Workch:
You didn't do anything, you are sonding like someone who doesn't know basic physics.

Go and read it

Oh dear
We are here talking about Quantum Physics and you here talking about basics physics

No wonder you don't understand what I mean by "sun time"

You understanding of time is actually BASIC

Kyase:

Oh dear
We are here talking about Quantum Physics and you here talking about basics physics

No wonder you don't understand what I mean by "sun time"

You understanding of time is actually BASIC

So what does theory of relativity say if you have read it and you know it?

Kyase:

Oh dear
We are here talking about Quantum Physics and you here talking about basics physics

No wonder you don't understand what I mean by "sun time"

You understanding of time is actually BASIC

theory of relativity is not quantum physics.
The concept of time is not quantum physics, are you sure you know physics?
Everything we have discussing here doesn't concern quantum physics.

There's nothing like sun time in physics, what do you mean by that?

Kyase, why did you ignore my own questions? Like Workch said, Einstein's theory of relativity offers the most accurate explanation of time till date.

Your argument lacks substance and you're sounding like someone ignorant of basic Physics.

A001:
Kyase, why did you ignore my own questions? Like Workch said, Einstein's theory of relativity offers the most accurate explanation of time till date.

Your argument lacks substance and you're sounding like someone ignorant of basic Physics.

i am taking it easy with him, he will keep showing his ignorance the more we engage him.

He's already doing that. He's yet to jusy browse the theory, talking about dunning Kruger syndrome

N

A001:

How do you think time should be defined apart from its popular conceptions?

Okay
So you are after google and wiki definition of time

Please try and read this and you will understand my point and maybe after we can create a thread for this discussion as science lovers and scientists

But because of next time, there's nothing like "you are wrong in science" the reason why I never told you, you are wrong, rather I bring my argument for you to disprove it with your
Not like what that bro did up there


https: //scitechdaily. com/time-might-not-exist-according-to-physicists/

A001:
Kyase, why did you ignore my own questions? Like Workch said, Einstein's theory of relativity offers the most accurate explanation of time till date.

Your argument lacks substance and you're sounding like someone ignorant of basic Physics.

I replied you
Was looking for something to show you on the internet

Workch:
theory of relativity is not quantum physics.
The concept of time is not quantum physics, are you sure you know physics?
Everything we have discussing here doesn't concern quantum physics.

There's nothing like sun time in physics, what do you mean by that?

Explain quantum mechanics for me bro

Kyase:
N

Okay
So you are after google and wiki definition of time

Please try and read this and you will understand my point and maybe after we can create a thread for this discussion as science lovers and scientists

But because of next time, there's nothing like "you are wrong in science" the reason why I never told you, you are wrong, rather I bring my argument for you to disprove it with your
Not like what that bro did up there


https: //scitechdaily. com/time-might-not-exist-according-to-physicists/

your article is using string theory to suggest that time doesn't may not exist.

Is there evidence for string theory?

Kyase:


Explain quantum mechanics for me bro

you first explain theory it relativity. We have been asking that since page 1.
Explain it and I will answer you

Workch:
your article is using string theory to suggest that time doesn't may not exist.

Is there evidence for string theory?

And string theory is false ?

Kyase:


And string theory is false ?

there's no evidence for it... It's a mere hypothesis.

Show me one evidence for it

Kyase:
N

Okay
So you are after google and wiki definition of time

Please try and read this and you will understand my point and maybe after we can create a thread for this discussion as science lovers and scientists

But because of next time, there's nothing like "you are wrong in science" the reason why I never told you, you are wrong, rather I bring my argument for you to disprove it with your
Not like what that bro did up there


https: //scitechdaily. com/time-might-not-exist-according-to-physicists/

Yes, those definitions are got from Physics textbooks as shown in the in-text citations of the attached photo.

You can be wrong in science. If you said force is mass over acceleration, that'd be wrong.

If you call the shape of the earth rectangular, that'd be wrong as well.

Workch:
you first explain theory it relativity. We have been asking that since page 1.
Explain it and I will answer you

If you tell me why time is slower at the centre of the earth then we can start talking about Einstein theory of relativity, while at that include why gravity have effects on time

A001:

Yes, those definitions are got from Physics textbooks as shown in the in-text citations of the attached photo.

You can be wrong in science. If you said force is mass over acceleration, that'd be wrong.

If you call the shape of the earth rectangular, that'd be wrong as well.

Nobody is wrong in science
As long as you can prove it

Even the theory of relativity you guys keep hammering, is yet to be fully proved
It's still a theory, workch said string theory has no evidence, same thing with E=mc^2 when Einstein postulate it

Just like I said
I find more sense in the string theory than your "Time exist" theory

Remember, theory of relativity is not a prove that time exist

Remember, he said we can bend time

Kyase:



If you tell me why time is slower at the centre of the earth then we can start talking about Einstein theory of relativity, while at that include why gravity have effects on time

Time is slower at the center of the earth because time is relative, a body in space bends the fabric of spacetime, in the process it exerts gravity and then slows time around it, the more the mass of the object, the more its ability to bend spectime. The closer you move to the object, the more it bends spacetime and the more it slows time. It's why at the center of earth where spacetime is more bent than the surface, time is slower than the surface.

All these are actually explained in the theory of relativity we have been asking you to read. It's called time dilation under general theory of relativity.

Kyase:



If you tell me why time is slower at the centre of the earth then we can start talking about Einstein theory of relativity, while at that include why gravity have effects on time

can you show me evidence for string theory now?

Workch:

Time is slower at the center of the earth because time is relative, a body in space bends the fabric of spacetime, in the process it exerts gravity and then slows time around it, the more the mass of the object, the more its ability to bend spectime. The closer you move to the object, the more it bends spacetime and the more it slows time. It's why at the center of time where spacetime is more bent than the surface, time slower than the surface.

All these are actually explained in the theory of relativity we have been asking you to read. It's called time dilation under general theory of relativity.

Good, now go back to my first two or three comments about time

What did I say about time there and then compare it with what you just wrote

Workch:
can you show me evidence for string theory now?

Show me evidence of time travel

Kyase:


Nobody is wrong in science
As long as you can prove it

Even the theory of relativity you guys keep hammering, is yet to be fully proved
It's still a theory, workch said string theory has no evidence, same thing with E=mc^2 when Einstein postulate it

Just like I said
I find more sense in the string theory than your "Time exist" theory

Remember, theory of relativity is not a prove that time exist

Remember, he said we can bend time

sorry sir, people can be wrong in science.

Albert Einstein theory of relativity is what we use to operate GPS and run the international space station, what can you use string theory for?

Kyase:


Show me evidence of time travel

What do you understand by time travel?

Because the scientific is different from the layman understanding

Kyase:


Good, now go back to my first two or three comments about time

What did I say about time there and then compare it with what you just wrote

you said time doesn't exist in your first comment sir.


We said it's relative. Time on the surface of the earth is relative to the time in the centre. Time exist sir

Kyase:


Show me evidence of time travel

can you show us evidence for string theory now?

Kyase:


Nobody is wrong in science
As long as you can prove it

Even the theory of relativity you guys keep hammering, is yet to be fully proved
It's still a theory, workch said string theory has no evidence, same thing with E=mc^2 when Einstein postulate it

Just like I said
I find more sense in the string theory than your "Time exist" theory

Remember, theory of relativity is not a prove that time exist

Remember, he said we can bend time

You're just posting pseudo-scientific claims about time without proof.

I'm sure if you understand what you're talking about and have solid proof, you won't be arguing about your point on Nairaland.

You would have published your findings in a journal.

Einstein's theory of relativity is one of the most powerful and revolutionary theories in Physics with different proofs.

You find more sense in a string theory without a single proof? You obviously don't know what you're talking about.

Time doesn't exist? But space does? Lols, you don't even know basic Physics.

Workch:
sorry sir, people can be wrong in science.

Albert Einstein theory of relativity is what we use to operate GPS and run the international space station, what can you use string theory for?

Please go to YouTube and search on string theory by Dr Michio kaku then we can have this conversation when everybody is on board

Kyase:


Please go to YouTube and search on string theory by Dr Michio kaku then we can have this conversation when everybody is on board

I don't learn science From YouTube sir, it's where many conspiracy theories and junk science like you re spewing now are spread.
I learnt science in school and from reading papers from renowned and trusted scientific journals.

Kyase:


Please go to YouTube and search on string theory by Dr Michio kaku then we can have this conversation when everybody is on board

you can as well share the evidence for string theory that you got from YouTube here. But I advice you to stop learning science there.

You will learn so much jargons

Kyase:


Please go to YouTube and search on string theory by Dr Michio kaku then we can have this conversation when everybody is on board

Lols, this man. Stop learning science on YouTube. They'll fill your head with all sorts of garbage that's pseudo-scientific 😂😂

LordReed, everything is possible. Can a human survive the event horizon of a blackhole that will enable him/her stop time?

It should be possible, let's wait another 2million years 😂

We cannot totally overrule it

Workch:
LordReed, everything is possible. Can a human survive the event horizon of a blackhole that will enable him/her stop time?

It should be possible, let's wait another 2million years 😂

We cannot totally overrule it

LMFAO! Now I know something is wrong with you, yet to figure what though. Bwahahahahaha!

You can't quote where I said everything is possible because I never did. LMAO!

I am God

LordReed:


LMFAO! Now I know something is wrong with you, yet to figure what though. Bwahahahahaha!

You can't quote where I said everything is possible because I never did. LMAO!

But you said everything is possible.

I am telling you that many thing are impossible, including traveling at light speed and breaking the barrier of time.

It's even impossible to get swallowed by a pythob and surviving its digestive juice. Should we also wait a while, maybe someone can disprove this in future?