LAY MAN BREAKDOWN OF OBI CASE AGAINST TINUBU AND INEC.

1 Obi say Tinubu “was fined $460,000 for an offence involving dishonesty, namely narcotics trafficking imposed by the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in case no:93C 4483″ between the United States of America and Bola Tinubu. Meaning Tinubu was an alleged DRUG BARON. Anybody wey don pay fine to any govt for drug business no suppose contest for any election for Nigeria .( I go explain this more in my bullet) .

2.Obi say Tinubu no suppose to appoint Shettima as Vice because at the time wey he appointed Shettima , say the guy was still senator contesting for Borno and also at the same time contesting for Vice President. It was against the electoral act. Yet, INEC approve am . He submit evidence to prove am. So therefore Tinubu elections is void.

3. Obi say , them say for the electoral act dem go use BVAS upload and submit result , dem no do am . So therefore the election should be canceled.

4.Obi say the electoral act say to be declared President you must win at least two third of all state and and Abuja but say he no win am and even in Abuja he no score the 25% so no be for am.

5. Obi say the forensic evidence wey he get show say votes wey INEC record many pass the accreditation wey the Obi forensic do and that they have the evidence to prove it on so many states and if na so, the electoral law say the whole election would be canceled.

6. And say votes wey dem count for Tinubu for Rivers, Lagos,Taraba, Benue,Adamawa, Imo, Bauchi, Borno , Kaduna, Plateau, and other states of the Federation na Obi votes them give Tinubu and their forensic prove am.

7.Say INEC violate their own law by announcing Tinubu as President when them never upload result finish for their Portal. So it has to be canceled.

8. Obi say the law wey set up INEC say if Pooling agent see any wahala and report am , INEC suppose stop the election or cancel am until they address the issue of agents. But say dem no do am even as many polling agents and LP agent raised alarm of politicians forcing them to write fake results. Say he get plenty evidence to show.

©julaion

Strong case premised on the truth....... Light and darkness type of trial.

Nothing strong here.

Op, please tell me which section of the Electoral Act says that results should be transmitted electronically.

I'm waiting.

N3TRAL:
Nothing strong here.

Op, please tell me which section of the Electoral Act says that results should be transmitted electronically.

I'm waiting.

when Ngige tell Tinubu make him never celebrate yet,you think say na joke...food don done for am......you spotted only one but there are 7 strong cases there una forget say obi was the first governor to get his stolen mandate 3 times in court from 2007

julaion:
when Ngige tell Tinubu make him never celebrate yet,you think say na joke...food don done for am......you spotted only one but there are 7 strong cases there una forget say obi was the first governor to get his stolen mandate 3 times in court from 2007

Tell me the section of the Electoral Act that provides for Electronic Transmission of results then we will start from there.

N3TRAL:
Nothing strong here.

Op, please tell me which section of the Electoral Act says that results should be transmitted electronically.

I'm waiting.

The law mandates INEC to set out guideline for elections.

They did provide guidelines according to law through many of press briefings and memos which included electronic transmission of results only for them to abandon the guideline. Which is unacceptable and can attract litigation

No wonder they started removing tweets to that effect to cover their tracks. Buh the memo to it's stipulated guideline for 2023 election is still in the public space.

YourMrBoo:


The law allows INEC to set out guideline for the election.

They did provided guidelines according to law through many of press briefings and memos which included electronic transmission of results only for them to abandon the guideline. It's unacceptable and can attract litigation

No wonder they started removing tweets to that effect. Buh the memo is still on the public space

The law does not tell INEC to set out guidelines. It states in section 60(5), that the results will be transmitted in a manner prescribed by INEC. That is an administrative power. As long as the law is silent about transmission, manual transmission is not a substantial irregularity.

The guideline is an administrative guide by the INEC chairman to guide his staff and political parties. Just like he promised on TV or wherever, he can change it. It his discretion. According to section 135 of the ACT, it isn't enough to cancel the results of the election.

Spot on OP, I read the 100 page petition. 👍

N3TRAL:
Nothing strong here.

Op, please tell me which section of the Electoral Act says that results should be transmitted electronically.

I'm waiting.

Don’t worry, strong tears will come soon

Our incoming president!

N3TRAL:


The law does not tell INEC to set out guidelines. It states in section 60(5), that the results will be transmitted in a manner prescribed by INEC. That is an administrative power. As long as the law is silent about transmission, manual transmission is not a substantial irregularity.

The guideline is an administrative guide by the INEC chairman to guide his staff and political parties. Just like he promised on TV or wherever, he can change it. It his discretion. According to section 135 of the ACT, it isn't enough to cancel the results of the election.

Go back to my post and read carefully, and stop contradicting yourself at the bolded

What's the difference between "section 60(5) results will be transmitted in a manner prescribed by INEC " and INEC determining the guideline for the election?!?

Abi you no dey understand properly.

INEC through various tweets, media rounds and briefing, memos and circular prescribed the guideline of the election which included electronic transmission of results.

They even stated in one of the memo that the manual collation forms won't be admissible without the electronic result data.

They can't come at the process of the said election and neglect or abandon what they already prescribed or provided guideline for.

Disclaimer: I have to use prescribed and guideline interchangeably and side by side for better understanding.

Now let me explain that number one point for the Obi case. To me it's the most important. When the case go shele, Obi go call witnesses from US DEA( drug enforcement Agency ) and from the US Justice department to come prove whether na Tinubu be the person wey allegedly settled with them when them catch am for dr*ug deal. Omo, things go full ground internationally, and the US must show to tender witness wether na him or not . If na him , election don tear be that . Because anyone wey settle dr*ug fine like that can't contest for Nigerian election because na criminal he be. Remember Atiku allegedly openly say the same thing . Who know why Biden never personally congratulate bros...hmm.

Omo! This one na biggest problem for tinubu oh

N3TRAL:
Nothing strong here.

Op, please tell me which section of the Electoral Act says that results should be transmitted electronically.

I'm waiting.

my dear INEC guidelines are laws

N3TRAL:


The law does not tell INEC to set out guidelines. It states in section 60(5), that the results will be transmitted in a manner prescribed by INEC. That is an administrative power. As long as the law is silent about transmission, manual transmission is not a substantial irregularity.

The guideline is an administrative guide by the INEC chairman to guide his staff and political parties. Just like he promised on TV or wherever, he can change it. It his discretion. According to section 135 of the ACT, it isn't enough to cancel the results of the election.

INEC spokesman, why are you not among the SANs to defend Tinubu’s mandate?

julaion:
Now let me explain that number one point for the Obi case. To me it's the most important. When the case go shele, Obi go call witnesses from US DEA( drug enforcement Agency ) and from the US Justice department to come prove whether na Tinubu be the person wey allegedly settled with them when them catch am for dr*ug deal. Omo, things go full ground internationally, and the US must show to tender witness wether na him or not . If na him , election don tear be that . Because anyone wey settle dr*ug fine like that can't contest for Nigerian election because na criminal he be. Remember Atiku allegedly openly say the same thing . Who know why Biden never personally congratulate bros...hmm.

Omo! This one na biggest problem for tinubu oh

Manhood Yakubu just used the drug baron to cash out. Reality will soon set in.

Una wan win presidential election una lule

Una wan take Lagos una lule again

Una go still lule for court again

We're used to you guys by now. Nzogbu zogbu

snapshot:
my dear INEC guidelines are laws

He doesn't know I guess...

Thanks for spilling it out to him as it is

snapshot:
my dear INEC guidelines are laws

They are not laws dir.the court have stated this severally.it is inferior to the electoral act and cannot be used to nullify elections

julaion:
Now let me explain that number one point for the Obi case. To me it's the most important. When the case go shele, Obi go call witnesses from US DEA( drug enforcement Agency ) and from the US Justice department to come prove whether na Tinubu be the person wey allegedly settled with them when them catch am for dr*ug deal. Omo, things go full ground internationally, and the US must show to tender witness wether na him or not . If na him , election don tear be that . Because anyone wey settle dr*ug fine like that can't contest for Nigerian election because na criminal he be. Remember Atiku allegedly openly say the same thing . Who know why Biden never personally congratulate bros...hmm.

Omo! This one na biggest problem for tinubu oh

Reason he is pushing for healing process like his life depends on it....

The healing is very hypocritical.

We can see through the deceits, the stench can be perceived from a very far distance.

senatordave1:


They are not laws dir.the court have stated this severally.it is inferior to the electoral act and cannot be used to nullify elections

That's why they are independent.

The law allows them to make election guideline that will guide any given election...

So whatever INEC does or says is backed by law or if not law itself...

So they can't be breaking their own guidelines which is already backed by law.

N3TRAL:

Tell me the section of the Electoral Act that provides for Electronic Transmission of results then we will start from there.

Paragraph 38 of the Regulations and Guidelines, 2023 makes Electronic Transmission of Results and Upload of Results to IReV mandatory. The paragraph requires that when voting and announcement of results have been completed at a polling unit, the Presiding Officer “(1) must Electronically transmit the result of the polling unit to INEC’s collation system; (2) Must use the BVAs to upload a scanned copy of the EC8A result sheet to the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV); and (3) [must thereafter] Take the BVAS and the original copies of all forms in a tamper evident envelope to the RA/Ward Collation officer in the company of security agents. Polling Agents may accompany the PO to the RA/Ward Collation Centre

Source: Simplified Electoral Act 2022, and INEC Guidelines. FEBRUARY 22, 2023 <https://placng.org/Legist/plac-publication-simplified-electoral-act-2022-and-inec-guidelines/>].


Thus, the Regulations and Guidelines require that the presiding officer must electronically transmit the results DIRECT from the polling units, after which the results would then be taken manually to the collation centres.

This means that the Regulations and Guidelines prescribe TWO levels of collation1). Electronic Transmission (collation) which must be done direct from the polling units; and (2). Manual collation which would then follow after electronic Transmission. Note that the manual collation is the lower level of collation. See section 64(5) of the Electoral Act 2022

YourMrBoo:


That's why they are independent.

The law allows them to make election guideline that will guide any given election...

So whatever INEC does or says is backed by law or if not law itself...

So they can't be breaking their own guidelines which is already backed by law.

omo you lie oh.....is obvious tinubu will fail in court

YourMrBoo:

Go back to my post and read carefully, and stop contradicting yourself at the bolded

What's the difference between "section 60(5) results will be transmitted in a manner prescribed by INEC " and INEC determining the guideline for the election?!?

Abi you no dey understand properly.

INEC through various tweets, media rounds and briefing, memos and circular prescribed the guideline of the election which included electronic transmission of results.

They even stated in one of the memo that the manual collation forms won't be admissible without the electronic result data.

They can't come at the process of the said election and neglect or abandon what they already prescribed or provided guideline for.

Disclaimer: I have to use prescribed and guideline interchangeably and side by side for better understanding.

Keep deceiving your ego “he can change it, It his discretion, pursuant to section 135 of the Electoral Act.

YourMrBoo:


Reason he is pushing for healing process like his life depends on it....

The healing is very hypocritical.

We can see through the deceits, the stench can be perceived from a very far distance.

omo the case against tinubu too strong abeg,he will be arrested self

N3TRAL:
Nothing strong here.

Op, please tell me which section of the Electoral Act says that results should be transmitted electronically.

I'm waiting.

So since BVAS is not useful for result transmittion why did Inec go to court for the court to order the configurations of the electronical device (BVAS) which was used during the Presidential elections to be used for the guber elections?Also note that a Federal High Court in Lagos also gave an order for the guber election results to be transmitted at the due time.

Spot on

YourMrBoo:


That's why they are independent.

The law allows them to make election guideline that will guide any given election...

So whatever INEC does or says is backed by law or if not law itself...

So they can't be breaking their own guidelines which is already backed by law.

And those guidelines cannot be used as a ground in a petition

Buckeyemedia1:
Keep deceiving your ego “he can change it, It his discretion, pursuant to section 135 of the Electoral Act.

Yes they can but where was it changed!?

The law is not emotional

If they change it, they have to publicize.

In absence of the said change the previous guideline is the acceptable guideline in the face of law.

Don't be emotional about this. Is the law

chibrolex:
So since BVAS is not useful for result transmittion why did Inec go to for the court to order the configurations of the electronical device (BVAS) which was used during the Presidential elections to be used for the guber elections?member a Federal High court in Lagos also gave an other that the results for guber elections must be transmitted at the due time.

For that MC oloumo boy, he thinks it's by screaming ah ah wo wo wo ah ah wo wo ah

N3TRAL:


The law does not tell INEC to set out guidelines. It states in section 60(5), that the results will be transmitted in a manner prescribed by INEC. That is an administrative power. As long as the law is silent about transmission, manual transmission is not a substantial irregularity.

The guideline is an administrative guide by the INEC chairman to guide his staff and political parties. Just like he promised on TV or wherever, he can change it. It his discretion. According to section 135 of the ACT, it isn't enough to cancel the results of the election.

If you argue right court will declare Obi as elected AND if you argue left court will bar Tinubu and order a re-run. The choice is yours

Buckeyemedia1:
Mumu which drug deal, why do you ipobians the number 1 narcotics tribe of Nigeria, like deceiving yourselves?

mumu man the joy i derive seeing you wail is enough for me I won't eat for 3days