I'm sure this has been done before, but hey.

ahem!

this is one of those posts that leave you bemused.
I saved it as the MVP on marriage-

chronique :

"Ok. For most men, it's fear of being financially incapable. For others, it's not meeting the kind of women they want. But honestly, if we want to remedy this situation, it's not so much a hard thing. Return most of the jobs to the men and by so doing, you'd be empowering them financially to take up responsibility.
"Give the job to a woman who becomes comfortable and starts searching for a partner who refuses to turn up because he doesn't want to be seen as incapable and a gold digger. At the end, he remains single and she remains single.
"Give the job to a man and empower him financially to take up responsibility and he gets married and can afford to take care of his wife from it. She gets off the single market and so does he.
"Looking at both scenarios, which makes more sense? Obviously the second. But unfortunately, we live in an era where more jobs are being assigned to the women and at the end of the day, the society at large ends up suffering it."

on the other hand, there was an MVP counter that I have to share also-

jaybee3 (m):

Let's flip it for a second and view it from a father/daughter angle.
Would you feel comfortable allowing your daughter whom you've tremendously invested in become a second class citizen just so she can become a Mrs?
Or
Would it be acceptable not to invest in them (girls) but rather focus on the boys since they will most certainly yield positive financial results?
I think it has a lot to do with understanding and full acceptance of roles in marriages.

therefore-
choose between marriage and career. simple.
feel free to give your reasons.
hapi weekend.

comansee o!