https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NR5M1c9CHvM

Demons are behind negative thinking.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB2bHMYo2Gc

[img]http://freeonlineporn.me/bh/345099655funnygifs384639654.gif[/img]

Benjamin (Gemini)
Benjamin shall ravin (ravage)
as (like) a wolf;
In the morning, he shall devour the prey,
And at night he shall
divide the spoil (plunder).

Richwallet:
Benjamin (Gemini)
Benjamin shall ravin (ravage)
as (like) a wolf;
In the morning, he shall devour the prey,
And at night he shall
divide the spoil (plunder).

Tribal Identification: Benjamin 1

"And the sons of Benjamin were Belah, and Becher, and Ashbel, Gera, and Naaman, Ehi, and Rosh, Muppim, and Huppim, and Ard" Genesis 46; 21.
The Tribes of Judah and BENJAMIN together were to compose the main stock of the modern Jewish people amongst the Black Franks.

.

The Roman Empire in its last days before Constantine was given over to all kinds of immorality, and in fact, that immorality continued long after Constantine. The Eastern Empire became officially Christian under Theodosius I, but the Western Empire continued to be a mixture of paganism and Christianity. Ironically, it was the invading Germanic tribes who brought Christianity – or its heresy, Arianism – and with it, stricter morals. The old Roman aristocracy remainedpagan in its beliefs and ways, and kept the immorality of the past. And with it, kept its sodomy as part of its life.

The Visigoths were adherents of the Aryan heresy which denied the divinity of Jesus. Their descendants founded the Merovingian dynasty which ruled Gaul until the death of Dagobert II. The Merovingians were said to rule by right of their "royal blood" or "sang real". "Sangreal" has been traditionally interpreted as the "holy grail" which, according to legend, Mary Magdalene carried to the Jewish kingdom of southern Gaul (including Rennes-le-Chateau. It may have been believed by adherents of a secret tradition that Mary Magdalene was the wife of Jesus and that what she brought was not a vessel but the royal seed of David in her womb. - Steve Mizrach, "The Mysteries of Rennes-le-Chateau and the Prieure du Sion"



Lincoln and his co-authors fashioned a theory that Christ had descendents who "legged it to the south of France where they intermarried with the royal Franks to found what eventually became the mystical Merovingian Dynasty. Ergo, the real mission of the Templars and Priory of Zion: to safeguard not just the treasure of the Crusades, but to preserve the Grail, which appeared in medieval texts as 'Sangraal' or 'Sangreal', and which Lincoln et al. translated to mean sang real, or 'royal blood'. In other words: the dynastic legacy of Christ, literally." - Jonathan Vankin and John Whalen, "Descendants of Jesus? Or Scam Artistes Extraordinaire?"

908

HarshBitterTrut:
Salic Law of Succession, the rule by which, in certain sovereign dynasties, persons descended from a previous sovereign only through a woman were excluded from succession to the throne. Gradually formulated in France, the rule takes its name from the code of the Salian Franks, the Lex Salica (Salic Law).

If the bloodline is passed down through the father to his son and the mother to her daughter then succession can only be accurate through a male her.

Sure women have maternal lineage that they pass to their daughters yet we are talking about kingship which is paternal lineage. Many hated the Salic Law without understanding it's scientific reasoning.

.

Donald V. Watkins
Aug 29, 2021
8 min

The Royal Bloodline: The King Yesuha Ben Yossef and Queen Mary Magdalene


A Search for the Whole Truth About Jesus' Life


This article concludes a three-part series of investigative articles that I began with "Mary Magdalene: Was She Jesus' Wife?," published on November 10, 2019, and "The Royal Bloodline of Jesus and Mary Magdalene," published on January 3, 2020. The Royal Bloodline article, alone, has been read by more than 105,000 people worldwide. This series of articles resulted from two years of research I conducted in connection with an upcoming book I am writing on the Royal Bloodline of Jesus and Mary Magdalene.


The articles and book are based upon: (a) the Bible, as we know it today, with all of its drastic editing, revisions, censorship, and omission of known facts about the life of Jesus; (b) certain historically accurate Books of Gospel that were deliberately excluded from the Bible because they did not adhere to the Roman Catholic Church's theological message at the time Bishop Athanasius of Alexandria compiled the Bible in 367 AD; (c) facts derived from historical records that were written and maintained by other parties in the ordinary course of life; and (d) various genealogical charts of historical figures and dynasty families that intermarried to perpetuate the Royal Bloodline to the present day.


Three key dates in Jesus' life have not been established with certainty. They are: (a) the year of Jesus' birth, (b) the date Jesus began his ministry and how long it lasted, and (c) Jesus' age when he was crucified. Jesus' birth year is uncertain because Dionysius Exiguus, the Scythian monk who developed the "BC" for "Before Christ" and "AC" for "After Christ" system of dates in the fifth century, made a calculation error in establishing Jesus' birth year. Exiguus failed to take into account the fact that Jesus was born before Herod the Great died in 4 BC. Herod ruled as king of the Jews from 27 to 4 BC. After Jesus' birth, Herod issued an order to kill all male children in Bethlehem two years old, or younger. As such, Jesus must have been a young child by the time Herod died.


Based upon other historical records beyond the Bible and correcting for Exiguus' error, it appears that Jesus' ministry began when he was about 32 to 34 years old. His ministry lasted anywhere from one to three years, depending on which Book in the New Testament is correct on the number of annual Passovers that occurred during his ministry. Most scholars believe Jesus' ministry lasted about three years. As such, Jesus' crucifixion occurred when he was about 35 to 38 years old.


I am a Christian. My sole objective in publishing these articles and my book is to present the whole truth regarding the life of Jesus. I used my training as a trial lawyer and skills as an investigative journalist to gather, organize, and properly document the relevant facts relating to Jesus and Mary Magdalene.


Chronologically speaking, it is not possible to sequentially arrange the events in the life of Jesus in any definitive way by a reliance on the Bible alone, as none of the New Testament's Gospels follows an overtly chronological pattern over his lifetime. Therefore, I used hundreds of independent sources and documents to reconstruct and corroborate the life, marriage, parenthood, and genealogy of Jesus and Mary Magdalene, as well as the genealogy of their descendants.


Jesus Married Mary Magdalene and Sired Children


Their first child was named Sarah. She would later be known as Sarah-Damaris Bat Yeshuah Princess of West-Francs. Her father was Jesus of Nazareth and her mother was Mary Magdalene. The couple also sired a son named Joseph, who would later be known as Joseph Rama Theo ben Jesus Bishop of Saraz.


The Bible does not expressly say whether Jesus was married or not, nor does it say whether Jesus fathered children, or not. The Bible is ambiguous about the role Mary Magdalene played in the life of Jesus. Yet, there is an abundance of credible historical information beyond the Bible that attests to the marriage between Jesus and Mary Magdalene and their parenthood.


The omission of these two important subjects from the Bible is not shocking from a theological standpoint. The Roman Catholic Church's Bible is a respected religious document within the context of (a) the time period it was written, (b) the religious messages it conveyed throughout the Roman empire, and (c) the religious interests it advanced and protected for the Church. The same is true with respect to King James' version of the Bible protecting the interests of the British crown. Both Bibles, however, paint an incomplete historical picture of the life of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. They intentionally omit known and well-documented facts about the life and times of this royal couple to portray him as a deity.


The objective evidence confirms that Jesus was, indeed, deity in the human form. In Jesus, God acquainted Himself, first hand, with the full range of human experiences (e.g., joy, sadness, temptation, fear, discipline, struggle, danger, learning, teaching, the challenges of leadership, romance and love, sexuality, conception, childbirth, parenthood, family ties, jealousy, envy, falsehoods, friendship, enemies, helplessness, loneliness, humility, self-restraint, commitment, faith, belief, betrayal, persecution, criminal prosecution, punishment, physical pain and suffering, and mortality).


The Wedding at Cana


Jesus was a member of the Tribe of Judah. Mary Magdalene was a member of the Tribe of Benjamin. After they met and fell in love, Jesus and Mary Magdalene were virtually inseparable. Jesus was a lineal descendant of a royal bloodline that spanned 42 generations and included King Solomon and King David.


Jesus met Mary Magdalene at the home of the local Pharisee, Simon, in Capernaum. Magdalene means "from Magdala." According to Luke 8:2, Jesus had cured her of "evil spirits" by casting out "seven demons." Afterwards, she accompanied him in and around the province of Galilee, where Nazareth, Magdala, Cana, and Capernaum are located. She also traveled with Jesus to Judea, where Jerusalem and Bethlehem are located. Mary Magdalene's friendship circle included Joanna (the wife of Chuza, Herod's wealthy business manager) and Mary (the wife of Clopas).


The couple married during the wedding at Cana. Jesus' mother, Joseph of Arimathea, and other dignitaries were in attendance. At the wedding, both Jesus and the attending servants obeyed his mother's commands. Jesus also performed the duties typically ascribed to a "bridegroom" under Jewish law. The wedding occurred before Jesus began his ministry and public display of miracles at "about thirty years old." Luke 3:23


The wedding at Cana began a dynasty marriage between the Tribes of Judah and Benjamin, which had historically competed for influence and political power in Roman-occupied Israel for generations. Symbolically, this union positioned Jesus as the titular "King of the Jews," literally and figuratively.


After they married, Jesus called Mary Magdalene his "companion," which translates to "spouse" in Jesus' era. He was openly affectionate with her. Jesus often kissed Mary Magdalene on the lips, much to the consternation of Peter and other disciples.


In their day, all Jewish men were expected to be married, especially for Rabbis like Jesus. Additionally, childbearing was viewed as the highest calling for a wife, while childlessness brought social stigma and shame upon her.


Jesus also loved little children and, over the objections of his disciples, he ministered to them, as well. He also promoted the marriage, fidelity, and family.


As his spouse, Mary Magdalene led the list of women who followed Jesus. Rabbis in Jesus' day did not have women disciples, so traveling with Jesus would have been highly unusual for a single woman. Mary Magdalene even "ministered unto [Jesus]." She attended the last supper. She was also present at Gethsemane when Jesus prayed to God to spare him of death, a prayer that God answered with His silence. Mary Magdalene stood with Jesus' mother at his crucifixion. She was the first witness to the empty tomb following Jesus' crucifixion. Finally, Mary Magdalene was the one Jesus first chose to reveal his resurrection.


Based upon the totality of facts and circumstances, Mary Magdalene was closer to Jesus than any of his disciples.


Mary Magdalene's Life After Jesus' Death


After Jesus' ascension, Mary Magdalene, her children, Jesus' mother, Joseph of Arimathea, Martha, and others were smuggled out of Jerusalem by Lazarus. For their personal safety, they were taken by ship to France, which had a large Jewish population.


This was not the first time the Royal Bloodline had to flee Israel. Jesus' parents, Mary and Joseph, had to flee Bethlehem for Egypt shortly after Jesus' birth to prevent Herod the Great from killing him.


The Royal Bloodline entourage arrived at Marseilles first. From there, Lazarus took Mary Magdalene and her children to Gaul. Jesus' mother eventually settled in Ephesus in Greece, where she died. Mary Magdalene died in France. Lazarus died at Marseilles after founding a church there.


Sarah and Joseph became adults in France, married, and had children. Their offspring also married, birthed children, and eventually ascended to royal positions in France and other parts of Europe.


After Mary Magdalene, her children, Jesus' mother, and their entourage escaped to France, the Royal Bloodline perpetuated itself, intact and incognito for the next four hundred years. During the fifth century, this Royal Bloodline intermarried with the Royal Bloodline of the Franks, thus engendering the Merovingian dynasty. From there, the Bloodline continued through the Carolingians (who deposed the Merovingian dynasty from its throne) to William the Conqueror of England, and from there to Great Britain, Ireland, France, Germany, and other parts of the world.


In Germany, Christian rulers took power and lands of the Western Roman Empire, 400 years after it fell in 467 AD. A king called Charlemagne crowned himself emperor and set about rebuilding a Christian empire in Europe. By 900 AD, King Charlemagne's empire had fallen apart, but ambitious German princes took on the title of Holy Roman Emperor for centuries afterwards. In medieval Europe, France was conquered by the Franks, a Germanic tribe. Eventually, France went on to become the most powerful country in Europe.


By the fifteenth century, King Louis XI of France acknowledged Mary Magdalene as the source of the French royal line. King Charlemagne, who ruled Hapsburg, recognized her royalty, as well.


Today, there are at least a dozen families in Europe who are of Merovingian descent. They include the Houses of Hapsburg-Lorraine, Plantard, Luxembourg, Montpezat, Montesquieu, and others. In Britain, various branches of the Sinclair, Stuart, and Devonshire families are descendants of the Royal Bloodline.


A present day descendant of the Royal Bloodline is Dr. Rainer Zielke, a distinguished professor of genealogy, politics & history, religion & spirituality, and theology in Germany. Dr. Rainer Zielke is the 38th descendant of King Charlemagne. His 2021 German publication titled, "Die Vorfahren Karls des Großen" ("The Ancestors of Charlemagne" documents a 4,000-year genealogical, cultural, and historical journey back in time to Jesus, King David, Abraham, Noah, and Adam, which spans an epic 136 generations ancestry.


An excellent history of the Royal Bloodline is also presented in "Holy Blood, Holy Grail," by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln, Published in Great Britain by Jonathan Cape Ltd., 1982. This well-researched New York Times bestseller served as one of my many reference sources.


Epilogue


Author/journalist Lee Strobel's 1998 book, "The Case for Christ," documented by clear and convincing evidence that Jesus was deity in the human form. The NLT Study Bible, Second Edition, Tyndale House Publishers (2008), corroborates this fact with biblical texts and historically accurate timelines. However, there was nothing in my research to suggest that the lineal descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene are deity themselves.


As Americans have seen in history books about the birth of our nation, historians tend to present narratives that reflect the cultural norms and biases existing in the periods of history that are presented. Women around the world have suffered a similar fate during times of extreme male dominance in a particular culture. The Bible is no different in its biased treatment of Mary Magdalene and its protectionism of a carefully scripted but incomplete account of Jesus and his life.

Richwallet:
Beware of Antichrists

18Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. 19They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.

Another ethnic group was born among us during our captivity. They had been born out of our daughters and the Creole separated themselves into their own society. The Creole lineage does not extend beyond our captivity and they possess no claim to Nobility. Their esteem is not equal to ours as Black Jews whose civilization goes back before Abraham as proclaimed by Christ when he said before Abraham I was. This difference is the primary reason for their anti Christ sentiment and why J. Edgar Hoover a Blue Vein said, We Must Prevent The Rise of a Black Messiah. The Messiah is more than a prophet he is one of nobility returning to unite the Nobility to action.

This is something that isn't discussed and expresses in a way not before. This Revealation had to wait End Times to reveal is the separation of the Tares from the Wheat.

I have Creoles in my family tree and they are upset that they don't share in my father's Nobility. This is most unfortunate and very hurtful because it's hard to witness the break up of what we thought was family. Yet it's them who make out clearly through vicious jealousy and cruelty they are not of us and never of us at all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_9ZUNxSABs

.

...

My actual great grandmother Queen of Judah the lady Mary Magdalene.

.

Read and research

Whenever Israelites accept God is a man they are straying away from the infinity of the God of Israel which is the LORD of creation. You are lending supernatural power to Esau because Esau rejected the God of Israel and saw himself as a dragon like Pharoah.


Whenever Israelites accept the Immaculate Conception they are denying their own royal lineage that passed through all David's sons through Joeseph through Yeshua Ben Yossef through his sons with Queen Mary Magdalene. This lie is an ancient one that's why Hebrew Blacks are at the root of it and those opposed to the God of Israel and His promise to Jacob's do not desire to see it undone.

.

Harsh bitter truth.

An press release by a a secret religious organization has stirred a significant uproar over the Christian world, By claiming to recognize 8978 living descendants of Jesus Christ.

The strange document is signed by Louis-Édouard du Bellay, the Grand Master of the Priory of Sion, an undercover and shadowy organization which was made renowned by Dan Brown’s Da Vinci Code novel

Copies of the 54-page report were sent to many media outlets around the globe yesterday, and in addition being made accessible online the Priory of Sion’s website. It quickly incited a shock wave all through the Christian world, as the ideas it inspires contradict many fundamental aspects of the Christian faith.

“The Divine Order of the Priory of Sion is requesting the help of every single true believers in protecting the remaining descendants of Jesus Christ from the Vatican. After the passing of numerous individuals of our organization, the task of protecting all individuals from the Divine Bloodline is presently past our ability, and we desperately need help in achieving our thousand year old mission,” reads the introductory paragraph, which sets the tone for the entire text.

The document explains, the secret organization as suffered great losses over the last few years, and is currently not able of finishing its mission of protecting the “bloodline of the Christ”. It claims that “the Opus Dei and their associates” have executed more than 4000 descendants in the course of the most recent 10 years, adding that they will completely eradicate the bloodline if they are not stopped.

.

...

King Pharamind

Romans 4:17
King James Version
17 (As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were.

CISTERCIAN BEGINNINGS
Founders St. Robert, St. Alberic, and St. Stephen Harding.
Founders St. Robert, St. Alberic, and St. Stephen Harding.

The Cistercian Order finds its historical origin in Cîteaux, a French monastery founded in 1098 by a group of monks under the leadership of St. Robert of Molesme. Having left behind the Abbey of Molesme to found a new monastery, the community set out intending to live a life faithful to the simplicity of the Rule of St. Benedict. Inspired by the age’s strong spirit of ecclesial and monastic reform, they wanted to set aside some of the developments in monastic life associated with the distinguished and influential Benedictine Abbey of Cluny. Concretely, St. Robert and his monks embraced a set of ideals popular among contemporary monastic reformers: among them were the desire for an effective balance between prayer and serious work, an emphasis on evangelical poverty and a detachment from worldly affairs, and a style of community life modeled on the apostles and first Christians (cf. Acts 2:42-47; 4:32-35). Most essentially, they desired to seek out new and authentic ways of living their lives as monks in response to the call of God, a program of discernment that included both a fidelity to a broader and more ancient monastic tradition and a sincere attention to the life and times in which they lived.

Map of Cîteaux
Map of Cîteaux

The fervor and inspiration of the first monks at Cîteaux was soon put to the test. From the sources that are available, it seems some tension arose on account of the somewhat ambiguous relationship between the new monastery and the Benedictine house the monks had left. In order to preserve peace, after only a short time St. Robert was required to leave Cîteaux and return to Molesme in order to resume his duties there as abbot. For this reason in Cistercian iconography he is often pictured as a Benedictine monk wearing a black habit, instead of the traditional white-and-black habit of the Cistercian Order. Some monks decided to return with St. Robert, while those remaining professed their stability to Cîteaux, thereby sealing their commitment to the new reform. As abbot of Cîteaux, St. Robert was succeeded first by St. Alberic and then by St. Stephen Harding; together these three men are celebrated as the Founders of the Cistercian Order with a solemn feast on January 26.

Cîteaux
Cîteaux

Under the guidance of St. Alberic the small community grew, built their first church, and began setting down the practical details of their way of life. During the tenure of St. Stephen the new monastery began to grow at a remarkable rate, with the first four foundations (commonly referred to as “daughter-houses”) coming in rapid succession: La Ferté (1113), Pontigny (1114), Clairvaux (1115) and Morimond (1115). The renewal of monastic life inaugurated at Cîteaux soon expanded into an ever-growing network of closely related but independent monasteries throughout medieval Europe. The desire to preserve a strong sense of unity and solidarity among the spreading communities led the early Cistercians to create a charter of fraternal communication that would keep the monasteries together, one which soon emerged as a watershed in the history of federated governance. Key mandates of the first constitution, titled the Carta Caritatis (“Charter of Charity”), required each Cistercian abbot to make an annual inspection or “visitation” of his daughter-houses, as well as to convene annually with his brother abbots at Cîteaux for a “general chapter” dedicated to the governance and promotion of what had essentially become the first “religious order” in the Church. Such a system of government was seen as a promising way to harmonize the roles of central and local authority, preserving a strong sense of unity while at the same time fostering a healthy independence in each of its monasteries. The system grew so popular that the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), pointing to the Cistercians as a model, enjoined governance by general chapter upon all religious institutions of the age that had not already adopted it.

.

“Listen, brethren, to what the Lord says about John the Baptist: ‘He was a lamp, enkindled and shining.’ For only to be enkindled (ardere) is vain, only to shine (lucere) is little, to be enkindled and to shine (ardere et lucere) is perfect” (cf. John 5:35).

Jude 3

3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

Baruch 4:2

“Turn thee, O Jacob, and take hold of it: walk in the presence of the light thereof, that thou mayest be illuminated.”