I always ask myself this question.if Wales and Scotland are still struggling to be independent from Britain do you think an Africa state Like Nigeria is not in the same state as Scotland and Wales?sometimes I ask myself why Britain took the biafran war so serious giving Nigeria all the military and financial support It needed to win that war I believe there is something behind the scene we are not yet aware of God help us.

Goodmarlian:
I always ask myself this question.if Wales and Scotland are still struggling to be independent from Britain do you think an Africa state Like Nigeria is not in the same state as Scotland and Wales?sometimes I ask myself why Britain took the biafran war so serious giving Nigeria all the military and financial support It needed to win that war I believe there is something behind the scene we are not yet aware of God help us.

1.We are independent from the UK,,,,the UK does not determine any aspect of our lives.

One crucial way we are independent from the UK...the final courts of appeal in Nigeria is the Supreme Court, not the Privy Council in the UK.

2.The Nigerian Civil war .....the UK and the Soviet Union supported Nigeria,....while Biafra was backed by the French, some African nations, etc. But the fighting was done by Nigerians and Biafrans. Very few foreign troops.

Also, both sides paid for their weapons with money. The UK and the Soviets did not up and dash us cash. Likewise France for Biafra.

Nigeria is owned by Jewish bankers.

She is part of the ZOG.

Babangida took us to OIC for that reason

kikero:



2.The Nigerian Civil war .....the UK and the Soviet Union supported Nigeria,....while Biafra was backed by the French, some African nations, etc. But the fighting was done by Nigerians and Biafrans. Very few foreign troops.

And both the UK and Soviet Union where solidly in the vice grip of Zionist Jews.

The Zionist, Henry Kissinger was the one who ensured the US (a Zionist colony) remain neutral.

But it didn't matter whom the Zionists backed as both warring parties where filled to the brim with Marxist idiots. The Biafrans were the idiots though for thinking the Globalist Jews will back a Christian Ethnostate.

That is why Nnamdi Kanu is spreading antichristian propaganda and getting more and more Biastards to renounce Christianity for Judaism which eventually will make communists out of the Igbo population as you can't be a Jew and not be a Communist.

TheDevilIsALai:


And both the UK and Soviet Union where solidly in the vice grip of Zionist Jews.

The Zionist, Henry Kissinger was the one who ensured the US (a Zionist colony) remain neutral.

But it didn't matter whom the Zionists backed as both warring parties where filled to the brim with Marxist idiots. The Biafrans were the idiots though for thinking the Globalist Jews will back a Christian Ethnostate.

That is why Nnamdi Kanu is spreading antichristian propaganda and getting more and more Biastards to renounce Christianity for Judaism which eventually will make communists out of the Igbo population as you can't be a Jew and not be a Communist.

Well, the US was neutral...(plus they had their hands full with Vietnam, and the last thing they needed was another war)...but somewhat sympatheitc to Biafra.

The Soviets were not neccesarily pro-Zionist. They fell out with the new State of Israel shortly after it was established, and by the 1960's were jailing pro-Zionist jews...plus they also started backing the Arab side vs the Jews (reached its height in the 1973 Yom Kippur war, where Soviets were shipping weapons to the Arab countries by the ton).

Communism in Africa failed , and will fail (It was tried in Benin, Congo PR, Somalia, Ethioopia and Angola. Did not work. Tanzania tried Socialism, and after 20 years, Nyerere was apologising to his people for making that mistake). Plus, the US won the cold war. China is a communist country in name only.

As for Biafra failing...Biafra failed because of two events in 1967

1.The failure of the war aims of invading the Midwest....had the Biafran Army succesfully invaded Lagos as planned, they could have made things difficult for the Nigerian Army.

2.The Nigerian Navy successfully blockading Biafra ...making it difficult for the nation to recieve weapons . Also, the inability of the Biafrans to gain control of oil incomes from oil under their control...and then the fall of Port Harcourt in 68. After that, it was a matter of time.

kikero:


Well, the US was neutral...(plus they had their hands full with Vietnam, and the last thing they needed was another war)...but somewhat sympatheitc to Biafra.

The Soviets were not neccesarily pro-Zionist. They fell out with the new State of Israel shortly after it was established, and by the 1960's were jailing pro-Zionist jews...plus they also started backing the Arab side vs the Jews (reached its height in the 1973 Yom Kippur war, where Soviets were shipping weapons to the Arab countries by the ton).

Communism in Africa failed , and will fail (It was tried in Benin, Congo PR, Somalia, Ethioopia and Angola. Did not work. Tanzania tried Socialism, and after 20 years, Nyerere was apologising to his people for making that mistake). Plus, the US won the cold war. China is a communist country in name only.

The US had diplomatic weight to throw around. If the US had backed Biafra, Britain would have backed off and the Soviet kikes would have been told to back down. Even the Nigerians won't dare advance an inch against Biafra.

The CIA painted a picture of Ojukwu and Biafran heirachy as Marxist which was true. Ojukwu was a Fidel Castro wannabe down to the beard. CIA simply labelled the rebels as Marxist and LBJ refused to recognise Biafra. Also at the time, the 6-day war which the Americans backed was straining relations with Arab and Muslim countries in the middle East. If the US was to back another non-muslim state against a Muslim controlled state it would have sent a bad message to the Arabs who at the time where gravitating towards the Soviets.

TheDevilIsALai:


And both the UK and Soviet Union where solidly in the vice grip of Zionist Jews.

The Zionist, Henry Kissinger was the one who ensured the US (a Zionist colony) remain neutral.

But it didn't matter whom the Zionists backed as both warring parties where filled to the brim with Marxist idiots. The Biafrans were the idiots though for thinking the Globalist Jews will back a Christian Ethnostate.

That is why Nnamdi Kanu is spreading antichristian propaganda and getting more and more Biastards to renounce Christianity for Judaism which eventually will make communists out of the Igbo population as you can't be a Jew and not be a Communist.

But the Jews supported South Sudan and are supporting Ibos for Biafra. Kanu's father was buried as Christian while Israel itself is Democratic contrary to your claim. I feel instead that investing in conspiracy theory that encourages us to find comfort in a failed Nigeria, we yorubas must do serious soul searching to know why we are the only ethnic group that take pride in the current condition of Nigeria to the extent that we are opposing the freedom of others.

TheDevilIsALai:


The US had diplomatic weight to throw around. If the US had backed Biafra, Britain would have backed off and the Soviet kikes would have been told to back down. Even the Nigerians won't dare advance an inch against Biafra.

The CIA painted a picture of Ojukwu and Biafran heirachy as Marxist which was true. Ojukwu was a Fidel Castro wannabe down to the beard. CIA simply labelled the rebels as Marxist and LBJ refused to recognise Biafra. Also at the time, the 6-day war which the Americans backed was straining relations with Arab and Muslim countries in the middle East. If the US was to back another non-muslim state against a Muslim controlled state it would have sent a bad message to the Arabs who at the time where gravitating towards the Soviets.

Plus, the US was in Vietnam.....and Nam was taking a lot of their attention. And since Nigeria and Biafra were not neccesarily anti-US (Sure Ojukwu went full Fidel...in 1968 with the Ahihara declaration...just to whip up enthusiasim locally. Did not work. Mobutu used a lot of 'leftist' language, and he was a good pal of the US too...).

I doubt the Soviets would have listened to the US to back down over Biafra...and that also includes the UK. (Plus, the UK supporting Nigeria is a good counterbalance to Soviet influence in Nigeria). This was the same Soviet Union that was openly arming the Viet Cong and the NVA against the US army in Vietnam, and the US could do nothing.

Nigeria was and isn't a 'Muslim controlled state. The Nigerian Army was majority Christian (60% by 1967, even after the Ibo exodus), Gowon was a Christian and a devout one at that. Muslim Nigeria fighing against christian Bafra was a product of Biafran propaganda.

kikero:


Well, the US was neutral...(plus they had their hands full with Vietnam, and the last thing they needed was another war)...but somewhat sympatheitc to Biafra.

The Soviets were not neccesarily pro-Zionist. They fell out with the new State of Israel shortly after it was established, and by the 1960's were jailing pro-Zionist jews...plus they also started backing the Arab side vs the Jews (reached its height in the 1973 Yom Kippur war, where Soviets were shipping weapons to the Arab countries by the ton).

Communism in Africa failed , and will fail (It was tried in Benin, Congo PR, Somalia, Ethioopia and Angola. Did not work. Tanzania tried Socialism, and after 20 years, Nyerere was apologising to his people for making that mistake). Plus, the US won the cold war. China is a communist country in name only.

As for Biafra failing...Biafra failed because of two events in 1967

1.The failure of the war aims of invading the Midwest....had the Biafran Army succesfully invaded Lagos as planned, they could have made things difficult for the Nigerian Army.

2.The Nigerian Navy successfully blockading Biafra ...making it difficult for the nation to recieve weapons . Also, the inability of the Biafrans to gain control of oil incomes from oil under their control...and then the fall of Port Harcourt in 68. After that, it was a matter of time.

Not true. Russian Jews formed the majority of migrants to Israel from the 60's up till the 80's.

Antisemitism was still criminalised in the Soviet Union.

There were more flights from Moscow and Kiev into Telaviv than from Brooklyn and Amsterdam.

The Soviet Union never interfered in middle East affairs involving Israel and only formed alliances with the biggest opposers of Zionism in the region to act as a form of controlled opposition or mediating agents.

Soviet Union was kikeland up till Putin got into power. The kikes stripped Russia bare during the Yeltsin years after the fall of communism in the name of privatization. Many a lice ridden kike became billioniares over night and fled with their loot to London where they live under the protection of Lord Rothschild - the real King of England and Europe.

kikero

Nigeria was and isn't a 'Muslim controlled state. The Nigerian Army was majority Christian (60% by 1967, even after the Ibo exodus), Gowon was a Christian and a devout one at that. Muslim Nigeria fighing against christian Bafra was a product of Biafran propaganda.

this is a big lie.

Noneroone:
kikero this is a big lie.

Were you forced to become a Muslim?

Are your kids forced to become Muslims?

Was the South east forced to convert to Islam at the end of the civil war?

Even now, the population of Christians may be more than that of Muslims in this country by a slight margin.

kikero:


Were you forced to become a Muslim?

Are your kids forced to become Muslims?

Was the South east forced to convert to Islam at the end of the civil war?

Even now, the population of Christians may be more than that of Muslims in this country by a slight margin.

you claim Nigeria isn't "Muslim controlled" isn't it? so let's stay on that.

Noneroone:
you claim Nigeria isn't "Muslim controlled" isn't it?

It isn't.

The political elite is made up of Muslims and Christians.

The civil service is made up of Muslims and Christians

Sharia law does not apply all over the country, and even in places where it applies it's not that seriously enforced.

Plus the reason why Buhari wins is because the potential opposition to him is divided.

And because we are a resource dependent economy, job creation is stifled, which means that competition for jobs in the civil service is tight, which leads to accusations of bias. If our economy was industrial, that won't be happening

Ooni:
But the Jews supported South Sudan and are supporting Ibos for Biafra. Kanu's father was buried as Christian while Israel itself is Democratic contrary to your claim. I feel instead that investing in conspiracy theory that encourages us to find comfort in a failed Nigeria, we yorubas must do serious soul searching to know why we are the only ethnic group that take pride in the current condition of Nigeria to the extent that we are opposing the freedom of others.

I am an adherent supporter of Nigeria's balkanization as I see Nigeria as pre runner to the incoming Zionist world order where the Fulani stands in place of the Jew in a multicultural cesspit experiment.

I have written of how the Fulani employs Jewish trickery in land and power grabbing citing nepotism and ruga kubitz model of land grabbing.

I have no problem with igbos having their own national space only thing I am pointing out is Igbo insicerity in wanting a separate state while clinging on the rest of Nigeria - it shows their parasitic nature. I am also telling the Igbos on their failure in 1966 and how they are stupidly repeating same thinking they can achieve anything with the Jew backing where it is clear the Jews only used them to usher in a quasi Marxist state. I am also pointing out the fraud Kanu who is steering them off the path of nationalism towards a more dangerous Jewish internationalism in their blind embrace of Zionism.

Don't get me wrong I sided with these biafrans until Kanu went full kosher and that to me is absolutely Haram.

kikero:


It isn't.

The political elite is made up of Muslims and Christians.

The civil service is made up of Muslims and Christians

Sharia law does not apply all over the country, and even in places where it applies it's not that seriously enforced.

Plus the reason why Buhari wins is because the potential opposition to him is divided.

And because we are a resource dependent economy, job creation is stifled, which means that competition for jobs in the civil service is tight, which leads to accusations of bias. If our economy was industrial, that won't be happening

Who controls the executive, legislature, judiciary, military and police? Muslims or Christians? answer me.

The only time we had a break from the fulani Muslim oligarchs was Jonathan era and we all saw how terrorism was employed by them to frustrate him.

Noneroone:
Who controls the executive, legislature, judiciary, military and police? Muslims or Christians? answer me.

The only time we had a break from the fulani Muslim oligarchs was Jonathan era and we all saw how terrorism was employed by them to frustrate him.

Well, the same terrorism is frustrating Buhari and frustrated Yaradua beforehand.

And the South too has its own long list of security issues.

The problem is job scarcity exacerbated by an import dependent economy which stifles job creation and makes education unattractive. More idle youths, food for Boko

kikero:


Well, the same terrorism is frustrating Buhari and frustrated Yaradua beforehand.

And the South too has its own long list of security issues.

The problem is job scarcity exacerbated by an import dependent economy which stifles job creation and makes education unattractive. More idle youths, food for Boko

you didn't answer my first questions.

Nigeria is a british company

TheDevilIsALai:


And both the UK and Soviet Union where solidly in the vice grip of Zionist Jews.

The Zionist, Henry Kissinger was the one who ensured the US (a Zionist colony) remain neutral.

But it didn't matter whom the Zionists backed as both warring parties where filled to the brim with Marxist idiots. The Biafrans were the idiots though for thinking the Globalist Jews will back a Christian Ethnostate.

That is why Nnamdi Kanu is spreading antichristian propaganda and getting more and more Biastards to renounce Christianity for Judaism which eventually will make communists out of the Igbo population as you can't be a Jew and not be a Communist.

Oga,. I just dy observe you and your Jewish communism propaganda.. If Israel today is not a communist state, then why not close that mouth.