Trudeau’s Party Passes Bill to Regulate Social Media, Streaming

By Kait Bolongaro
22 June 2021, 12:31

Move would prioritize Canadian content, echoing broadcast law
But critics say it threatens free speech on user-driven sites

Canadian lawmakers passed a controversial bill that aims to regulate programming distributed by media streaming services and social platforms like Facebook and YouTube, a measure that critics warn could infringe on individual speech.

The legislation drafted by Justin Trudeau’s government, known as Bill C-10, is meant to subject tech giants to the same requirements as traditional broadcasters -- effectively compelling companies like Netflix Inc. and TikTok Inc. to finance and promote Canadian content. It’s among the most far-reaching plans by governments anywhere to regulate the algorithms tech companies use to amplify or recommend content.

And, in an age when everyone is a potential publisher, the Act to Amend the Broadcasting Act could affect individual expression on social media and other digital platforms that rely on user-generated content.


It’s unclear whether the bill will become law, however. The legislation needs to win passage through the Senate, a process that could be pre-empted by an election later this year that would effectively kill the bill. If that happens, a new government would have to put it through the legislative mill again if it wants the rules to come into effect.

Trudeau’s government hailed its passage. “There are other issues we have to address when it comes to broadcasting and creation, and we will,” Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault said during the final debate Monday evening. “Bill C-10 is a first step in that direction.”

Tech Titans
Governments around the world are grappling with how to modernize their legal frameworks to account for the global reach of the digital economy, reshaping how policy makers think about issues as varied as monopoly power, taxation and worker rights.

In Canada, an additional worry is how to protect domestic cultural industries as more Canadians turn to internet companies for music and video programming, which is the focus of the new law.

Stunting the influence of U.S. culture, in particular, is a core principle of modern Canadian media law. For decades the government has required radio and television broadcasters to produce and distribute local content.


That stance has irked trading partners, because it means that the media sector is often exempted from agreements meant to give foreigners access to Canadian markets. It also means that global media companies like Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. can’t own newspapers or television stations in Canada.

Under the existing law, a regulatory body known as the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission certifies what is and what is not Canadian. It can also issue fines for violations starting at C$250,000 ($202,500) or even suspend a broadcaster’s license to operate. The new law would give the CRTC that same kind of power over internet companies.

Netflix
Bill C-10 would effectively compel companies like Netflix to finance and promote Canadian content.Photographer: Jason Alden/Bloomberg
The challenge is how to regulate content on the internet without undermining individual freedom of expression. The bill’s language is ambiguous on this point, according to its critics. Some of it can be interpreted as saying that user activity won’t be regulated, while other parts suggest that content produced on user-driven sites will be.

“It is not at all clear how this would be implemented. Would Canadians be required to disclose that they’re Canadian to meet these requirements?” asked Michael Geist, an internet law professor at the University of Ottawa and a prominent critic of the legislation. “It’s hard enough frankly to identify what constitutes Canadian content for conventional broadcast.”

The bill would effectively add three requirements for digital media companies: They must provide information about their revenue sources, give a portion of their profits to a fund to support Canadian content and increase the visibility or “discoverability” of Canadian content. It would be the first modernization of the country’s broadcasting legislation since 1991.

Continue reading here
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-06-22/trudeau-s-party-passes-bill-to-regulate-social-media-streaming

Country wey sabi..

One of the peaceful country in the world

No sensible nation will allow the internet supersede its national interest.

Just yesterday the US blocked couple of Iranian websites globally (not just in US cyberspace). Tell me where is the freedom of speech in that.

Now tell me if any sane country will tolerate the sabotage and secessionist AGENDA Kanu or IPOB is pushing.

Some inferiority complex ridden youths will come here and try to justify US' or Canadian decision and condemn that of Nigeria.

Let me tell our youths this : You might not like the current leadership in the country or the current situation (God knows I am not a fan of Buhari too), but Buhari will return to his farm and we will be left with the (irreparable) battered image we all created for our nation. You should know that IPOB is after the downfall of the nation (so I expect nothing short of their current propaganda and attacks on national asset and they should also understand why we take them as terrorists and treat them as such), But for us Nigerians who are frustrated by the system, we need to understand the difference between seeking to change the system and destroying the nation (the former cannot be exclusive of the latter, but the the latter can independent of the former)

The same save Haven of Nigeria immigrants?

I thought Nigeria is being led by a dictator dunno Canada is as well


Ndi wailer, YOU CAN DESERT CANADA NOW and go to North Korea

Buhari in the front and his lapdog Lie Mohammed in the back respectively right now

ThatFairGuy1:
The same save Haven of Nigeria immigrants?

I thought Nigeria is being led by a dictator dunno Canada is as well


Ndi wailer, YOU CAN DESERT CANADA NOW and go to North Korea

Stop showing how much you lack knowledge on a public space.
Canada is going through the right channel to regulate their SM system of viewership and not trying to ban freedom to express or access by canadians as a Democratic society.

The incompetent leaders in Nigeria didn't do such ..rather they decided to ban and even threaten citizens whereas their colleagues are glaringly still using the platform.
SMH @You.

@OP there is nothing controversial about this bill process of regulating streaming modalities for the good of their citizens.....you don't always need sensationalism to thwart information. Be guided.

We need young visionary leaders with great sense of empathy in Nigeria.


@Seniorwriter

Fake news from lagos Ibadan Express and Arewa/mumuric concocted lies from the pit of hell rufai fire..

mod please front page so that we can discuss censorship

mods now?

The bill is not about regulating social media but more about promotion of Canadian local (creative) content on social media