I know alot of people think there are special ladies around that can love someone without money,

love is real but without money you cant do anything, and you cant feed on love, you need money to facilitate it, and its hard to stay in a relationship where the guy depends on you for every financial assistance, especially when he has no dreams or prospects just the promise of love, na love i wan chop?

This is what most guys mistook as gold digging, Its not gold digging, money is necessary in a relationship for smooth sailing

has anybody in his right senses ever disputed the fact?

bitchcrafts:
has anybody in his right senses ever disputed the fact?

yes Talk2Bella for one

Cyndyonyx:
yes Talk2Bella for one

That person probably just finished having a good one from the other room. I hope u know that feeling?

I'm tired of these topics

bitchcrafts:
That person probably just finished having a good one from the other room. I hope u know that feeling?

lol, so why are we still referred to as gold diggers if you understand that there's no love without money

KissChris:
I'm tired of these topics

who called you, did you open the thread because theres a gun pointed to your head?

Cyndyonyx:
who called you, did you open the thread because theres a gun pointed to your head?

Keep calm and #ShutUp

Cyndyonyx:
lol, so why are we still referred to as gold diggers if you understand that there's no love without money

Well, gold digger is a word that has it's meaning, You're one if you're one. It's not an abuse.

It becomes gold digging when they turn it to business

Y'all stop overflooging this matter.

Stick with whatever notion you have. If you feel there's no love without the Benji's, cool. If you feel otherwise, also cool, instead of these many threads and counter threads. #MyOpinion

Very true. Without money, relationships have no future. This is also why I can never be faithful to a woman in this life. If I had no money she'd be gone in a herybeat. Why should she be the only woman to benefit from my largess?

Talk2bella is getting more popular

Fūck love..

I mean...who fūcking "loves" these days

I fûcking love my money and my money fūcking loves me

#Say NO to girlfriends

You can get a fûcking hot s*x , a badass blowjöb ,nice fûckhot styles all below $10(#4000)

This is why my philosophy is this: "Life is a balancing act. Extremism is really bad". We make general sweeping statements w/o defining terms.

How much money are we talking about? Thousand-ire? Millionaire? Billionaire? What kind of love? Agape? Eros? Phileo?

You do not need to be a millionaire or be "rich" to find or nurture love. And you do not need money to "agape, or phileo" someone. That's why romantic (eros) love is so warped--that's why men think money plays a role and where women got it twisted because we think that if men don't spend on you, it can't be love. Who are we fooling really? True love should first be agape, then phileo, then eros. Not eros first. This is why marriages fail today--including those that start with money as the basis.

No one says you should bring children into this world if you are (as parents) unable to provide for them. Note "parents with "s". Meaning two people's contributions.

Why does the financial burden lie only on men? What of the woman? Is your boyfriend your father? Why should he be held responsible for feeding and clothing you while you are dating?

If not for vanity, why can't both men and women reciprocate and exchange the burden? I mean, when we go out, feed your fucking self with the money your father gave you or the money you made for yourself. Why does the financial aspects of dating/courting fall just on the guy?

As a woman, get your own fucking career. Make your own damn money. And spend on dates and pay if/when you get married, pay for rent etc.

As a woman, ask and tell yourself "i can't go into a relationship if i can't contribute financially". Maybe men would stop thinking they need to hit the jackpot before they settle down. Unless for those, whom ego is an issue.

its a shame that the op is thinking with just the backside of his/ her brain..... If a grl loves yu cos you've got money, she loves your money thru you. Simple. She doesnt friggin love your wealthy asz. Get over it

Your thread shows how dry you are of good thoughts.

Xiadnat:
This is why my philosophy is this: "Life is a balancing act. Extremism is really bad". We make general sweeping statements w/o defining terms.

How much money are we talking about? Thousand-ire? Millionaire? Billionaire? What kind of love? Agape? Eros? Phileo?

You do not need to be a millionaire or be "rich" to find or nurture love. And you do not need money to "agape, or phileo" someone. That's why romantic (eros) love is so warped--that's why men think money plays a role and where women got it twisted because we think that if men don't spend on you, it can't be love. Who are we fooling really? True love should first be agape, then phileo, then eros. Not eros first. This is why marriages fail today--including those that start with money as the basis.

No one says you should bring children into this world if you are (as parents) unable to provide for them.

Why does the financial burden lie only on men? What of the woman? Is your boyfriend your father? Why should he be held responsible for feeding and clothing you while you are dating?

If not for vanity, why can't both men and women reciprocate and exchange the burden? I mean, when we go out, feed yourself fucking self with the money your father gave you or the money you made for yourself. Why does the financial aspects of dating/courting fall just on the guy

As a woman, get your own fucking career. Make your own damn money.

Ask and tell yourself "i can't go into a relationship if i can't contribute financially". Maybe men would stop thinking they need to hit the jackpot before they settle down. Unless for those, whom ego is an issue.

if you are a female...... I love you...

Bt if you're male, just know i didnt mean it.

Sensible comment

Xiadnat:
This is why my philosophy is this: "Life is a balancing act. Extremism is really bad". We make general sweeping statements w/o defining terms.

How much money are we talking about? Thousand-ire? Millionaire? Billionaire? What kind of love? Agape? Eros? Phileo?

You do not need to be a millionaire or be "rich" to find or nurture love. And you do not need money to "agape, or phileo" someone. That's why romantic (eros) love is so warped--that's why men think money plays a role and where women got it twisted because we think that if men don't spend on you, it can't be love. Who are we fooling really? True love should first be agape, then phileo, then eros. Not eros first. This is why marriages fail today--including those that start with money as the basis.

No one says you should bring children into this world if you are (as parents) unable to provide for them.

Why does the financial burden lie only on men? What of the woman? Is your boyfriend your father? Why should he be held responsible for feeding and clothing you while you are dating?

If not for vanity, why can't both men and women reciprocate and exchange the burden? I mean, when we go out, feed yourself fucking self with the money your father gave you or the money you made for yourself. Why does the financial aspects of dating/courting fall just on the guy

As a woman, get your own fucking career. Make your own damn money.

Ask and tell yourself "i can't go into a relationship if i can't contribute financially". Maybe men would stop thinking they need to hit the jackpot before they settle down. Unless for those, whom ego is an issue.

Awwn well said.. ..

Chelsea won today by 4 goals to Nil against.....You knw who

It doesn't concern this thread But It just feels good saying it

.....Going to say it in another Thread

NevetsIbot:
if you are a female...... I love you...

Bt if you're male, just know i didnt mean it.

Sensible comment

. Genotypically and phenotypically XX. Intellectually, ideologically, practically XXY--meaning asexual.

If you understood the aforementioned jargon, more feather to your tail-feather.

Xiadnat:



. Genotypically and phenotypically XX. Intellectually, ideologically, practically XXY--meaning asexual.

If you understood the aforementioned jargon, more feather to your tail-feather.

I didn't do science.... It's jargon, like you said. Bye

RichieDaVinci01:
Chelsea won today by 4 goals to Nil against.....You knw who


It doesn't concern this thread But It just feels good saying it


.....Going to say it in another Thread

eerey.

Cyndyonyx:
I know alot of people think there are special ladies around that can love someone without money,

love is real but without money you cant do anything, and you cant feed on love, you need money to facilitate it, and its hard to stay in a relationship where the guy depends on you for every financial assistance, especially when he has no dreams or prospects just the promise of love, na love i wan chop?

This is what most guys mistook as gold digging, Its not gold digging, money is necessary in a relationship for smooth sailing

nice.....she's being real

How much money are we talking about here?

jubrealguy:
nice.....she's being real

being real is good

Cyndyonyx:
being real is good

I know......dats y m Jubrealguy......realestG actually

Cyndyonyx:
yes Talk2Bella for one

Its better u understand dat if ur man isnt make it good now doesnt mean he wouldnt ever again... A beautiful woman should learn to support d man she claims to love and not condemn him, she should support him finacially. A woman doesnt need to rest her burdens on a man for him to do it all.

Love lives with money... True love cannot die except u love him for money then dat is not true love