JackBizzle:



Something is definitely wrong with you

He's going to quote you 10 BILLION TIMES, repeating the same retãrded sh¡t over and over again.

budaatum:
KEB, It's been pretty quiet since your post on 23 November. Careful observers would have noticed the true Christians (as opposed to deists like you) have held sway since that day, with even the most militant atheists having to be silent while God reigned. Welcome back.

So, to your challenge, I would take it up under certain conditions.

1. Who would be the judges? It can't be you as you have not shown the ability to comprehend positions that stand opposed to yours.

Lets sort that out and I'll take up your challenge.

Aaaaahh that is low blow coming from you BudaAtum. Is the motive fear or ENVY?

Kingebukasblog is making a contribution that cowardly Low-level Atheists fear. Yet he is appealing to participants courage. The king is appealing to participants sense of fairplay. Look closely, this generous offer from the King is in service of humanity.

Maezara:
He's going to quote you 10 BILLION TIMES, repeating the same retãrded sh¡t over and over again.

That is correct. He is forced to repeat things over and over and over for the benefit of Low-level unregistered Atheists.

CoolUsername:


I don't believe that a failed blogger has 100k in disposable cash think that whatever argument is thrown at you will simply be disregarded since you are both the custodian of the reward and the umpire of the challenge.

In the event that no one wins the challenge, (since you aren't exactly an unbiased party) why don't you donate the 100k to a charity and document it on this forum?

Totally unnecessary. You can pass if you are not interested . You are not being forced to take it up

JackBizzle:



Something is definitely wrong with you

You finangled 5000 naira from an innocent couple earlier this year and can't get free 80k . smh

budaatum:

Sorry, no. I haven't the time to waste if you are to do the judging.

Fear can cripple a strong man. The liberating challenge that Kingebukasblog is offering the world must not go to waste because of cowardice.

I always thought you would be the one to show courage to lead this group of confused low-level unregistered Atheists to freedom.

Your demands for someone else to judge is a copout. The whole world is watching and judging.

JackBizzle:
So butterflyl1on has become an azz-licker?


I envy Ebuka. He has his own worshipper

What is going wrong with you Jackbizzle? If you were a true blue blooded Atheist, you would be unbiased in your opinions. Then you would have said you ENVY both Kingebukasblog and your teacher Butterfly1on.

Let bygones be bygones Sir.

JackBizzle:



Something is definitely wrong with you

I have agree with you as usual. But why do you discriminate? WHY can't you simply say to Butterfly1on as well that you ENVY him as well as Kingebukasblog.

KingEbukasBlog:


You finangled 5000 naira from an innocent couple earlier this year and can't get free 80k . smh

What !!! Jackbizzle conned an innocent DECENT couple out N5000. OMG !

Well man this is extremely sad. Would a strident unregistered Atheist do something so cowardly ?

Kingebukasblog, It is admirable that you have offered to help the world settle this destructive problem. But Jackbizzle may not take your offer because it needs some work and is honest money.

CoolUsername:


I don't believe that a failed blogger has 100k in disposable cash think that whatever argument is thrown at you will simply be disregarded since you are both the custodian of the reward and the umpire of the challenge.

In the event that no one wins the challenge, (since you aren't exactly an unbiased party) why don't you donate the 100k to a charity and document it on this forum?

Coolusername your reasons given is ridicules and insulting to the proven integrity of Kingebukasblog. Allow me to respectfully say that you are a COWARD. You have no LEADERSHIP in your frightening journey through Satan Atheism. If you had LEADERSHIP you would take up the challenge generously offered to the world by Kingebukasblog who is a man of integrity.

CoolUsername:


I suddenly have a feeling that this challenge is a scam.

It is only a scam in the mentally diseased minds of cowardly unregistered Atheists because they don't have the balls.

Is this disturbing behaviour of Atheists a sign that they are admitting defeat. Are they admitting that their No-god do not real exist.

Now why we're they offering their lives to No-god but now that don't have the balls to prove the allegiance to No-god ?

Could it be that Coolusername has scammed us with No-god ?

Maezara:
He's going to quote you 10 BILLION TIMES, repeating the same retãrded sh¡t over and over again.

Maezara Aka TOZARA have you heard that word is spreading among the women that you claim to DAZZLE THEIR VAGINAS. They say your exaggerate your abilities the same way do here. I QUOTED YOU FOUR TIMES but you claim it is 10 BILLION TIMES.

You are a self proclaimed Catholic Atheist. You claim you worship No-god, but when Kingebukasblog offer a reward to prove it you crumble like a dried out SHITBAG.

Modo9:
but there’s no evidence of god

Ok let's say you are right. Here is your chance to prove your views and get paid. WHY are you standing at the back of the crowd like beggar hoping someone else can give you more reason to worship your No-god.

Go to the front now MODO9, be a man, save the world. You will never get this chance again to prove to the world that No-god is real and that you have not suffered under the burden of Atheism in vain. The world is watching!

Let me know if you want me to up the prize independently.

The only reason they aren't striking him is because he doesn't claim to be a Christian he's a deist historically deist have been called atheist

KingEbukasBlog:


Ok.

So are you still interested in taking up the challenge ?

What is going on King?
The whole world is watching this with baited breath Sir. I see Nairaland is also marketing your ground breaking offer to save the world from madness.

I am disappointed in BudaAtum, he show promise to lead a primitive tribe of Low-level Atheists out of their obvious confusion. I have some thing good to say about their modern day prophet Richard Dawkins, he took up challenges like yours and lost. Now his sheep is running scared. Let's get Dawkins in to show his sheep how to do it, WIN OR LOSE.

KingEbukasBlog:


God has morally sufficient reasons why he permits evil mainly because of freewill . Every moral agent has the ability to do things on their volition and so if God permits evil , it could because of the expression of freewill . That's why we moral laws that help us freely choose to do good not evil . Evil itself is evidence for God . Why ? Because evil is a departure from good and since God (the epitome of moral goodness) is good , evil is contrary to Its nature .

How can God be said to be the epitome of moral goodness when he does evil himself? How can evil be contrary to it's nature when he does evil?

Accordingto the bible, God does evil acknowledges it and even repents from it.

Jer 42:9 - And said unto them, Thus saith the LORD, the God of Israel, unto whom ye sent me to present your supplication before him;
Jer 42:10 - If ye will still abide in this land, then will I build you, and not pull you down, and I will plant you, and not pluck you up: for I repent me of the evil that I have done unto you.

I've asked you many times without getting an answer and I'll ask again. How is your God the epitome of moral goodness when he does evil, acknowledges it and even repents from it? How is evil contrary to his nature when he does evil?

KingEbukasBlog, you'll agree with me that there's no way you'll agree that someone has "correctly" answered your question (of course that'd mean you're agreeing that the person has given you a reason to dump your belief in God). Of course that's not possible; no one can successfully prove the non-existence of God with the best of logic. So why not visit this thread and donate the said 100,000 to ten or more very needy people who may not have something good to eat this festive season?

I've followed the thread enough and will be glad to mention monikers you can gift it to.

Link: https://www.nairaland.com/4238164/nairaland-christmas-giveaway-2017-edition/113

dalaman:


How can God be said to be the epitome of moral goodness when he does evil himself? How can evil be contrary to it's nature when he does evil?

Accordingto the bible, God does evil acknowledges it and even repents from it.

Jer 42:9 - And said unto them, Thus saith the LORD, the God of Israel, unto whom ye sent me to present your supplication before him;
Jer 42:10 - If ye will still abide in this land, then will I build you, and not pull you down, and I will plant you, and not pluck you up: for I repent me of the evil that I have done unto you.

I've asked you many times without getting an answer and I'll ask again. How is your God the epitome of moral goodness when he does evil, acknowledges it and even repents from it? How is evil contrary to his nature when he does evil?

. lol your not a Christian but your using Bible you're a joker

dalaman:


How can God be said to be the epitome of moral goodness when he does evil himself? How can evil be contrary to it's nature when he does evil?

Accordingto the bible, God does evil acknowledges it and even repents from it.

Jer 42:9 - And said unto them, Thus saith the LORD, the God of Israel, unto whom ye sent me to present your supplication before him;
Jer 42:10 - If ye will still abide in this land, then will I build you, and not pull you down, and I will plant you, and not pluck you up: for I repent me of the evil that I have done unto you.

I've asked you many times without getting an answer and I'll ask again. How is your God the epitome of moral goodness when he does evil, acknowledges it and even repents from it? How is evil contrary to his nature when he does evil?

Everytime you bring these same verses and I have always interpreted and explained them . This is the obvious conclusion : You don't want to accept my explanation. This is very fine with me . Like I said in the OP , old rebutted arguments shouldn't be presented again . It's not use going through them over again .

Like I told the other guy , there is a type of theism -maltheism/dystheism - that posits that the nature of the creator is an evil one and it still accepts that God exists .

A deist can also posit that God may derive perversive pleasure from creating the world that is prone to evil that's why It does not intervene.

The nature of God - good or evil - does not question God's existence. Let's stick to the challenges that have been put up . There is a big opportunity to learn and test one's intellect

Daviddson:
KingEbukasBlog, you'll agree with me that there's no way you'll agree that someone has "correctly" answered your question (of course that'd mean you're agreeing that the person has given you a reason to dump your belief in God). Of course that's not possible; no one can successfully prove the non-existence of God with the best of logic. So why not visit this thread and donate the said 100,000 to ten or more very needy people who may not have something good to eat this festive season?

I've followed the thread enough and will be glad to mention monikers you can gift it to.

Link: https://www.nairaland.com/4238164/nairaland-christmas-giveaway-2017-edition/113

Thank you David for calling my attention to this . May God bless you .

KingEbukasBlog:


Thank you very much



I'm the judge . This is why atheists who are questioning my ability to reason are not actually smart themselves : Since I lack the ability to reason , then construct an argument that is above my purview and you win the money easily because I lack the intellectual ability to refute it .

But una no get sense na ... so I dey look una

You Will be the judge, great we trust your ability to judge fairly King. Besides, the whole world will also be judging.

WHY don't these cowardly ATHEISTS setup a N100'000 challenge to prove that JESUS and his doctrines are real?

KingEbukasBlog:


Thank you David for calling my attention to this . May God bless you .

Amen. God bless you too.

Daviddson:
KingEbukasBlog, you'll agree with me that there's no way you'll agree that someone has "correctly" answered your question (of course that'd mean you're agreeing that the person has given you a reason to dump your belief in God). Of course that's not possible; no one can successfully prove the non-existence of God with the best of logic. So why not visit this thread and donate the said 100,000 to ten or more very needy people who may not have something good to eat this festive season?

I've followed the thread enough and will be glad to mention monikers you can gift it to.

Link: https://www.nairaland.com/4238164/nairaland-christmas-giveaway-2017-edition/113

The King must be encouraged to complete his humanitarian mission. The poor will benefit great after a challenge such as this.

If it can be proven that God don't exist, I will gladly dump my beliefs.

KingEbukasBlog:


Hehehehehe

King, you deal with these idiots very well.

I am chatting to some guys that are considering a plan to help you double the prize money if you are able to narrow the list of competitors down to ten.

ScienceWatch:
Fear can cripple a strong man. The liberating challenge that Kingebukasblog is offering the world must not go to waste because of cowardice.

I always thought you would be the one to show courage to lead this group of confused low-level unregistered Atheists to freedom.

Your demands for someone else to judge is a copout. The whole world is watching and judging.

The whole world can't be stupid enough to agree that KEB should be judge and jury in deciding in a discussion on which he takes the opposing side. I'm in fact not asking for an atheist to be judge. Any one with an ounce of objectivity and an understanding of the use of words would do. I'm even willing to accept you as judge as I am certain you are capable of seeing reason even if you disagree, though I would ask that you suspend the insults for the duration and request explanations if one has been unclear. KEB's ability to be honest is what I cannot stand.

Take the discussion on here. I pointed out that a string of references on wiki do not make a person credible. I posted a link to references of someone I know he would not, under any circumstances, accept as a credible person even though that person has much longer references than those presented. But what was his response? He sets up some straw argument and resorts to backslapping rhetoric. I'd find it amusing if it weren't pitiful.

So, if you define my not allowing KEB to be judge and juror in a discussion he takes the other side of to mean one is cowardly, then so be it. Like I've said, the whole world can't be so stupid that they would all share your conclusion.

KingEbukasBlog:


Totally unnecessary. You can pass if you are not interested . You are not being forced to take it up

I know you 's a broke boi.

KingEbukasBlog:


Honestly , because of how incredibly shallow and naively constructed these arguments are , I could give you the 100k to buy sense .

Must you insult him?

modik:


Must you insult him?

hakeem4 is a comedian (for real , he is a comedian , known him before nairaland ) , he does not take such things seriously. I told a joke and I'm sure he laughed

Our op shooting himself.
LoL

CoolUsername:

I know you 's a broke boi.

Hehehehehe ... na wa oo . ok o

budaatum:

The whole world can't be stupid enough to agree that KEB should be judge and jury in deciding in a discussion on which he takes the opposing side. I'm in fact not asking for an atheist to be judge. Any one with an ounce of objectivity and an understanding of the use of words would do. I'm even willing to accept you as judge as I am certain you are capable of seeing reason even if you disagree, though I would ask that you suspend the insults for the duration and request explanations if one has been unclear. KEB's ability to be honest is what I cannot stand.

Take the discussion on here. I pointed out that a string of references on wiki do not make a person credible. I posted a link to references of someone I know he would not, under any circumstances, accept as a credible person even though that person has much longer references than those presented. But what was his response? He sets up some straw argument and resorts to backslapping rhetoric. I'd find it amusing if it weren't pitiful.

So, if you define my not allowing KEB to be judge and juror in a discussion he takes the other side of to mean one is cowardly, then so be it. Like I've said, the whole world can't be so stupid that they would all share your conclusion.

I am starting to see your point BudaAtum The world will agree that there is an effective alternate compromise that can useful under the circumstances. The esteemed Nairalander Kingebukasblog may be willing to accommodate you if you offer to secure the prize money and then you become judge and jury.

Put your money where your mouth is, my tough mother used to say.

We must keep in mind that the King offers an open public challenge that is being monitored world wide. He will never be so stupid as to biblically DISGRACE himself. I find him to be wise and stable under attack from an insane mob.

Nevertheless, the world don't have to agree with my conclusion. They want to see how problems are solved. One thing they will agree on is that the prize money was freely offered by Kingebukasblog and that the world is full of brilliant scammers.

KingEbukasBlog:


Everytime you bring these same verses and I have always interpreted and explained them . This is the obvious conclusion : You don't want to accept my explanation. This is very fine with me . Like I said in the OP , old rebutted arguments shouldn't be presented again . It's not use going through them over again .

What is your explanation for the verse? You've never explained anything to me about it. Why is your God doing evil and repenting from it if evil is contrary to Its nature?

Like I told the other guy , there is a type of theism -maltheism/dystheism - that posits that the nature of the creator is an evil one and it still accepts that God exists .

A deist can also posit that God may derive perversive pleasure from creating the world that is prone to evil that's why It does not intervene.

The nature of God - good or evil - does not question God's existence. Let's stick to the challenges that have been put up . There is a big opportunity to learn and test one's intellect

You are a joke. Are you into maltheism/dystheism? Are you a deist? You described your God and stated his attribute, after I showed you that your assertions are false you are jumping to maltheism/dystheism and deism.