Something seems fishy in this whole messy issue. This days it's real hard to know what is real and what's not. This is disturbing.

what is the level of involvement of all players in the whole story i.e The Umar farouk, the U.S, Amsterdam's connections.
Are what we know Half-truth, does anyone have something to hide, or what is the aim of the sick game unfolding

Anyway, Let's stand together to condemn ALL form of terrorism irrespective of who commits it.

Check out this links on you tube video to find out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GCRHZJ87-0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mI5DN0Mimk4&feature=channel

AIRDIG:


Anyway, Let's stand together to commit ALL form of terrorism irrespective of who commits it.

Unfortunately, people are more predisposed to believing the lies told by the U.S. than using their third eye so I doubt that this side of the story would be taken seriously.

Say what? People would go to any point to look for conspiracy theory.

For starters, the video cited won't even be considered as a credible evidence, the radio presenter is nothing but a sensationalist. Read about him here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones_%28radio_host%29

The so called Lawyer appears to be trying to teach the FBI how their job is done. For a lawyer, I am expect him to know there are procedures and information are only released on a need to know basis. I am sorry, but based on the interview, I am not in any convinced about him, sounds like he had a motive. He is a witness and as such should have kept his opinions to himself.

Finally, Alex gored the lawyer - it is a common ploy used in media [Anyone remember Martin Bashir and MJ fiasco??].

Please let us call a spade, a spade. The guy [Nigerian dude] was intent on trying to blow up the plane, why now try and talk about some sham or hoax going on? Come on guys, there are several witness as stated by the radio presenter and yet he appeared to have presented only one. . . Who take this kind of guys serious any way?

I will listen to the second link and make any more comments if needed.

Omo your headline is misleading and inaccurate. Based on the evidence you have provided, there is no "facts" whatsoever. Period.

All I see is a man who is doing what he has done best for years - making a career out of Conspiracy theory. He's made about 10 documentaries all along the lines of claiming there is a wider plot blah blah blah. If am presenting an argument, I will never quote such sources as "facts". It is short-sighted to say the least.