There is this book I want to share here about Female Psychology. It's only 64 pages long and every word is pure wisdom. When you're done reading, you'd understand the true nature of women and how to deal with them. If you want to read it, you can request and I'll mail it to you. I just read it yesterday and the veil from my eyes has been cleared. Please I want to urge you to share it with others so they can understand too.

The book is titled The Manipulated Man by Esther Vilar. Do well to read it thanks.

Drop your email if you interested!!

auduhenry1428@gmail.com

diamondpaul61@gmail.com

manchangseldun25@gmail.com

Mazinokhome@gmail.com

linobrown9@gmail.com

Oneguy250@yahoo.com

drmortanyatc@gmail.com

onyekachiodiba7@gmail.com

Mostob10@gmail.com

nuelsupreme@gmail.com

Lec25:
auduhenry1428@gmail.com

Check your mail

samueltom68@gmail.com

. @gmail.com

5 Things You Must Keep in Mind

· You are alone.
· Today could be your last day.
· Nobody gives a F＊ about you.
· You can´t change what's done.
· Nobody will get your things done.

Remember those, live your life to the fullest.

What Is Woman?
A WOMAN, as we have already said, is, in contrast to a man, a human
being who does not work. One might leave it at that, for there isn't much
more to say about her, were the basic concept of “human being” not so general and inexact in embracing both “man” and “woman.”
Life offers the human being two choices: animal existence – a lower order of life – and spiritual existence. In general, a woman will choose the
former and opt for physical well-being, a place to breed, and an opportunity
to indulge unhindered in her breeding habits.
At birth, men and women have the same intellectual potential; there is no
primary difference in intelligence between the sexes. It is also a fact that
potential left to stagnate will atrophy. Women do not use their mental capacity: they deliberately let it disintegrate. After a few years of sporadic
training, they revert to a state of irreversible mental torpor.
Why do women not make use of their intellectual potential? For the simple reason that they do not need to. It is not essential for their survival.
Theoretically it is possible for a beautiful woman to have less intelligence
than a chimpanzee and still be considered an acceptable member of society.
By the age of twelve at the latest, most women have decided to become
prostitutes. Or, to put it another way, they have planned a future for themselves which consists of choosing a man and letting him do all the work. In
return for his support, they are prepared to let him make use of their vagina
at certain given moments. The minute a woman has made this decision she
ceases to develop her mind. She may, of course, go on to obtain various
degrees and diplomas. These increase her market value in the eyes of men,
for men believe that a woman who can recite things by heart must also
know and understand them. But any real possibility of communication between the sexes ceases at this point. Their paths are divided forever.
One of man's worst mistakes, and one he makes over and over again, is
to assume that woman is his equal, that is, a human being of equal mental
and emotional capacity. A man may observe his wife, listen to her, judge her feelings by her reactions, but in all this be is judging her only by outward symptoms, for he is using his own scale of values.

He knows what he would say, think, and do if he were in her shoes.
When he looks at her depressing ways of doing things, he assumes there
must be something that prevents her from doing what he himself would
have done in her position. This is natural, as he considers himself the
measure of all things – and rightly so – if humans define themselves as beings capable of abstract thought. When a man sees a woman spending hours cooking, washing dishes, and cleaning, it never occurs to him that such jobs probably make her quite
happy since they are exactly at her mental level. Instead he assumes that
this drudgery prevents her from doing all those things which he himself
considers worthwhile and desirable. Therefore, he invents automatic dishwashers, vacuum cleaners, and precooked foods to make her life easier and
to allow her to lead the dream life he himself longs for.
But he will be disappointed: rarely using the time she has gained to take
an active interest in history, politics, or astrophysics, woman bakes cakes,
irons underclothes, and makes ruffles and frills for blouses or, if she is especially enterprising, covers her bathroom with flower decals. It is natural,
therefore, that man assumes such things to be the essential ingredients of
gracious living. This idea must have been instilled by woman, as he himself
really doesn't mind if his cakes are store-bought, his underpants unironed,
or his bathroom devoid of flowery patterns. He invents cake mixes to liberate her from drudgery, automatic irons and toiletpaper holders already covered with flower patterns to make gracious living easier to attain – and still
women take no interest in serious literature, politics, or the conquest of the
universe. For her, this newfound leisure comes at just the right moment. At
last she can take an interest in herself: since a longing after intellectual
achievements is alien to her, she concentrates on her external appearance.
Yet even this occupation is acceptable to man. He really loves his wife
and wants her happiness more than anything in the world. Therefore, he
produces non-smear lipstick, waterproof mascara, home permanents,
no-iron frilly blouses, and throwaway underwear – always with the same
aim in view. In the end, he hopes, this being whose needs seem to him so
much more sensitive, so much more refined, will gain freedom – freedom
to achieve in her life the ideal state which is his dream: to live the life of a
free man.
Then he sits back and waits. Finally, as woman does not come to him of
her own free will, he tries to tempt her into his world. He offers her coeducation, so that she is accustomed to his way of life from childhood. With all
sorts of excuses, he gets her to attend his universities and initiates her into
the mysteries of his own discoveries, hoping to awaken her interest in the
wonders of life. He gives her access to the very last male strongholds,
thereby relinquishing traditions sacred to him by encouraging her to make use of her right to vote in the hope that she will change the systems of government he has managed to think up so laboriously, according to her own ideas. Possibly he even hopes that she will be able to create peace in the world – for, in his opinion, women are a pacifist influence.

In all this he is so determined and pigheaded that he fails to see what a
fool he is making of himself – ridiculous by his own standards, not those of
women, who have absolutely no sense of humor.
No, women do not laugh at men. At most they get irritated. The old institutions of house and home are not yet so obviously outdated and derelict
that they can't justify relinquishing all their intellectual pursuits and renouncing all their claims to better jobs. One does wonder, however, what
will happen when housework is still further mechanized, when there are
enough good nursery schools nearby, or when – as must occur before long
– men discover that children themselves are not essential.
If only man would stop for one moment in his heedless rush toward progress and think about this state of affairs, he would inevitably realize that
his efforts to give woman a sense of mental stimulation have been totally in
vain. It is true that woman gets progressively more elegant, more
well-groomed, more “cultured,” but her demands on life will always be material, never intellectual.
Has she ever made use of the mental processes he teaches at his universities to develop her own theories? Does she do independent research in the
institutes he has thrown open to her? Someday it will dawn on man that
woman does not read the wonderful books with which he has filled his libraries. And though she may well admire his marvelous works of art in museums, she herself will rarely create, only copy. Even the plays and films,
visual exhortations to woman on her own level to liberate herself, are
judged only by their entertainment value. They will never be a first step to
revolution.
When a man, believing woman his equal, realizes the futility of her way
of life, he naturally tends to think that it must be his fault, that he must be
suppressing her. But in our time women are no longer subject to the will of
men. Quite the contrary. They have been given every opportunity to win
their independence and if, after all this time, they have not liberated themselves and thrown off their shackles, we can only arrive at one conclusion:
there are no shackles to throw off.
It is true that men love women, but they also despise them. Anyone who
gets up in the morning fresh and ready to conquer new worlds (with infrequent success, admittedly, because he has to earn a living) is bound to despise someone who simply isn't interested in such pursuits. Contempt may
even be one of the main reasons for his efforts to further the mental development of a woman. He feels ashamed of her and assumes that she, too,
must be ashamed of herself. So, being a gentleman, he tries to help.
13
Men seem incapable of realizing that women entirely lack ambition, desire for knowledge, and need to prove themselves, all things which, to him,
are a matter of course. They allow men to live in a world apart because they
do not want to join them. Why should they? The sort of independence men
have means nothing to women, because women don't feel dependent. They
are not even embarrassed by the intellectual superiority of me because they
have no ambition in that direction.
There is one great advantage which women have over men: they have a
choice – a choice between the life of a man and the life of a dimwitted,
parasitic luxury item. There are too few women who would not select the
latter. Men do not have this choice.
If women really felt oppressed by men, they would have developed hate
and fear for them, as the oppressed always do, but women do not fear men,
much less hate them. If they really felt humiliated by men's mental superiority, they would have used every means in their power to change the situation. If women really felt unfree, surely, at such a favorable time in their
history, they would have broken free of their oppressors.
In Switzerland, one of the most highly developed countries of the world,
where until recently women were not allowed to vote, in a certain canton, it
is reported, the majority of women were against introducing the vote for
women. The Swiss men were shattered, for they saw in this unworthy attitude yet another proof of centuries of male oppression.
How very wrong they were! Women feel anything but oppressed by
men. On the contrary, one of the many depressing truths about the relationship between the sexes is simply that man hardly exists in a woman's
world: Man is not even powerful enough to revolt against. Woman's dependence on him is only material, of a “physical” nature, something like a
tourist's dependence on an airline, a café proprietor's on his espresso machine, a car's on gasoline, a television set's on electric current. Such dependencies hardly involve agonizing.
Ibsen, who suffered from the same misapprehensions as other men,
meant his Doll's House to be a kind of manifesto for the freedom of
women. The première in 1880 certainly shocked men, and they determined
to fight harder to improve women's position.
For women themselves, however, the struggle for emancipation as usual
took shape in a change of style: for a while they delighted in their often-laughed-at masquerade as suffragettes.
Later on, the philosophy of Sartre made a similarly profound impression
on women. As proof that they understood it completely, they let their hair
grow down to their waists and wore black pullovers and trousers.
Even the teachings of the Chinese Communist leader Mao Tse-tung were
a success – the Mao look lasted for a whole season.