Click on video, "Jesus was ultimate fighter." If he was Muslim, this fighting minister for Jesus that is, how would the media react: "Jihadist" they would scream:

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/living/2010/03/14/fof.fighting.preacher.wsmv?hpt=C2

uhmmm

1. Its hypocrisy.

2. Boxing is a SPORT. There are muslim boxers (Amir Khan) and no one loses sleep over them neither has the media called them jihadists.

3. What is the correlation between a boxing match between 2 consensual adults and a deliberately evil plot to kill thousands of innocent, unsuspecting civilians?

I'm sorry but this just proves one thing - islam breeds demons and liars.

davidylan:

uhmmm

1. Its hypocrisy.

2. Boxing is a SPORT. There are muslim boxers (Amir Khan) and no one loses sleep over them neither has the media called them jihadists.

3. What is the correlation between a boxing match between 2 consensual adults and a deliberately evil plot to kill thousands of innocent, unsuspecting civilians?

I'm sorry but this just proves one thing - islam breeds demons and liars.

U re very right.Mohammed Ali is also a muslim

davidylan and toba ignored the obvious ;the title of the video.

just imagine if an imam were to put on gloves and beat his opponent as the pastor obviously did, even for charitable cause. and he announces that Muhammad was the ultimate fighetr, and he, the fighting imam in the way of Muhammad, love for Allah, by hitting somebody in the ring.

now, think about that with real brain, and not what is behind you that you use to sit on the potty.

while you deny the truth about jesus, the pastor precariously and unknowingly gave us his Jihadist nature. that was the message of the video, which was lost to you. No muslim will hit another person in the face and say that he is demostrating the Quality of Muhammad. That will be a lie. But there is the pastor saying that the slayer of "slaves" and caller of nations, vipers, and ethnic people dogs was not ameek, turn the other cheek kind of a guy.

the world did not break into pieces, yet. no one has accused this pastro of religious incitements. the case is simple, if its not muslim, it is right, but when muslim it is muslim, it is evil! it is like the guy who flew his plane into the IRS building in Florida. he was not a terrorist, but only an angry man. frustrated.

double standard, i say. what say you; davidylan and toba?

nopuqeater:

davidylan and toba ignored the obvious ;the title of the video.

just imagine if an imam were to put on gloves and beat his opponent as the pastor obviously did, even for charitable cause. and he announces that Muhammad was the ultimate fighetr, and he, the fighting imam in the way of Muhammad, love for Allah, by hitting somebody in the ring.

now, think about that with real brain, and not what is behind you that you use to sit on the potty.

while you deny the truth about jesus, the pastor precariously and unknowingly gave us his Jihadist nature. that was the message of the video, which was lost to you. No muslim will hit another person in the face and say that he is demostrating the Quality of Muhammad. That will be a lie. But there is the pastor saying that the slayer of "slaves" and caller of nations, vipers, and ethnic people dogs was not ameek, turn the other cheek kind of a guy.

the world did not break into pieces, yet. no one has accused this pastro of religious incitements. the case is simple, if its not muslim, it is right, but when muslim it is muslim, it is evil! it is like the guy who flew his plane into the IRS building in Florida. he was not a terrorist, but only an angry man. frustrated.

double standard, i say. what say you; davidylan and toba?

Ur reasoning and understanding levels are very pathetic

If as a christian i joined the military or police to defend my territory and an adversary is coming towards me to kill my pple and myself, whilst having opportunity to defend them. If i failed to do that then i must be a fool.

Would u call defense a jihad?

@Toba: You just made sense by asking question. No wonder; Davidylan is not available to steer you wrong.

Your question about if defense is Jihad is valid. The answer is yes. Defense is Jihad. Jihad is defense. Jihad is nothing except defensiveness against all forms of evil.

And if you do not put up a defense again evil doers, then you are a complete fool.

nopuqeater:

@Toba: You just made sense by asking question. No wonder; Davidylan is not available to steer you wrong.

Your question about if defense is Jihad is valid. The answer is yes. Defense is Jihad. Jihad is defense. Jihad is nothing except defensiveness against all forms of evil.

And if you do not put up a defense again evil doers, then you are a complete fool.

total nonesense. . . . . .what were u defending when terrorists blew hotels in india and killed innocent tourists?