Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,209,364 members, 8,005,813 topics. Date: Monday, 18 November 2024 at 11:24 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. (5396 Views)
Army Raids Plateau Fulani Settlers, Burns 100 Homes After 2 Soldiers Were Killed / Nigerian Army Opens Up On Why Soldiers Were Sent To COZA Headquarters / Only Igbo Soldiers Were Sent To Fight Boko Haram. (2) (3) (4)
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Ngokafor(f): 5:31pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
Throwback: Who needs your sympathy??...dude to hell with you and whatever you represent...mscheww! 6 Likes |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 5:48pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
Ngokafor: That Ojukwu did not give you food during the war, doesn't mean you cannot digest the below information.
https://www.google.com.gh/amp/s/drbiggie./2013/11/19/open-letter-to-odumegwu-ojukwu-by-robert-s-goldstein-during-the-civil-war/amp/ http://www.citypeopleonline.com/history-101-americas-secret-files-ojukwu/ 3 Likes |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by LZAA: 5:49pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
imhotep:
|
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 5:53pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
POINT SIX – I cannot in all conscience serve you any longer. Nor can I be a party to suppressing the fact that your starving thousands have the food, medicine and milk available to them…..it can and is ready to be delivered through international organizations to you. Only your constant refusal has stopped its delivery. 1 Like |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 5:54pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
POINT FIVE – This was incredible to me. I am now convinced that I have been used by you and your cabinet to help in military 1 Like |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 5:55pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
POINT SEVEN – I am now convinced that one Nigeria is the only solution to peace. I also call upon you Mr. Ojukwu to allow your starving people to be fed. Their well-being is of deep concern to me as well as other right thinking people of the world. Your acting in the utmost haste in this matter is in my opinion the first step toward any lasting peace in your country. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:25pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
. |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DerideGull(m): 10:13pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
GoroTango: There was no distortion to the discourse. How many coups were branded ethnic coup thereafter? |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DerideGull(m): 10:14pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
imhotep: You could not be more correct. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DerideGull(m): 10:17pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
Throwback: What idiotic greed if I may ask? Was there anything Eastern Region of Nigeria tried to deny all other regions in the shithole called Nigeria? The statement about "Yoruba partners in NCNC and sharing the juicy spoils from your partnership with the North" showed that you are very ill-educated about the facts. 3 Likes |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Igboid: 11:46pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
RE: NigerianID | Re:Robert S. Goldstein (Biafra
Public Relations Rep in the USA) - Letter of
Resignation to Odumegwu Ojukwu (1968)
Dr. Aluko:
It is obfuscation at its most blatant to read
Goldstein letter outside of the rationale for action
taken by Ojukwu and the Biafran leadership.
I'll attempt to answer your earlier questions posed
to me alonsgide this, because they are related.
- The first question was why Ojukwu did not, given
that Biafra had shrunk dramatically, not surrender
to save starving Biafrans. - The second is, to link it to the substance of Goldstein's letter, why Ojukwu insisted on ceasefire and the airlift of relief to Biafrans as the only grounds or conditions for accepting relief. First, Ojukwu knew that an internationally observed ceasefire was the only guarantee for the security and safety of the Biafran. Second, the atrocities recorded wherever the federal forces liberated lent credence to that demand. In fact, it made it imperative, particularly because the Lagos regime was not prepared to negotiate in true faith for the amicable end of the conflict. The war strategy of the Gowon administration was hell-bent on Biafra's complete surrender without guarantees. No political and military leader will agree to that kind of suicide. I'll return to this point. But let me quote from Susan Cronje's quite illuminating book, The World and Nigeria: The Diplomatic History of the Biafran war 1967-1970 ( I'd also recommend that you read the other, Biafra: Britain's Shame). Cronje writes this about the meeting in Niamey referenced by Goldstein: "The Nigerian delegation was led by Chief Awolowo, but General Gowon arrived in Niamey on 16 July and addressed the meeting as an 'observer.' The main theme of his speech was a warning that if the 'rebels persist in their contemptuous attitude to the conference table the federal government will have no choice but to take over the remaining rebel-held areas...In military terms the rebellion is virtually suppressed already.' But the atmosphere had suibtly changed. hamani diori had altrady suggested that the committee's consultative role should be changed to a mediatory one, and after Gowon's address the committee went into closed session. Eventually it was announced that that Ojukwu had been asked to attend, and Gowon who had already returned to Lagos flew back to Niamey the following day, cancelling all engagements. His presence in Niamey was required not for a meeting with Ojukwu but to reply to a truce proposal put forward among others by General Ankrah. This called for a ten-mile wide demilitarized zone patrolled by neutral troops to allow relief supplies to pass to Biafran refugees. According to one account of the debate, Gowon is said to have turned to General Ankrah, saying, 'You are a military man: you know what it is with commanders.' The suggestion that he might be unable to restrain his army was reinforced when he warned the committee that if it did not see things his way they would have to have 'a Nigeria without me.' According to a Niamey radio report the following day, General Gowon rejected the resolution put to him by the O.A.U. committee; the main points of this resolution were the establishment of a demilitarized zone and 'an international force which would include neutral observers acceptable to both sides.' Ghana and Cameroun, the broadcast said, had offered shipping facilities for moving relief supplies. Ojukwu arrived in Niamey on 19 July in President Houphet-Boigny's private jet. The Biafran delegation, when it was fully assembled, included Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, the former Nigerian president, Dr. Okpara, former Eastern Nigerian premier, Sir Louis Mbanefo, Dr. Eni Njoku and several other notables; Lagos was not far off in suggesting that the 'entire rebel leadership' had assembled in Niger. At the end of the meeting between Ojukwu and the consltative committee - Gowon had returned to Lagos two days previously - a communique was issued. Two versions appear to be in existence; the one broadcast by Niamey radio read: (1) the Nigerian Federal Military Government and Colonel Ojukwu have agreed to meet immediately in Niamey under the chairmanship of President Diori Hamani in order to begin preliminary talks on a speedy resumption of Nigerian peace negotiations; (2) the Nigerian Federal Military Government and Colonel Ojukwu have agreed to resume as soon as possible peace negotiations in Addis Ababa under the auspices of the O.A.U Consultative Committee on Nigeria.' The version as broadcast by Lagos - and which does not pretend to be a verbatim report - said that the committee had called on both parties to resume peace talks as soon as possible, '... with the objecvtive of preserving Nigeria's territiorial integrity and guaranteeing the security of all its inhabitants.' The committee said, according to this broadcast, that 'it will be in contact with the federal military government, and Ojukwu or his representativs may at any time contact any member government of the committee.' The Lagos version went on to cite two further point of which ther was no mention in the Niamey version, both dealing with relief, and appealing to the two sides to undertake various mesures to alleviate the suffering among war victims. In view of the strong criticism that has been levelled at the Biafran leadership for its intrasigence, and the high praise heaped o General Gowon and his Government for humanitarian concern and magnanimity, it should be stressed that in Niamey Gowon rejected the O.A.U proposals for a partial truce and international policing of relief routes, while Ojukwu was prepared to accept both these proposals. When Ojukwu returned to Biafra, he gave a press conference at which he was asked whether his invitation to the OAU had meant any form of recognition of him. For once Ojukwu was cautious in his reply: 'Let's put it this way. My presence in Niamey for once represents the O.A.U's acceptance that there are two sides to a conflict.' He would not reveal any further details about the forthcoming Addis Ababa peace talk, but said, 'I find myself in a rather simillar situation as after Aburi.' He did not want to say anything in case Lagos started 'interpreting it, and go back to square one..." (302-303) The foregoing provides the clear context of the situation, that it was not Ojukwu, but Gowon who rejected the proposals by which Ojukwu and the Biafran leadership was prepared to abide.The context is clearly established and makes nonsense of Golsdstein's ground for resignation. While the Biafran government was prepared to act without precondition, the Nigerian authorities persistenly insisted on Biafran surrender. It was a deliberate and determined argument made to make certain that the only solution was by a military solution because Lagos knew that the basic grounds on which it made its offer of relief was conditional and unconscionable. It was to disavow the very basic reason why Biafra defended itself in the first place: its sovereignty as a means to the safety, security and dignity of its population. Now, were the Gowon administration acting in good faith, that would be a differet matter. What guaratees could Biafrans have, had Ojukwu surrendered as a condition for food? None. Here is the evidence narrated by John Stremlau in his The International Politics of the Nigerian Civil War how Gowon's cable upturned the agreements reached in May 1968 in kampala between Eni Njoku and Enahoro in which Eni Njoku had in fact "conceded the evntuality of one-Nigeria." As Stremalau notes, "Whereas Enahoro had left acceptance of the twelve-state structure implicit in his propsals, Gowon insisted that before any agreement was reached the rebels must explictly embrace the twelve states. In addition, Gowon stipulated that there would be no question of an interim commission for the rebel-held areas, there would be no recruitment and formation of Ibo units into the federal armed forces, and no elements of the rebel troops or police would be allowed to retain their arms. Gowon's instruction, which did not reach Kampala until shortly after Enahoro had made his presentation, clearly reflected the views of the more hawkish elements in the federal government" (172-173). To put these in summary: (a) Ojukwu did not reject relief, he wanted the security and guarantee of safety for Biafrans. He was in fact willing to accept the O.A.U's proposals (b) Gowon and the Lagos administration manipulated international propaganda, as testified in the versions of the broadcasts of the Niamey agreement to further its own goals of the liquidation of Biafra (c) The federal government was not, in spite of all the efforts made by the Biafrans willing to negotiate peace, they were hell-bent on "surrender" as the only condition for the survival of the Biafran population. If anybody must bear responsbility, it must be those who kept using the talks to elongate the suffering of the civilian population, and clearly this are the 'hawks" who placed the only condition for peace on Biafra's surrender and liquidation. And there, you have it. Obi Nwakanma 4 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Igboid: 11:47pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
“Its (mass starvation) is a legitimate aspect of war (Anthony Enahoro, Nigerian Commissioner for Information at a press conference in New York, July 1968) “Starvation is a weapon of war, and we have every intention of using it against the rebels” (Mr Alison Ayida, Head of Nigerian delegation, Niamey Peace talks, July 1968.) “The Igbos must be considerably reduced in number”, Lagos Policeman quoted in New York Review 21 December, 1967) “Until now efforts to relieve the Biafran people have been thwarted by the desire of the central government to pursue total and unconditional victory and by the fear of the Ibo people that surrender means wholsesale atrocities and genocide. But genocide is what is taking place right now- and starvation is the grim reaper. This is not the time to stand on ceremony, or go through channels or to observe diplomatic niceties. The destruction of an entire people is immoral objective, even in the most moral of wars. It can never be condoned”, (Richard Nixon, during the presidential campaign, September 9, 1968) “All is fair in war, and starvation is one of the weapons of war. I don’t see why we should feed our enemies fat in order for them to fight harder”, (Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Nigerian Minister of Finance, July 28, 1969) 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by horsepower101: 11:54pm On Mar 20, 2018 |
New York Times: They Fled Boko Haram, Only to Be Raped by Nigeria’s Security Forces https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/08/world/africa/boko-haram-nigeria-security-forces-rape.html This is what nigerian military is good at. They also did it to liberian and sierra leonean women. So many reports of rape during their missions in those countries. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Nobody: 12:50am On Mar 21, 2018 |
Throwback: Over the graves in Biafra, like for real? |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by SakuraSimiola: 1:26pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
This is why people hate us. This is why Nigeria does not work. The blockade was civilian genocide. It had nothing to do with the military. These were children who had nothing to do with the politics of grown men. Starving children is WRONG It's wrong in Igbo culture. It's wrong in Hausa culture. It's wrong in Yoruba culture. In 2018 we cannot justify our forefathers starving millions of children and call ourselves civilised. And we wonder why these people hate us. Throwback: 4 Likes |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 1:43pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
SakuraSimiola: They hate Yorubas for many reasons. Firstly you dare to become premier in your own tribal region when an Igboman migrant was also aspiring to the post. You dared to win a war where they wanted to ilegally secede and attempted to invade the SouthWest in a bid to keep the war tied down in Yorubaland, while the aggressors would be enjoying peace in their own region. They love to gloat to other tribes but have realised gloating to the Yorubas is a case of a child boasting to his teacher. If Ojukwu refused to surrender after being defeated with a successful economic blockade, the result is what they suffered, only to later surrender after Ojukwu ran away to preserve his own and his family's cherished life. If Ojukwu refused to accept the land corridor always offered by the Nigerian side as the route to allow food get to Biafra, then the blood of the dead is on the head of Ojukwu. Little wonder he died as an invalid while his contemporaries like Gowon and Obasanjo look fit as ever. If Biafra failed to secure food for its people being already landlocked inside Nigeria as the federal forces had already secured the coastal territories, then that failed republic was only hoping to win the war by mercy and media propaganda, which it did do and failed. Mercy only has its place in war after a surrender, not before. Also a beggar can never dictate terms by which it will receive humanitarian supplies, such that it insisted on the air route so as to stealthily import weapons to ensure the war continued. Of good note is that all that was done as police action to get the illegal Biafra to retrace its step, were the very actions that Azikiwe outlined as punitive measures that will be taken by Nigeria against the North if that region tried to illegally secede from Nigeria, as he had already ensured that secession was not allowed in the constitution. And we wonder why these people reject the very practices, policies, rules, laws and decree they foisted on Nigeria. In 2018 we cannot justify the stupidity of continuing in a war when you are already at the mercy of your enemy, only to surrender eventually. 3 Likes |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 2:01pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
Igboid: Why were you still fighting a war when you were already at the mercy of your enemy? The moment you were encircled by your opponent, common logic should have told you it was time to negotiate a surrender then, rather than capitulate to an unconditional surrender later. Besides I remember it was also Biafran boast then that they would rather have weapons than to have food? Why didn't they chew on the weapons when hunger finally descended? You were ready for war only to cry later that you were not shown mercy. Even the Igbos who were still being accommodated in Lagos, upon hearing that Biafran forces were at MidWest region and approaching the West, were noted to have been rejoicing and boasting to their Yoruba accommodators that Ojukwu will soon bomb Lagos. That is how vile and suicidally senseless a creature you are. 3 Likes |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by uba1991: 2:22pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
gidgiddy:The funny thing u are writing dis trash from Yoruba land. go back to poto poto land so dat we ll knw u ar not a slave 1 Like |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DeeMain(m): 2:27pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
Repeated |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DeeMain(m): 2:47pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
Throwback: Beautiful nonsense. All warped logic and zero heart. You sir is the definition of a seared callous mind. For your information Nnamdi Azikiwe, Ironsi or even the coup plotters' sins do not represent the Igbo nation's sins just like Jonathan's sins did not represent that of the entire Ijaw nation. These people were humans that made mistakes, erred and had weaknesses just like Obafemi Awolowo and the rest of us. Stop equating the wisdom or lack of it and the mistakes of one man or a group of men to that of their whole tribe. It's this sort of tribal stereotype and propaganda that led to the pogrom and the subsequent civil war which we are still on the aftermath till this day. Do well to find your lost humanity young man. Feel. Empathize. Swap places. Use your brain to make the world a better place. 3 Likes |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DejiSantos: 5:29pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
It's sad that you have many of our compatriots. Trying to rationalise the starvation of our children. It's disgusting. Trying to blame it Ojukwu. Kmt. |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by InfiniteLoopx: 5:30pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
Throwback is a devil incarnate. May the experiecne of innocent fallen Biafran children be the portion of his future generation. |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by SakuraSimiola: 9:33pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
Someone is telling you starving children is wrong. And your response is Mercy only has its place in war after a surrender, not before. You see the psychopaths our nation produces? This is the legacy of hatred. Where we hate each other so much we justify the unjustifiable. Throwback: 1 Like |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:39pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
SakuraSimiola: If only Ojukwu cared about his people like you care. Maybe he would have allowed them to have food rather than use them as tools of media propaganda. I repeat, mercy is only expected after a surrender and not before. Anyone who chose to fight a war already expects death as a possible outcome. 1 Like |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:41pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
DeeMain: I cannot feel for a man who hates me and who is gloating. There are no tender feelings in such interactions. 2 Likes |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:46pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
InfiniteLoopx: Are you one of those who gleefully and willfully chose to fight a war and promised destruction, only to lament after an unconditional surrender that they were not shown mercy during the war? What stopped the rebels from negotiating a surrender when they were already blockaded but still posed a threat that could be employed to negotiate a compromise? Why wait till hunger set in, and deliberately cultivated to win a media propaganda that failed? Why wait until all was lost before capitulating to an unconditional surrender? 1 Like |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Guestlander: 9:50pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
Throwback: You capture so much with little words. I doff my hat to you sir. This is the straight up truth about the ibos in Nigeria. 1 Like |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:53pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
DejiSantos: Who should it be blamed on? Were the children starving as Nigerians or was Biafra even attacked after it declared itself a sovereign state? Who dared to venture into the others' territory? Was Ojukwu not the ruler of Biafra who should have the welfare of his followers at heart the moment he realised that Biafra had been strategically and technically defeated since 1968 and not the Jan 1970 that they surrendered without Ojukwu? Yes I blame it on Ojukwu and rather than even surrender, he ran away like a heartless coward to avoid the death he committed others to, both military and civilian. The coward ran away with his well fed and healthy family and also did not forget his favourite car. 1 Like |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:56pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
Guestlander: They are looking for empathy. They want me to have empathy for a tribe that gloats after it has inflicted death and agony on others. I have learnt to be as vile as my enemy. 3 Likes |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by OnyeOGA(m): 10:23pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by CrtlAltDel: 11:01pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
Throwback:Gbam… igbos are the architect of thier present predicament but as usual, they rewrite history and blame yorubas just like they will blame yorubas in future when they want to discuss coward Kanu. 4 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by sharpsecret: 11:57pm On Mar 21, 2018 |
if ur father hav a problem wit a rich man and ur father tried to avoid his troubles and ran wit you and other members of ur family to the next village and the rich man kip comin to fyt ur family to the extent of blockin every means of ur survival..and then ur siblings start dieing cos of hunger.who wud u blame,ur father or the rich man? 2 Likes |
Enugu PDP Hold Rally In Igbo-etiti LG, Nwodo, Itanyi Commend Ugwuanyi, Back PDP / FG To Develop 20 Dams For Hydropower / The Words(hate Message) Of Dir. Nnamdi Kanu(radiobiafra), Explained!!!
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 118 |