NoToPile:
@immortalcrown the question was(and is still is)
Are you saying forceful/violent penetration cannot be determined medically? Because that is what I highlighted.
It's a yes or no answer. No long story please. You can decide not to respond.
And yes there are too many rape apologists on NL.

immortalcrown:

Forceful penetration can be proven by a medical test. But is penis the only object that can forcefully penetrate the place? Did the post tell you the result of the test? The argument is not even whether a medical test can prove forceful penetration. Try to follow the argument from the beginning. Stop being stupid. The argument is whether the post says the test result proved the rape happened. The post just said she did a test. The post does not explain the result of the test.

If you are not stupid, point out any of my comments that make me a rape apologist.
If you are not stupid, point out where I justify rape.
If you are not stupid, point out where I said the rape did not happen.
I only explained that the court is being careful. I did not say the rape happened. I did not say the rape did not happen. I only said the court did the right thing based on the evidence provided.

NoToPile:

The bolded is all I wanted to hear.
And yes there are too many rape apologists on NL

immortalcrown:


Forceful penetration can be proven by a medical test. But is penis the only object that can forcefully penetrate the place? Did the post tell you the result of the test? The argument is not even whether a medical test can prove forceful penetration. Try to follow the argument from the beginning. Stop being stupid. The argument is whether the post says the test result proved the rape happened. The post just said she did a test. The post does not explain the result of the test.

If you are not stupid, point out any of my comments that make me a rape apologist.
If you are not stupid, point out where I justify rape.
If you are not stupid, point out where I said the rape did not happen.
I only explained that the court is being careful. I did not say the rape happened. I did not say the rape did not happen. I only said the court did the right thing based on the evidence provided.

MufasaLion:


That boy was arguing blindly and he said this :

"What planet are you living on? Didn't you read it in the OP that she had the evidence on her phone and that she did a medical test? What other substantial evidence are you looking for?"

Nope, I don't support the virginity test. However, I had to counter that boy's blind argument with this - from the report :

"The alleged attacker had told police that he and Schietekat were in a relationship, so officers asked to look at her phone to find evidence of intimacy, which she denied."