budaatum:
People incessantly warn you about your spurious allegations but you constantly ignore their warnings claiming they come from satanic atheists. The Christians watch you with trepidation as they see your lies and baseless claims but the better ones fail to tell you off least they be painted with the brush you paint the atheists with; while the small cabal, of which you are one, go about backslapping one another for being dishonest. Imagine claiming a pool, albeit invisible, has nothing to do with water! Or that a satirical claim about Finland is fact, or that you ever wrote to Google about your fake 22 year study that claims you suffer from mental illness! As if a 2 minute study were required to ascertain that you indeed do suffer from mental illness!

Its not you though, we know. It is the spirit in you that makes you behave as you do, which is why I will desist on placing a bull on your ass, for now. However, I am setting myself the task of ignoring ScienceWatch henceforth. My hope is that you become so invisible that I cannot even hear you. I do however plan to fail, as letting you get away with your behaviour is evil, in my opinion.

My regards to your girl for putting up with you.

Can you be matured in the face of a sincere apology? Are you able to be unbiased? here is your chance to show that you can recognize an honest mistake based on the evidence before you. You sound bitter and revengeful. Now its your turn to post proof that I am incessantly warned about spurious allegations. And be fair show the true context as I have done when I posted my proof that I confused Budaatum with Otumatum and the situation and context of that mistake.

The ball is in your court. Play it like a champ !

budaatum:


Its not you though, we know. It is the spirit in you that makes you behave as you do, which is why I will desist on placing a bull on your ass, for now. However, I am setting myself the task of ignoring ScienceWatch henceforth. My hope is that you become so invisible that I cannot even hear you. I do however plan to fail, as letting you get away with your behaviour is evil, in my opinion.

My regards to your girl for putting up with you.

Please stop pressing the report button. Follow my lead, I will never and have never pressed Naralands report button because I have a problem with someone including you. I have respect for differences and mistakes.

Your "mistake" is not honest. You have shown sufficient evidence for one to conclude that it is your nature. Take the satirical post about Finland as an example and read how you twisted what you know is satire and fake news to slander people just because they have different believes to yours. Now you ask others to be mature? If only you understood the definition of the word!

I refuse to provide you with evidence that you have been warned as I cannot allow you to take up any more of my time. I'll point out future ones though, rest assured, for I know good people will not give up on your soul.

ScienceWatch:
Can you be matured in the face of a sincere apology? Are you able to be unbiased? here is your chance to show that you can recognize an honest mistake based on the evidence before you. You sound bitter and revengeful. Now its your turn to post proof that I am incessantly warned about spurious allegations. And be fair show the true context as I have done when I posted my proof that I confused Budaatum with Otumatum and the situation and context of that mistake.

The ball is in your court. Play it like a champ !

ScienceWatch:
Please stop pressing the report button. Follow my lead, I will never and have never pressed Naralands report button because I have a problem with someone including you. I have respect for differences and mistakes.

I have never pressed the report button on anyone ever. I am not some immature child nor is it my nature to ask mods to fight my wars. Please stop making allegations you have no proof or evidence for!

I promise that if I ever do report you, I will make it known publicly.

budaatum:
Your "mistake" is not honest. You have shown sufficient evidence for one to conclude that it is your nature. Take the satirical post about Finland as an example and read how you twisted what you know is satire and fake news to slander people just because they have different believes to yours. Now you ask others to be mature? If only you understood the definition of the word!

I refuse to provide you with evidence that you have been warned as I cannot allow you to take up any more of my time. I'll point out future ones though, rest assured, for I know good people will not give up on your soul.

Your response here shows how deeply biased you are. I don't see you chastising Atheists for blatant lies about Islam and Christianity.
I don't see you asking Atheists for proof and evidence while the brutally attack and hack away at the Holy Doctrines of Islam and Christianity.
I will also be watching you.

There is a war between Darkness and Light. Those that love the Dark have nothing precious to lose.

My bias is towards you. As someone mentioned, we assume the 'science' in your name means you adhere to the scientific method, but it turns out the "watch" really is the more active and the science a mere noun. It's a pity we can't ask you to change your name.

Please note, I do not go about chastening Muslims or Christians, or hacking at their beliefs. (Now there you go again accusing me without evidence, again!) I am fully aware that people have diverse views and beliefs and that everyone cannot know what I know. And besides, there are people behind those beliefs; don't you think I would be an odd individual if I only respected atheists?

In fact, one of my more popular posts on here was against we atheists, albeit before your time. A search through my early posts will prove that fact, though careful reading, and of the comments, will show it applies to people on the whole regardless of their beliefs, and you in particular.

Let it be known all the same, that I am an atheist. Not only do I not do belief the existence of gods, I try as much as possible to not believe anything that I can possibly know. So, if anyone, in discussion with me claims evidence exists for a claim they make, it is my nature to ask to see it myself. I should not be asked to take your word for it! That though does not apply to beliefs people hold. No one has to prove to me that the God they believe in exists! (By the way, that would be my stance if I were a Christian, and one which butterflyl1on's invisible pool alluded to but which his desire to win an argument allowed him to bash his head on invisible concrete. Sincerely speaking, his "special equipment" was ingenious).

I will be delighted if you keep an eye on me. It is good that I don't convince myself I am perfect.

ScienceWatch:
Your response here shows how deeply biased you are. I don't see you chastising Atheists for blatant lies about Islam and Christianity.
I don't see you asking Atheists for proof and evidence while the brutally attack and hack away at the Holy Doctrines of Islam and Christianity.
I will also be watching you.

There is a war between Darkness and Light. Those that love the Dark have nothing precious to lose.

In Addition, topics like "Why having faith is bad" should stop. People who creates such threads should go and investegate the power of the human mind before coming here and throwing up garbages.

budaatum:
The Christians watch you with trepidation as they see your lies and baseless claims but the better ones fail to tell you off least they be painted with the brush you paint the atheists with; while the small cabal, of which you are one, go about backslapping one another for being dishonest. Imagine claiming a pool, albeit invisible, has nothing to do with water!

Your are wrong again BudaAtum. True Christians are grateful and know in their hearts of hearts that I will never do what you falsely accuse me of. They know that I simply point truth seekers to easily verifiable MIGHTY TRUTHS about the Holy Gospels and Jesus Christ. Many Christians and Non-Christians have told me how their awareness of the reality of life changing MIRACLES grew rapidly because they used Emmanuel TV and Scoan Youtube to investigate the scientifically verifiable evidence of a loving creator God.
May the mighty power of the Holy Spirit indwell their loving hearts always.

You must agree BudaAtum, when you look again at your green accusation above, that in your haste to defend Atheism, you have banged your biased head against your own INVISIBLE PAVING.
Why are you battling to imagine an INVISIBLE POOL that has no water in it? Have you no experiential knowledge of empty pools?

I noticed with concern how you as a Low-level unregistered Atheist continually hack away at the superior truths freely shared by highly esteemed Niaralanders Vaxx, Butterflyl1on, Kingebukasblog, sonofthunder, GodsMopol, vaxx, bloodofthelamb, felixomor, MAXIMAL123(m), Ermacc, Pidgin2(f), Roy52793 and many others.

There is a war between Darkness and Light. Those that love the Dark have nothing precious to lose.

Freiburger:
In Addition, topics like "Why having faith is bad" should stop. People who creates such threads should go and investigate the power of the human mind before coming here and throwing up garbage.

Awesome ! We all have seen the evidence that faith in Satan, is what gives Low-Level Atheists the power to proudly hack away at all the Holy doctrines of the worlds major religions. Atheists cringe when they see the worlds largest stadiums and Mecca over crowded with millions of people worshiping in FAITH. The self proclaimed Atheist, Buda Atum should realize that atheists have lost the battle for thousands of years.

Christ Is First
Preeminence simply means that Christ, as the head of the church, should be held in the highest esteem in each of our lives. As we think about His exalted status, there ought to well up within us an appreciation for His supreme position in the universe. He is the preeminent One. Look around at what Atheism has to offer humanity and see the agonizing sorrow, poverty, destruction, Men marrying Men, Child Pornography, Child prostitution and much more.

butterflyl1on:


Any logical person told there is an INVISIBLE POOL in my backyard would ask the right questions and not assume that an invisible pool is an everyday occurrence.


swimming pool
noun
a tank or large artificial basin, as of concrete, for filling with water for swimming.

As you can see, the definition speaks of the structure and not the content.

Thanks for taking your time to provide clarity again.

Have you guys seen BudaAtum said even after the esteemed Butterflyl1on provided this definition of "Swimming pool".
BudaAtum says accusingly, "you go about backslapping one another for being dishonest. Imagine claiming a pool, albeit invisible, has nothing to do with water!"

Lord have mercy !!!!!

Religions never waste time to argue with Atheists. Religions have conclusive scientifically verifiable evidence, that their faith is correctly focused. Atheists are losing their war against the Holy doctrines of humanity, thanks to free access to many spiritual TV channels, such as Emmanuel TV and others.

What must stop in 2018 is the insane trolling on religious topics.

Purity
Teens today are pressured to conform to social norms, fit into certain groups, and lose their Christian testimony. One specific battle is the holiness—the sanctity—of their purity. Your purity is valuable to God. How valuable is your purity to you?

Deicide:
This is more of a Biological argument and not a religious one but it still relates.

IF WE EVOLVE FROM MONKEYS WHY ARE THERE STILL MONKEYS?

This s#it must end 2018 cause it makes you wonder if the person even has a knowledge of what he/she is talking about.

Compliments of the season to you and your family. Even corrupt scientist can not answer your fair question.

My take is that the wise Monkeys that refused to follow the mad evolutionary crowd knew that they would one day be employed to hack away at the God that created them.

A big up for the monkeys that stood their ground, they are better off than their God hating relatives.

butterflyl1on:


Swimming Pools don't "work " in mysterious ways. Be logical alright? Swimming Pools are simply what they are. The only difference about this particular one is that it's invisible. Does it's invisible nature mean it does not FUNCTION like any other swimming pool?

My question is like asking you something like this,

" if you put on a totally transparent piece of cloth and everyone can see the transparent clothing but they can also see your näkedness would you say you have clothes on or you are näked?

OMG ! Now my imagination is stuck. Help me please.

An atheist fully dressed in transparent clothes, underwear and all? When they get to work, will they get to work and argue with their angry boss. What will they say if the Police want to body search them?

butterflyl1on:


Please I do not like it when rètards mention me anyhow. You and your fellow atheists are proving to be so on the daily

1. I never began the swimming pool talk. An atheist like you named deicide did. I only added INVISIBLE so it would seem like a better comparison when talking about supernatural things.

2. The word is SWIMMING POOL and not POOL. everywhere in the world a swimming pool is the structure that houses the water and not the water. You do not say "a swimming pool of water", you say a pool of water. Right here we are talking about SWIMMING POOL AND NOT POOL so you can thank me for the educational brush up.

3. Now you ask if the invisible swimming pool was natural or constructed? (jackbizzle take note)

4. Anyone in a civilized environment who gets told that I own a swimming pool would immediately ask if it's dry or has water in it. (google is your friend) in fact this shows that a lot of you atheists lack common sense or intelligence and simply argue to be seen and heard.

5. If today there is nothing wrong with asking someone to show you an INVISIBLE swimming pool then it makes me wonder whatever happened to INVISIBLE MEANING UNABLE TO BE SEEN?

major fail from you and I ain't surprised.

Could it be that this dudes ignorance is because he can not afford to pay his tithes/fees.
It is interesting to note that the prophet and FOUNDER of modern Atheism, Prof. Richard Dawkins is angry that Atheists are selfish and refuse to pay their basic yearly registration fees.
Membership is organized hierarchically in circles/Levels similar to Criminal Scientology's membership scams—depending of course on how much money you pay for his “non-profit” organization—called the “dawkins Circles”. The “Reason Circle,” which is the cheapest option, costs 27,000Niara monthly and offers you discounts on merchandize from the foundation store, such as this cool T-shirt above, and the chance to attend events with “richard dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science personalities.”

However, 27,000Naira a month Atheism membership fees is too little for the blessing you gain from having a private lunch with the “Holy Prophet” Richard Dawkins himself. Such a privilege is reserved for top members of the “Evolution Circle” or “The Magic of Reality Circle,” which cost, again 31.4million Naira – $500,000 annually.

It is becoming obvious now, that prophet Dawkins is throwing unregistered Low-level Atheists to the dogs.

budaatum:
My bias is towards you.

Let it be known all the same, that I am an atheist. Not only do I not do belief the existence of gods, I try as much as possible to not believe anything that I can possibly know. So, if anyone, in discussion with me claims evidence exists for a claim they make, it is my nature to ask to see it myself. I should not be asked to take your word for it! That though does not apply to beliefs people hold. No one has to prove to me that the God they believe in exists! (By the way, that would be my stance if I were a Christian, and one which butterflyl1on's invisible pool alluded to but which his desire to win an argument allowed him to bash his head on invisible concrete. Sincerely speaking, his "special equipment" was ingenious).

I will be delighted if you keep an eye on me. It is good that I don't convince myself I am perfect.

Your response here shows how deeply biased you are. You hound me like a data Gestapo. I don't see you asking Atheists for proof and evidence while they brutally attack and hack away at the Holy Doctrines of Islam and Christianity.

While, 27,000Naira a month Atheism membership fees is too little for the blessings you gain from having a private lunch with the “Holy Prophet” Richard Dawkins himself. Such a privilege is reserved for top members of the “Evolution Circle” or “The Magic of Reality Circle,” which cost, again 31.4million Naira – $500,000 annually. Is this whyI don't see you chastising Atheists for blatant lies about Islam and Christianity.
I will also be watching you.

There is a war between Darkness and Light. Those that love the Dark have nothing precious to lose.

hopefulLandlord:
@sonofthunder, just for educative purpose I'll answer the question why an atheist can believe in the supernatural while not believing in god (who is claimed to be supernatural)

The logic of people asking the question goes like this

P1 atheist doesn't believe there is a god

P2 An atheist can still believe in the supernatural

P3 God is supernatural

P4; P2+P3 means an atheist that believes in supernatural should also believe god exists

C An atheist that believes in supernatural but doesn't believe in a god is a joker

while it looks sensible and watertight (although P3 is a claim that still needs to be supported as one can replace "god" with Bigfoot or Unicorn or dragon), we nevertheless see a modal fallacy committed at P4, that one believes in a particular realm's existence doesn't automatically mean one should accept any claim based on that realm, let me use an example to buttress that point

Sonofthunder: There was a ship that sank on 15 April 1912, this ship was called "Titanic" and that was where a poor man called Jack Dawson sacrificed his life for rich girl Rose DeWitt Bukater out of love

sonofthunder's listener: I don't think any of that happened

You then show him some proof of the ship, maybe you flew him and used submarine to get to the location of the ship and the ship actually does fit the description of what you told the listener or whatever you did was enough to convince him Titanic did sank
you guys get back on dry land and he says "while I'm convinced a big ship did sank and it looked as aged as a century old ship both in design and decay, I still don't believe jack and rose part is real"

You'd agree that accepting the Titanic did sank doesn't automatically mean any story told about it should also be taken at face value

also if I claim to have £1B cash in my house, you can believe I have a house after "proving" that to you while still doubting the "£1B cash" part

in the same vein, that a Nigerian doubts spiderman is real doesn't mean one just shows him New York and expects New York to be proof of spiderman to him all because Spiderman is said to live in New York

that someone accepts England is real doesn't mean he should also accept Hogwarts is real

One can still believe Gotham City is real and Batman is not and vice versa

one can accept a character called Jesus existed without accepting he's son of god

I hope I've been able to explain well and do feel free to ask any question

I think that the response by @butterflyl1on to this should hold. Maybe jonnydon22 should respond or let me read up and see how the discussion has turned out to be.

vaxx:
you will not stop making me laugh......another stomach crumbling laughing .......

hahahaha..... tell your guy to behave..... people just dey look me like mumu here..... Lol.

budaatum:
My bias is towards you.

Let it be known all the same, that I am an atheist. Not only do I not do belief in the existence of gods, I try as much as possible to not believe anything that I can possibly know.

We reveal the poverty of our thinking by our use of ambiguous, biased, inexact or empty linguistic constructions. We must learn to dig to the roots of our own ideas. Truthful analysis in linguistic matters along these lines will help us to see whether any statement which he or others may make, conveys genuine information or mere misinformation. Thats why I respectfully make light of empty linguistic constructions Atheists thrive on.

All major ancient religions arm their followers with powerful holistic tools to survive most effectively in a cruel evil world.
That is why I respect all religions. If religions are dismantled the whole world will be in serious crisis. It is this dangerous turn of events that Low-level Atheists hope to achieve because it has strong Satanic links.
All right thinking person that are open to the reality of experiential Knowledge will not be fooled by the destructive doctrines of Atheism.

What are Atheists offering mankind? Can they offer humanity a better life than religions? The answer is a huge NO !!

I am beginning to wonder if you get someone else to write some of the stuff you post. Your more intelligent girlfriend, perhaps?

ScienceWatch:
We reveal the poverty of our thinking by our use of ambiguous, biased, inexact or empty linguistic constructions. We must learn to dig to the roots of our own ideas. Truthful analysis in linguistic matters along these lines will help us to see whether any statement which he or others may make, conveys genuine information or mere misinformation.

Now, anyone please read the above again and tell me if it is not one of the most intelligent things you would read today. Forget for a moment who wrote it, and be honest. And do me a favour please, post your comment.

Now, SW, you be honest, tell me how the above applies to you. Is the "poverty of your thinking" not revealed by the incessant lies you tell on here? Or do you think atheists are too dumb to notice? Ok, what about the Christians, are they dumb too, do they notice? Or do you just not have poverty in your thought, in your opinion? How the hell can you possibly write the above and not consider the impression your more senile posts (like the one below) give of you?

ScienceWatch:
Thats why I respectfully make light of empty linguistic constructions Atheists thrive on.

Now, see, here you go spoiling what began well. You can't see you are calling a kettle black. First you lack respect. Second, you are the one who spins empty linguistic constructions (I struggle to make sense of that empty statement, but I'm sure you know what it means!); and thirdly, there is nothing light about thrashing someone just because their religion differs to yours! Can't you just stick to disputing what they've said without the constant "dumb atheist".

ScienceWatch:
All major ancient religions arm their followers with powerful holistic tools to survive most effectively in a cruel evil world.

And thank the gods for that, or ancient people would have remained ape like, never realising they were naked (is how the bible describes it), not knowing the difference between good and evil.

ScienceWatch:
That is why I respect all religions. If religions are dismantled the whole world will be in serious crisis.

But no you don't respect all religions! And to be honest, perhaps one shouldn't. But what about the people who hold those religions, should they be respected?

That aside, religion may have been good for ancient people, but we have moved on now and are not ancient people anymore. We no more say to Moses, "Na man, you go up the mountain because we are not worthy to stand in God's presence". We say, "Hold on Moses, we coming with you". It's not so much that Moses might lie, or even that there is no god, but Moses might make some mistake, and besides more eyes is better than one.

We do not just accept things because someone said their god said so. We do not just accept things by faith anymore. The new religion has taken on a scientific nature. We set our beliefs up against scientific scrutiny to see if they hold water, and if they do, we don't mere believe anymore, we now know! It is that knowing (knowledge) that allows me to throw my words over long distances right into your brain right this very moment and simultaneously into the brains of thousands.

Tell me my words are not becoming flesh right this very moment in your head, which is one of the more rigid on here?

ScienceWatch:
[s]It is this dangerous turn of events that Low-level Atheists hope to achieve because it has strong Satanic links[/s]

All right thinking person that are open to the reality of experiential Knowledge will not be fooled by the destructive doctrines of Atheism.

I've crossed out the irrelevant to focus on the last bit, though I doubt you know what experiental knowledge means. The funny thing is it negates believe.

I had a discussion about it with vaxx and will look it up at some point, but the crux of it is, most people will not say they believe it was raining if they were standing in the outside open and can hear thunder, see lightening and feel water dropping on their head. They would rather say, "it is raining". That's what knowledge gained from experience does for you.

ScienceWatch:
What are Atheists offering mankind? Can they offer humanity a better life than religions? The answer is a huge NO !!

The answer is actually yes. Atheistic attitudes unshackles you from belief. It gives you an enquiring mind because you seek to know. That knowledge is what improves the lot of humanity. It is what produces the device on which you are now tempted to insult me.

However, since you see atheism as merely a disbelief in the existence of gods, you would never understand that!

Atheist used to refer to a person who did not believe in and worship the established gods - or see the gods in the way that the authorities would have the gods seen - and not that they didn't believe in any gods whatsoever. There wasn't much difference between the ancient heretic and the modern atheist except that the heretic need not go as far as today's atheist to get burnt at the stake. I guess we have evolved and abandoned gods in their entirety, and no one can burn us anymore.

I thought you got banned. Glad to see you merely voluntarily suspended the incessant baseless posts. There is hope for us all yet.

budaatum:
(1) I am beginning to wonder if you get someone else to write some of the stuff you post. Your more intelligent girlfriend, perhaps?


(2)Now, SW, you be honest, tell me how the above applies to you. Is the "poverty of your thinking" not revealed by the incessant lies you tell on here? Or do you think atheists are too dumb to notice? Ok, what about the Christians, are they dumb too, do they notice? Or do you just not have poverty in your thought, in your opinion? How the hell can you possibly write the above and not consider the impression your more senile posts (like the one below) give of you?


(3) First you lack respect. Second, you are the one who spins empty linguistic constructions (I struggle to make sense of that empty statement, but I'm sure you know what it means!); and thirdly, there is nothing light about thrashing someone just because their religion differs to yours!

(4) That aside, religion may have been good for ancient people, but we have moved on now and are not ancient people anymore. We no more say to Moses, "Na man, you go up the mountain because we are not worthy to stand in God's presence". We say, "Hold on Moses, we coming with you". It's not so much that Moses might lie, or even that there is no god, but Moses might make some mistake, and besides more eyes is better than one.


(5) I've crossed out the irrelevant to focus on the last bit, though I doubt you know what experiential knowledge means. The funny thing is it negates believe.


(6) The answer is actually yes. Atheistic attitudes unshackles you from belief.


(7) I thought you got banned.

After you have revealed the poverty of your Atheistic thinking we can get to the roots of your hidden motives for targeting me, Vaxx, Kingebukasblog, Butterflyl1on and others all this time. It is because we LOVE GOD. Simplicity is at the root of all truths unlike ambiguous Atheistic truths.

For the sake of the readers I will attempt to show how I deal with God haters;
(1) Yes I do get others to write my stuff. If president do it, why do you want to persecute me BudAtum?

(2) No the above dont apply to me, I did not write it.
You display paranoia as you accuse me of not writing it, then you go bezerk questioning how the hell I could have written that simple post. Confusion is the hallmarks of Atheism Sir.

(3) BudAtum, are you not ashamed to admit that you are struggling to make sense of my ........
Others wont be surprised after they the witnessed your bungling of Butterflyl1on's simply idea of an INVISIBLE POOL. You also failed to respect Kingebukasblog's simple, honest and fair rules for the simple challenge he offered with a handsome prize to an Atheist like you.
All we witnessed was a man on the run.

(4) You can count yourself lucky that I wont dirty my hands on point (4). Let me rather point my clean fingers at our esteemed readers and say in a loud voice, "DO YOU SEE THIS DUDES ARROGANCE?"

(5) You again express your doubts when handling kindergarden stuff. Then you foolishly inform your lost tribe that only you know the meaning of experiential knowledge. You are in fact saying to your lost tribe exactly what your master, Prophet Richard Dawkins want you to say to them
Which is, that Christians and Muslims dont know what they are experiencing. Only we the master tribe of Atheists know what they are experiencing. If religious people say it is hot outside, insult them and rather get scientific equipment and check it out for yourself. If the religious people are right, dont agree with them. Keep them in their place which is created by us for them.

(6) I stupidly asked you, can Atheists offer mankind something better in place of religions, and you gave a mighty arrogant reply,
"The answer is actually yes. Atheistic attitudes unshackles you from belief." Grung Grung !

(7) You say to me with gleeful bitterness, "I thought you got banned?" BudAtum, Yes you wish came true. Be careful what you wish for says the people that write my stuff.

WILL LOW-LEVEL ATHEISTS BE ABLE TO STOP TROLLING RELIGIOUS TOPICS AND SITES IN 2018.

Atheists strongly believe in No-god, but we all see them snuggling up wherever they see the word God or Jesus or Mohamed.
Kingebukasblog gave the world another profound observation when he said, "The internet is the end of Atheism." If I remember correctly he also religions brilliant advice when he said, " Atheism is alien to so many people (google is your friend)."

TO ALL THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD !!
Be very careful of the Satanic journey called atheism. Examine the few examples of the consequences of atheism below;

Kim Jong-un (1983-)
North Korean dictator who maintained North Korea as an atheist state and executed about 70 people just in the first few years of his reign to secure his power as well as for personal vendetta. Some of these executions were done "creatively," such as by anti-aircraft gun, mortar shell, and tying someone to a stake while torching them with a flame-thrower. He also killed, tortured, and starved an unknown amount of other people, numbering at least in the hundreds.

Michael Adam Carneal (1983-)
A self-professed atheist who went to a religious youth group in Kentucky and began shooting them after the opening prayer, murdering three girls and wounding five others.

Seung-Hui Cho (1984-2007)
South Korean mass shooter who killed 32 students (before killing himself) in the "Virginia Tech Shooting." He apparently had become an atheist, having dropped out of his church, and, according to his roommate, had "railed against his parents' strong Christian faith."

Matti Juhani Saari (1986-2008)
Finnish atheist who shot and killed 10 people in the "Kauhajoki school shooting," before committing suicide.

James Holmes (1987-) a.k.a. "the Dark Knight Killer"
American mass murderer who was convicted on 24 counts of murder and 140 counts of attempted murder, having shot up a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, which was playing the film "the Dark Knight Rises" while he was dressed as the Joker. He had labelled himself an agnostic on an online dating service website (which, according to some atheists, would make him qualify as an atheist).

Jeffrey James Weise (1988-2005) a.k.a. Jeff Weise
Ojibwe student who killed 9 and injured 7 people at Red Lake Senior High School, after which he then shot himself. His behavior during the shooting spree indicated militant atheism as a motive. He shot a female teacher in response to her saying, "God be with us," and then turned and asked a student, "Do you believe in God?" to which the student answered, "No," and consequently spared the student and proceeded to find alternate targets.

Jared Lee Loughner (1988-)
Atheist mass shooter in the 2011 Tucson shooting, killing 6 people (including a U.S. District Court Judge) and injuring 13 others (including a U.S. Representative). He was an outspoken critic of US currency having the phrase "In God We Trust," repeatedly mocked all religion (especially Christianity), and said Karl Marx's "the Communist Manifesto" was one of his favorite books.

Pekka-Eric Auvinen (1989-2007)
Finnish student and Nazi enthusiast who shot and killed 8 people before killing himself in the "Jokela school shooting." He described himself as a "godlike atheist," having said, "I, as a natural selector, will eliminate all who I see unfit."

Christopher Sean Harper-Mercer (1989-2015)
a.k.a. Chris Harper Mercer
Mass murderer from California who killed 9 people at Umpqua Community College in Oregon, the deadliest shooting in the state's history. He described himself as an atheist on his MySpace page and asked multiple people if they were Christians and then shot them after they answered yes.

Elliot Rodger (1991-2014)
Atheist mass murderer who killed 6 people and injured 14 others at the University of California, Santa Barbara, using multiple guns and knives, and then committed suicide. He had written in his journal: "I am the closest thing there is to a living god. Humanity is a disgusting, depraved, and evil species. It is my purpose to punish them all."

ScienceWatch:

(1) Yes I do get others to write my stuff.

My regards to the person who writes your stuff for you. Pity such an intelligent mind has to hide behind your sort. That person would be an asset to nl. Perhaps your writer would let you know he or she writes it for you to read it too. You do that person a disservice by copying and pasting and not considering that what they write for you, and which you copy and paste here, applies to you too.

I'll leave you with the following just to show that not only have you been told in the past, but that your writer has asked you to acknowledge your fault too by putting a confession in front of you.

ScienceWatch:
I agree with you that I am a sinner and tend to accuse others of my own SIN. It is a weakness Nairaland robust critique is helping me to resolve.

But I guess you just copied and pasted and it doesn't really apply to you.

ATHEISTS ARE MOSTLY SUBTLE AND SLY AS THEY HACK AWAY AT THE WORLDS PRECIOUS HOLY DOCTRINES OF ALL RELIGIONS.


2018 WILL CHANGE ALL THAT.

People of all religions have finally cracked Atheists main weapons of attack, which are fake complexity, grand sounding empty words that they trip over themselves, authoritative scientific jargon that is empty of substance.

Advice to all world religions;
1) Atheists will come at you with bling bling words and ideas that they dont understand to intimidate you and get you to look stupid.
To deal with it, simply ignore all their bling bling words and respond with simple ordinary words. Repeatedly communicate straight from the heart and ignore their most prized fake weapons. SIMPLICITY RATTLES AN ATHEIST as seen recently when the esteemed Butterflyl1on introduced an INVISIBLE POOL to Budatum and his followers.

2) Dont waste your time listening to their bling bling. Quickly ask them to list all the benefits Atheism offers mankind.

3) Leave quickly and go read it with a wise friend.

4) Let us know you compared Atheisms offer to humanity with what religions offers. If you get stuck, Butterflyl1on, Sonofthunder, Kingebukasblog and Felixomor will sacrifice their time to help.

budaatum:


My regards to the person who writes your stuff for you. Pity such an intelligent mind has to hide behind your sort. That person would be an asset to nl. Perhaps your writer would let you know he or she writes it for you to read it too. You do that person a disservice by copying and pasting and not considering that what they write for you, and which you copy and paste here, applies to you too.

I'll leave you with the following just to show that not only have you been told in the past, but that your writer has asked you to acknowledge your fault too by putting a confession in front of you.


But I guess you just copied and pasted and it doesn't really apply to you.

Mmmmmm. point well made old chap.
Why persecute me, I do exactly what presidents around the world are doing daily?

Others write the presidents speech, he reads it out to a hungry world. He dont know what he read. I am no different when canvassing an Atheist audience.

You on the other hand write your own stuff and you dont know what you are saying. You were offered a grand prize if you can prove your Atheist beliefs in NO-god. When push comes to shove, you could not take on Kingebukasblog's fair and transparent challenge.
BudaAtum, I say to you that you knew, that you knew, that you did not know what you believe.

butterflyl1on:


Aren't you also avoiding strong criticism of your atheism here?

If you say something does not exist this means you have somehow FOUND OUT that such does not exist (that is knowledge).

Show me this knowledge you acquire that proves the non existence of that thing. In other words prove to me that such does not exist.

Does it still confuse you?

Dont stress with this copy & paste monkey. He will never understand your superior arguments.

He is like most Atheist, he will Bling, Bling his way all around you to boost his ego. He is not solution driven and will confuse the hell out of himself and Atheists that follow him. BYe Fegelfire. Good riddance of a God hater.

Fegelfire:



Anyways, the burden of proof is upon you. And you artfully avoided the question laden in my statement. It seems that you really can't defend your own beliefs.

Atheism is the lack of belief in a God. It's as simple as that.

You are wrong this time. The burden of proof is on Atheists to prove what ever world religions require of them your easy game is up Fegelfire, the tables has turned in 2018.

1) Prove to us that atheism is a lack of belief?

2) Show scientific evidence of that Lack?

3) do Atheists believe in their "Lack of believe."

sonofthunder:

its like you don't understand my position here... religious people are having a discussion as regards their religion and/or God and you think atheists should have a say... maybe why your brothers keep spamming threads with trash always.

Your observation of the insane trolling of atheists is correct Sir.
When they get wind of the words GOD and JESUS they froth at the mouth as if Demonically possessed.

The atheists deity known widely as NO-GOD is the force behind this tragic behaviour Sir.