andyanders:
In fact, Enyinnaya Abaribe is a disgrace to himself, family, community he represents and the house of assembly that he is a serving senator.

Is he now saying that he does not understand the gravity of the offence he has committed by standing as a guarantor to a criminal known as Nnamdi Kanu that nature has deformed, walking like a ghost with a walking stick at his age?

Abaribe should be arrested by the authorities and MUST produce Nnamdi Kanu whether dead or alive. He signed his bail bond and should produce him. He should have known the implication of his action before signing for him. I believe that the school he went to did not pass through him as he lacks knowledge.

Abaribe should be arrested. He should be arrested anywhere he is even when he is at the national assembly premises.

adanny01:


Your common sense needs prayers.

Anyone who signs surety for the person he cannot produce has signed away his hard earned money and reputation. It is imaterial that the Army raided his house. As long as the army didnot officially say they have arrested Kanu, no court can free his sureties. If Kanu is dead, his death certificate will free Abaribe. If Kanu is with DSS, Army, Prison, Police or any lawemforcement withing Nigeria, Abaribe can get free.

But even if Kanu speaks on radio, appears on TV, grant interviews to news media without showing up in court, Abaribe cannot get away.

Its either the FG has Kanu or have Ababribe's 100m. That was what Abaribe signed, no going back.

When my mum signed surety for our neighbour to get roofing sheets on credit from an Igbo trader even after our warning, she was compeled by the court to pay for the roof over our neighbours head. There was no going back and the court agreed with that Igbo trader.

Its no different with Abaribe's case, dont ever sign surety for what you cannot guarantee. Let this episode teach you a vital lesson.

Modified

Let me add this definition of surety



In other words, Abaribe is legally reponsible for Kanu's obligation to appear in court and becomes liable that Kanu has not oblidge to his summons. His liability is forfeiture of the bail bonds, 100milly.

msld:


As a lawyer you are, you do not know that exigent circumstances prevails as a precedence. The invasion of his house by armed men, absolves all bail sureties from any liability. Is for Nigeria army to explain the reason of the invasion, to destroy evidence, to carry out extra judicial killing or to manipulate justice process. First year law student will thrash that ruling in a higher court easily.
Till Nigeria army present Kanu, sureties can sleep fine, the judiciary does not listen to sentiments or news.

msld:


Oga, backyard lawyer, the lady of justice is blindfolded because sentiments and emotion have no place in a law court. As long as the army invaded his house and he has not been seen since then, it is the prosecutor job to provide Kanu now.

adanny01:


Your common sense needs prayers.

Anyone who signs surety for the person he cannot produce has signed away his hard earned money and reputation. It is imaterial that the Army raided his house. As long as the army didnot officially say they have arrested Kanu, no court can free his sureties. If Kanu is dead, his death certificate will free Abaribe. If Kanu is with DSS, Army, Prison, Police or any lawemforcement withing Nigeria, Abaribe can get free.

But even if Kanu speaks on radio, appears on TV, grant interviews to news media without showing up in court, Abaribe cannot get away.

Its either the FG has Kanu or have Ababribe's 100m. That was what Abaribe signed, no going back.

When my mum signed surety for our neighbour to get roofing sheets on credit from an Igbo trader even after our warning, she was compeled by the court to pay for the roof over our neighbours head. There was no going back and the court agreed with that Igbo trader.

Its no different with Abaribe's case, dont ever sign surety for what you cannot guarantee. Let this episode teach you a vital lesson.

Modified

Let me add this definition of surety



In other words, Abaribe is legally reponsible for Kanu's obligation to appear in court and becomes liable after Kanu did not oblidge his court summons. His liability is forfeiture of the bail bonds, 100milly.

anyebedgreat:
Hahahahaha.
It's just like betting on a game and then going to cancel your bet like 5 minutes to the end of the match because you are loosing.

In response, the judge said: “Even if you apply from today till next year, this court will only have one of these three options for you: produce the defendant, pay the bond or demand for time to come and explain to court.”

Palaver:
N100m don go be that o.

Something wey e for use stake
Feyenoord v shakter Donetsk - 0 2.5
ManCity v Napoli - 0 2.5
Maribor v Liverpool - 0 2.5
Leipzig v Porto - 0 2.5

Use am win N1bn

adanny01:


Your comment seem to be ambiguous but if i get it well, you really do not expect a surety to be free when he signed an undertaking to produce the accused.

Abaribe needs to bring Kanu and ask the court to free him. No judge will refuse that.

If Abaribe goes, who will be held to produce Kanu? I am shocked you can even think in that direction.

PDPGuy:


Well, if the Nigerian Army has Kanu in custody, it would have been announced to the public.
After all, his group is now legally recognized as a terrorist organization (which I disagree with), and thus, the Nigerian Army has the authority to go after the leader of the said terrorist organization.

Moreover, it will hr tough to prove, in court, that the alleged invasion of Kanu’s home by the Army is the actual and/or proximate cause of Kanu’s failure to appear before the FHC.

So, the FG could argue that exigent circumstances does not apply here.

MabraO:
I wonder the kinda lawyer that told him he can withdraw himself as surety from cownu case.
Next tine use ur head.
Go and produce that coward u dumb mother effer

adanny01:


Your common sense needs prayers.

Anyone who signs surety for the person he cannot produce has signed away his hard earned money and reputation. It is imaterial that the Army raided his house. As long as the army didnot officially say they have arrested Kanu, no court can free his sureties. If Kanu is dead, his death certificate will free Abaribe. If Kanu is with DSS, Army, Prison, Police or any lawemforcement withing Nigeria, Abaribe can get free.

But even if Kanu speaks on radio, appears on TV, grant interviews to news media without showing up in court, Abaribe cannot get away.

Its either the FG has Kanu or have Ababribe's 100m. That was what Abaribe signed, no going back.

When my mum signed surety for our neighbour to get roofing sheets on credit from an Igbo trader even after our warning, she was compeled by the court to pay for the roof over our neighbours head. There was no going back and the court agreed with that Igbo trader.

Its no different with Abaribe's case, dont ever sign surety for what you cannot guarantee. Let this episode teach you a vital lesson.

Modified

Let me add this definition of surety



In other words, Abaribe is legally reponsible for Kanu's obligation to appear in court and becomes liable after Kanu did not oblidge his court summons. His liability is forfeiture of the bail bonds, 100milly.

MabraO:
I wonder the kinda lawyer that told him he can withdraw himself as surety from cownu case.
Next tine use ur head.
Go and produce that coward u dumb mother effer

maasoap:

Many think that he has already paid but no. Well, it is going to be interesting because his accounts may be frozen and properties confiscated if judge should decline the request and deadline to produce Kanu expires.

msld:


As a lawyer you are, you do not know that exigent circumstances prevails as a precedence. The invasion of his house by armed men, absolves all bail sureties from any liability. Is for Nigeria army to explain the reason of the invasion, to destroy evidence, to carry out extra judicial killing or to manipulate justice process. First year law student will thrash that ruling in a higher court easily.
Till Nigeria army present Kanu, sureties can sleep fine, the judiciary does not listen to sentiments or news.

ruffhandu:
Many of you guys don't understand what's playing out here, shown by your comments.

Abaribe is invariably saying : "FG, since you tagged the person I suretied a terrorist, I am no longer interested. Also, he went missing since the army went shooting in his house, let the army produce him".

His argument is logical.

msld:


The reason you are not supposed to be a lawyer. "It would have been announced publicly" really?? I feel sad for your clients. The onus is not on the defence now, is on the prosecutor FG that invaded his house to prove that he is not in their custody but the facts speaks for itself and the fact is this, they invaded his house, they now must provide information on where he is.

adanny01:


Your comment seem to be ambiguous but if i get it well, you really do not expect a surety to be free when he signed an undertaking to produce the accused.

Abaribe needs to bring Kanu and ask the court to free him. No judge will refuse that.

If Abaribe goes, who will be held to produce Kanu? I am shocked you can even think in that direction.

freshboi88:


But the army didn't stand surety for the man....senator did, he has to prove army abducted him

Icecream4U:
This is a simple case na.

Senator Abaribe should promise to give 10million Naira to anyone that can help him get nnamdi Kanu.

I tell you, In a twinkle of an eye, ipob will produce nnamdi Kanu in this manner:

Icecream4U:
This is a simple case na.

Senator Abaribe should promise to give 10million Naira to anyone that can help him get nnamdi Kanu.

I tell you, In a twinkle of an eye, ipob will produce nnamdi Kanu in this manner:

MabraO:
I wonder the kinda lawyer that told him he can withdraw himself as surety from cownu case.
Next tine use ur head.
Go and produce that coward u dumb mother effer

Icecream4U:
This is a simple case na.

Senator Abaribe should promise to give 10million Naira to anyone that can help him get nnamdi Kanu.

I tell you, In a twinkle of an eye, ipob will produce nnamdi Kanu in this manner:

fabiano09:
It will be a shame for any learned individual whether for or against the federal government to support the judges decision not to grant their prayers,to be honest partisan politics by our learned judges have all but ruined this old profession of law in naija,out judicial system has become a joke,justice Binta nyako is a disgrace to the profession, history will judge them.

msld:


As a lawyer you are, you do not know that exigent circumstances prevails as a precedence. The invasion of his house by armed men, absolves all bail sureties from any liability. Is for Nigeria army to explain the reason of the invasion, to destroy evidence, to carry out extra judicial killing or to manipulate justice process. First year law student will thrash that ruling in a higher court easily.
Till Nigeria army present Kanu, sureties can sleep fine, the judiciary does not listen to sentiments or news.

msld:


The reason you are not supposed to be a lawyer. "It would have been announced publicly" really?? I feel sad for your clients. The onus is not on the defence now, is on the prosecutor FG that invaded his house to prove that he is not in their custody but the facts speaks for itself and the fact is this, they invaded his house, they now must provide information on where he is.

Palaver:
N100m don go be that o.

Something wey e for use stake
Feyenoord v shakter Donetsk - 0 2.5
ManCity v Napoli - 0 2.5
Maribor v Liverpool - 0 2.5
Leipzig v Porto - 0 2.5

Use am win N1bn

msld:


The reason you are not supposed to be a lawyer. "It would have been announced publicly" really?? I feel sad for your clients. The onus is not on the defence now, is on the prosecutor FG that invaded his house to prove that he is not in their custody but the facts speaks for itself and the fact is this, they invaded his house, they now must provide information on where he is.