vixpal:



https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/529334-supreme-court-rejects-gop-bid-to-nullify-biden-win-in-pennsylvania

Johnnyessence:


Rushing To Judgement And Media Gaslighitng.
Guys, do not let the mainstream media gaslight you concerning
the SCOTUS case filed by some Republicans in Pennsylvania.
Note that this is separate from the one filed by Texas now
joined by other States (more on that later).
The media is now GASLIGHTING people that the SCOTUS has
thrown out the case of these Republicans. They are
desperately doing their best to dampen the spirit of
Republicans.
That is simply not true. The case is still alive and well before
SCOTUS.
Yes, the SCOTUS has DENIED a big ask made by the
Republicans to "overturn" the election result in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The Apex Court denied the "emergency injunctive relief"
because it was too radical and would be unprecedented for a
Court to "overturn" the result of an election. But you need to
know that the substantive case is STILL PENDING before the
Court because it has not been heard on the merit.
The injunctive relief was denied by Justice Alito (and not by
the Full Court). Justice Alito denied the injunctive relief to
pave way for a determination of the case on the merit.
See photos 1 and 2 attached below.
Photo 2 is the injunctive relief denied.
In other words, for emphasis, the substantive case has not
been thrown out. Senator Ted Crus will still get to argue before
SCOTUS.
See this link to show that it is still on the Court's schedule;
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=
%2Fdocket%2Fdocketfiles%2Fhtml%2Fpublic%2F20a98.html
Interestingly, the Republican Plaintiffs in their Appeal have
also asked the SCOTUS to ADVISE THEM ON OTHER RELIEFS
THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE TO THEM.
That general prayer or ask is what we should watch out for.
What reliefs would the SCOTUS be willing to grant if their case
succeeds on the merit?
SCOTUS could rule that the case succeeds on the merit and
then restore power to appoint Pennsylvania Electors back to
the Pennsylvania Legislature as per the US Constitution under
the Electors Clause instead of the Pennsylvania Secretary of
State.
Guys, this case is not over!
Immediately the news broke that SCOTUS has thrown out the
case in its entirety, I knew something wasn't right.
Why would SCOTUS accept to hear the case on the merit,
docket it and then dismiss it without a hearing?
It just didn't make any sense.
It didn't make sense because it never happened.
The case is still pending. The Court merely denied one radical
injunctive relief preliminarily. Period.
More information to come on the new States that joined Texas
in their lawsuit at the SCOTUS.

sandland:
After the safe harbor day, Dec. 8th, no court in Us can overturn a certified result.

Johnnyessence:
The US Supreme Court has just accepted and will hear the
lawsuit that the State of Texas is taking against Pennsylvania,
Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for electoral fraud !!
GREAT DAY !!

juman:


The election was 100 percent transparent, but trump reduced america to his level.
Trump is agbero, he live as tout all his life.
Somebody that declared bankruptcy six times.

Trump never cared about the image of the country.
Any of our bad african president is better than trump.

Johnnyessence:


Rushing To Judgement And Media Gaslighitng.
Guys, do not let the mainstream media gaslight you concerning
the SCOTUS case filed by some Republicans in Pennsylvania.
Note that this is separate from the one filed by Texas now
joined by other States (more on that later).
The media is now GASLIGHTING people that the SCOTUS has
thrown out the case of these Republicans. They are
desperately doing their best to dampen the spirit of
Republicans.
That is simply not true. The case is still alive and well before
SCOTUS.
Yes, the SCOTUS has DENIED a big ask made by the
Republicans to "overturn" the election result in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The Apex Court denied the "emergency injunctive relief"
because it was too radical and would be unprecedented for a
Court to "overturn" the result of an election. But you need to
know that the substantive case is STILL PENDING before the
Court because it has not been heard on the merit.
The injunctive relief was denied by Justice Alito (and not by
the Full Court). Justice Alito denied the injunctive relief to
pave way for a determination of the case on the merit.
See photos 1 and 2 attached below.
Photo 2 is the injunctive relief denied.
In other words, for emphasis, the substantive case has not
been thrown out. Senator Ted Crus will still get to argue before
SCOTUS.
See this link to show that it is still on the Court's schedule;
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=
%2Fdocket%2Fdocketfiles%2Fhtml%2Fpublic%2F20a98.html
Interestingly, the Republican Plaintiffs in their Appeal have
also asked the SCOTUS to ADVISE THEM ON OTHER RELIEFS
THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE TO THEM.
That general prayer or ask is what we should watch out for.
What reliefs would the SCOTUS be willing to grant if their case
succeeds on the merit?
SCOTUS could rule that the case succeeds on the merit and
then restore power to appoint Pennsylvania Electors back to
the Pennsylvania Legislature as per the US Constitution under
the Electors Clause instead of the Pennsylvania Secretary of
State.
Guys, this case is not over!
Immediately the news broke that SCOTUS has thrown out the
case in its entirety, I knew something wasn't right.
Why would SCOTUS accept to hear the case on the merit,
docket it and then dismiss it without a hearing?
It just didn't make any sense.
It didn't make sense because it never happened.
The case is still pending. The Court merely denied one radical
injunctive relief preliminarily. Period.
More information to come on the new States that joined Texas
in their lawsuit at the SCOTUS.

flemsy15:
I used to think US elections were 100 percent transparent and have no need for questioning

Johnnyessence:
The US Supreme Court has just accepted and will hear the
lawsuit that the State of Texas is taking against Pennsylvania,
Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for electoral fraud !!
GREAT DAY !!

Bigchristo:
stop wasting your time writing full episodes,Trump has lost the election it’s so difficult for him and the republicans to concede defeats he is only trying to make gullible people like you to believe his illegal claims about electoral fraud, he doesn’t have any tangible evidence to backup this claim that’s why his entire lawsuit are being tossed out of court room

ceejayluv:

Lol, electoral fraud without evidence,.... Make we see

ekestic1976:


Won ti fi se e o. Claiming to know America more than Americans. Bet you've never stepped into a foreign embassy all your life.

Obrigardo:


They are not hearing the case, slow learner. They are calling for the defendants to state why Texas case should not come up the courts.

kingxsamz:


Omo, it must really be hard for you being a Nigerian Trump supporter.
You're only going through the 5 stages of grief.
Soon, all this your long epistles would be irrelevant like the ones you've been posting before.
No dey give yourself false hope.

nelsonoba:


Get your facts right! The court only rejected the emergency Injunctive bid, to stop certification, not the case itself. Trump's Lawyer clarified that. Besides, Texas and 9 other states have filed a new case with the Supreme Court yesterday to throw out Joe Biden's fraudulent win in Wisconson, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia

Johnnyessence:


Rushing To Judgement And Media Gaslighitng.
Guys, do not let the mainstream media gaslight you concerning
the SCOTUS case filed by some Republicans in Pennsylvania.
Note that this is separate from the one filed by Texas now
joined by other States (more on that later).
The media is now GASLIGHTING people that the SCOTUS has
thrown out the case of these Republicans. They are
desperately doing their best to dampen the spirit of
Republicans.
That is simply not true. The case is still alive and well before
SCOTUS.
Yes, the SCOTUS has DENIED a big ask made by the
Republicans to "overturn" the election result in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The Apex Court denied the "emergency injunctive relief"
because it was too radical and would be unprecedented for a
Court to "overturn" the result of an election . But you need to
know that the substantive case is STILL PENDING before the
Court because it has not been heard on the merit.
The injunctive relief was denied by Justice Alito (and not by
the Full Court). Justice Alito denied the injunctive relief to
pave way for a determination of the case on the merit.
See photos 1 and 2 attached below.
Photo 2 is the injunctive relief denied.
In other words, for emphasis, the substantive case has not
been thrown out. Senator Ted Crus will still get to argue before
SCOTUS.
See this link to show that it is still on the Court's schedule;
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=
%2Fdocket%2Fdocketfiles%2Fhtml%2Fpublic%2F20a98.html
Interestingly, the Republican Plaintiffs in their Appeal have
also asked the SCOTUS to ADVISE THEM ON OTHER RELIEFS
THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE TO THEM.
That general prayer or ask is what we should watch out for.
What reliefs would the SCOTUS be willing to grant if their case
succeeds on the merit?
SCOTUS could rule that the case succeeds on the merit and
then restore power to appoint Pennsylvania Electors back to
the Pennsylvania Legislature as per the US Constitution under
the Electors Clause instead of the Pennsylvania Secretary of
State.
Guys, this case is not over!
Immediately the news broke that SCOTUS has thrown out the
case in its entirety, I knew something wasn't right.
Why would SCOTUS accept to hear the case on the merit,
docket it and then dismiss it without a hearing?
It just didn't make any sense.
It didn't make sense because it never happened.
The case is still pending. The Court merely denied one radical
injunctive relief preliminarily. Period.
More information to come on the new States that joined Texas
in their lawsuit at the SCOTUS.

Obrigardo:


They are not hearing the case, slow learner. They are calling for the defendants to state why Texas case should not come up the courts.

Johnnyessence:
Senate resolution to recognize Joe Biden as the real
president-elect failed to pass.
The Inaugural Committee voted down a resolution by House
Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) on Tuesday naming
Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden president-elect,
with all three Republican members voting against it.

Sultannayef:
Johnnyessence, stop dreaming.
Put this time into productive venture.

DarkJeddi:
Name one court case your Hero have won since he has been bleating like a castrated ram?
Whether the Rebulicans like it or not, Biden is incoming..
Court cases are not won on Twitter..
Let them continue pandering to Dump,.
The date is January 20 2021 and we from the Shithole will witness a new American president..

NdigboWorldwide:
Are you with us?

ponziponzi:

That’s not true. The US Supreme Court just acknowledged that they received the filings.

Bigchristo:
stop wasting your time writing full episodes,Trump has lost the election it’s so difficult for him and the republicans to concede defeats he is only trying to make gullible people like you to believe his illegal claims about electoral fraud, he doesn’t have any tangible evidence to backup this claim that’s why his entire lawsuit are being tossed out of court room

Johnnyessence:
oponu ode ofun gbemu. you aren't God OK. the lord that started his works will finish it. keep on living in your deluded state of mind. I will post my travelling details when I'm through. oponu Ayirada, OMA pe ko to ye ooo.

Johnnyessence:
go and swear in dementia biden now. besides the inaugural committee doesn't recognized dementia and electoral fraudster biden as the President elect.

sandland:
After the safe harbor day, Dec. 8th, no court in Us can overturn a certified result.

DarkJeddi:
The date is January 20th 2021,after dementia Biden is sworn in,you can go cry on a pair of Dumps knickers..

Johnnyessence:
electoral frauds evidence is much abundant. you are not current at all. stop watching and reading main stream media.

bluefilm:
Of course, they don't want to expose how DEAD people voted for Biden.

Evil Satanists.