Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,217,752 members, 8,035,314 topics. Date: Monday, 23 December 2024 at 09:05 AM

What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? - Religion - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? (11365 Views)

Open Letter To General Overseers And Church Leaders In Nigeria / Why Are All These General Overseers Bringing Their Kids Into Pastoring / Oversea Contacts For Pastors/general Overseers/outreaches(partnership) (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply) (Go Down)

What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 3:31pm On Jul 31, 2010
The Ninety-five Theses at the Castle Church in Wittenberg is widely regarded as the primary catalyst for the Protestant Reformation.

Prior to the start of the Roman catholic church, we have the new testament church where church leaders regard themselves as fellow brothers with all believers. They followed the teachings of Christ who though was Lord made all disciples his brothers and they related to him so. After Constantine's new faith and subsequently the birth of the roman catholic church,members of the new testament church were persecuted especially the Ana baptist members in Switzerland and a new order of church was formed. The roman catholics re-instituted the Levitical order of priesthood which was abolished at the cross and made the office of the pope equivalent to that of the High priest in Judaism. Many roman pagan practice's were also included in order to appease all that lived in the empire at that time; and a state religion was formed headed by the pope and governed by the council of cardinals of which the emperor was a member.

Martin Luther in 1517 protested the spiritual slavery the church had subjected the people and emphasised that "the just shall live by faith." Luther was excommunicated from the Roman Catholic church and every other churches that came out of this are classified protestant Churches or protestsants.

Rome claimed the protestants are wrong and in fact believed they do not have the complete bible. In Nigeria, since the Pentecostal revival in the 70s many churches have been formed from the orthodox churches ( not the Russian or Greek orthodox churches but "old" in this context). Interestingly these churches are governed by General overseers who are following in the role of the Pope. Although many Nigerian Pentecostals have zero tolerance for the Roman Catholic church
The truth is that they believe almost thesame thing as Rome in fact their church administration is patterned after Rome.

They believe the general overseer is the representative of Christ in the church just as Rome believe the Pope is the representative of Christ on earth. They believe the general overseer is infallible ( even though they disagree in profession but agree in principle and in administration) just as Rome believes the Pope is infallible. Most of their members worship the general overseer ( though they disagree in profession but do so in practise) just as Catholics have been accused of worshiping the Pope. They believe the general overseer is the high priest just as Rome believes the Pope is the high priest in principle. They accuse Pope of collecting mass, but "sow" heavily during special anointing programmes with the hope of receiving many blessings in return of the money they had given.

In conclusion these Pentecostal churches have also re-instituted the levitical order of priesthood just as they accuse the Vatican. Jesus is not from the tribe of Levi He is from Judah. The levitical
order died with Christ becoming our only high priest and all believers priests unto the Lord. So paying some tithes to a so called LEVITE or high priest is fraud and unscriptural according to the bible and even the practices of the new testament church. Honour the lord with your substance, give to the need, give to the church according to how you have purposed in your heart not with the mind of giving to God's high priest because Jesus is the high priest

OR

How are these general overseers different from the pope?
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 3:57pm On Jul 31, 2010
Prior to the start of the Roman catholic church, we have the new testament church where church leaders regard themselves as fellow brothers with all believers

Could you please tell me when your so called new testamnet church ended and the RCC were able to subdue it ?Does that not contradict the statement of Jesus that "The gates of hell shall never prevail against his church".

.
After Constantine's new faith and subsequently the birth of the roman catholic church,members of the new testament church were persecuted especially the Ana baptist members in Switzerland and a new order of church was formed
.

The RCC far predated the birth and reign of the Roman Emperor Constantine,The structure of the catholoc church with the bishop of Rome as the leader was already in place centuries before the edict of milan in 3145 CE ,which many people wrongly ascribe to the birth of the RCC.One more error in this your quote was the millenium long gap between the reign of Constantine and the birth of the Anabaptist movement.The Anabaptists arose after the the protestant reformation and more than 1200 years after the death of constantine just do a little bit of history lesson.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabaptist

Martin Luther in 1517 protested the spiritual slavery the church had subjected the people and emphasised that "the just shall live by faith." Luther was excommunicated from the Roman Catholic church and every other churches that came out of this are classified protestant Churches or protestsants.

Though I would concede that there was considerable corruption in the RCC of the renaisssance. Martin Luther himself ws not an angel as he also encouraged genocide of the jews and also committed blasphemy of certain books of the bible for e.g He called the episle of James 'an epistle of straw" just because it said that faith without works is dead.


Rome claimed the protestants are wrong and in fact believed they do not have the complete bible.

It is a fact that protestants go about with incomplete bibles ,since the eighteenth century when the excised seven bookks ffrom the original Bible that was canonised at the Roman catholic synod of Hippo in 393 CE and the council of Carthage in 397 CE.

Rome believes the Pope is infallible.

Papal infallibility does not mean the pope is immune from sin or errors .For more on papal infallibility see the link below
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility


They believe the general overseer is the high priest just as Rome believes the Pope is the high priest in principle.


That is not the teaching of the RCC as Jesus remans the only high priest in the order of melchizedek
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 4:01pm On Jul 31, 2010
After Constantine's new faith and subsequently the birth of the roman catholic church,members of the new testament church were persecuted especially the Ana baptist members in Switzerland and a new order of church was formed

The Roman Catholics and Protestants alike persecuted the Anabaptists, resorted to torture and other types of physical abuse, in attempts to curb the growth of the movement. The Protestants under Zwingli were the first to persecute the Anabaptists. Felix Manz became the first martyr in 1527


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabaptist
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by KunleOshob(m): 4:18pm On Jul 31, 2010
@belabela
Nice and interesting article, very illuminating. Shows how hypocritical those delusional pentecoatals are.
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by lagerwhenindoubt(m): 7:06pm On Jul 31, 2010
One thing though is spiritual representation. Pope is God's vessel on earth; d only Big Cahuna wit d balls to speak to God by-passing Jesus(so say's my catholic priest buddy) and overseers are just temple-priests wit a monster-size ego and a whole lot of expensive italian suits
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 9:11pm On Jul 31, 2010
@ Chukwudi 44
It is clear from your contributions that you never read a peer reviewed article. What Anabaptist was written about in wikipedia? "This article describes the Anabaptists of 16th-century Europe" That was the one of the 16th century a remnant of the new testament church. The new testament church is the church you read in the Bible's new testament called the church and was universal.
It is clear that you are not an historian let alone bible history otherwise you would know that universal church is different from the church in Rome. Sorry mate if wikipedia is your main source of history you are lost!
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Rhino3dm: 10:11pm On Jul 31, 2010
They are all thiefs. While pope is international, the other is local. Thief na thief
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 11:52am On Aug 01, 2010
"This article describes the Anabaptists of 16th-century Europe" That was the one of the 16th century a remnant of the new testament church.

You are seriously dreaming!!!,The anabaptists have nothing whatsoever to do with the new testament church.They never existed before the sixteenth century and I seriously challenge you to produce proof of their existence before the sixteenth century.
Could you please name an anabaptist leader who lived before the sixteenth century?

It is clear that you are not an historian let alone bible history otherwise you would know that universal church is different from the church in Rome. Sorry mate if wikipedia is your main source of history you are lost!

Without sounding immodest I can confidently tell you that I am well grounded in the history of christianity over the last 2000 years .I can tell among the various christians sects that existed over the centuries.

The roman church have existed right bfrom the time of the apostles and this was attested by several of the church fathers privileged to have met the apostles.

St Ignatius of Antioch in 107 CE was the first person to use the term "catholic" to describe the church in his letter to the smyrneans

See that you all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as you would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church.

st Ignatius of anatioch was privileged to hear and learn from the apostles,he never mentioned anabaptists and there is no ancient writing anywhere in history linking the anabaptists to the new testament church.

St Ireneaus of lyons was adisciple of st Polycarp who in turn was a disciple of John,he told us about the sucession of bishops in Rome after the apostles

In 185 CE Irenaeus writes in Adversus Haereses:

When the blessed apostles had founded and built up the Church, they handed over the ministry of the episcopate to Linus. Paul mentions this Linus in his Epistles to Timothy. Anencletus succeeded him. After him Clement received the lot of the episcopate in the third place from the apostles. He had seen the apostles and associated with them, and still had their preaching sounding in his ears and their tradition before his eyes -- and not he alone, for there were many still left in his time who had been taught by the apostles. In this Clement's time no small discord arose among the brethren in Corinth, and the Church in Rome sent a very powerful letter to the Corinthians, leading them to peace, renewing their faith, and declaring the tradition which they had recently received from the apostles, which declared one almighty God, maker of heaven and earth and fashioner of man, who brought out the people from the land of Egypt; who spoke with Moses; who ordained the Law and sent the Prophets; and who has prepared fire for the devil and his angels. Those who care to can learn from this Writing that he was proclaimed by the churches as the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, and so understand the apostolic tradition of the Church, since this Epistle is older than those present false teachers who make up lies about another God above the Demiurge and maker of all things that are. (

http://www.ntcanon.org/Irenaeus.shtml

St Ireneaus was also the one who named the four gospels as the only authentic gospels and told us their authors
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 12:36pm On Aug 01, 2010
Sorry mate if wikipedia is your main source of history you are lost!

wikipedia remains the most reliable online piece of information because it allows everyone to contest any piece of information on it.So my friend if you think you have anythingagainst whatever is in wikipedia you are free and contest it.
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by PastorAIO: 12:40pm On Aug 01, 2010
Anabaptists were a lot of interesting things but there is little about them that I would recognize as being 'authentic' christian:
John of Leiden (Dutch: Jan van Leiden, Jan Beukelsz or Jan Beukelszoon; aka John Bockold or John Bockelson) (1509? – January 22, 1536), was an Anabaptist leader from the Dutch city of Leiden.


Raised in poverty, young John became a charismatic leader who was widely revered by his followers. According to his own testimony, he went to the German city of Münster, arriving in 1533, because he had heard there were inspired preachers there. He sent for Jan Matthys, who had baptized him, to come. After his arrival Matthys – recognized as a prophet – became the principal leader in the city. Following a failed military attempt on Easter Sunday 1534, in which Matthys died, John of Leiden became King of Münster until its fall in June of 1535. The conventional view is that he set up in Münster a polygamous theocracy, best known for a law John passed stating that any unmarried woman must accept the first or any requests for a husband, with the result that men competed to acquire the most wives. Some sources report that John himself took sixteen wives, and that he publicly beheaded one of his wives after she rebelled against his authority. Karl Kautsky however, in his Communism in Central Europe at the Time of the Reformation, notes that this picture of Anabaptist Münster is based almost entirely on accounts written by the Anabaptists' enemies, who sought to justify their bloody reconquest of the city. Kautsky's reading of the sources emphasizes the Anabaptists' emphasis on social equality, political democracy, and communal living during the time of John's nominal rule.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Leiden



The Münster Rebellion was an attempt by radical Anabaptists to establish a communal theocracy in the German city of Münster. The city became an Anabaptist center from 1534 to 1535, and fell under Anabaptist rule for 18 months


After the Peasants' War (1524/25), a second and more determined attempt to establish a theocracy was made at Münster, in Westphalia (1532–1535). Here the group had gained considerable influence, through the adhesion of Bernhard Rothmann, the Lutheran pastor, and several prominent citizens; and the leaders, Jan Matthys (also spelled Matthijs, Mathijsz, Matthyssen, Mathyszoon), a baker of Haarlem, and Jan Bockelson or Beukelszoon, a tailor of Leiden, had little difficulty in obtaining possession of the town and deposing the magistrates. Matthys was a follower of Melchior Hoffman, who, after Hoffman's imprisonment at Strasbourg, obtained a considerable following in the Low Countries, including Bockelson. Bockelson and Gerard Boekbinder had visited Münster, and returned with a report that Bernhard Rothmann was there teaching doctrines similar to their own. Matthys identified Münster as the "New Jerusalem", and on January 5, 1534, a number of his disciples entered the city and introduced adult baptism. Rothmann apparently accepted "rebaptism" that day, and well over 1000 adults were soon baptized. Vigorous preparations were made, not only to hold what had been gained, but to proceed from Münster toward the conquest of the world. The town was being besieged by Franz von Waldeck, its expelled bishop. In April 1534 on Easter Sunday, Matthys, who had prophesied God's judgment to come on the wicked on that day, made a sally with only thirty followers, believing that he was a second Gideon, and was cut off with his entire band. He was killed, his head severed and placed on a pole for all in the city to see, and his genitals nailed to the city gate. Bockelson, better known in history as John of Leiden, was subsequently installed as king.
Claiming to be the successor of David, he claimed royal honours and absolute power in the new "Zion". He justified his actions by the authority of visions from heaven, as others have done in similar circumstances. He legalized polygamy, and himself took sixteen wives. (John is said to have beheaded one wife himself in the marketplace; this act might have been falsely attributed to him after his death.) Community of goods was also established. After obstinate resistance the town was taken by the besiegers on June 24, 1535, and in January 1536 Bockelson and some of his more prominent followers, after being tortured, were executed in the marketplace. Their dead bodies were exhibited in cages, which hung from the steeple of St. Lambert's Church; the cages still hang there, though the bones were removed later.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Münster_Rebellion
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 1:02pm On Aug 01, 2010
It is clear that you are not an historian let alone bible history otherwise you would know that universal church is different from the church in Rome

.Tertullian also writes in the second century CE
: "But if you are near Italy, you have Rome, where authority is at hand for us too. What a happy church that is, on which the apostles poured out their whole doctrine with their blood; where Peter had a passion like that of the Lord, where Paul was crowned with the death of John (the Baptist, by being beheaded)."


Dionysius of Corinth also serves as a late second-century witness to the tradition.[6] He wrote IN 170 CE:

"You (Pope Soter) have also, by your very admonition, brought together the planting that was made by Peter and Paul at Rome and at Corinth; for both of them alike planted in our Corinth and taught us; and both alike, teaching similarly in Italy, suffered martyrdom at the same time".[44]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Peter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dionysius_of_Corinth
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 9:29pm On Aug 01, 2010
While I do not want to push for history lessons. May be Chukwudi44 would need to know that the word "catholic" means universal. The church before Constantine's faith has always been called universal ( or catholic) and every church was being headed by a Bishop. You have the bishop of Rome, bishop of Smyrna ( Polycarp was popular), bishop of Alexandre ( in Egypt) Timothy in the new testament was also a bishop. The catholic church ( universal church not RCC) was controlled by the church council in Jerusalem. All these time Rome was predominantly a pagan community and Christianity ( true Christianity) was not popular. In fact many believers were martyred.
You seemed to be so confused that you thought the Bishop of Rome of the then new testament church is the same as the Bishop of the Roman catholic church. No mate. Roman was added to the catholic church because it became a church used to govern people and represent the vast believes in the old roman empire.

My last word to you Chukwudi44. That you have a text book on human medicine doesn't make you a doctor, that you have a law text book doesn't make you a lawyer and that you have Wikipedia to read doesn't make you an historian. You seemed to be too confused for yourself to handle
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by TheClown: 10:22pm On Aug 01, 2010
@belabela

You are the highly confused person here!
The problem with you and your likes is that you take things at the surface without digging deep. You said the Catholic Church was established by Constantine, can you prove it?
@chukwudi has proven all his points with authorities. Your problem is that you don't go beyond the bible into church history and yet you claim to know a lot. Your case is clearly that of zeal without knowledge. You even said the Pope collects mass! Can you imagine, so mass now is money and is collected by the Pope? And that Constantine, (who's mother converted to Christianity early in life but who stuck with paganism until after the battle of Milvian Bridge, when as the result of the prayers offered by the Church in Rome courtesy his mother, he dreamt on the night before the battle and he saw a flaming cross and a voice addressed him 'by this sign, conquer') established the Catholic Church, dismantling the Church that prayed for him, his mother's Church! Again that the Catholic Church established the Levitical order of priesthood! Where on earth did you get that? The Catholic priesthood is never like the jewish priesthood, it is likened to Melchizedek and not Levi! At ordination, it is said of that 'you are a priest for ever, a priest like Melchizedek of old'.
You obviously don't know much about the Catholic Church beyond what your biased pastors tell you, seek the truth (even when I doubt you would because it is made clear in your arguments that you are swollen with pride would never accept any contrary opinion, even from tested authorities and sources).
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 8:19am On Aug 02, 2010
@ The clown
If the Pope is a priest in the order of Melchizedek then you can as well claim he is Christ ( Read Hebrews 7). May be you would need Theologians to explain certain things to you about Melchizedek ( I am not one I only know what I read and heard from them)
For your other unguided conclusions you can read wikipedia or a book written by a church or another but history is not a one man/way opinion. It is a study of many facts. If only you are a historian you would understand Constantine the great contribution to the structure of The Roman Catholic church and how The church is different from the early church ( new testament church or the other "catholic" church).
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 9:51am On Aug 02, 2010
I
do not want to push for history lessons. May be Chukwudi44 would need to know that the word "catholic" means universal.


who the hell dosen't know that .Isn't it obvious the term catholic was not meant to be used as a denominational term but was only used to distinguisg between the orthodox faith and other heretical sects like the valentinians,marcionites and other gnostic sects that existed in the 2nd,3rd and fourth centuries CE .

The
catholic church ( universal church not RCC) was controlled by the church council in Jerusalem. All these time Rome was predominantly a pagan community and Christianity ( true Christianity) was not popular. In fact many believers were martyred.


Could you please tell me how your own "catholic" church died and How the RCC took over,you just write nonsense without providing any link to substantiate your pack of lies.

The bishop of Rome is regarded as the first among all the bishops simply because,St Peter died as the bishop of Rome.St Peter left Jerusalem during the persecution by herod Agrippa1,he later became the first bishop of antioch before becoming the first bishop of rome.He finally died as the bishop of Rome.

The primacy of the Roman bishop was attested as early as 96 CE,durin the crisis in the corinthian church when the matter taken to clement1,the fourth bishop of Rome to adjudicate upon.Despite the fact that corinth has so many nearby churches around,the matter was still refeered to Rome.

In the 156 CE,Polycarp,the bishop of smyrna,had to travel to Rome to confer with Anicetus 1 over disagreement in the celebratioon of easter.

Around the year 170-180 CE,Ireneaus bishop of lyons had to plead with Pope victor 1,to stop the excommunication of some christians in North africa over thisn same issue of easter celebration.

After the death of James the just and subsequent fall of Jerusalem to the Romans in 70CE,Jerusalem ceased to be amajor christian hub ,as the major churches that thrived were Alexandria,Rome,Antioch and other areas like carthage,ephesus and later Constantinopole
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 9:56am On Aug 02, 2010
seee the links below,if youn have any issue with them you can contest it i wiki[pedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_controversy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistles_of_Clement
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by TheClown: 11:05am On Aug 02, 2010
@belabela

Not just the Pope, every Reverend Father in the Catholic is ordained after the order of Melchizedek. They are supposed to be a guide to the people, for the reason that they given up the world to serve God nothing else, they are to minister to the people like Melchizedek did.
Again, the word 'Pope' is not like an abstract word, it is a Latin word meaning Father (Papa, Poppa). He is the Bishop of Rome and the most senior of all the Bishops in the Catholic Church, thus, the overseer (worldly leader, as you would sure not like the word head) of the Catholic Church.
You said the Catholic was set-up by Constantine, I advise you to take a look at ancient churches like the southern India Mar Thoma Church which received their conversion directly from Saint Thomas, a disciple of Jesus Christ and afterwards got cut-off from the mainstream or was never in direct contact again with Christianity but survived independently among Hindus and Muslims until the Dutch protestants conquered the southern part of India some 1400 yrs after and even then never converted to protestantism as they saw it a wiered form of Christianity. Even after Portuguese Catholics took over the southern India, they never converted to Catholism even when there was virtually no difference between the two but maintained their faith. I also admonish you to take a look at the Coptic church which virtually developed independent of the influence of the Catholic Church. Take a look at these Churches which like the Catholic Church got their roots directly from individual Apostles of Christ and compare them with Catholic Church and you will fundamentally see no difference.
This is an era when every lie told about the Church hold, because people don't know but claim to know too much and their followers take everything hook, line and sinker. Seek knowledge.
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Nobody: 5:34pm On Aug 02, 2010
The catholic church is composed of two parts The latin rite ortherwise known as the roman catholic church and the eastern rite otherwise known as the eastern orthodox church.Both churches seperated in 1054 CE during ,the east west schism.Before that at the council of chalcedon,The church of egypt,ethiopia and armenia which did not agree with the decisions reached at the council had pulled out.

These are the only surviving apostolic churches besides the Roman catholic church,anyone trying to name the anabaptists among the apostolic churches is merely fooling himself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East%E2%80%93West_Schism
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Okijajuju1(m): 12:43pm On Aug 03, 2010
Bookmarked!!
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by okeoghenepeter(m): 1:10pm On Aug 03, 2010
D truth is that the RCC are not worshipping the true God but the queen of heaven. May God deliver their priets from fornication and idolatry
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by cold(m): 1:16pm On Aug 03, 2010
The Cathloic church is nothin but glorified paganism
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by kobikwelu(m): 1:26pm On Aug 03, 2010
MEHNNNN see lectures
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by sayso: 1:32pm On Aug 03, 2010
isn't nairaland a good forum for learning?thanks guys for this piece of scattered information still very educative I may add.
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by zaza1(m): 1:50pm On Aug 03, 2010
why are we all disturbing ourselves with this rubbish that belabela has justwritten, it is such a simple question and we do not even need history lessons to answer it, how are general overseers different from the pope?, the pope is the head of the catholic church, no matter how old or shrouded in history a church is does not make it right or the correct path to heaven, (i will refrain from talking about my reservations about the catholic church), however italso does not mean that every pentecostal church is right and true also, a general overseer is exactly what the name infers, "a person who oversees the ffairs of an organisation and stands as the representative of that organisation", so he stands in gap for the members of his curch when there is a need for it, to the best of my knowledge most pentecostal churches do not play down gthe importance of Jesus and make such a big fuss about Mary, there are so many funny things about the catholic church and sometimes i feel it is on the borderline of paganism,
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Acidosis(m): 1:59pm On Aug 03, 2010
The word 'Pope' and 'Bishop' are meaningless, senseless and nonsensical. Out of the million characters in the Bible we heard of Pastor, Evangelist, Prophet, Teacher and Elders but these words (Pope, Bishop) are no where to be found. It's an occultic slang!
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by cold(m): 2:04pm On Aug 03, 2010
@ zaza,it is not on the borderline of paganism,it is PAGANISM,pure and simple.Don't be too feeble minded to say it as it is.
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by NativeCap: 2:08pm On Aug 03, 2010
@ chukwudi44, The Clown, belabela, apart from belabela’s initial comment which seems slightly screwed, but can be interpreted as his search for understanding, you are all correct on ‘most’ counts. It is obvious that Christianity has evolved, and has been subject to hallucinatory interpretations (as with Thomas, and other Apostles, and the ‘Church’ Old and New) as Man seeks to understand the ways of God/Spirituality and his role/purpose on earth, and also hence this discussion we are having here today.

Christianity is still evolving, and there will be different forms and interpretations, of Christianity in the next 1000 years. Which brings us to the question, what is Man, who was Christ, why are we here, what is Christianity, or is Christianity (or any religion infact) an excuse for Mans self-indulgence and subject to the every whim of Mans unpredictable nature?
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by GoldCircle: 2:25pm On Aug 03, 2010
interesting thread! meanwhile, @acidosis, Is the word 'Bible" in the bible?? How do you explain this??

Food for thought I guess!
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Kx: 2:42pm On Aug 03, 2010
The only difference i can think of is
The pope flies AirItalia while most G.O's flies private jets.
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by Acidosis(m): 2:45pm On Aug 03, 2010
^^am still laughing ooo
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by onyengbu1(m): 2:53pm On Aug 03, 2010
GoldCircle:

interesting thread! meanwhile, @acidosis, Is the word 'Bible" in the bible?? How do you explain this??

Food for thought I guess!
How I wish he will answer this. grin grin <<< is it in the bible >>>

Kx:

The only difference i can think of is
The pope flies AirItalia while most G.O's flies private jets.

But Rev. King is an Overseer naa. He doesnt fly private jet. He is in Kirikiri.
Re: What Is The Difference Between General Overseers And The Pope? by proudly9ja(m): 3:00pm On Aug 03, 2010
Native_Cap:



Christianity is still evolving, and there will be different forms and interpretations, of Christianity in the next 1000 years. Which brings us to the question, what is Man, who was Christ, why are we here, what is Christianity, or is Christianity (or any religion infact) an excuse for Mans self-indulgence and subject to the every whim of Mans unpredictable nature?


Even God Himself does not impose himself on man. He tells us to 'test every spirit' and when we think we have all knowledge, The One who knows all things says 'come let us reason together'.

It is the way man thinks and acts that is the problem. We try to impose our gods on others (whether christian, muslim, protestant, etc) when truly all we should be doing is to work on our relationship with this God.


My tots

(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply)

Pastor Chris Oyakhilome Says The Bible Does Not Say Anything About Tattoos False / Did Mary Give Birth To Other Children Aside Jesus Christ? / Jw.org: 100 Years Of Failed Prophecies.

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 104
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.