Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,168,883 members, 7,872,903 topics. Date: Thursday, 27 June 2024 at 03:47 AM

10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? - Politics (7) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? (34815 Views)

10 Controversies Of 2018 In Nigeria: Millionaire Snake, Ganduje Dollars, Adeosun / Is Insertion Of Alpha Beta Consulting Justifiable In The Land Use Act? / Oil Block Revocation By President Buhari Causes Controversies (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (25) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by Michael004: 4:24pm On Oct 23, 2017
9jaDoc:


Sir did u finish primary school?
Yeah I know it was a mistake. But don't bother yourself. I know the correct word to use. I understand Concord very well. Thank you.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by Michael004: 4:32pm On Oct 23, 2017
[s]
Malawian:

Lie! The first soldier to do a marathon was

Brigadier Ogundipe .. The first of his name, Father of Cowards, breaker of records, The un-livered.
[/s]Keep deceiving yourself, the world knows the holder of the marathon race. Ogundipe ko, songotetede ni.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by T9ksy(m): 7:12pm On Oct 23, 2017
Maduawuchukwu:


Lastly, he might have felt that the west could not afford a war so they should side with the north. But then, neutrality was an option just like the mid-west and his region would have been unaffected by his neutrality. So.


But the Mid-west neutrality as you tagged it, didn't stop ojukwu invading the region and imposing his own rule on the people.

The bottom-line was that Ojukwu intended bringing the whole of southern nigeria under his rule but Awo- a mere civilian showed him that brain power is mightier than sheer brawn and braggadio.

If in doubt, google " Ojukwu's letter to Banjo" and you will clearly discern ojukwu's intention- he was already salivating at the prospect of dominating yorubaland, something his father's friend tried but was unable to accomplish 16 years, earlier.

2 Likes

Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by 9jaDoc(f): 7:53pm On Oct 23, 2017
T9ksy:



But the Mid-west neutrality as you tagged it, didn't stop ojukwu invading the region and imposing his own rule on the people.

The bottom-line was that Ojukwu intended bringing the whole of southern nigeria under his rule but Awo- a mere civilian showed him that brain power is mightier than sheer brawn and braggadio.

If in doubt, google " Ojukwu's letter to Banjo" and you will clearly discern ojukwu's intention- he was already salivating at the prospect of dominating yorubaland, something his father's friend tried but was unable to accomplish 16 years, earlier.

Why would he choose Banjo a heartland core Yoruba man. Think, mehn, think.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by 9jaDoc(f): 7:55pm On Oct 23, 2017
Michael004:
Yeah I know it was a mistake. But don't bother yourself. I know the correct word to use. I understand Concord very well. Thank you.

If u knew it was a mistake why didn't you correct it? All na sign of illiteracy.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by 9jaDoc(f): 7:57pm On Oct 23, 2017
koladebrainiac:
I dont understand. there are other accounts to this story u guys are bragging about , playing victim upandan. Victor Bajo's account and what LET TO AWOLOWO'S REFUSER TO JOIN SECESSION. ANYTHING OF SECESSION ON YORUBA PART IS A SUICIDE FOR US. WE WILL BE THE BATTLE GROUND. COMMON DORDAN BARRACK WAS IN LAGOS. AND NIEGRIA CAPITAL. ITS WELL FORTIFIED . SO IF YORUBA MAKE SECEDE WHO WILL FIGHT FOR AWOLOWO? CAN HE MUSTER ARMY IN THE BARACK? THAT ASIDE THE ACCOUNT WE HEARD WAS THAT AWOLOWO WENT TO SEE OJUKWU TO STAND DOWN NOT TO DISCUSS SECESSION. AND WHAT AWOLOWO SAID WAS THAT IF OJUKWU FINALLY SUCEDE, HE WILL JOIN THE FRAY. BUT YOU GUYS WILL KEEP LYING N THROWING PROPAGANDA UPANDAN.

Bros go to whoever taught u English and get your money back
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by 9jaDoc(f): 8:01pm On Oct 23, 2017
koladebrainiac:
I dont understand. there are other accounts to this story u guys are bragging about , playing victim upandan. Victor Bajo's account and what LET TO AWOLOWO'S REFUSER TO JOIN SECESSION. ANYTHING OF SECESSION ON YORUBA PART IS A SUICIDE FOR US. WE WILL BE THE BATTLE GROUND. COMMON DORDAN BARRACK WAS IN LAGOS. AND NIEGRIA CAPITAL. ITS WELL FORTIFIED . SO IF YORUBA MAKE SECEDE WHO WILL FIGHT FOR AWOLOWO? CAN HE MUSTER ARMY IN THE BARACK? THAT ASIDE THE ACCOUNT WE HEARD WAS THAT AWOLOWO WENT TO SEE OJUKWU TO STAND DOWN NOT TO DISCUSS SECESSION. AND WHAT AWOLOWO SAID WAS THAT IF OJUKWU FINALLY SUCEDE, HE WILL JOIN THE FRAY. BUT YOU GUYS WILL KEEP LYING N THROWING PROPAGANDA UPANDAN.

We are not blaming Awo for not seceding - something he clearly was in no position to do. We are faulting him for lying about something beyond his capability, as u just pointed out
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by 9jaDoc(f): 8:19pm On Oct 23, 2017
GhanaMustGoo:


Seems like once a coup plotter, always a coup plotter. Same.thing with Danjuma, Babangida, Murutala, etc

You forgot the big ones - Gowon and Obasanjo
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by 9jaDoc(f): 8:28pm On Oct 23, 2017
GhanaMustGoo:


Seems like once a coup plotter, always a coup plotter. Same.thing with Danjuma, Babangida, Murutala, etc


Ojukwu was the only major Nigerian historical soldier statesman who never participated in coup. He even refused to join the Nzeogwu coup and also the Gowon coup
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by Ngozi123(f): 8:35pm On Oct 23, 2017
He was an evil tribal overlord who should have been charged with war crimes by the ICC. I don't even know if I can call him a human being undecided.

1 Like

Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by GhanaMustGoo: 9:02pm On Oct 23, 2017
9jaDoc:


You forgot the big ones - Gowon and Obasanjo

Oh I intentionally left them out. They benefitted from coups but I'm not sure there is absolute proof they participated in coups. Two sharp guys.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by WetinConsignMe: 9:28pm On Oct 23, 2017
Ngozi123:
He was an evil tribal overlord who should have be charged with war crimes by the ICC. I don't even know if I can call him a human being undecided.

I think Awo was a great man. It's just that fate cast him such that it seemed he meant Igbos harm when in actuality he didn't. Ojukwu had nothing against him and actually called him a hero. If he was Igbo enemy would Ojukwu had done that?
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by WetinConsignMe: 9:54pm On Oct 23, 2017
koladebrainiac:
I dont understand. there are other accounts to this story u guys are bragging about , playing victim upandan. Victor Bajo's account and what LET TO AWOLOWO'S REFUSER TO JOIN SECESSION. ANYTHING OF SECESSION ON YORUBA PART IS A SUICIDE FOR US. WE WILL BE THE BATTLE GROUND. COMMON DORDAN BARRACK WAS IN LAGOS. AND NIEGRIA CAPITAL. ITS WELL FORTIFIED . SO IF YORUBA MAKE SECEDE WHO WILL FIGHT FOR AWOLOWO? CAN HE MUSTER ARMY IN THE BARACK? THAT ASIDE THE ACCOUNT WE HEARD WAS THAT AWOLOWO WENT TO SEE OJUKWU TO STAND DOWN NOT TO DISCUSS SECESSION. AND WHAT AWOLOWO SAID WAS THAT IF OJUKWU FINALLY SUCEDE, HE WILL JOIN THE FRAY. BUT YOU GUYS WILL KEEP LYING N THROWING PROPAGANDA UPANDAN.

Well said
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by WetinConsignMe: 10:16pm On Oct 23, 2017
9jaDoc:


I know that but I don't think that's what Gowon meant.

Here is how a specialist of that era put it

If Ojukwu did not release Awo, I'd have no business disputing some people's attempts at crass revisionism. I'll simply accept it. But as their increasing vacillation shows, the truth haunts because it is stubborn. They have moved from one angle to the other in a shifting sand that only amuses people like me. Note: the story has since gone from Ironsi did not release Awo to "Ironsi's release was CONDITIONAL."

I have never before in my life found greater irony. Now he is squirming under the weight of interpretation - the wheres and wherefores that belong to legal doublespeak - which is when you really need to close an argument.

Awolowo's letter is rather self-explanatory. Emissaries sent to him to Calabar arrived Calabar with a plane on July 27, 1966. The SMC wanted him in Lagos on July 29. In the early mornings of July 29, Ironsi and Fajuyi were murdered in Ibadan by a coup in which Gowon was very active. On the day that Ironsi was supposed to make the announcement publicly in the gala planned for his final day in Ibadan as a gesture of goodwill to the West, he was killed. The crucial point to note here from Awo's diary is that

(a) his release was already final. A plane had been sent to him to leave Calabar to Lagos. He did not leave because it was a one-engine plane and he just did not like the idea of traveling in that plane.

(b) Having being released, a second declaration of release was no longer necessary by Gowon because the papers releasing him had been signed and sealed and effected. The only person who could stop further action on that release document in the circumstance was the Eastern Regional governor whose authority was required to effect the wishes of the Federal government,

(c) there is no place in the annals of Nigeria's administrative records where you will find an order or paper of release for Awolowo in which Yakubu Gowon's signature appears.

But I'd like to bet Ayo and co $1000 that if we go into the archives of the Nigerian Cabinet Secretariat, the signature that will be on the release order for Chief Awolowo will be Ironsi's signature by the power conferred on him by the SMC, and that there is no second release order unless it was backdated. Ironsi's order was fully carried out by the administrative requirements that compelled the Governor of the East to issue administrative writ to the Director of Prisons in Eastern Nigeria to comply.

It is as simple as that. If Gowon issued an order in that regard, Emeka Ojukwu would have very clearly and deliberately ignored it to fully press the point that he was under no obligation to heed Gowon's authority and Chief Awolowo would not have been released. He would most likely have ended up in the East, like Banjo and co during the war all of whom were released by Ojukwu's orders.

Awo's diary confesses quite clearly that Ironsi's regime had kept his release "secret." Why did Ironsi feel the need to thread carefully about such a matter? Would it be to placate the East, the West, or the North? From whom was Ironsi keeping this secret and why? Who would be more grieved by the news of Awo's release? Awo's release was apparently affected by the confusion in Lagos.

If Ayo were Ojukwu, would he have let him go on July 29th 1966, the day he was expected to be taken to Lagos from the East and the day Ironsi was murder or wait for things to clear up a bit? Why did Ojukwu feel the need to release Awo on the 3rd before a reconstituted SMC? Clearly, Ojukwu thought that Awo's presence in the West would help rally the rump of his supporters in the West to act against the coup in evolution. Awo told Ojukwu plainly when they met in Enugu later in May that he could not act because of the presence of Northern troops in the West. As soon as he arrived Ibadan, Awo was placed under clear surveillance. Military sentries were kept daily at his gate in Ibadan and Ikenne.

That is a version of House arrest. Anyone who talks about "conditional release" does not know how governments function. Awo was to be put through a safe, transitional house, no more than a week after the public announcement of his release, debriefed, and released to his home. The same thing happened to Mandela. It is the normal administrative process in these matters. What really makes me happy is that "Nebu and Obi" can no longer be said to write about things that are not in the public domain. We were both clear about who released Awo and why. Awo's diary basically confirmed the following:

(a) A plane had been sent to Calabar to bring him to Lagos on 27th July, two days before Ironsi was killed; (b) the SMC expected him in Lagos on July 29th the day Ironsi and Fajuyi were killed in Ibadan. In fact, they were desperate that he must arrive Lagos by the 29th! It prompts the question: Why the hurry to bring him to Lagos on the 29th? Were these facts communicated to the coup plotters? If so, who but those in the inner circle of the SMC could have communicated this highly classified policy to the coup plotters who had to act quickly to eliminate Fajuyi and Ironsi before the effectuation of the orders on July 29?

(c) Awo refused to travel in the one-engine plane for fear of his safety and

(d) But above all, no other order is required once the order of release has been gazetted for the release of a prisoner. Therefore, Gowon could no longer have re-issued an order already being carried out. It is elementary.

TO RECAP: By the very decree establishing the National Military Government under Ironsi, the Governor of the Eastern Group of provinces was a member of the Supreme Military Council, and the Chief agent of the federal government in the East. All federal institutions, including the Federal Prison Services, were under his jurisdiction and authority. That is one. As at August 3 1966, with a coup in evolution which had not succeeded in the East, the laws of the federation ceased to exist in the East. The only laws that existed in areas under Ojukwu's command were the emergency laws that he assumed. No tributes, declarations or orders by any other authority outside of the East under any guise of law could be enforced in the East. Basically, Nigeria temporarily ceased to exist.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by GhanaMustGoo: 10:26pm On Oct 23, 2017
WetinConsignMe:


I think Awo was a great man. It's just that fate cast him such that it seemed he meant Igbos harm when in actuality he didn't. Ojukwu had nothing against him and actually called him a hero. If he was Igbo enemy would Ojukwu had done that?

Ok, how do u explain:
"Starvation is a legitimate weapon of war."
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by T9ksy(m): 12:49am On Oct 24, 2017
9jaDoc:


Why would he choose Banjo a heartland core Yoruba man. Think, mehn, think.


Simple..........as another "afonja" and that was probably why Banjo didn't rush to lead biafran troops to wreck havoc on his homeland.

1 Like

Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by GhanaMustGoo: 1:31am On Oct 24, 2017
9jaDoc:



Ojukwu was the only major Nigerian historical soldier statesman who never participated in coup. He even refused to join the Nzeogwu coup and also the Gowon coup

You can also say it's because he never.had an opportunity.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by GhanaMustGoo: 1:37am On Oct 24, 2017
T9ksy:



Simple..........as another "afonja" and that was probably why Banjo didn't rush to lead biafran troops to wreck havoc on his homeland.
[/i][/color][/quote]

This your post makes no sense to.me
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by WetinConsignMe: 1:52am On Oct 24, 2017
GhanaMustGoo:


Ok, how do u explain:
"Starvation is a legitimate weapon of war."

I'll let Awo himself explain it when I find it again. His explanation made sense to me and I don't remember if he admitted making this statement
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by WetinConsignMe: 1:55am On Oct 24, 2017
GhanaMustGoo:


You can also say it's because he never.had an opportunity.
No, he had opportunity. Nzeoqwu made overtures to him. And I'm sure he would have been head of state but he refused to join Nzeogwu.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by WetinConsignMe: 2:02am On Oct 24, 2017
T9ksy:



Simple..........as another "afonja" and that was probably why Banjo didn't rush to lead biafran troops to wreck havoc on his homeland.

I don't understand your post but I can assure Ojukwu was not the power hungry type. That's why you never saw him in any coup. It would be out of character for him to want to rule the West. According to Aluko he didn't even want to rule the East. He was 32, he said he wanted to walk away from the whole affair, but he was trapped.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by 9jaDoc(f): 2:28am On Oct 24, 2017
T9ksy:



Simple..........as another "afonja" and that was probably why Banjo didn't rush to lead biafran troops to wreck havoc on his homeland.

U have no answer, that's why u chose to type gibberish.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by 9jaDoc(f): 2:28am On Oct 24, 2017
GhanaMustGoo:


Ok, how do u explain:
"Starvation is a legitimate weapon of war."

No mind am
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by 9jaDoc(f): 2:32am On Oct 24, 2017
WetinConsignMe:


Here is how a specialist of that era put it

If Ojukwu did not release Awo, I'd have no business disputing some people's attempts at crass revisionism. I'll simply accept it. But as their increasing vacillation shows, the truth haunts because it is stubborn. They have moved from one angle to the other in a shifting sand that only amuses people like me. Note: the story has since gone from Ironsi did not release Awo to "Ironsi's release was CONDITIONAL."

I have never before in my life found greater irony. Now he is squirming under the weight of interpretation - the wheres and wherefores that belong to legal doublespeak - which is when you really need to close an argument.

Awolowo's letter is rather self-explanatory. Emissaries sent to him to Calabar arrived Calabar with a plane on July 27, 1966. The SMC wanted him in Lagos on July 29. In the early mornings of July 29, Ironsi and Fajuyi were murdered in Ibadan by a coup in which Gowon was very active. On the day that Ironsi was supposed to make the announcement publicly in the gala planned for his final day in Ibadan as a gesture of goodwill to the West, he was killed. The crucial point to note here from Awo's diary is that

(a) his release was already final. A plane had been sent to him to leave Calabar to Lagos. He did not leave because it was a one-engine plane and he just did not like the idea of traveling in that plane.

(b) Having being released, a second declaration of release was no longer necessary by Gowon because the papers releasing him had been signed and sealed and effected. The only person who could stop further action on that release document in the circumstance was the Eastern Regional governor whose authority was required to effect the wishes of the Federal government,

(c) there is no place in the annals of Nigeria's administrative records where you will find an order or paper of release for Awolowo in which Yakubu Gowon's signature appears.

But I'd like to bet Ayo and co $1000 that if we go into the archives of the Nigerian Cabinet Secretariat, the signature that will be on the release order for Chief Awolowo will be Ironsi's signature by the power conferred on him by the SMC, and that there is no second release order unless it was backdated. Ironsi's order was fully carried out by the administrative requirements that compelled the Governor of the East to issue administrative writ to the Director of Prisons in Eastern Nigeria to comply.

It is as simple as that. If Gowon issued an order in that regard, Emeka Ojukwu would have very clearly and deliberately ignored it to fully press the point that he was under no obligation to heed Gowon's authority and Chief Awolowo would not have been released. He would most likely have ended up in the East, like Banjo and co during the war all of whom were released by Ojukwu's orders.

Awo's diary confesses quite clearly that Ironsi's regime had kept his release "secret." Why did Ironsi feel the need to thread carefully about such a matter? Would it be to placate the East, the West, or the North? From whom was Ironsi keeping this secret and why? Who would be more grieved by the news of Awo's release? Awo's release was apparently affected by the confusion in Lagos.

If Ayo were Ojukwu, would he have let him go on July 29th 1966, the day he was expected to be taken to Lagos from the East and the day Ironsi was murder or wait for things to clear up a bit? Why did Ojukwu feel the need to release Awo on the 3rd before a reconstituted SMC? Clearly, Ojukwu thought that Awo's presence in the West would help rally the rump of his supporters in the West to act against the coup in evolution. Awo told Ojukwu plainly when they met in Enugu later in May that he could not act because of the presence of Northern troops in the West. As soon as he arrived Ibadan, Awo was placed under clear surveillance. Military sentries were kept daily at his gate in Ibadan and Ikenne.

That is a version of House arrest. Anyone who talks about "conditional release" does not know how governments function. Awo was to be put through a safe, transitional house, no more than a week after the public announcement of his release, debriefed, and released to his home. The same thing happened to Mandela. It is the normal administrative process in these matters. What really makes me happy is that "Nebu and Obi" can no longer be said to write about things that are not in the public domain. We were both clear about who released Awo and why. Awo's diary basically confirmed the following:

(a) A plane had been sent to Calabar to bring him to Lagos on 27th July, two days before Ironsi was killed; (b) the SMC expected him in Lagos on July 29th the day Ironsi and Fajuyi were killed in Ibadan. In fact, they were desperate that he must arrive Lagos by the 29th! It prompts the question: Why the hurry to bring him to Lagos on the 29th? Were these facts communicated to the coup plotters? If so, who but those in the inner circle of the SMC could have communicated this highly classified policy to the coup plotters who had to act quickly to eliminate Fajuyi and Ironsi before the effectuation of the orders on July 29?

(c) Awo refused to travel in the one-engine plane for fear of his safety and

(d) But above all, no other order is required once the order of release has been gazetted for the release of a prisoner. Therefore, Gowon could no longer have re-issued an order already being carried out. It is elementary.

TO RECAP: By the very decree establishing the National Military Government under Ironsi, the Governor of the Eastern Group of provinces was a member of the Supreme Military Council, and the Chief agent of the federal government in the East. All federal institutions, including the Federal Prison Services, were under his jurisdiction and authority. That is one. As at August 3 1966, with a coup in evolution which had not succeeded in the East, the laws of the federation ceased to exist in the East. The only laws that existed in areas under Ojukwu's command were the emergency laws that he assumed. No tributes, declarations or orders by any other authority outside of the East under any guise of law could be enforced in the East. Basically, Nigeria temporarily ceased to exist.


grin grin I already knew all this. I just wanted you to round up your post grin
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by 9jaDoc(f): 2:42am On Oct 24, 2017
.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by T9ksy(m): 2:52am On Oct 24, 2017
WetinConsignMe:


I don't understand your post but I can assure Ojukwu was not the power hungry type. That's why you never saw him in any coup. It would be out of character for him to want to rule the West. According to Aluko he didn't even want to rule the East. He was 32, he said he wanted to walk away from the whole affair, but he was trapped.


Yeah, of course, he was trapped! Just google his letter to Banjo and then come back and tell me Ojukwu had no intention of ruling yorubaland.

Btw, after Ojukwu had invaded the mid-west, who was in control of the region?

1 Like

Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by T9ksy(m): 2:59am On Oct 24, 2017
9jaDoc:


U have no answer, that's why u chose to type gibberish.


I already suspected my post wili be too much for your cerebral capability. No wonder, you call it gibberish.

1 Like

Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by VillageWinch: 4:04am On Oct 24, 2017
Maduawuchukwu:


Awolowo in my estimation chose to support one-Nigeria for various reasons.
Firstly, the oil reserves in the East and the wealth therein.Oil was becoming the energy hotcake of the world just as renewable energy is going to be that of the future and the riches he could profit from was stupendous.
Also, Awo must have felt that with the death of Balewa and Ahmadu Bello and the political redundancy of Azikiwe because of the war, the coast was clear for him to become Nigerias strongest man and Leader;maybe even for life. The north outsmarted him sha.
Lastly, he might have felt that the west could not afford a war so they should side with the north. But then, neutrality was an option just like the mid-west and his region would have been unaffected by his neutrality. So.

I agree with u especially the oil part. People don't realise that war was really about oil when u boil it down
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by VillageWinch: 4:06am On Oct 24, 2017
koladebrainiac:
what part of promise people make in politics. in politics countries don't practice friendship, they practice allies

Honest people, people with some honour don't make promises they can't keep.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by WetinConsignMe: 4:36am On Oct 24, 2017
T9ksy:



Yeah, of course, he was trapped! Just google his letter to Banjo and then come back and tell me Ojukwu had no intention of ruling yorubaland.

Btw, after Ojukwu had invaded the mid-west, who was in control of the region?

My friend, why are you trying to be too clever by half? Here is the letter you keep talking about in it's entirety.
Where in this letter does Ojukwu even imply he wanted to rule the West? Quite the contrary. He and Banjo had the same rank. Do u think he was unaware Banjo would not be a yes man to him and would do whatever was best for his own people? Notice how he addressed himself as "Military Governor", the same title Banjo would have in the West - equals.

Here is the letter (note the bolded):

From: The Military Governor,
Republic of Biafra Enugu,
22nd August, 1967.
My dear Victor,

1. For some time now, you and I have been discussing the circumstances that have led to the current and inevitable disintegration of what was the Federation of Nigeria. We have been fully convinced that the aim of the Hausa/Fulani complex has ever been, and will ever remain, the total domination of every other part of what was known as the Federation of Nigeria. It is impossible to forget that the crisis which led to the army take over in January 1966, the coup of the Northern soldiers led by Gowon in July 1966, the wholesale and indiscriminate massacre of the people of what is now Biafra- and, to a less degree,the people of the Mid-West and West, including the Yorubas, were all the direct result of Hausa/Fulani attempt to subjugate and use as tools,the gallant people of Western Nigeria namely the Yorubas. We do not need to remind ourselves of the heavy losses in life and property suffered by the Yoruba people in their fight for justice and freedom during 1965.


2. Sharing our belief that the people of Yorubaland have a right to live a life of equality and self-respect and justice free of domination and dictatorship from any quarter, you have both identified with the cause of the Biafra struggle for survival and expressed your determination to see the people of Yorubaland freed from Hausa/Fulani domination.
We, the people of Biafra, for our part are willing and have decided to give you and the people of Yorubaland every assistance to achieve your aim.


3. After clearing the whole question with my Executive Council, I, as the Commander in Chief of the Biafran Armed Forces, have decided to place at your disposal Biafran forces, for the liberation of
Yorubaland on the following clear conditions:-
(i)You will have nothing to do with the Military Administrator in the Mid-West Territory during your sojourn there prior to your move to the West.
(ii)The willingness and preparedness of Biafra to assist any part of the former Federation of Nigeria wishing and willing to liberate itself from the Hausa/Fulani domination, does not in anyway whatever
imply any inclination on her part to compromise her sovereignty or preserve what remains of the defunct Federation of Nigeria. In other words, our sovereignty and break with Nigeria is irrevocable. Nothing must, therefore be said or done by you or any member of the Liberation Army to give a contrary impression.
(iii)Biafra is determined to maintain and safeguard her sovereignty and ensure that her integrity and safety are never again threatened.
(iv)Biafran troops will, after the liberation of the Yorubaland, remain in that territory only for as long as we in Biafra consider it necessary for the Yorubas to consolidate their position and sovereignty against any external threat.
(v)On the liberation of the Yorubaland, you will be appointed as the Military Governor of that territory.
(vi)The liberation of Western Nigeria will be a prelude to the liberation of all Yorubas up to the River Niger and the severance of all connections between the West and the North at Jebba.
(vii)During the period of Biafrans troops’ presence in your territory, all political measures, statements or decrees shall be subject to the approval, in writing by myself or on my authority.
(viii)Should our troops arrive and liberate Lagos, the government of the Republic of Biafra reserves the right to appoint a Military administrator for the territory. Such an Administrator will remain in office until a merger of that territory with Yorubaland is effected by Biafran troops.
(ix)As soon as possible after your appointment as the Military Governor of Western Nigeria and separation of that territory from Nigeria, you and I must meet to discuss:
(a)the duration of stay of Biafran troops in your territory;
(b)the areas and subjects of cooperation between the liberated sovereign states of Western Nigeria, or by what name it may call itself, and Biafra.


4. I do not need to remind you that Biafra regards all Yoruba as friends. As such everything should be done, to ensure that minimum force and loss of life are involved in achieving the objective of liberation.




5. It is essential, in order to avoid misunderstanding or confusion, that all subsequent requests for support be formally made to me by you in writing.



6. Will you please signify in writing, your acceptance of the above conditions so that you may leave for Western Nigeria and lead the army of liberation.



Yours very sincerely,
signed Lt. Col. Odumegwu Ojukwu,
Military Governor and Commander in Chief of Biafran Armed Forces.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by WetinConsignMe: 5:01am On Oct 24, 2017
T9ksy:



Yeah, of course, he was trapped! Just google his letter to Banjo and then come back and tell me Ojukwu had no intention of ruling yorubaland.

Btw, after Ojukwu had invaded the mid-west, who was in control of the region?

So, my friend, Ojukwu's strategy was to do whatever was necessary to see to it that the West also seceded because he knew that was the only way his own secession could possibly succeed.
Re: 10 Awolowo Controversies: Are They Justifiable? by WetinConsignMe: 5:12am On Oct 24, 2017
T9ksy:



Yeah, of course, he was trapped! Just google his letter to Banjo and then come back and tell me Ojukwu had no intention of ruling yorubaland.

Btw, after Ojukwu had invaded the mid-west, who was in control of the region?

From his letter you can see he was not even counting on or even thought it necessary that Banjo should get to Lagos.

Here is what he was probably counting on (bolded):

“AG (Action Group) activists and the man in the street are convinced Awolowo made the statement under duress… They say Awolowo’s true position was indicated in the Leaders of Thought resolution in May, which said if any region seceded or forced out, the West would automatically become independent. The activists feel that Awolowo missed the opportunity to bring the present conflict to close by coming to Ibadan and making a Western Declaration of Independence speech supported by Victor Banjo and his National Liberation Army.”

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (25) (Reply)

Ochanja Market: Mob Stopped Firefighters From Putting Out Fire - CGF / Asari Dokubo Blasts Nnamdi Kanu And IPOB "I'm Not A Gentle Man" / PDP Refers Ortom To Disciplinary Committee, Suspends Fayose, Anyim, Others

Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 97
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.