Well, based on your criteria, I will go with the 2.2

The 2.1 might have bribed is way through in getting the grade.

Searchingvictor:
Evening to everyone. I have a question for employers of labor

For instance, If 2 candidates of same field, and were mates came for an interview for same position and one scored higher than the other but the one with the higher score graduated with 2 2 and the other person with lower score graduated with 2 1

In their oral interview, the one with 2 2 still beat the other person with 2 1

Who will you consider for the job?

Nigerians and certificate! Rubbish...

kroger:


Nigeria and their 2 1 , 2 2 mentality.

I taya o..... nothing technical..all na certificate.

I'll stick to the company's guidelines for that particular job position.

If the job position requires a 2.1, and i found a 2.2 candidate best for the position, i will send a report to mgt with a tone of recommendation of the 2.2 person and another tone that requires their consent and they will decide which best candidate and based on their approval, I will go with what they say.


Because peradventure, it happens that the 2.2 guy embezzles money on the long run, mgt will not have any reason to use that as a yardstick to halt my career advancement in that organization.

kroger:


Nigeria and their 2 1 , 2 2 mentality.

Lol

Mgada1ne:
I sense Second class candidates here
None supporting 2.1

The first one, 2.1 and 2.2 are not far apart, very marginal difference.
Also, interviews are not about qualifications but your attitude and personality.

You can have the best degree in the world but if you're not a decent person, I wouldn't hire you.

Lol the one that performed better. But It depends on the job. As for, I will always go for the one with the best personality.. some people are intelligent but wicked. I'd prefer someone that is moderate intellectually and still humane!

Hmmm