😂 🤣 😂 🤣

Vic2023:
🇺🇦⚡- "Syrskyi [Ukraine's Commander-In-Chief], go f*ck yourself and come fight. Syrskyi is a red-haired idiot who does not give a f*ck about ordinary people who are now dying like flies, and I’m not talking about our fighters. This genius moved our best to Volchansk [northern Kharkov direction], now Konstantinovka [Mariinka-Ugledar direction] is hell." – Ukrainian 79th Brigade (Cyborgs).

Ahoy, to the last Ukrainians...of cos.. Ukraine is winning.

Vic2023:
🇷🇺🙌🏻 It is important to understand that the West’s terrorist attacks against Russia are a response to our effective actions on the battlefield in Ukraine and on the fields of global economic and political confrontation. Just like there were terrorist attacks on the Nord Streams immediately after the announcement of referendums on the annexation of the DPR, LPR, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions

By the way, as then, the West is responding with terrorist attacks to the starting point we have designated in a possible settlement of the conflict

📉 The trend is clearly visible: they started with a high-tech terrorist attack at the bottom of the Baltic Sea with a blow to the European and Russian economies. They continued with a complexly organized attack on Crocus "under a false flag" with the potential for an interethnic split in Russia. Now they have descended to banal terror at the hands of crests

It is becoming more and more difficult for the West to make strong moves, it seems that it has none left
☝🏻 Typical zungzwang leading to defeat. Both in the war in Ukraine and in the global confrontation

Of course, this does not make it any easier for the victims and the relatives of the victims. We mourn with them and will never forget

At the same time, I would like to send rays of diarrhea to those who hype on tragedies. 🥴 "This is not how you should fight", "I'll tell you how to do it" and generally "I told you so". Take a break at least for the time of mourning, immediately after I’m ready to answer you to the point

And about the pause. ‼️ Today is exactly one year of Prigozhin’s campaign against Moscow. I hadn’t started a telegram yet and didn’t have a personal platform
But I was live on the air for more than nine hours: I covered the events, gave a personal assessment and answered all your questions. Unlike those who “took a break” and waited than everything will end

Of course, you have the right to do so. Just like hype today at the events in Sevastopol and Dagestan, no one will forbid you. Then just don’t be offended

hmmmm......


I shake yna*h for you ooo.
you just dey give us conspiracy/propaganda back to back.

Balogunodua:


Of course, Obeideince40 needs to calm down and agree to this new reality


But then again will it be possible with the Carrier operating far from the shore.

The US has gamed these type of scenario several times and the result is always the same: some drones always went through the layered defenses.

Nonetheless, if the carrier is operating far away from shore, the lesser the drone swarm success rate would become. But again, that would be almost impossible to achieve.because, carrier strike groups are designed to stay close within the geographical proximity of their target. And this will depend on if the enemy had advanced defenses.

If the enemy has little to no defense, the carrier can sit say a 100 to 200 miles away from the enemy's coastline. In theory, a carrier can sit and strike thousands of miles away from an enemy's shoreline, but the further away from the shore the lower the sorties and ordinances it can drop. Plus, it would have to expend huge refuelling assets for a very small strike force.

Masterviolence:

My conversation with them will soon come to a halt.

I can't afford to loss brain cells because of them.

It's frustrating and baffling how some of them don't accept their errors, learn new facts and move on. They always have something irrelevant, incorrect or off topic to say. This is why most of the time I just chose to read comments without replying. I don't even read some comments anymore because is of no use reading when you know it would be fruitless to reply them.

Masterviolence:


Argument like this gets me livid.

We are talking about:
Lunch, Detection and Interception.

[b]What is the correlation between this topic and the numbers of airplanes an airport can accomodate?
There's obviously no link to this topic of debate.

The only link I can think of, is you trying everything in you to travel out.
Visa, Airport and Abroad

[/b]

Ay the bolded.

Obedience40:



which drones is stealthy,.?😂😂😂😂😂
even advance USA drones can be well spotted on radars talk less of cheap Chinese or Iranian drones

even stealthy fighter jets with their body frame and speed, when their weapons bay are open to release bombs they lose their stealthiness, and can be spotted on radars.

we are not in a stone age, there is no way a group of drones will surprise a USA navy carrier group,, IT IS SIMPLY IMPOSSIBLE.

Are there drones designed to be stealthy or not?

Obedience40:


I was only saying hypothetical a swamp of drones will likely score a bit
the problem is how will drones be able to swamp a USA carrier, without them being intercept in transit.

Your first paragraph answered your question but at the same time, you contradicted your first paragraph with your second paragraph. At this stage, I cannot help you brother, because my eyes are turning me going around in circles. Stay blessed.

Fash20:


The same way drones are used to overwhelm every other DF system. The drones may not do the damage they just have to keep the carrier busy while another weapon strikes the carrier.

Extended facts.

Masterviolence:

The last paragraph sum it up.
This should also be a lesson to others.

And I hope he learnt something from this topic too.

I hope that too.

Balogunodua:


Hypothetical is what we all do factually Friend

The USA Carrier have yet to come across that kind of threat none that this defence system have engaged such threat on land or at the sea. So yours and his summation are all hypothetical....base theory...



The USA carrier that was supposedly hit by Houthi had all this system in place...even though no real time proof that this Mighty Carrier was hit...the USA providing an old video as a counter leaves room for suspicion for us all. We can go all and allover again with this to no end.

Logically, the old video they put out gave them away that they're hiding something.

Watcharena:
maybe no carrier was hit but why did U S gave us old picture instead of new one and again why did US sent Carrier home only to replace it with another one

Gbam.

Appleyard:


Your first paragraph answered your question but at the same time, you contradicted your first paragraph with your second paragraph. At this stage, I cannot help you brother, because my eyes are turning me going around in circles. Stay blessed.

it's all good, anything you believe is OK as long as it's makes you happy.

Appleyard:


Are there drones designed to be stealthy or not?

give me one drone, that has stealthily capabilities like the F22, drones are just cheap alternatives and low risk assets.

with innovation maybe a stealthy capable drone will be produce, for now there is nothing like a drone which it's signature won't be seen on radar.

drones can overwhelmingly overpower AD base on its numbers, but they can't evade radar detection.

Kingsnairaland:


That is what he meant to say.

Abi LGBT spirit 😂

WriteerNg:



But one fool here said that China's relationship with the EU/US is the most important and that China would not risk it for Russia. He swore that China cannot do without EU/US.


Most people don't realize that to the Chinese people, Russia is Europe.

It is in infact Europe with everything that Europe lacks and the largest portion of Europe at that.

The reverse is the reality the world cannot do without China, not just EU.
China actually has the world by the balls...