CilicMarin:
Many people, reported that Kanu's tweet..but twitter, as interested party refused to act..

OssyMalik:
yes they refused to act because those that reported him are from a backward section of the country.

Nnamdi Kanu is a force!!! We move!!

CilicMarin:
Many people, reported that Kanu's tweet..but twitter, as interested party refused to act..

Oharina:
On seeing that lamidi cownu, i stoped reading. Cause i know it will be trash

Bassa1:
On the much tauted comparison that Nnamdi Kanu is allowed to preach hate, bigotry and death while the same twitter is currently moderating and even deleting some of PMB's post, here is likely what is happening.

There is an ongoing scuffle to control narratives on social media and the current administration, as with most other things is failing at controling the narrative, despite all the resources available to them.

If they want to make it difficult for Lamidi kunu and his minions, If they want to make it difficult for hate preachers on twitter or any other social, there are routes to do it through the same platform but it seems they are either just indifferent or lazy, I personally don't believe they don't know how.

In line with their habits of trading blame when failing, they find it convenient to blame twitter for been biased.
To start with, Twitter's or any other social media algorithm usually can't tell when a post contains hate, racism, death threat or the like but the algorithm depends largely on it users to guide twitter to fish out this sort of tweet/post. If twitter recieves alot of report on a particular post, they take action either by deleting, hiding or even suspending. Depending on how bad the violations could have been.

A simple analogy is like a situation where a person A threatened to kill person B and then the audience/on lookers watching the brawl call the police on person A to report his threat. The police wasn't at the scene, they got to know because the audience called and directed them there. They would most likely arrest person A because that was the information the audience gave them. It may be that it was person B that initially threatened to kill person A but a part of the on lookers out of prejudice decided to only report person A. So long as nobody is calling to report person B, he would most likely escape getting arrested too. This is how most social media algorithm for moderation work.

What this means is, Lamidi kunu and his minions would keep spreading hate and bigotry on the platform so long as other users aren't reporting him. Twitter's algorithm was able to fish out PMB because other users help the algorithm to detect that something was off with the post and the moderators took over from there.

Personally, I usually take out time to report inappropriate post when I see them. But it's almost impossible to do this to every inappropriate post I see because there is just so many of them. As a community, we should be collectively moderating our social media feeds by reporting inappropriate post when you see them, regardless of how insignificant you might think your efforts would. Collectively it counts for alot.

Twitter and the likes largely depend on its algorithm for moderation and the algorithm depends on twitter users to guide them to identify what should be and what shouldn't be on the platform.

-------
Anivassa
#UnbrokenOptimist