5a18ea5be95f2a19c68689963a4618%2F204122607%2Flockheed_drysub.jpg[/img] Lockheed Martins Submergence Group just announced a $166 million defense contract with the US Special Operations Command to build a new "missile sub" meant to carry Special Forces scuba divers into battle. Operated by a pilot and a navigator, the 30-ton Swimmer Delivery Vehicle will carry a team of six divers to an underwater location in a completely dry environment. Once the sub reaches its drop point, it can launch the dive team through an onboard airlock system. "The dry, one-atmosphere environment of these vehicles provides an alternative to traditional wet submersibles being used by the U.S. and international Special Forces communities today," Lockheed Martin wrote in a statement, "and will deliver operators to their destination in better physical condition to complete a mission." According to the Daily Mail, Lockheed Martin is currently building three of the vehicles, which have a depth rating of 328 feet and a lock-out depth of 98 feet. With a top speed of 5 knots (or about 6 mph), it won't be the fastest thing underwater, but it offers an upgrade over the open, wet submersibles Special Forces teams currently use, and reduces a mission's overall swim time. According to Lockheed Martin, the platform will be based on the existing S301i dry manned submersible and will include an Inertial Navigation System, Doppler Velocity Log for navigation support, an Underwater Telephone and UHF radio for communications, and an obstacle avoidance sonar and fathometer. The S302, as it is officially called, will also include support for additional sensors as specific missions require. THE SWIMMER DELIVERY VEHICLE THE SDV will carry two pilots and six passengers It will have a depth rating of 328 ft (100 m) Lock-out depth of 98 ft (30 m) Top speed of 5 knots (6 mph, 9 km/h) According to Lockheed, the three 30-ton (27-tonne) DCS vehicles that it is contracted to build will allow warfighters to travel deeper and farther underwater than today. The craft are dry submersibles that support two operators (pilot and navigator) plus up to six swimmers with the ability to lock them out and in. 'The dry one-atmosphere environment of these vehicles provides an alternative to traditional wet submersibles being used by the U.S. and international Special Forces communities today, and will deliver operators to their destination in better physical condition to complete a mission,' Lockheed Martin says. Instead of sitting in the open, the passengers will sit in a dry, environment as the vessel brings them closer to their destination. Once at the target location, disembarking is through a lockout chamber while still submerged. |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (668) (Reply)
Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live / American Politics Thread: Trump Is President-Elect! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 118 |