Svlla:


Impressive!

But my physics is good if you really want us to talk about radar technology

AldrichAmes:
This lousy overrated aircraft that keeps dropping into the sea on its own due to mechanical problems, lol.

Using this junk in real war would be a disaster. The same junk ran away from Iranian airspace once they discovered that Russia gave Iran radars that can detect it - to save themselves from colossal embarrassment because Iran would have captured it with EW, lol.

Only F-22 raptor is alright and that as well is useless against Russians.

Yesterday I was watching how Soviet soldiers manning Vietnamese AA guns shot down dozens of US B-26 bombers that were overhyped as invincible back then within a few days, lol. The same fate awaits these lousy jets.

BritishNaija:


I'm Very right by saying hypersonic Missile need platform. The current one Russia is using are Specific Aircraft fitted. If they have develop anyone to lunch from other craft, that i have not seen.
There is Stealth technology, you can believe What you chose to, US, Russia,China and the rest know this.

And the aim of Shealth is to get close to you, the current sets of Shealth now, once they open their bays, you are dead already, because they are too close and too late for you to react already.

Svlla:


Just had to come back to this post

Iskander missile used regularly in Ukraine is an hypersonic missile of mach6 and it has a mobile ground based launch platform


Iskander: Surface to surface Missile
Khinzal: Air to Surface Missile
Zircon: Cruise missiles

All hypersonic and all has been used in Ukraine

BritishNaija:

One thing you failed to know is this, Iskander is not ''manoeuvrable'' in flight and is different from Khinzal and ZIrcon Which are Cruise and manoeuvrable missile.

Point to Note too is all ballastic missiles follows tracjectories and falls back to earth with hypersonic speeds. So all ballastic missiles both that of any country are hypersonic and could be shotdown easily because they follow a trajectory course.

Hope you understand better now.

Svlla:


What are you implying?

That hypersonic missiles have the same trajectory with ballastic missiles?

It's disappointing to hear you say this

Well, I only replied you because of your early post about the launch of hypersonic missiles from aircrafts (platforms)

All this talk about hypersonic missiles following a trajectory path same as ballastic missiles or hypersonic missiles not being manoeuvrable means you haven't done your homework

BritishNaija:

One thing you failed to know is this, Iskander is not ''manoeuvrable'' in flight and is different from Khinzal and ZIrcon Which are Cruise and manoeuvrable missile.

Point to Note too is all ballastic missiles follows tracjectories and falls back to earth with hypersonic speeds. So all ballastic missiles both that of any country are hypersonic and could be shotdown easily because they follow a trajectory course.

Hope you understand better now.

BritishNaija:

One thing you failed to know is this, Iskander is not ''manoeuvrable'' in flight and is different from Khinzal and ZIrcon Which are Cruise and manoeuvrable missile.

BritishNaija:

Point to Note too is all ballastic missiles follows tracjectories and falls back to earth with hypersonic speeds. So all ballastic missiles both that of any country are hypersonic and could be shotdown easily because they follow a trajectory course.

BritishNaija:


I'm Very right by saying hypersonic Missile need platform. The current one Russia is using are Specific Aircraft fitted. If they have develop anyone to lunch from other craft, that i have not seen.

Svlla:


I dont know how to break this down to you but I need to tell you anyway