ItzMePuffPuff:
Shut up Guy u just go on and on.
U didnt even have a point 2 argue anymore!

Fabulocity:
Art has apparently evolved.

TheSonOfMark:


You're crassly ignorant. Even when other folks, females even, explained the theme to you, you couldn't grasp it 'cause it's beyond anything intellectual you've had to deal with. Scurry away from this thread and stick to derailing dumb threads by Jesüsboiy and his likes.

On this thread I choose not to go ballistic on you and punish you with the most scathing remarks. You've perfected the act of victim-playing. This one time, I'd be Kingsley rather than KingSLAY.
And type in contemporary English Language, this isn't the 1780's and you aren't on a cotton plantation like your ancestors.

So egotistical
Look u think its art
.....i disagree.It does not make mentally challenged
☆☆☆☆
There u go again ,throwin' my history up in my face and u expect me 2 view this piece as art

ItzMePuffPuff:
So egotistical

TheSonOfMark:

Egotistical? I've claimed to drop of humility. It doesn't even do justice to my seeming peculiarities . I'm narcissistic, ego-drunk, denigrating dude. Am I missing any dysphemistic word, Valerie? Add the ones I skipped.

She turns it around and plays the victim. Predictable female.

ItzMePuffPuff:
No,i wont
☆☆☆☆
Not really,it' my history and for some odd reason u wont let me forget it.
U 2 must believe it's sorrid or u wouldnt try 2 hurt me with it

Still playing cards, the victim's card? So what's to play now? Hearts? Pick two!

What? Is this the part where I role-play, apologize for hurting you, we add a thousand smiling and grinning emoticons to our subsequent posts and become buddies or more? Don't skip a heartbeat waiting, cupcake.

I'm more African than you'll ever be which rules out you tagging me a racist - this time against blacks. Seems it's a win-win for me, missy, again.

TheSonOfMark:


Still playing cards, the victim's card? So what's to play now? Hearts? Pick two!

What? Is this the part where I role-play, apologize for hurting you, we add a thousand smiling and grinning emoticons to our subsequent posts and become buddies or more? Don't skip a heartbeat waiting, cupcake.

I'm more African than you'll ever be which rules out you tagging me a racist - this time against blacks. Seems it's a win-win for me, missy, again.

Uh uhn,no apology,
Im just really curious about this.
Last time we debated u ran from my question
What's with u and african americans our history ,culture and vernacular.
We are always faulty/lacking 2 u.
why are u obsessed with us?
☆☆☆☆
And u may not be a racists but u are a prejudice bigot

CertifiedNaija:
What do you think about this shoot?

Yay or Nay

http://www.certifiednaija.com/2016/12/lady-pose-nude-with-holy-bible-in-viral.html?m=1

farano:
hmmm. . What business of mine is it to judge her. . "Do not judge, or you too will be judged" Matt 7:1

BabaRamota1980:

focus on her message, not her nud1ty

Inkman:
I think this is supposed to depict slavery and colonization of black beautiful virgin Africa


Bible and chains

favourmic:
Please Madam Come forward! Come! Come! Don't be afraid, What is happening to you eh! It's not ordinary oh! God has remembered you today... Oyaa raise your hand up... Raise it up very well! Then bend it and place it on your head... Preferably where your mind tells you your brain is located... your stomach or your head. Then repeat this prayer after me... *My father! My father* Where ever they have buried my sense and my brain... *In my maternal village* *In my paternal village* *in the coven* Let them Vomit it now! Oya start shouting it with anger ! Shooooooouuuuuuut it

TheSonOfMark:


No, she's not. I might be a Christian but one with a discerning mind who appreciates art for what it is.

The photographer/visual artist is portraying religion as a chain, a leash which limits humanity in a way albeit an obscene display to jar our senses and, yes, to be controversial.


Whether I agree with the message being passed across is a different issue entirely but this is art and it's powerful.

bbmpin:


Am i supposed to be offended?

The power of his word has never been "limited" to book (printed and commissioned) by human's (King James and co)

If you are trying to pull the "religious line"( that its wrong ) then you have failed child!

TheSonOfMark:


No, she's not. I might be a Christian but one with a discerning mind who appreciates art for what it is.

The photographer/visual artist is portraying religion as a chain, a leash which limits humanity in a way albeit an obscene display to jar our senses and, yes, to be controversial.


Whether I agree with the message being passed across is a different issue entirely but this is art and it's powerful.