An Abuja-based lawyer has approached a Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking an order to restrain the National Assembly from compelling retired Col. Hameed Ali, Comptroller-General of Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) from wearing uniform.


Mr Mohammed Ibrahim, the plaintiff in the suit, made copies of the process available to newsmen on Tuesday.


The suit listed other defendants to include the Comptroller-General of NCS, the NCS, the Senate and the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF).


The plaintiff is seeking a declaration of the court that the oversight functions of the National Assembly did not extend to compelling, mandating and enforcing the first defendant to wear uniform before performing his duties.


He is also seeking the court to declare that the first defendant, who is not a commissioned officer of the NCS, is not mandated by law to wear the service’s uniform.


Ibrahim further asked the court to declare if Ali’s appointment made pursuant to Sections 5 and 171 of the Constitution could be subjected to the provision of Customs and Excise Management Act or any other law.


The plaintiff, therefore, urged the court to decide whether the first defendant’s appointment, having been made pursuant to the provisions of the constitution, could be subjected to the provisions of other laws.


He also asked the court to explain whether there was any legal provision that prescribed the wearing of uniform as a condition precedent by the first defendant in view of his appointment under Section 171 of the constitution.


He asked the court to decide whether the first defendant, not being commissioned custom officer, could be mandated to wear the service’s uniform for the performance of the duties of Comptroller-General.


The plaintiff further urged the court to decide whether every directive or power hitherto exercised by the first defendant while not in uniform was null and void.


Ibrahim had also asked the court to decide whether, in view of Section 88 (1) of the constitution, the senate could summon the first defendant having not published a resolution to that effect.


The defendants are mandated to, within 30 days after service of the originating summons on them appear in court.

SOURCE

http://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/03/uniform-controversy-lawyer-sues-senate/

Yes this is the change we are talking about, where people will not wear uniform of the institution they represent, where someone can use millions to clear GRASS. yes!!! change




is alright observing with David Mark chairman Senate committee on observation

rollybest:
Yes this is the change we are talking about, where people will not wear uniform of the institution they represent, where someone can use millions to clear GRASS. yes!!! change




is alright observing with David Mark chairman Senate committee on observation

LOL

Make Chairman NL committee on observation follow observe..

Very soon, School prefects no go gree wear school uniform..

This is the right way to go. Let the court decide.

The proponents of wearing of uniform could not cite a single line of the law to back up their claims apart from sentiments, as if law relies on sentiments and emotions.