ElSherriff:
On the basis of your last sentence, do you agree that there is a possibility that the 2016 affidavit and INEC Form CF001 which have both been admitted as evidence may indicate providing false evidence under oath? Remember as at 2016, he had claimed he lost his certificates. Now, if he made a mistake in the INEC forms he filled, why did the affidavit bear a date corroborating the CF001? Why was no counter affidavit sworn between then and now to correct the mistake? and why all of a sudden there became a cropped date on the 2020 certificate?

I will tilt slightly to a disqualification. Not because of the 2020 forms but for the previous criminal offence. In this case, he forged in 2016 and Section 31 (6) of the electoral act provides that "If the court determines that any of the information contained in the affidavit or any document submitted by that candidate is false, the Court shall issue an order disqualifying the candidate from contesting the election"
quote author=fergie001 post=97829418]
The Abuja High Court Registrar wasn't called up as a witness by any of the lawyers. He didn't confirm or deny anything.
It is mere conjecture.

If you are found to have forged which is a Criminal offence at any time, especially in a pre-election or tribunal case (excepting as a civil case), even if it were many years back...You will go in for it.

Gbam.am sure that boy up there with an abominable name starting from agbo is guilty of the same crime hence the frenzy in defending obaseki

ElSherriff:

From what I have gathered so far:
The 3 issues formulated from the Plaintiff's case I believe, is that:
1. Obaseki supplied false information in his INEC form CF001 submitted for the September 19, 2020 election.

2. Obaseki lied on oath in the INEC form CF001 to contest either the 2016 or 2020 elections, in aid of his qualification.

3. Obaseki submitted a forged Certificate to contest the 2020 elections...that the Certificate submitted in 2016 (bearing the signature of only the VC) was different from that of 2020, and so forged.

The Prosecution called up 6 witnesses and the 1st respondent 3.

The PW1, PW3 & PW6 all agreed with DW-1, DW-2 (issuing authority) & DW-3 that if you make photocopies of the said Certificate it will become an incomplete photocopy.

PW1 - PW6 all agreed that they had never set their eyes on Obaseki's original, and instead relied on the photocopies.

DW-2 (the key witness) also stated emphatically that the Certificates of 2016 & 2020 are theirs, bringing forth other photocopies with different cut sizes as exhibits which was pleaded.

DW-1 stated he made the photocopies and in error.

Line 10 of yours said.."previous criminal offence"..for the purpose of emphasis, there is no Court that have pronounced criminality on Obaseki. It is a conjecture and not tenable.

Your Line 11 was also wrong: What is a counter-affidavit?
Counter affidavit is an affidavit filed by the respondent in reply to a petition.
He cannot file an affidavit and then file a counter- affidavit.

AGAIN, for emphasis..... Obaseki allegedly submitted an affidavit that he graduated in 1976 alongside a Certificate that he graduated in 1979, all of this in 2016.

Are you familiar with the case between Agi V Ayade & 2Ors)
dansuqi
kahal29
cktheluckyman
agborietoye

fergie001:

From what I have gathered so far:
The 3 issues formulated from this case I believe, is that:
1. Obaseki supplied false information in his INEC form CF001 submitted for the September 19, 2020 election.

2. Obaseki lied on oath in the INEC form CF001 to contest either the 2016 or 2020 elections, in aid of his qualification.

3. Obaseki submitted a forged Certificate to contest the 2020 elections...that the Certificate submitted in 2016 (bearing the signature of only the VC) was different from that of 2020, and so forged.

The Prosecution called up 6 witnesses and the 1st respondent 3.

The PW1, PW3 & PW6 all agreed with DW-1, DW-2 (issuing authority) & DW-3 that if you make photocopies of the said Certificate it will become an incomplete photocopy.

PW1 - PW6 all agreed that they have never set their eyes on Obaseki's original.

DW-2 (the key witness) also stated emphatically that the Certificates of 2016 & 2020 are theirs, bringing forth other photocopies with different cut sizes as exhibits which was pleaded.

Line 10 of yours said.."previous criminal offence"..for the purpose of emphasis, there is no Court that have pronounced criminality on Obaseki. It is a conjecture and not tenable. No offence, at least yet.

Your Line 11 was also wrong: What is a counter-affidavit?
Counter affidavit is an affidavit filed by the respondent in reply to a petition.
He cannot file an affidavit and then file a counter- affidavit.

AGAIN, for emphasis..... Obaseki submitted an affidavit that he graduated in 1976 alongside a Certificate that he graduated in 1979, all of this in 2016.

Are you familiar with the case between Agi V Ayade?
dansuqi
kahal29
cktheluckyman
agborietoye

Please,I heard that agi has gone to the tribunal.can you confirm

Dansuqi:

Please,I heard that agi has gone to the tribunal.can you confirm

Yes, he has gone to the tribunal.

fergie001:

The Abuja High Court Registrar wasn't called up as a witness by any of the lawyers. He didn't confirm or deny anything.
It is mere conjecture.

If you are found to have forged which is a Criminal offence at any time, especially in a pre-election or tribunal case (excepting as a civil case), even if it were many years back...You will go in for it.

Don't forget that all evidence must not be oral.

Indispensable85:

Don't forget that all evidence must not be oral.

The Registrar didn't show up at all.
His matter wasn't mentioned. The exhibits were just submitted.

fergie001:

The Registrar didn't show up at all.
His matter wasn't mentioned. The exhibits were just submitted.

That's exactly my point. The submitted exhibits in that regard are before the Judge. Be sure that he's going through them right now.

Indispensable85:

That's exactly my point. The submitted exhibits in that regard are before the Judge. Be sure that he's going through them right now.

Yes, alongside the Original UI Certificate.

fergie001:

Yes, alongside the Original UI Certificate.

U know why I dey laff? The judge has a good reason to give judgement either way. I just hope the cabal has no interest in this case.

Indispensable85:



U know why I dey laff? The judge has a good reason to give judgement either way. I just hope the cabal has no interest in this case.

why do you think oshiomole withdraw his chairman lawsuit in court??

Why do you think oshiomole was able to boast about this court case to his supporters??

The case has already been settled, this is just academic exercise.

There's a reason no single soul has decamped from APC in Edo State.

There is a reason obaseki haven't share position in his cabinet since he won.

This case is done and dusted.

Try to call any APC Edo supporters in Abuja, they are celebrating

Igbosmoker:
why do you think oshiomole withdraw his chairman lawsuit in court??

Why do you think oshiomole was able to boast about this court case to his supporters??

The case has already been settled, this is just academic exercise.

There's a reason no single soul has decamped from APC in Edo State.

There is a reason obaseki haven't share position in his cabinet since he won.

This case is done and dusted.

Try to call any APC Edo supporters in Abuja, they are celebrating

Haaaaa they're celebrating? For real? We wait and see what happens tomorrow.

Indispensable85:


U know why I dey laff? The judge has a good reason to give judgement either way. I just hope the cabal has no interest in this case.

At the bolded.....you don finish the whole work for there

I still think it is rather IN than OUT.

Indispensable85:



Haaaaa they're celebrating? For real? We wait and see what happens tomorrow.

i heardthe case will starts by 12 pm, its not confirm sha

fergie001:

At the bolded.....you don finish the whole work for there

I still think it is rather IN than OUT.

Can you see any influence from the powers that be?

Indispensable85:



Haaaaa they're celebrating? For real? We wait and see what happens tomorrow.

I hope your monikers will not disapear tomorrow

cktheluckyman:

I hope your monikers will not disapear tomorrow

Feel free to mention me anytime provided you're not insultive. We'll discuss the judgement tomorrow bro.

Indispensable85:

Can you see any influence from the powers that be?

If it will be....it definitely will be on Oba's side, tbh.

Obaseki is a closet-Buharist...but the cases are as clear as day, I still maintain that it will be an American-wonder for Oba to lose tomorrow.

fergie001:

If it will be....it definitely will be on Oba's side, tbh.

Obaseki is a closet-Buharist...but the cases are as clear as day, I still maintain that it will be an American-wonder for Obaseki to be ruled against tomorrow.

AMERICAN WONDER! Laff wan kill me here.
See you tomorrow bro. Thanks for your insight.

Indispensable85:

AMERICAN WONDER! Laff wan kill me here.
See you tomorrow bro. Thanks for your insight.

Same here bro

Igbosmoker:
i heardthe case will starts by 12 pm, its not confirm sha

Yes... Judgement is by 12

Igbosmoker:
i heardthe case will starts by 12 pm, its not confirm sha

Yes... Judgement is by 12.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-tzjh0Yp3w

Also learnt that the judge is the younger brother of the CJN

kahal29:


Yes... Judgement is by 12.

Also learnt that the judge is the younger brother of the CJN

he is also a long time friend of oshiohmole