Stats: 3,187,135 members, 7,931,884 topics. Date: Monday, 26 August 2024 at 01:54 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure (24910 Views)
Louise Ojukwu And Nnamdi Azikiwe In 1954 (Throwback Photo) / Had I Known Is Always At Last - 1954 Secession Clause / Osinabjo, Amaechi, Dogara At 3rd Annual Conference Of African Maritime (2) (3) (4)
The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by MetaPhysical: 3:01am On Jun 04, 2017 |
FEDERALISM IN NIGERIA NIGERIAN FEDERALISM Origin of Nigerian Federalism; federalism is a system of government in which government power that exist in a country are shared between a central government that represents the whole country and government of components regions or states, so that each governments is legally and constitutionally independent and autonomous. Nigerian Federalism can be traced far back to 1914, when the Northern and southern protectorates then amalgamated though with unitary form of administration, since then, governmental powers that existed in Nigeria started to be shared between the central governments headed by the Governor-General and the governments of Northern and southern protectorates headed by the lieutenant Governors. Therefore with the existence and recognition of two near autonomous parts of Northern and southern provinces, the administrative system outlook of a federalism MAJOR CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCES THAT LED TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FEDERALISM IN NIGERIA it was lyttenton constitution of 1954 that finally entrenched the features of federal system of government in Nigeria and the two constitutional conference that led to the promulgation of the constitution were (1) The London Constitutional Conference (2) The Lagos Conference of 1954 LONDON CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE OF 1953 Due to the defects of McPherson Constitution some of which were: the constitution vested too much veto and reserved power on the Governor; it limited the power of the regions in making laws and also, the law made by them had to be approved first before they could be allowed to operate, e.t.c “to provide for greater regional autonomy and for removal of power of intervention by the centre”. Nigeria leaders were invited by the Secretary to London to review the constitution. A team of 19 delegates, which comprised six representatives from the Cameroon’s were sent to London. The conference which sat down between July 30 and August 22, 1953 reached, many agreements among which were (1) That Her Majesty’s Governments could grants self-governments to those regions, which desired it in 1956. (2) That legislative power should be shared between the federal state and the federating units. (3) That a conference to be held in Lagos in 1954, should ratify a separate regional administration in the cameroons if the people of the territory expressed their desire through a referendum (4) That Lagos should be separated from the Western Region and made a neutral federal territory. (5) That the Region Lieutenants-Government should be called Governor while the Governor of Nigeria should be called Governor-General. THE LAGOS CONFERENCE OF 1954 In order to settle some unresolved political problems by the 1953 London Conference, the Lagos Conference, met in January 1954, under the chairmanship of the Secretary of the state for the colonies. The conference published in December 1953 and arriver at the following decision. (1) That the public service should be regionalized (2) That the judiciary should be regionalized (3) Accept in principle the proposals put forward by the fiscal commission on the allocation of financial resources to the federal and regional government (4) That though southern cameroons should remain part of Nigeria Federalism as a quasi-federal territory it should have a legislatures of its own. (5) That autonomy should be granted to the southern cameroons FACTORS NECESSITATING FEDERALISM IN NIGERIAN (1) To protect the interest of minority groups (2) The large population and wide geographical are of Nigeria (3) To ensure rapid and even development of all part of Nigeria (4) To bring government nearer to the people of Nigeria (5) To expand the local market (6) Differences in culture, region, language, custom, tradition, etc among different ethnic group (7) The fear of one ethnic group dominating other necessitated the establishment of federalism in Nigeria (8 ) To make it possible for diverse law that will suit the diverse communities in Nigeria (9) In order to preserve the local independence or autonomy of every ethnic group in Nigeria (10) In order to form a common and stronger government to secure the sovereignty of Nigeria FEATURES OF NIGERIAN FEDERALISM (1) Adoption of a written and rigid constitution. (2) The supremacy of the constitution (3) The supremacy of the federal government (4) Existence of bicameral legislature in Nigerian (5) Constitution repudiation of secession (6) The division of Nigerian into unequal regions/states PROBLEMS OF NIGERIAN FEDERALISM • Revenue Allocation: Revenue allocation refers to the sharing of revenue and other resources generated in the country among the federal and state government. These revenue are shared among the three tiers of governments according to their constitutional responsibilities • Minority issues and creation of state: Due to the multi-ethnic nature of Nigeria which brought about the issue of minorities has constituted one of the problems militating against the development of the country; Nigerian has three major ethnic group of Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba and multiplicity of minor ethnic groups. There were political agitations for creation of states by minority groups especially those in the mid-western region, the Middle Belt or Northern Region and the Calabar, River Niger Delta and Ogoja of the Eastern Region as a panacea to domination of the minorities. • Inter-ethnic Rivalry: Since Nigeria is made up of multi-ethnic, the rivalry among Hausa/Fulani, Igbo and Yoruba has been a serious issue. The major issue that brings about rivalry is the question of leadership of the country, none of the three major ethnic group wants to concede the leadership of the country to the other because they are aware that who ever gets political power first, all other things shall be added unto them. The creation of more state in the country has not in any way reduced the intensity of inter-ethnic rivalry. • Issue of secession: The inter-ethnic rivalry in Nigeria contributed a lot in delaying the independent of the country, which should have taken place in 1956. This rivalry especially when the country should be granted the status of an independent nation led to the threat of secession by the Northerners. Posted by FADIPE.S.OYINLOLA at 5:28 AM http://accessportal..com/2009/07/federalism-in-nigeria.html |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by MayorofLagos(m): 3:33am On Jun 04, 2017 |
Interesting article. One of my arguments against having an Ibo President in this country is that its inevitable he will sorround himself with Ibos, but Ibos dont have it within them naturally to be good leaders and will soon bungle authority and power vested in the Presidency and make life intolerable for the whole country. This article acknowledges that the Yoruba, Hausa and Igbo are not culturally compatible and have a fierce competition, so it advises putting us into different cages where we do not collide and blow things up. So they created regional government for each major tribe where we can run our society and people the way it fits us. It was working well before Independence, it continued to work fine after Independence but the back to back leadership of yanminri fvckd it up, first by Azikiwe in 1963, not satisfied, Ironsi demolished regionalism and made himself Supreme Commander over the zoo and put the different wild animals, previously caged in separate zones, into one arena for collision and fury. Here we are now.... |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by Nobody: 3:48am On Jun 04, 2017 |
Best system of government. Lets go back to it please! !! 2 Likes |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by orunto27: 7:10am On Jun 04, 2017 |
Thanks for this Reminder. |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by Ballmer: 7:23am On Jun 04, 2017 |
God will truncate the well being and joy of every soul dead or alive that partook in truncating regional govt in this country. May it never be well with their dead heros in their graves. May it never be well with their unborn generation too. |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by Super1Star: 7:44am On Jun 04, 2017 |
When will the Osus that they are myopic in vision and action, they will be arguing. A political structure was worked out to make every region autonomous and develop at her own pace. Just in one over night rash decision, lack of foresight, lack of deep thought of action and their heart desire to forcefully lord it over others, they cancelled the regional govt and introduced the Unitary System that their children are fighting tooth and nail to get out from. Awolowo advised that clown called Zik to allow insertion of Secession Clause in the 1956 constitution. Rather than support it, he opposed the proposal based on his warped philosophy of indivisibility and insolubility of Nigeria and he later went on to connive with the British to prevent the insertion. Just 10years later, they were the ones clamouring for the same secession, which their children are still clamouring for in 2017. They never weigh the consequences of their actions before taking it. They act before thinking, think with their chest rather than their brain, acts with their emotion rather than their senses. Ugandan Developers and Cousins of Benjamin Netayanhu are the most myopic beings on planet earth 2 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by MetaPhysical: 3:54am On Jun 18, 2017 |
I sincerely think and hold the belief that the structure proposed in this document holds the solution to survival of Nigeria. If we could at least go back to this setup, and then from there move forward with other state-like ambitions at the different level. We need to push the reset button and start from this point. |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by Aphrygian(m): 4:49am On Jun 18, 2017 |
MayorofLagos:I JUST TAYA FOR THE IBOES, yet the yorubas are the ones they still accuse of one Nigeria, wereas the yorubas i no are tired of this contraption |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by Aphrygian(m): 4:50am On Jun 18, 2017 |
Super1Star:HONESTLY I SUPPORT YOU WITH 1000000000LIKES |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by MetaPhysical: 2:21am On Jul 29, 2017 |
Revisit.. |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by Uchek(m): 7:43am On Jun 15, 2022 |
Gowon, not Ironsi, demolished Nigeria's regionalism. MayorofLagos: |
Re: The Lagos Constitutional Conference Of 1954 - Regional Structure by Uchek(m): 9:40am On Jun 15, 2022 |
"Awolowo advised that clown called Zik to allow insertion of Secession Clause in the 1956 constitution. Rather than support it, he opposed the proposal based on his warped philosophy of indivisibility and insolubility of Nigeria and he later went on to connive with the British to prevent the insertion" How can Awo expect to allow insertion of secession clause in the 1956 constitution? Was Zik the colonial master in charge of the determining what was allowed and disallowed in the 1956 Constitution? Awo should have directed his plea to the secretary of the colonies who was in charge of the constitutional conference. Second, the secession of Eastern Region did not happen under 1956 Constitution or 1963 Constitution or under any democratic constitution. It happened under a military dictatorship which had already suspended the constitution because a military regime is a treason under a democratic constitution so suspending the constitution after hijacking power is their first act of survival. So how would Awo secession clause, if it was ever inserted panned out under a military dictatorship which did not respect the provision of suspended constitution. Third, Awo and not Zik fought for the indivisibility and indissolubility of Nigeria. Zik verbally canvassed for the indivisibility and indissolubility of Nigeria by not supporting Awo suggestion of insertion of secession clause. Awo on the other hand went to war and joined the North to fight a bloody civil war to keep Nigeria one. Awo killed millions of his fellow Nigerians to keep Nigeria one even though he earlier advocated for the right of secession. And lastly, Zik did not connive with the British to prevent insertion of secession clause. The British made the decision independently and exclusively of Zik, Awo and Bello. And if Awo was dead serious about the inclusion of insertion clause into the constitution, he should have insisted on separate independence of Yoruba nation and Western Region rather than sharing same country with North and East without an escape route of secession in the event that the union did not work out. That he did not pursue this line of action and more tellingly fought against Eastern Nigeria's secession - a patent contradiction of his argument of inclusion of secession clause into the constitution - shows how unprincipled and untrustworthy Awo was. Super1Star: |
(1) (Reply)
We Now Monitor Social Media For Anti-Government And Anti-Military Information – / Biafra: Kanu's Lawyer Ejiofor Address The World After Ecowas Court Today(video) / Pictures From Kano State Eid Durbar
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 62 |