yemmit90:


Oga, election in Nigeria is still far from being decided by logic or masses choice. Both PDP and APC bought votes during Osun election, one of the reason PDP won was because they pay more than APC per vote #10k while APC pays 7k.

Poverty is main cause of chosen the bad leaders in this country, I am very sure that 95% of those shouting take your country back will collect 10k and vote for a particular candidate. Apart from the fact that Nigerians lack foresight, no poverty striken electorates will reject 10k in the name of " I want this particular candidate".

Whoever says or think they will collect their money and vote their choice has never been to pooling booth before. There is a way electorates stylishly show their tumb print to a coded party agent hiding at strategy conner before they give you money. They are not that silly to dash people money without ensuring they vote for them(except party agents did not spend as expected).

For us to chose the best leaders, the poverty rate must be reduce to barest minimum.

You have a point. It's either you vote for their candidate and collect the money or you vote your choice and go home empty handed which can be done by few youths in Nigeria. The deciders of every elections are women.

Okoroawusa:

Don't just tell me with BVAS. How? Show us how BVAS will make Obi win and others lose.

If this election was done freely and fairly obi will emerge victorious. Apcpdp are putting all their hope on northern votes which was why tinubu picked a northern Muslim and pdp jettisoned zoning for a northern fulani.those votes are from underage and manual registration done in 2015 and 2019 whereas in the South many were excluded because card readers didn't capture them were faulty and they couldn't vote manually but in the north due to lack of network manual registration was allowed thereby increasing their advantage. Bvas will greatly reduced these votes thereby ending the myth of block votes from the north.

A lot has changed man. The new electoral law, the first time we gonna have the three major tribes contesting and youth are more involved this time around. So, with these expect shock come 2023.

Okoroawusa:

How will it be different? Don't just give us blanket statements that looks like you are reassuring yourself of what you want to happen. Show us howthe 2023 election being different will mean that Peter Obi will win it. We would all love to know.

lhordspy:
'Lion no be tiger mate, lion na ordained king of the jungle.'

^^^
You are free to engage in your tribal wars with those who think like you - its your funeral.

But misinformation and miseducation will not be tolerated.

With Natgeo wild documentaries all over the place there is absolutely no excuse for the nonsense you have up there. First of all the two do not meet in the wild. Second, the tiger is the largest and strongest (pound for pound) of all the big cats - you may not like it but it is what it is. Third, lions are typically not found in the jungle - it isn't their habitat.

Get an education. Please.

Reference:


I often hear this line together with another that has been recently addressed in full which says 'power is not given, but is taken', to which a south-easterner has stepped up in the form of Peter Obi, yet it is still a problem to most.

So I will ask you in clear terms. What do you mean by 'making peace and stretching hands', because I cannot recount an Easterner elected into office since 1999. And if not, it means they have been voting for candidates from regions other than their own all the while. So what is the peace and the hands about?

Now, I am not from the East, but if you are from the West, I think the moral burden is rather on folks from that clime who feel they deserve another shot at the office having enjoyed it for 8 years under OBJ, so your moral compass should at least be spinning completely around and pointing you in the direction of supportung a south-easterner this time around instead of fueling this guilt escortion.

But like most posts from you folks I sense an inkling of superiorism, an ownership of the polity, that arrogates you the power to decide where the leadership of this country goes. You can taste it in the condescending tone of the 'plea'.

That my friend is not a moral contest at all. Sorry, but you are deeply embedded in sectionalism and are a flag for all that is base about Nigeria. So look intently into a mirror and know this. You may have all the cake, but,

This country WILL NEVER MOVE FORWARD WITH INJUSTICE. Take that to the bank.

The easterners are doing well now Playing the political game now but it will take time for the west and north to align with them as long as they continue playing it politically instead of from the war point of view.
This is what we meant by making peace.

As you can see some westerners and northerners are for peter Obi. So for many to align with them they need to stop the blame game and victim mentality.

Yorubas were marginalized by the Hausas and Igbos before the Biafra war and we were the opposition party. Abiola and our top leaders were kill and lots a don't have time to mention

But what did we do? We forged ahead and began to play it from the politically perspective.

Lastly, you not Igbo neither Yoruba as you stated but you should know that the easterners hate us just for being born Yoruba and accues us for not involving a war we see not win able. After Biafra the west accepted many of them into our lands. Go and verify

I do not believe in sectionalism but Nigeria is a sectional country even if we don't want to admit it or not.

And the Igbos are the ones who want to divide the country they have wanted to do their own thing. Tell me is that not sectionalism.

Even if they are granted Biafra do you think they will be able to be accommodated in the North or west as they were now?

Fujiyama:




^^^
You are free to engage in your tribal wars with those who think like you - its your funeral.

But misinformation and miseducation will not be tolerated.

With Natgeo wild documentaries all over the place there is absolutely no excuse for the nonsense you have up there. First of all the two do not meet in the wild. Second, the tiger is the largest and strongest (pound for pound) of all the big cats - you may not like it but it is what it is. Third, lions are typically not found in the jungle - it isn't their habitat.

Get an education. Please.

Goodday,

First of all, base on your allegation, i don't engage in tribal wars and tantrums. I only seek to educate, and teach some amateur online miscreants some lessons. Especially the hot-headed ones who have decide to go rogue in a political space thinking they can bully,insults and abuse anyone whenever they do come up with their beer parlour baseless arguments.

Having corrected your view about me on that. I will also like to spare little time of my schedule to enlighten you also, because i see you are very ignorant of some facts. Especially having noticed, you are one of those that dives into a stated statement, charging to argue, and run your mouth just to appear woke, knowledgeable or in-know without first understanding or comprehending the said statement first.

It will definitely be an honour to save someone from drowning in the sea of ignorance this morning. I will implore you to just please read slowly to understand.

' A lion is the king of the jungle' in context isn't and should'nt be base on strength, speed or power. I don't know the characteristics of making someone a king where you come from. But it's definitely not of those factors you think. It might seem from the size, behavior, speed, and power that the tiger should be crowned king. Infact a tiger is more potent than a lion if its strength, size, and his speed are harnessed to the right kind of endeavor.

BUT
The LION claims the title because of its kingship abilities that the TIGER does not possess. A king must possess leadership qualities and the lion remains head of his colony. He oversees his group of lions including the lioness and cubs. This ranges from hunting to decision-making and more.

Just look at the way the lion protects its prides, a protector of territory and just as a king makes sure their community is safe, the lion protects its pride. He stops intruders and since the TIGER is a solitary animal, this is a key difference and determining factor in who takes away the crown.

When there is a need for food, the lion provides. However, he rarely does the work himself and as a king, commands the lioness and others to go hunting for him. 


If you noticed, i keep using the word, JUNGLE. Because of your assertion that a lion does'nt live in the jungle. You are very wrong sir, ofcourse lions are 'rarely' found in the jungle , they prefer the savannah. Lions can be found living in the jungles of Gabon and Congo. You can make your research about this since you seems to believe more on NatGeo wild than in heaven . In Ethiopia you may find some lion prides in the jungles, but truthfully, those are closer to the open than deep in the jungles. But atleast it is in a jungle, open or deep.

So all in all. When it's said that 'Lion is the king of the jungle' ... I think in this context , jungle is just more of a general word to classify the habitat for all animals. And Lion is the king of that jungle.

Shalom.

asanausana91:
how old are you? Do you think the outburst of Tinubu against buhari in ogun state will be forgiven? I will remind you after the election.

Forget about that outburst. Politics isn't about emotional considerations. Its about logic, and reality, as far as interests are concerned. Thats why you have old foes become friends overnight.

lhordspy:
Goodday,

First of all, base on your allegation, i don't engage in tribal wars and tantrums. I only seek to educate, and teach some amateur online miscreants some lessons.

^^^
This simply isn't true.

lhordspy:
Having corrected your view about me on that. I will also like to spare little time of my schedule to enlighten you also, because i see you are very ignorant of some facts. Especially having noticed, you are one of those that dives into a stated statement, charging to argue, and run your mouth just to appear woke, knowledgeable or in-know without first understanding or comprehending the said statement first.

^^^
Okay.

I never thought I would see the day when I would be described as trying to appear 'woke' but apparently that day has come.

lhordspy:
BUT
The LION claims the title because of its kingship abilities that the TIGER does not possess. A king must possess leadership qualities and the lion remains head of his colony. He oversees his group of lions including the lioness and cubs. This ranges from hunting to decision-making and more.

Just look at the way the lion protects its prides, a protector of territory and just as a king makes sure their community is safe, the lion protects its pride.

^^^


Your own words are fighting hard against you.

From what you have written, the lion is actually 'king' of his pride and not the "jungle". According to you, lions have 'kingship' attributes because of their service to the pride (your words, not mine). That service simply doesn't extend to the other animals. So if kingship is service, how can you be king over those whom you do not serve? Is it clear to you now? You see the power of an education?

lhordspy:
He stops intruders and since the TIGER is a solitary animal, this is a key difference and determining factor in who takes away the crown.

^^^
Again, your argument is faulty.

So...a pride male stops intruders...and he deserves the 'crown' for this reason.

And...the tiger meekly allows intruders into the living room and allows them to put their feet up while he makes dinner for his unwanted visitors? Have you seen tigers protecting their territory or their kill? Do you know how fiercely territorial tigers are?

In your world, 'kingship' is the preserve of lions just because they live in prides and repel invaders - and tigers do not qualify because they are solitary animals and give in to intruders. This sir, is faulty logic. Of course it would be harder (in theory) for a single tiger to fend off a gang of intruders than it would be for several males of the same pride of lions. But tigers simply do not face this sort of challenge in their natural habitat in the wild. And when they do have unwanted guests I assure you that tigers more than hold their own.

lhordspy:
When there is a need for food, the lion provides. However, he rarely does the work himself and as a king, commands the lioness and others to go hunting for him.

^^
We are back to the same point I made earlier. The lion is king of his pride and not the 'jungle'! Why doesn't he also command the crocodile or the rhino (and not just those poor overworked lionesses) to go find food for him since he's king?

lhordspy:
If you noticed, i keep using the word, JUNGLE. Because of your assertion that a lion does'nt live in the jungle. You are very wrong sir, ofcourse lions are 'rarely' found in the jungle , they prefer the savannah. Lions can be found living in the jungles of Gabon and Congo. You can make your research about this since you seems to believe more on NatGeo wild than in heaven . In Ethiopia you may find some lion prides in the jungles, but truthfully, those are closer to the open than deep in the jungles. But atleast it is in a jungle, open or deep.

So all in all. When it's said that 'Lion is the king of the jungle' ... I think in this context , jungle is just more of a general word to classify the habitat for all animals. And Lion is the king of that jungle.

Shalom.

^^^


You have tied yourself in a thousand knots trying to prove the unprovable. My point in my first post still stands and needs no further explanation. Go back and read it again.

Shalom!

Fujiyama:


^^^
This simply isn't true.



^^^
Okay.

I never thought I would see the day when I would be described as trying to appear 'woke' but apparently that day has come.



^^^


Your own words are fighting hard against you.

From what you have written, the lion is actually 'king' of his pride and not the "jungle". According to you, lions have 'kingship' attributes because of their service to the pride (your words, not mine). That service simply doesn't extend to the other animals. So if kingship is service, how can you be king over those whom you do not serve? Is it clear to you now? You see the power of an education?



^^^
Again, your argument is faulty.

So...a pride male stops intruders...and he deserves the 'crown' for this reason.

And...the tiger meekly allows intruders into the living room and allows them to put their feet up while he makes dinner for his unwanted visitors? Have you seen tigers protecting their territory or their kill? Do you know how fiercely territorial tigers are?

In your world, 'kingship' is the preserve of lions just because they live in prides and repel invaders - and tigers do not qualify because they are solitary animals and give in to intruders. This sir, is faulty logic. Of course it would be harder (in theory) for a single tiger to fend off a gang of intruders than it would be for several males of the same pride of lions. But tigers simply do not face this sort of challenge in their natural habitat in the wild. And when they do have unwanted guests I assure you that tigers more than hold their own.



^^
We are back to the same point I made earlier. The lion is king of his pride and not the 'jungle'! Why doesn't he also command the crocodile or the rhino (and not just those poor overworked lionesses) to go find food for him since he's king?



^^^


You have tied yourself in a thousand knots trying to prove the unprovable. My point in my first post still stands and needs no further explanation. Go back and read it again.

Shalom!

I have been trying to respond for the past few hours now, i just can't seems to even know where to begin. For Goodness sake, did you read all you typed up there.

I stated my opinion of on a post, you replied me, antagonising most of it. I tried correcting, showing you the light, and making you realise the absence of some certain knowledge in you. But look at all you typed to payback. Am now of the opinion that sir, you are irredeemable. It's such a pity that i can't do pass what have done in saving your ignorance, mother nature didnt allow human thinking for other human.

Back to your reply sir, Most of your defensive argument are very incoherent, baseless and very contradicting. You stated that i was insinuating that lion is a king of its pride not jungle because i gave an example on the xtics a Lion shows toward its pride, how they hunt in group and how he exhibit a kingship behaviour towards them. I implore you to read wide, a king must have that kingship trait before he can be generally excepted as a king. A lion shows of that trait much more than any other any in the world. What more can you ask of a animal to be crown a king. I will beg you sir, please go back and re-read all i stated earlier. Please. But this time do it very slowly to understand.

Lastly. Even though i stated that a lion can be found in the jungle, which i even gave like three to four countries jungle it can be found. You are still denying the fact without even first making your research on it or even giving me a counter-prove to prove that am wrong.

And If you remember, i kept hammering on the fact that the use of the word 'jungle' in context stands for the general habitat of all animals without exceptions. Even if a lion exhibits the traits of a king in the savannah, which superceeds all kingship trait that can be found in any other animals be it in the jungle or deep wild, forest, woodland, grassland, plains, sahara or savannah. It is very correct to use the general terms 'jungle' to describe all habitat animal lives in because its more of a general acceptable word(jungle) for habitat of animal. Because the unlearned people still put the deep wild, the savannah and others including the jungle itself as jungle. Because it is a generally excepted word for wild animal habitat.

For example, when we say 'somebody is the fastest person in the universe. Should we challenge the word 'Universe' in context on that statement because the universe doesnt really implies just earth, the world but also mars, but also jupiter, pluto and the rest. Why using the word 'universe', when we know there could also be some aliens or humans who are also very fast in other planet we havent explore yet.??

That is simply because the word 'universe' is a generally accepted word to generalise the habitat of human in a more clearer terms for both for the learned and the unlearned. We believe human is of much higher-living things which some of the xtics or trait been shown. So it doesnt really matter if some other human show the same in the other planet. The kingship trait of human, will always superceeds. Which brought about the word 'universe' in context of 'fastest person in the universe.' ...


Omo i dont think you will ever understand this. Me self don tire to dey explain. Just believe in what you know and let me believe in mine biko.

Asgard73:
Oyetola said same .. even Tinubu said same about Osun

Gombe is a traditional pDP states and is already in the bag.

Even this governor will mobilize ruggedly for Atiku and PDP

We just have to tell Tinubu wetin he wan hear ..

Remember how Muazu take run Gej for Pdp that year
This one go too loud .

Power to the people
North 2023

PDP!!

how far?