In Ptolemaic Egypt, the goddes Isis - she was the Last Queen of Ancient Egypt, when rulers were men, worshipped across the Roman Empire and the last Queen Cleopatra was the resurrected Isis - became Isis Chrest.

Julius Caesar and later, Mark Antony, became the husband of this divine Cleopatra claiming the Romans as her Divine Consort; between them were fathered a number of children; among them was Antonia.

Antonia was the legitimate daughter of Mark Antony and Octavia Minor, and founded a polythesistic, imperial cult. Their followers called themselves Chrestian in the early decades of the first century of the modern era.

We thus see that Isis Chrest is linked, through Cleopatra and Mark Antony, to Chrestianity.

Chrestians became explicit in 37 CE, in an inscription naming Antonia Minor, her husband the commander Drusus, and the Pompeii banker, Lucius Caecilius lucundus.

One has a natural tendency to look to religions to be based on something positive, good; Chrestianity was the exact opposite: it was political, with the purpose of supporting Imperial clients in the Levant against Messianic Judaism (which was a rising force).

It did this not by promoting itself, but by instigating conflict with Messianic Jews, just look at their character and actions: the Imperial chamberlain Epaphroditus; the Prefect of Judaea, Felix; the common-law wife of Emperor Vespasian, Caenis.

They are those members who built the sect through the first century, killing Nero and Domitian (within less than a century).

The two levers of power used by early Chrestianity were the imperial army and money (which is how the other two Chrestians founder, first named was a brilliant, Roman commander (Drusus, husband of Antonia) and the Pompeii banker/money lender Lucius Caecilius.

Codex Sinaiticus, of the fourth century, was explicitly Chrestian; this Bible was conceived as Black Propaganda against Messianic Judaism, which is one reason why the early dates offered for its individual books are highly doubtful; it parodies both the Ebionim and the Messianic expectations of sacred, Jewish literature, after the Wars had ended.

Chrestianity was not conceived as good for anyone other than the Imperial cause, as Antonia had intended.
Chrestianity is overtly magical and when “IS Chrest” appears, he too is a magician, in the Greek style.
The New Testament is most accurately described as parody, because it is full of parodies and was composed to parody the enemy of the authors: the Poor and its leadership.

From this Bible(Codex Sinaiticus) , we learn that all previous manuscripts that became included in the Modern New Testament are not “Christian”, but Chrestian; we can see how monks much later scratched the Greek H (E) used in Chrest to become the I of Christ.

This becomes of particular importance in the discussion of the Logos doctrine of Philo, for his brother - Alexander Lysimachus, Alabarch of Alexandria - was the chamberlaim to one of the first, explicit Chrestians (Antonia Minor, according to the Latin inscription of 37 CE).

Philo is widely believed to have written the first Christology, but from this Bible and other archaeological records, we see how it would have been a Chrestology.

Just to remind: Chrestianity is a pagan, imperial cult starting in the early first century. It first appears as supporting imperial clients in the Levant and in so doing, opposing Messianic Judaism, seen as competing against the claimed divinity of the Emperor.