famology:



I'm saying the section 299 doesn't add special to it's description. Simple! There's no need for this long epistle. The status of state given to the fct by section 299 is for constitutional purposes not for structural purposes. After the court judgement we talk more on this.

It remains to be seen how an EXPRESSLY worded sub-section of a section would impliedly be repealed by the following sub-section, in the absence of amending it procedurally. A Nigerian senior lawyer foresaw the quagmire and called on the electoral body for clarification in order to avoid an absurd and unjust outcome. There may not be anything to talk more on this as the ambiguity has created the opportunity for the highest bidder. Saner climes avoid constutional crises.

If the result assigned to Tinubu does not fit into the full implementation of S.134 (2) (b) by the courts, then the national assembly should begin the process of expunging it. Given that It would amount to a global mockery of a nation's legal system, particularly her constitution.