I'm loving this..

lexiconkabir:


Thanks bro, i hope he understands this, i chose to ignore him when i saw him drifting from the main point, i noticed something in his style of argument(ive had clashes with him in the past), argument by exhausting his opponent, just imagine the epistle he wrote to reply my 6liner post, and in reality all he wrote was the same thing i replied initially coupled with some other rubbish.

I hope he does. I Assumed he didn't know he was drifting. You know sometimes, its good to give them a benefit of doubt

lexiconkabir:


Thanks bro, i hope he understands this, i chose to ignore him when i saw him drifting from the main point, i noticed something in his style of argument(ive had clashes with him in the past), argument by exhausting his opponent, just imagine the epistle he wrote to reply my 6liner post, and in reality all he wrote was the same thing i replied initially coupled with some other rubbish .

Exactly lol

Rilwayne001:
[/s]

Oga, you are just squelching. Maybe you don't get the point or that I don't get yours, but as long as what you wrote above is concerned you are just retorting.

no sir, no squelshing(wateva it means), if you had read my initial posts, you would have understood my line of thought.

No one is denying the fact that there are division in every religion, the point is what are we doing to correct our friends that we thought to have err from the fold? As you can see annunaki's post up there, he said his mission is to remove the log in the eyes of the Muslims (this same objective is what we known truthman2012 and parisbookaddict for) while he hold on to the view that his fellows have been misguided. they as well hold this same view about is belief.

1. since no one is denying the fact that there are divisions in every religion, therefore no one should attack/accuse/criticise Christianity based on division! hope you get me now.
2. pls who is "we" that you used up there. does the word "we" refer to christians or Muslims or just people generally(there is a reason for asking)
3. "correct our friends"? , are they friends?, that some of their beliefs(not all) are similar does not mean they are friends, even having a common goal or enemy does not certify friendship. once you tell who "we" are, we can have a better understanding on if they are friends or not.

The point is why are they not trying to correct their fellows that are misguided instead of attacking Muslims all the time? Could it be that they love the Muslims than their fellows to the extent that they will prefer to see their fellows burn in hell rather that a Muslim? We all know the answer though.

well, this is not the point I brought up in my first post, but I do wish they could answer if your statement is true or not, I don't have a record or details as to all they do, so I can't say all their time is dedicated to Muslim issues.

The Same thing applies to you; you believe their Bible has errors they believe yours does too..Who is fooling who?

I do not believe there is error in the bible, I do believe their is error in some translations.
and I do support my beliefs with facts.
secondly, I've never condemned anyone to hell cus I don't have the power or authority to do so.
The only one being fooled is the one who sees the right thing but believes the wrong thing is the right thing to do.

Like a brother rightly put it .. who quenches the fire of another's house when he has refused to quench his?

that's if their is fire in his house!

udatso:
I am going to reply you while you wait for his reply


I think you are changing the issue at hand here to a more general sense. Even as at that, I will handle it.

these part was brought up cus some have turned from talking about the three monikers the op mentioned to attacking Christianity and it's so called divisions.

It is true Sunnis see shias as misguided and so does shias. Go to Islam section and see lots of post by albaq.ir, shiamus.lim (shia). He doesn't hide or sugarcoat in telling Sunnis that we are misguided. And so does new.nas lexiconka.bir and other brothers exposing the misguidance in shia.
The challenge is we don't pretend like we don't have a difference.
These three mentioned in the Op have only one aim in Nairaland, to talk about Islam and expose the falsehood in it. These three independently see falsheood in each others christianity but they have never tried to call each other to the true christianity.
I hope you understand this now

pls note, I'm not defending anybody, but pls tell, how did you know that they see falsehood in each others christianity if they never mentioned it on nairaland, or if they never tried to call each other to the true christianity?.
for you to know there stand on their views of others who claim to be christians, it means they must have mentioned it, if only once while the talk about Muslims the 99 times.(pls don't take this statement as fact)

Once again. stay on the topic. The question remains truthman is not fine with annunakis christianity and he has not seen it fit to correct his brother. Annunaki sees parisbook and truthman as people who wrongly see Jesus as God but has said nothing to correct them both.
Truthman also sees parisbook (a Catholic) as idol worshiper but kept mute.
Have they been quiet because they would rather see each other born in hell fire than see Muslims born for eternity?

I believe I can now see the issue at hand, you expect Annunaki to correct parisbook directly and personaly instead of correcting the division she belongs to.
I believe there is more joy for some if these three accuse each other individually, they will be happy, not because of the attempt to correct each other, but for the manifestation of division between them. well, Unless the situation Comes up, I don't see the need for that.
again I ask, how did you know about how they see these things if they have kept mute and not talk about it.

There are thousands and thousands of catholics on nairaland, if Annunaki sees or thinks something is wrong with catholics, correcting Parisbook will not solve the issue, but directing the corrections to catholics in general can! note same applies to parisbook if she has the same issue with protestants(assuming Annunaki is one)

It's true the issue of Trinity has been discussed but I challenge you to give me a link where these three or at least just two of them have tried to let the other see the error in their ways?
The question isn't about division but about hypocrisy of these three.

now there is a difference between talking about about an issue the other person believes in and and talking directly to the other person about the issues he or she believes in.
If there is evidence to show that parisbook talked to others about trinity, why do you want evidence to show that parisbook talked to Annunaki about trinity!, is that the way it's done?

udatso:
dolphinheart
If you really want to compare. Do the following
1. Pick any three Muslims that are constantly bash christianity in collabo

2. Bring out the differences in their Islam assuming there is

3. Check to see if they have addressed each other about these differences (shia, Sunni or whatever)

4. If they have, then you have nothing to compare.

5. If they haven't Then Create a thread as this and expose their hypocrisy just as these three have been exposed

sir, I did not post my first post because of those three. I posted it because some have turned their issues with those three to attacking christianity in general, emphasising the so called division in christianity rather the actions of the three.
If I had digressed from the issue at hand, I apologise, but I did it cus of the digress I noticed before my post.

In conclusion I still state: he who want to attack christianity based on so called divisions should do so if their is no division in his own religion.

dolphinheart:

no sir, no squelshing(wateva it means),

You don't pretend not to know the meaning and you answered no.. Smh! It seems you are confused. Don't you have Google

if you had read my initial posts, you would have understood my line of thought.

Contrary to this, you are the one that are not getting what the pi was all about. Those whom it was created for got the message hence their running away from the thread, but on the other hand are just here to argue blindly since you enjoy irrelevant argument.

1. since no one is denying the fact that there are divisions in every religion, therefore no one should attack/accuse/criticise Christianity based on division! hope you get me now.

Well, the OP's intention was not about Christianity rather about the 3 guys belief.. And then I don't know when you turn the co owner of Nairaland that you start dishing out to members what to do, who to criticize and who not to. Maybe you should direct this your command to the atheist on this board or your fellow brothers who are always attacking Islam. Either way, thats your cuppa'.

2. pls who is "we" that you used up there. does the word "we" refer to christians or Muslims or just people generally(there is a reason for asking)

The" we" here is general.

3. "correct our friends"? , are they friends?, that some of their beliefs(not all) are similar does not mean they are friends, even having a common goal or enemy does not certify friendship.

Are you their spokesman? So because you know how to argue blindly you feel you can speak on anyone's behalf?

Durhh!

once you tell who "we" are, we can have a better understanding on if they are friends or not.

You are obviously confused.

well, this is not the point I brought up in my first post, but I do wish they could answer if your statement is true or not, I don't have a record or details as to all they do, so I can't say all their time is dedicated to Muslim issues.

Turning a blind eye?

I do not believe there is error in the bible, I do believe their is error in some translations.

And what have you done to correct those who are still following those translations that have errors?

A guy opened a thread as regards 1 John 5:7 one thing was found in what he quoted and another is in the Bible the Jehovah witness use, yet you were nowhere to be found on that thread to prove him wrong, and below you are talking about facts, what facts exactly

and I do support my beliefs with facts.
secondly, I've never condemned anyone to hell cus I don't have the power or authority to do so...

No one is saying that you should condemn them to hell, but since you believe they have err in some cases, what and what have you done to guide them back to true Christianity you believe you are doing?

The only one being fooled is the one who sees the right thing but believes the wrong thing is the right thing to do.

what makes you think that what you are seeing is indeed the right thing?

that's if their is fire in his house!

THERE is and your opinion doesn't change anything.

dolphinheart:

these part was brought up cus some have turned from talking about the three monikers the op mentioned to attacking Christianity and it's so called divisions.


pls note, I'm not defending anybody, but pls tell, how did you know that they see falsehood in each others christianity if they never mentioned it on nairaland, or if they never tried to call each other to the true christianity?.
for you to know there stand on their views of others who claim to be christians, it means they must have mentioned it, if only once while the talk about Muslims the 99 times.(pls don't take this statement as fact)

For someone who had time to read the comments of those turning this thread to an avenue to attack Christians and didn't see the evidence presented against the defendants, tells alot about your personality.
Go back to the first page and read the evidences. I really hate it when one keeps dragging issues back and forth.

I believe I can now see the issue at hand, you expect Annunaki to correct parisbook directly and personaly instead of correcting the division she belongs to.
I believe there is more joy for some if these three accuse each other individually, they will be happy, not because of the attempt to correct each other, but for the manifestation of division between them. well, Unless the situation Comes up, I don't see the need for that.
again I ask, how did you know about how they see these things if they have kept mute and not talk about it.

If they have, it shouldn't be so difficult to give us a link.

There are thousands and thousands of catholics on nairaland, if Annunaki sees or thinks something is wrong with catholics, correcting Parisbook will not solve the issue, but directing the corrections to catholics in general can! note same applies to parisbook if she has the same issue with protestants(assuming Annunaki is one)

Go and check their posts where they attack Islam, at least one of them is always there to add his/her venom.
If these guys can join hands to call others to Christianity, whats wrong in asking them to tend to their internal wounds.

now there is a difference between talking about about an issue the other person believes in and and talking directly to the other person about the issues he or she believes in.
If there is evidence to show that parisbook talked to others about trinity, why do you want evidence to show that parisbook talked to Annunaki about trinity!, is that the way it's done?

There are many other Christians on Nairaland. Did it ever occur to you why the focus is on these three? Malvisguy oladegbu backfire anas.09 and so many others attack Islam but why was this thread about these 3?

The reason for the seeming diversity in Christianity is because for us, the punishment for apostasy is not death. Rather a Christian who holds a belief which differs from the mainstream Christianity will usually be disfellowshipped or excommunicated.

Those expelled from the Church for false doctrine will usually take advantage of the leniency and forgiving spirit of the Christian Faith by setting up their own religious organisations (Mormons, Jehovah Witnesses, Celestials etc).

We Christians won't judge these people in this world, rather we trust in our Lord and Saviour when he said:


'Not everyone who says to Me, "Lord, Lord," shall enter the kingdom of heaven' (Matthew 7:21).


If we were in the habit of killing dissenters like Muslims do, there would be only one Christian denomination.

We believe as Christians that Jesus is the Only Begotten Son of God no matter what else we might disagree about.

It is better to have one Saviour and many denominations than have one denomination united under an illiterate pedophile.

Cc lexiconkabir; Demmyz15, Rilwayne001

Onechancearmy:
The reason for the seeming diversity in Christianity is because for us, the punishment for apostasy is not death. Rather a Christian who holds a belief which differs from the mainstream Christianity will usually be disfellowshipped or excommunicated.

If we were in the habit of killing dissenters like Muslims do, there would be only one Christian denomination.

We believe as Christians that Jesus is the Only Begotten Son of God no matter what else we might disagree about.

It is better to have one Saviour and many denominations than have one denomination united under an illiterate pedophile.

Cc lexiconk.abir; Demm.yz15, Rilway.ne001

Are you done convulsing? Or you are still on it?

Rilwayne001:


You don't pretend not to know the meaning and you answered no.. Smh! It seems you are confused. Don't you have Google

sorry for the misunderstanding sir!

Contrary to this, you are the one that are not getting what the pi was all about. Those whom it was created for got the message hence their running away from the thread, but on the other hand are just here to argue blindly since you enjoy irrelevant argument.

seems you already have an opinion of me. What I said is not irrelevant. my post was not based on the topic, and as you can see , ive not taken sides on the issue of the three(apart from trying to gather info and understand views),but it was based on what the topic was turning into. you don't look at the perceived division in Christianity based on the actions or inacations of three people.

Well, the OP's intention was not about Christianity rather about the 3 guys belief..

from what I've read , I think it's not about their belief but more about how they handle their beliefs and how they react to each others beliefs

And then I don't know when you turn the co owner of Nairaland that you start dishing out to members what to do, who to criticize and who not to. Maybe you should direct this your command to the atheist on this board or your fellow brothers who are always attacking Islam. Either way, thats your cuppa'.

my statement "therefore no one should attack/accuse/criticise Christianity based on division! hope you get me now" is not a command, I was just expressing my views. everyone , Irrespective of religious stand has a right to accept it or refuse it or do anything they want with it.
I do not think I have brothers who are always attacking Islam, maybe my definition of brother is different from yours!

The" we" here is general.

then reality has shown that "we" have dealt with their friends that they thought to have erred from the fold in variety of ways, from councElling to outright murder!.

Are you their spokesman? So because you know how to argue blindly you feel you can speak on anyone's behalf?

Durhh!

I'm not speaking on anyone's behalf, I just asked a simple question in which the answer will help one to understand the relationship between these three: are they friend?

[s]You are obviously confused. :
Turning a blind eye?

turning a blind eye to what?, look at what i said again: "well, this is not the point I brought up in my first post, but I do wish they could answer if your statement is true or not, I don't have a record or details as to all they do, so I can't say all their time is dedicated to Muslim issues.

And what have you done to correct those who are still following those translations that have errors?

you can go through my posts to see what I've done. I've pointed some of those verses out and given(with facts and evidence) my views on them.

A guy opened a thread as regards 1 John 5:7 one thing was found in what he quoted and another is in the Bible the Jehovah witness use, yet you were nowhere to be found on that thread to prove him wrong, and below you are talking about facts, what facts exactly

I do not see all the threads on the religious section or any other section on Nairaland, if that thread do exist, I don't know if I've read or not. maybe if you can give more details about the thread , then I can give more details.
Secondly, it's not a must that I must respond to all issues I have contrary opinion with on Nairaland.
have I ever shared my views about 1 John 5:7?, yes!, many times!, so not doing so in one thread does not mean a thing.

No one is saying that you should condemn them to hell, but since you believe they have err in some cases, what and what have you done to guide them back to true Christianity you believe you are doing?

I try to discuss the issue with them anytime I have the opportunity to do so.
I try to first learn why they think it's me that have erred , then try to reason with them(if they are reasonable persons). you can go check my posts, the facts are their.

what makes you think that what you are seeing is indeed the right thing?

you examine what you have learnt with what they tell you, you ask questions about it and draw up a sincere conclusion based on things presented.

THERE is and your opinion doesn't change anything.

yes, there might be fire in a house!

lexiconkabir:


Are you done convulsing? Or you are still on it?

As Aisha said about the "prophet":


Narrated Aisha: "A man called Labid bin al-A 'sam from the tribe of Bani Zariq worked magic on Allah's Apostle until Allah's Apostle started imagining that he had done a thing that he had not really done.

Sahih BukhariVolume 8 no. 658

Narrated Aisha: "Magic was worked on Allah's Apostle so that he used to think that he had sexual relations with his wives while he actually had not. "

Sahih BukhariVolume 8 no. 660

Question: If the 'prophet' was so easily bewitched,how can we be sure that parts of the Qur'an were not 'revealed' while he was 'under the influence"?

Onechancearmy:


As Aisha said about the "prophet":


Narrated Aisha: "A man called Labid bin al-A 'sam from the tribe of Bani Zariq worked magic on Allah's Apostle until Allah's Apostle started imagining that he had done a thing that he had not really done.

Sahih BukhariVolume 8 no. 658

Narrated Aisha: "Magic was worked on Allah's Apostle so that he used to think that he had sexual relations with his wives while he actually had not. "

Sahih BukhariVolume 8 no. 660

Question: If the 'prophet' was so easily bewitched,how can we be sure that parts of the Qur'an were not 'revealed' while he was 'under the influence"?

Oh, you are still convulsing, get well soon, pele.

Onechancearmy:
The reason for the seeming diversity in Christianity is because for us, the punishment for apostasy is not death. Rather a Christian who holds a belief which differs from the mainstream Christianity will usually be disfellowshipped or excommunicated.

If we were in the habit of killing dissenters like Muslims do, there would be only one Christian denomination.

We believe as Christians that Jesus is the Only Begotten Son of God no matter what else we might disagree about.

It is better to have one Saviour and many denominations than have one denomination united under an illiterate pedophile.

Cc lexiconkabir; Demmyz15, Rilwayne001

annunaki2 abi na truthman2012, whoever you are, so you had to open another account 40minutes ago basically because you wanted to hide under another moniker' on this thread?

Coward, why don't you come here with your original account?

Dolphinheart, you might want to check this https://www.nairaland.com/2640984/awakening-jehovahs-witnesses-dismantling-watchtower

lexiconkabir:


Oh, you are still convulsing, get well soon, pele.

Actually it's the prophet who was convulsing. That's why he fell under a spell so easily.

So let me turn the question on you: " Can you Convince me that your "prophet " is better than Jesus? "

Do it and I will change my mind about him. Don't do it and I will conclude that the "prophet" is an embarrassment and a shame.

Consider it a challenge.

udatso:

For someone who had time to read the comments of those turning this thread to an avenue to attack Christians and didn't see the evidence presented against the defendants, tells alot about your personality.
Go back to the first page and read the evidences. I really hate it when one keeps dragging issues back and forth.

yes, it does say a lot about my personality.
yes some evidence are presented, but are they true, correct, accurate? I don't just take sides because someone said something.
some times I try to look also at why such statements or evidences where given,(is it because of hate, envy, love, search for knowledge, to correct someone or just the need to find fault) it helps to understand how to view such evidences. sometimes some evidences are true but irrelevant.

I'm not dragging anything on the issue of the three, I've hardly said anything about them other than trying to get more info about the issue. my post has primarily been concentrated on how the issue about division in Christianity should be addressed, the three should not be used as yardstick. that is the only linknow between the issue of the three and my post.

If they have, it shouldn't be so difficult to give us a link.

I believe everyone knows some of their views on trinity, and I believe they got to know it through Nairaland, therefore their views should be out their, but that they should show it by directly mentioning each other is not necessary by my own understanding.
I'm still drawing up my view as to the main issue of the thread, that will be concluded after I shifted the wheat fromy the weed.

Go and check their posts where they attack Islam, at least one of them is always there to add his/her venom.

with what ive seen so far, same thing being done on these thread, same thing being done by some Muslims on Nairaland. pls, note,this is not a defense for their actions.

If these guys can join hands to call others to Christianity, whats wrong in asking them to tend to their internal wounds.

that boldeday part sir, is the big question, but before that can be answered one must first if the wound in internal or external, what the wound really is, one must also ask if they have done that and how they did it.

If they could prove that they talked about the issue, but you want them to talk to each other about the issue, then I need to ask why do you want it that way?

There are many other Christians on Nairaland. Did it ever occur to you why the focus is on these three? Malvisguy oladegbu backfire anas.09 and so many others attack Islam but why was this thread about these 3?

I've considered it, I think(not sure o) it's because they have more post about their views on Muslim and Islam than anyone else

Demmzy15:
Parisbookaddict, true2god, truthmans2012, malvisguy212, dolphinheart if I want to be a Christian, which church can I go to so as I can attain salvation!

I will not tell you which church, denomination, group of people , organization to associate with. ill rather tell you to read the word of God first, try to know the requirements for salvation. If you know what to look for, you'll probably know where to find it. You will be in a better position to separate the truth from false.

Onechancearmy:


Actually it's the prophet who was convulsing. That's why he fell under a spell so easily.

So let me turn the question on you: " Can you Convince me that your "prophet " is better than Jesus? "

Do it and I will change my mind about him. Don't do it and I will conclude that the "prophet" is an embarrassment and a shame.

Consider it a challenge.

Yaba left escapee!

Rilwayne001:
Dolphinheart, you might want to check this https://www.nairaland.com/2640984/awakening-jehovahs-witnesses-dismantling-watchtower

I've checked it!

lexiconkabir:


Yaba left escapee!

I'm crazy ain't I ? But why're are you running away from a madman's challenge?

Use Christian scripture and Islamic scripture to make the case for Muhammad as a superior to Jesus.

That ought to be a simple enough instruction.

Letter by a non - Muslim woman who once dated a Muslim man. A lot to learn from this:


Hello Pamela Geller,

I recently came across your website thanks to Ali Sina who has mentioned you a couple of times on his blog. My story is on his blog under “I was in a relationship with a Muslim”. I have been watching a lot of your interviews and your debates with Muslims and I have learned so much from you and Ali Sina. When I hear you speak about the dangers of Islam, I sometimes fear for your life because I know how aggressive Muslims can be. I dated one for 3 years. I have learned a lot more about Islam by watching your videos and reading Ali Sina’s blog(within 2 months) than my 3 years relationship with my ex Muslim boyfriend. I was taught never to judge others’ religion and culture. I took Cultural Anthropology, World Religion, Philosophy, Social Environment classes and I have the Quran at home. In school, professors makes Islam and all other religions seem very peaceful and I guess it has a lot to do with freedom of religion and ethics. During those 3 years I use to believe that Islam was indeed peaceful, my Ex convinced me that it was very peaceful… but I never believed it was perfect. No religion is perfect in my mind.

I am a Psychology major, while taking psychology courses I realized that Islam created people who are ignorant, dependent and selfish. I started to slowly realize that I was dating a massive manipulator. His logic made no sense to me. I couldn’t question Muhammad or Allah, and when I did, he would go ballistic.

At times he was very sweet and kind but I felt like Islam limited his mind. He was afraid to make his own choices. Everything was a sin. I use to believe women who covered themselves were very committed and loving to their religion and happy. Many of the things you have said really has helped me move on. You have convinced me to the point in which I truly believe Islam IS a cult. I use to be naive and defend Islam because of all the “Stereotype”.

I was a willing victim to my ex boyfriend and to Islam. I was willing to move with him to Saudi Arabia, Thanks god I didn’t. The amount of prejudice and racism in that culture is incredible. I know for a fact that my ex hates Jews with passion and had no idea what the holocaust was. Even after showing him pictures of dead Jews and dead children during the holocaust, he would twist the topic and talk about the Palestinians who were suffering due to the Jews.
Islam brainwashes people. Everything in Islam goes against Psychology. It is highly impossible to have a stable mindset while raised in that culture. You don’t have a voice in that culture and religion. It took me a long time to start healing because I had a very strong love for my ex, even now after a year, I sometimes cry at night.

I see you as a mother and a hero. Your bravery is astonishing because I know you must get millions of death threats and criticism. I honestly don’t know how you handle it but it takes a strong person to do what you do.

Hearing you speak and fight against Islam is very important, not only for me, but to the world. I had no Idea how bad Islam was until I dated a Muslim man. My ex had some good qualities and it made me damn sad that he had such strong hold on Islam. I hate Islam because there are potential good people in Islam but the more they are controlled by their faith, the more inhuman they become. It is an honor to write to such a strong woman such as yourself. I wish I could help fight against Islam. The stories I hear from Muslim women breaks my heart and it angers me that it is the norm in the middle east. I wish I would live long enough to see the day Islam is banned from the globe. It might be wishful thinking but Islam is too dangerous. These stories I have read and watched on you tube about women being murdered due to Islam makes me appreciate my life even more. I was stupidly willing to give up my freedom to move to Saudi Arabia. So many women over there would wish to take my place, I took my freedom for granted.
God Bless you
XXXXXXXXX

Sir you clearly know how to prolong issues. I am beginning to think you are always gonna have a reply for me whether it takes us forward or not.

dolphinheart:

yes, it does say a lot about my personality.

I am glad we both agree on this
Then why pretend like we were just accusing them wrongly?

yes some evidence are presented, but are they true, correct, accurate?

if after checking out these evidences, you are still asking these questions, i am beginning to regret while i even replied you in this first place. I thought you were different.

I don't just take sides because someone said something.
some times I try to look also at why such statements or evidences where given,(is it because of hate, envy, love, search for knowledge, to correct someone or just the need to find fault) it helps to understand how to view such evidences. sometimes some evidences are true but irrelevant.

So after looking at the evidences, you are now shifting the goal post to why the evidences was given? perhaps who gave the evidences or on what occasion were they given?

I'm not dragging anything on the issue of the three, I've hardly said anything about them other than trying to get more info about the issue. my post has primarily been concentrated on how the issue about division in Christianity should be addressed, the three should not be used as yardstick. that is the only linknow between the issue of the three and my post.

Actually you are. Its been established that even though some muslims have taken advantage to speak ill of some christians in general(Its not like christians are not guilty of this too), that wasnt the aim of the thread. If that is what upsets you, i apologise on their behalf. Now can we face the issue here?

I believe everyone knows some of their views on trinity, and I believe they got to know it through Nairaland, therefore their views should be out their, but that they should show it by directly mentioning each other is not necessary by my own understanding.
I'm still drawing up my view as to the main issue of the thread, that will be concluded after I shifted the wheat fromy the weed.

Their views are out there for everyone to see.
Truthman believes a muslim or a catholic is an idol worshiper and will burn in hell if he doesnt repent.
He has been trying to save the muslims by his numerous threads insulting all that muslims hold dear. Can you provide us a link were he has done same with respect to catholics? Let me reduce the task for you, he doesnt have to mention anyone. Just a thread he created adresssing the issue.

with what ive seen so far, same thing being done on these thread, same thing being done by some Muslims on Nairaland. pls, note,this is not a defense for their actions.

Can you mention any 3 muslims who make it a hobby to create at least topics about christianity everyday?

that boldeday part sir, is the big question, but before that can be answered one must first if the wound in internal or external, what the wound really is, one must also ask if they have done that and how they did it.

You only see what your eyes want to see
How can life be what you want it to be
You're frozen
When your heart's not open[color=#000099][/color]

If they could prove that they talked about the issue, but you want them to talk to each other about the issue, then I need to ask why do you want it that way?

First why dont you give us links of topic any of them created to address the issue? NOTE I am not requesting for a link where they talk to each other? All you have been doing so far is defend them.

I've considered it, I think(not sure o) it's because they have more post about their views on Muslim and Islam than anyone else

they are more enthusiastic in saving muslims from burning in hell but dont care about each other burning in hell.

To ensure that you dont give me a very long piece taking us backward, i will highlight the major point and question i asked:

1. You wanted evidences of the accusations and you were given these evidences only for you to start asking for circumstances and what have you. It was an attempt to further drag this issue longer than it deserves.

2. If you were sincere you would have found the answers you require in those evidences which is why i gave you the madonna song.

3.I have equally apologised on behalf of other muslims who might hae said anything offensive about christians in general since that wasnt the aim of this thread. hopefully you wont start talking about how other muslims talked about other christians.

[center] QUSETIONS [/center]
a. Can you mention any 3 muslims who make it a hobby to create at least topics about christianity everyday?
b. Give us links of topic any of them created to address the issue? NOTE I am not requesting for a link where they talk to each other?

dolphinheart:


I will not tell you which church, denomination, group of people , organization to associate with. ill rather tell you to read the word of God first, try to know the requirements for salvation. If you know what to look for, you'll probably know where to find it. You will be in a better position to separate the truth from false.

This Dolphin man talks too much. What is it you don't understand? , hum? .


Dolphinman

udatso:
Sir you clearly know how to prolong issues. I am beginning to think you are always gonna have a reply for me whether it takes us forward or not.

That's dolphinman for you. He will always do that unless and until you cut his head off and take it with you

That's the only thing that can STOP him.

Empiree
I hope he doesn't make me regret quoting him though.
Please brother, about the the images, pls take it easy

Empiree:
That's dolphinman for you. He will always do that unless and until you cut his head off and take it with you

That's the only thing that can STOP him.

Haaaaa
Are you a terrorist? You want to cut his head off.. ......
Annunaki2 come and see empiree oooo

udatso:
Empiree
I hope he doesn't make me regret quoting him though.
Please brother, about the the images, pls take it easy

I hope you are enjoying your chit chat with him?? I know him, which was why i ignored him initially

I Just dey enjoy having fun with his moniker. I had fun with him before. He got funny moniker to play with. Nothing to regret. He understands it is SARCASM. His moniker is not deity. That would have been a different case.

Empiree:
This Dolphin man talks too much. What is it you don't understand? , hum? .


Dolphinman

This got me really laughing

^^ WAllaahi i laughed so hard