AmKen:
Please is this still paying?

I want to apply.

Guuuuuyyyyyy!


I go whoop you

GentRoyal:

Shey you dey whyn me ni?

Lol!!!

I have not been seeing questions to answer for close to 2 weeks now

barackodam:



Guuuuuyyyyyy!


I go whoop you

You guys have not been allowing me to see any questions to answer.

Let me reapply.

GentRoyal:


.....In the upcoming weeks, we will be performing a series of audits and if we encounter either answers that do not meet the required standards or plagiarized information, regardless of how big or small, we will be forced to take the regrettable step of terminating your account....
I wish each and everyone of us, the best.

I think people that would be bothered are those who submit subquality answers.


Despite haven't been rated, despite not looking forward to being rated, despite wanting not to be rated. I have never knowingly submitted subquality answer, or plagiarized answer.

I keep having this, dem fit review me this week feeling. I really don't want to answer 20, then get paid for 10.

So while I don't want to be rated, I'm pretty positive if I'm rated I would still get, maybe not 100, but over 85%, ceteris paribus

AmKen:


You guys have not been allowing me to see any questions to answer.

Let me reapply.

Hahahahahahahaha


Dem don get my guy.

Stop over sleeping

AududuNine11:


WRONG

I am not sure there is any tutor who started answering around Jan that they don't review their answers, week in, week out. Except such a tutor answered relatively very few questions for that week, like, maybe less than 20.

Even with the total of 26 questions I answered, according to the last report, I still had 3 of my answers reviewed. Sometimes, they do review more than 20% of my total questions answered in a week.

I'm really amazed why you guys think regular weekly reviewing of a sample of every tutor's answers seem odd to you guys.

No wonder why I don't get to see discussion about mods reviews... The last time someone talked about his answers being reviewed, it was GentRoyal.

In week 16 or so, that was how 2 of my answers were rated 3. One for wrong units(I spent close to an hour on this), the other for "not enough explanation". The latter has more than 1000 characters.

That mod has an evil spirit sha

barackodam:


I think people that would be bothered are those who submit subquality answers.


Despite haven't been rated, despite not looking forward to being rated, despite wanting not to be rated. I have never knowingly submitted subquality answer, or plagiarized answer.

I keep having this, dem fit review me this week feeling. I really don't want to answer 20, then get paid for 10.

So while I don't want to be rated, I'm pretty positive if I'm rated I would still get, maybe not 100, but over 85%, ceteris paribus

..

Who still remembered when Cake played us all?

That guy is weirdly talented.

Ent3rpreneur:

What subjects are your specialty



Na village people. That one na special case.











Ermmmm bosses, someone (mistakenly) posted a question twice. I just finished answering the first one then saw the second one, thought it was an error, i answered but answered differently. Is this valid?

Biology and Social studies.

How you take understand that question wey you post so?

How you take read the passage?

barackodam:


I think people that would be bothered are those who submit subquality answers.


Despite haven't been rated, despite not looking forward to being rated, despite wanting not to be rated. I have never knowingly submitted subquality answer, or plagiarized answer.

I keep having this, dem fit review me this week feeling. I really don't want to answer 20, then get paid for 10.

So while I don't want to be rated, I'm pretty positive if I'm rated I would still get, maybe not 100, but over 85%, ceteris paribus

We're pretty much saying the same thing

chrisnando:


In week 16 or so, that was how 2 of my answers were rated 3. One for wrong units(I spent close to an hour on this), the other for "not enough explanation". The latter has more than 1000 characters.

That mod has an evil spirit sha

Those people no get joy

chrisnando:


In week 16 or so, that was how 2 of my answers were rated 3. One for wrong units(I spent close to an hour on this), the other for "not enough explanation". The latter has more than 1000 characters.

That mod has an evil spirit sha

Here's what I was referring to.

You can submit a correct answer and still get a 3/5

barackodam:



Here's what I was referring to.

You can submit a correct answer and still get a 3/5

The mods are human; they make mistakes
I've had a right answer rated as 2 before..
All you need to do is to make use of the contact form if you feel your answer is wrongly rated.
They'll take corrections if truly it's wrongly rated.

barackodam:



Here's what I was referring to.

You can submit a correct answer and still get a 3/5

Yeah, I also feel if you answer physics, maths or engineering, you're not spared from weekly reviews.

GentRoyal:

Those people no get joy

Honestly.

That week I got 66%, although that was the only week I got less than 100% last month.

GentRoyal:


12 out of 33 answers were still reviewed..... E shock me.
I'm convinced that if I answered just 1 question in a week, it'll be reviewed..
-------------------
.

Lol...


I remember I mentioned something about a formal warning mail that was issued to one of my friends... I also mentioned something related to a separate team that has been set aside for checking plagiarism even after weekly report has been sent...

moreb2cum:

I think review depends on your major subjects. There are some subjects with fewer quality assurance peeps.
Compare the time it'll take to review 10 engineering questions to 10 English questions

Lol... this is not totally true... It doesn't depend on your major subjects...

I once answered only 1 computer question plus other questions from other subjects, lo and behold, they rated that single computer question I answered...

AmKen:
Please is this still paying?

I want to apply.

Lol..

DanRay1:
Biology and Social studies.

How you take understand that question wey you post so?

How you take read the passage?

Oh, na why we never jam.

I found the passage on CommonLit.

barackodam:


I think people that would be bothered are those who submit subquality answers.


Despite haven't been rated, despite not looking forward to being rated, despite wanting not to be rated. I have never knowingly submitted subquality answer, or plagiarized answer.

I keep having this, dem fit review me this week feeling. I really don't want to answer 20, then get paid for 10.

So while I don't want to be rated, I'm pretty positive if I'm rated I would still get, maybe not 100, but over 85%, ceteris paribus

Sometimes, I go wan gamble some questions like this, one mind would just tell me, "bros, respect yourself, waka pass"

barackodam:



Hahahahahahahaha


Dem don get my guy.

Stop over sleeping

No mind AmKen o... The guy sabi whyne

AududuNine11:
No mind AmKen o... The guy sabi whyne

chrisnando:


In week 16 or so, that was how 2 of my answers were rated 3. One for wrong units(I spent close to an hour on this), the other for "not enough explanation". The latter has more than 1000 characters.

That mod has an evil spirit sha

Last month, I think about 2 or 3 of my answers on several occasions were rated 3 without any reason given. After checking the answer I gavce and was sure I explained enough, I had to send a msg to them on each occasion for them to review again. When the monthly report came out for last month, my quality score was 100%. If you are sure you gave a well explained answer, send them a msg immediately. That's, if you are sure o.

AududuNine11:
Last month, I think about 2 or 3 of my answers on several occasions were rated 3 without any reason given. After checking the answer I gavce and was sure I explained enough, I had to send a msg to them on each occasion for them to review again. When the monthly report came out for last month, my quality score was 100%. If you are sure you gave a well explained answer, send them a msg immediately. That's, if you are sure o.

I'm very sure of those answers, especially the one tagged "wrong units". By our standards here, those units are correct.

That was for last month though.

AmKen:
Who still remembered when Cake played us all?

That guy is weirdly talented.

people dey use their talent better their lives and the lives of others, that one is busy constituting nuisance upandan being just plain stupid. How can someone be so talented to the extent of saying I am seun? He's so talented that he still hasn't figured out I got his account number Anytime the psychopath mentions me on one of his mumu threads where he shares his delusional conspiracy theory on nairaland, I will just be laffin esp each time he makes mention of how I might have gotten his account details...

DanRay1:
Biology and Social studies.

How you take understand that question wey you post so?

How you take read the passage?

You have asked a valid question... coz the kind English questions I dey see ehn, e dey weak local man

GentRoyal:

The mods are human; they make mistakes
I've had a right answer rated as 2 before..
All you need to do is to make use of the contact form if you feel your answer is wrongly rated.
They'll take corrections if truly it's wrongly rated.

exactly

chrisnando:


I'm very sure of those answers, especially the one tagged "wrong units". By our standards here, those units are correct.

That was for last month though.

ok

Ent3rpreneur:


Oh, na why we never jam.

I found the passage on CommonLit.

O boy eh! You dey try o

AududuNine11:
You have asked a valid question... coz the kind English questions I dey see ehn, e dey weak local man

Mehn na so so invisible books and passages dem dey refer to. How me wan take answer when I never read am?

DanRay1:
Mehn na so so invisible books and passages dem dey refer to. How me wan take answer when I never read am?

Most time them Dey include title of the books