The Independent National Electoral Commission on Thursday insisted that it had no electronic server being sought to be accessed and inspected by the Peoples Democratic Party and its presidential candidate in the February 23, 2019 presidential election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.

The commission had earlier denied the existence of such server in its reply filed on April 10, 2019 to oppose Atiku and PDP’s petition pending before the five-man tribunal.

The petitioners are by their petition challenging the victory of President Muhammadu Buhari and his All Progressives Congress at the last presidential election.

INEC, Buhari and the APC who are the respondents to the petition and to the petitioners’ application for access to the server used for the election, on Thursday, asked the Justice Mohammed Garba-led panel to dismiss the petitioners’ request.

The three respondents, through their respective counsels, reminded the tribunal that the Court of Appeal had, on May 6, 2019 (before the petition was filed on May 18), dismissed a similar application filed by the petitioners.

Represented at the Thursday’s proceedings by its lead counsel, Mr. Yunus Usman (SAN), INEC said the application by the petitioners amounted to asking the commission to produce what it did not have.

Urging the tribunal to dismiss the application, Usman said, “We attached as Exhibit 1, the enrolled order of this honourable court made on May 6, 2019 refusing all the prayers of the petitioners in this application.

“They said we should bring what we don’t have.”

INEC had declared Buhari and APC the winner of the February 23 election.

It said Buhari polled 15,191,847 votes to defeat his closest rival, Atiku, who polled 11,262,978 votes.

But Atiku and the PDP, in their petition filed on March 18 challenging the outcome of the poll, contended that “from the data” obtained from INEC’s server, “the true, actual and correct results” showed that they polled a total of 18,356,732 votes to defeat Buhari whom they said scored 16,741,430 votes.

By calculation, Atiku and PDP claimed to have defeated Buhari by 1,615,302 votes.

The petitioners, through their lead counsel, Dr. Livy Ozoukwu, subsequently filed an application on May 8, 2019, seeking an order of the tribunal permitting them to access and inspect the INEC’s server into which results and other data were allegedly transmitted during the February 23 poll.

A senior member of the petitioners’ legal team, Chief Chris Uche (SAN), moved the application on Thursday.
Uche urged the tribunal to grant the application in the interest of justice, transparency and neutrality, saying it was necessary for his team to be able to maintain the petition.

He said, “The application in summary asks for access to and inspection of the server of the INEC and the smart card readers used in the conduct of the presidential election.

“We have addressed the issues in our counter-affidavit, written address and reply on points of law and we urge your lordships that the application be granted as prayed in the interest of justice, transparency and neutrality.

“The application is necessary for the maintenance of this petition.”

Reacting first, INEC’s lead counsel, Usman, referred the tribunal to his client’s counter-affidavit filed on May 23 in opposition to the application.

He added that the Court of Appeal having earlier refused similar application, same should not be granted again.

The leader of Buhari’s legal team, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), also urged the tribunal to dismiss the application.

https://punchng.com/atiku-pdp-asking-us-for-server-that-we-dont-have-inec-tells-tribunal/amp/

Las Las, Atiku might finally come

Lol, constitutionally there's no server

stop decieving yourselves inec,we nigerians know that the election was rigged.......

..
Something is fishy.
INEC is making itself look very suspicious

Where was all the various results transmitted from polling units going to?
.

What a country!

RealLordZeus:
Lol, constitutionally there's no server

Go educate yourself Sir

The electoral act gives legal backing to INEC guidline

electronic transmission of results is in INEC guidline and is recognised by law as far as 2019 election is concerned


Prof Yakubu should be cross-examined under oath! Then INEC will get serious

Let Yakubu come and deny there was not Server nor electronic transmission of results

He will then have to explain to the court why his budget to NASS included the use of electronic transmission, why his training materials for INEC staff included this and why days to election INEC press conference confirmed that electronic transmission will be used.

If Buhari and Yakubu wants to destroy Nigeria let them mess with this case then they will see mutiny within the Army and coup de tat supported by the masses

richmind2019:
stop decieving yourselves inec,we nigerians know that the election was rigged.......

Yes , the election was rigged at Upper Iweka/ Ochanja market

krendo:


Go educate yourself Sir

The electoral act gives legal backing to INEC guidline

electronic transmission of results is in INEC guidline and is recognised by law as far as 2019 election is concerned


Prof Yakubu should be cross-examined under oath! Then INEC will get serious

Let Yakubu come and deny there was not Server nor electronic transmission of results

He will then have to explain to the court why his budget to NASS included the use of electronic transmission, why his training materials for INEC staff included this and why days to election INEC press conference confirmed that electronic transmission will be used.

If Buhari and Yakubu wants to destroy Nigeria let them mess with this case then they will see mutiny within the Army and coup de tat supported by the masses

The guideline u r referring to is the training instructions being given to Electoral officers but not yet stipulated in the Electoral laws, please be informed

RealLordZeus:

The guideline u r referring to is the training instructions being given to Electoral officers but not yet stipulated in the Electoral laws, please be informed

Trained with guideline that will not be implemented..... Right?

They trained them in advance so that when electronic voting will be passed as INEC law, they will be called back to come and apply the training.