Hathor5:


It is obvious you don't really give a hack about the consequences for the children. If you did, you would not neglect the role that boys/men play in all of this. Instead it is just the typical ranting about how ladies should not spread their legs. Do they impregnate themselves? And as always the 'heads and leaders' are absolved from all forms of responsibility when it's the male who can impregnate several females at a time whereas a female can only conceive once.

Moji12:


Their hypocrisy reeks of delusion when it comes to that aspect. Hian.

Magnoliaa:


Exactly. They don't care! They fvking don't! It's all just faux outrage. Let's insult this one, move on to the next. Rinse and repeat. Everything fuelled from a misogynist mind. "Ah, is it a woman? Okay. I'm not seeing the facts. As far as she get vagina, na her fault. I no wan know. She brought it on herself. It's female nature." Funniest thing is MOST of them are not even active in orphanage activities. How many times do they donate to motherless babies homes? How many outreaches in real life do they engage? They are tenaciously pro-birth, actually. It ends at eart, nor pro-life. They do not care for the living conditions of the rest of humans on earth. And last I checked, it is WOMEN that still run these foundations. Women. Caring for orphans; hosting events to donate to poor people, women and kids - both feminists and conservative women. More women are into caring professions than the lots of them sitting behind their computers and throwing half-baked logics around. Whether in cash of kind, they never help in stuff like these. But if it's to spend time watching porn, trading cocaine, splashing money on drinks, cars, in clubs and on girls -- they are always representing.

DoggoneDogg:


So why does she want to get rid of the baby? Is it the baby's fault?