Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,226,945 members, 8,068,700 topics. Date: Sunday, 02 February 2025 at 11:00 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" (926 Views)
Top 9 Parallels Between Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Scientologists / US Pastor, Jenkins: "I Love Women & Pussy" After He Was Caught At Strippers Club / Reverend Father And Sisters Drinking Beer (Photos) (2) (3) (4)
No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" by OLAADEGBU(m): 1:12am On Jun 04, 2023 |
No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons are NOT our "brothers and sisters" https://endtimeheadlines.org/2023/06/no-dallas-jenkins-mormons-are-not-our-brothers-and-sisters/ 1 Like |
Re: No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" by OLAADEGBU(m): 11:39am On Feb 12, 2024 |
Son of pedophile bishop claims Mormon church couldn't care less about abuse victims Just in 🚨 DailyMail
|
Re: No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" by Oyinbo1886: 4:43am On Feb 13, 2024 |
"If anyone knows the Bible..."...I would say that the very "Christians" that wrote this piece of trash don't know their own Bible. I have been a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints for going on 37 years, was not born into it, but converted from the Southern Baptist faith, which is very mainstream here. Half the arguments posted here are regurgitated garbage that anyone can find in an anti-LDS tract. I know because I live in the Bible Belt (Georgia, USA), and I served a 2-year mission in Poland. I couldn't care less who Dallas Jenkins is, Marie Osmond, or any "Mormon Notables". I despise "church culture" because it promotes ignorance and teaches tradition instead of doctrine, the same holding true for any other sect of Christianity. "First of all, Do we really believe that God the Father and Jesus Christ both made a personal visit to a man to tell him that all other Churches were corrupt and an abomination and that he was the true prophet that would 'restore the Church'?" Who is the [/b]we[b] in this question? Roman Catholics believe that the Messiah appeared to people all the time. Would you consider them any [/b]less[b] Christian? Did you even go farther back to find out the reason behind the events? In Joseph Smith's own testimony, he was seeking an answer through James 1:5, period. Or do people believe that God changes and does not reveal himself as He did to Moses (Exodus 33:11). And no, that passage is [/b]not[b] meant in the figurative sense, the Hebrew clearly states that it was face to face. So, who is to say that neither God nor Jesus Christ can do the same 2,000 years later, unless that person believes in a God that changes, and He doesn't. "Secondly, Smith states even more blasphemous nonsense when he claims that an 'Angel from Heaven' named Moroni visited him to show him where some golden plates were buried to help him establish what would be later called “Another Testament of Jesus Christ”. Revelation 14:6-7 prophesied this. "Blasphemous nonsense" according to [/b]whom[b]? Galatians 1:6-7 is being taken entirely out of context here. This was addressed specifically to the [/b]Galatians[b]. The Judaizers had infiltrated the congregation and started preaching adherence to the Law of Moses, something that Paul was against. So, he wrote an epistle to them to set them straight. If you read the entire New Testament, as I have, you will find that many of the congregations have started practicing false teachings, even some of the 7 churches in Revelation. So that argument dead based on scripture that was meant in an entirely historical context. "Now let's talk about what these people believe..." According to whom? "Mormon leaders have taught that Jesus’ incarnation was the result of a physical relationship between God the Father and Mary." Which leaders? What is your source? Do you have a quote from these leaders or was this given for purposes of sensationalism? "Mormons believe Jesus is a god..." Got news for you, so does every other person that believe the Bible with understanding. Read John 1:1, especially where it says the Word [Jesus Christ] was with God, and the word [again, Jesus Christ] [/b]was[b] God. "but that any human can also become a god." Again, so does every other person that believes the Bible with understanding. Genesis 1:26-27 says that we are formed in His image. Just like children have the potential to become like their fathers, we have that same potential. Also, Romans 8:17 implies that we will become joint-heirs with Christ, meaning we will have that same inheritance should we live worthliy enough to do so. The word for joint-heirs in Greek is συγκληρονόμος, which means " one who obtains something assigned to himself with others, a joint participant". "Mormonism teaches that salvation can be earned by a combination of faith and good works." James 2:20. Faith alone does not save, apoint that the Apostle James drives home throughout the chapter. "According to Mormonism, it is believed that God the Father was once a mortal man who became a god, possessing an immortal and physical body. However, this contradicts what is mentioned in the Bible, which states that God has always been a spirit and has never been a man. Moreover, the Bible emphasizes that a spirit does not have a physical form." Really? Then why in the scriptures does it mention "the hand of God", "the finger of God", "eyes of God", etc. if God has no body? The argument is drawn from John 4:24. So, let's look at the entire verse instead of half-truthing it. "God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth." (John 4:24 KJV). So, if God is a spirit, and it says that we must worship him in spirit, then that interpretation implies that we cannot worship him while in our body, as it says "we must worship him in spirit"...so that interpretation is blatantly false. Also, if we are created in the image of God, according to Gen. 1:26-28, then that means we must also be spirits, and cannot have a body, because the verse says that we are created in His image. The interpretation that God does not have a body is not from the Bible, but from neo-Platonism, and it contradicts other passages in the Bible. "Lastly, Mormons do not believe in the traditional Trinity but instead consider it to consist of three distinct gods" Yes, Latter-Day Saints do reject the doctrine of the trinity for the simple reason that it is not Biblical. Nowhere is the word Trinity mentioned in the Bible nor was it ever referred to as such until the Athanasian Creed came into existence about the 4th century A.D, 3 centuries after the Bible was written. "Lastly, Christ warned himself about anyone adding to the Bible. 'For I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the Book of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book'." I find it laughable that the source verse wasn't cited, but then, that's a typical game that anti-LDS play, they will quote scripture and not even know where it comes from. First of all, it is in Revelation 22:18-19. Second, "this book" does not refer to the Bible itself, but the Book of Revelation, which John was writing. and that is evident from the Greek word τοῦ βιβλίου, which is genitive [/b]singular[b] referring to one book, the book of Revelation. The word "Bible" is taken from the Greek τὰ βιβλία, meaning "the books", [/b][/i]plural[b][i]. Therefore, the book of prophecy mentioned in this citation does not refer to the Bible, but only the Book of Revelation. We also know from Biblical history that the 3 epistles of John (1, 2, and 3, John) were written after the Book of Revelation according to many chronologies. So was John cursing himself when he wrote those epistles? It never ceases to amaze me that in order for people to tear down a faith that they disagree with, they will resort to trickery, shege, innuendo, and false interpretations of the Bible to achieve their objective. They would do well to heed 2 Timothy 2:15, because the arguments presented in the previous anti-LDS polemic clearly shows a lack of serious Biblical scholarship and research. Next, I imagine you will want my credentials. I teach Biblical Hebrew and Greek as an adjunct professor at Peace Multicultural Theological Seminary in Ft. Washington, Maryland where I hold an honorary doctorate, and graduated with a B.A. in Linguistics (1996) at Brigham Young University. |
Re: No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" by OLAADEGBU(m): 2:17pm On Feb 13, 2024 |
Oyinbo1886: Agreed. Bible doctrine cannot be equated with church culture. The doctrines of the Bible is the way to go because the Scriptures is God-breathed. Oyinbo1886: Some questions for you to answer: Who witnessed Joseph Smith's experience? Can his story be corroborated by anyone? Mohammad said angel Gabriel appeared to him, who else witnessed it? Should we just go by their words because they said it? Are their words God-breathed? Oyinbo1886: "Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on Him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead" (Romans 4:23-24; 15:4) All Scriptures are written for our learning...that we may have hope. Why do you think that epistle was included in the Scriptures if it was only to be for the Galatian church? It reveals the historical context just as it applies to us spiritually. Oyinbo1886: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). Wrong. Jesus is God, not a god as other cults such as Jw claim in their NWT bible. Oyinbo1886: "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast" (Ephesians 2:8-9). Salvation is not earned it is a gift given to those who believe in the finished work of Christ on the Cross. The works that emanates from a saved life is what counts in the sight of God it is not what you worked for. "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord" (Romans 6:23). Oyinbo1886: It depends on what you understand by the phrase: "to worship God in spirit and truth." Oyinbo1886: Can you show me anywhere in the authorised version of the Bible where the word grandfather is written? If it cannot be found should we then conclude that there are no grandfathers in the Bible days going by your line of thought? Oyinbo1886: "This book" refers to the all Scriptures which are God breathed. (The 66 books of the Bible). Read Deuteronomy 4:2; 12:32; Proverbs 30:6. Oyinbo1886: If you read the following chapter (2 Timothy 3:16) you will realise that it says "All Scripture" which are God-breathed and that is the 66 books of the God breathed Words of God which should not be altered, added to nor subtracted from. Oyinbo1886: I must commend you for taking the time and effort to respond. It is my prayer that you look much deeper into the verses I used to buttress my point. Much appreciated for chipping in. |
Re: No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" by Oyinbo1886: 2:25am On Mar 10, 2024 |
"Some questions for you to answer: Who witnessed Joseph Smith's experience? Can his story be corroborated by anyone? Mohammad said angel Gabriel appeared to him, who else witnessed it? Should we just go by their words because they said it? Are their words God-breathed? "Who witnessed Joseph Smith's experience?" Who witnessed Moses' experience with the burning bush? Who witnessed the suffering of Christ while he was praying in Gethsemane as those who were with Him were asleep? Can anyone corroborate those "just because they said them", as you put it? "If you read the following chapter (2 Timothy 3:16) you will realise that it says "All Scripture" which are God-breathed and that is the 66 books of the God breathed Words of God which should not be altered, added to nor subtracted from." Really? And where does it mention that it is just those 66 books? Do you infer that God has stopped speaking through scripture at 66 books? And how do you know for 100% that those were the only books that were written as scripture? Read 1 Chr. 29:29. Where are the books of Nathan and Gad, and why are they not in the Bible? Also, in light of recent discoveries in 1947 with the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi Library in 1945, we know that there were even more books written than we have in the canon. And there are other missing books in the Bible that are mentioned: Book of the Wars of the Lord (Num. 21:14) Book of Jasher (Josh. 10:13; 2 Sam. 1:18) Book of the acts of Solomon (1 Kgs. 11:41 Book of Samuel the seer (1 Chr. 29:29) Book of Gad the seer (1 Chr. 29:29) Book of Nathan the prophet (1 Chr. 29:29; 2 Chr. 9:29) Prophecy of Ahijah (2 Chr. 9:29) Visions of Iddo the seer (2 Chr. 9:29; 12:15; 13:22) Book of Shemaiah (2 Chr. 12:15) Book of Jehu (2 Chr. 20:34) Sayings of the seers (2 Chr. 33:19) An epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, earlier than our present 1 Corinthians (1 Cor. 5:9) Possibly an earlier epistle to the Ephesians (Eph. 3:3) An epistle to the Church at Laodicea (Col. 4:16) Some prophecies of Enoch, known to Jude (Jude 1:14) As a matter of fact, the word for scripture in the Greek is γραφὴ, which simply means "writings". And no, there is [/b]zero[b] implication that it [/b]only[b] refers to the 66 books that make up the canon of certain versions of the Bible...and yes, I said "certain versions". The Roman Catholic version has 73 books with the Apocrypha included, and the Ethiopian Orthodox church uses 81 books. Are we going to sit there and say that they are wrong because they have more books? And before you say "well they added them"...again, according to whom?? They could make the exact same argument that those that follow the 66-book canon have taken away from the Bible. I recommend you read up on the history of the canon of the Bible, and the Council of Nicaea, which was headed by a pagan, Constantine the Great, who was a Sun-worshipper until his deathbed, when he was baptized. That is [/b]also[b] where the Trinitarian Doctrine comes from,, and again, we should follow that non-Biblical counsel...why?? "All Scriptures are written for our learning...that we may have hope. Why do you think that epistle was included in the Scriptures if it was only to be for the Galatian church? It reveals the historical context just as it applies to us spiritually." Hmmm...all right. So your argument is that anything in the scriptures should be practiced today. Very well, let's tithe in kind (no cash allowed, crops only), observe the laws of the Sabbath, make animal sacrifices, etc. You get the point. Just because it is included in scripture does not mean that it is to be regarded as a general practice today. We learn from it, yes, but some things are strictly for historical context, and not to be used as generally accepted practices, unless you are one of those that think that women should [/b]never[b] speak in church as per 1 Cor. 14:34., but to be honest, I wouldn't ascribe that to you. "Wrong. Jesus is God, not a god as other cults such as Jw claim in their NWT bible." You said "It depends on what you understand by the phrase..." in another part of the discussion. I will offer up the same...depends on what you understand by "God". In actuality, the word for God is אֱלהִים...which is a [/b]plural[b] noun, [/b]not[b] singular. I'll let you mull over why that is. "Can you show me anywhere in the authorised version of the Bible where the word grandfather is written? If it cannot be found should we then conclude that there are no grandfathers in the Bible days going by your line of thought?" And just which "authorized" version are you referring to, KJV, RSV, NIV, ESV? Which one is "authorized", and an even bigger question is [/b]who[b] authorized it? I doubt it was God Himself. To answer your question, I can, in the original Hebrew...and it doesn't go back any farther than that. The word אָב does mean father, true, but in Genesis 28:13 and Genesis 32:10, particularly in the style of the author J (as opposed to P, E, or D.), that word is used to specifically mean grandfather. Unlike most Western languages, Hebrew words are broader in concept, and when אָב is put in the plural אָבוֹת֙, it can mean fathers, grandfathers, or any direct male ancestry thereof. |
Re: No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" by OLAADEGBU(m): 3:48pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
THE FORBIDDEN ERRORS
|
Re: No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" by Oyinbo1886: 5:08am On Mar 29, 2024 |
That is a false comparison if I ever saw one. In order to draw that conclusion, then one has to assume that there were [/b]only[b] 66 books of the Bible [/b]originally[b], a statement that we know full well is false, Q.E.D. Second, the Lost Books of the Bible were never meant to be a substitute for the partial Bible "as we know it today". Those books are to be read with those who have a very strong foundation of Christianity and the fundamental tenets thereof. Third, do you think the Bible doesn't contain errors? Ever hear of doublets? Here is an example of one... Exodus 17:6: "Behold, I will stand before thee there upon the rock in Horeb; and thou shalt smite the rock, and there shall come water out of it, that the people may drink. And Moses did so in the sight of the elders of Israel." Numbers 20:6: "Take the rod, and gather thou the assembly together, thou, and Aaron thy brother, and speak ye unto the rock before their eyes; and it shall give forth his water, and thou shalt bring forth to them water out of the rock: so thou shalt give the congregation and their beasts drink." So which was it, was he commanded to speak to the rock or smite it? And this is just [/b]one[b] example of [/b]many[b]. Fourth, read the Greek of 2 Timothy 2:16. The word used for "scripture" is "γραφὴ". It does [/b][/i]not[b][i], as many wrongly interpret, mean only the 66 books as we have now. In fact, if you look at the timeline, the gospel of John, 1, 2, and 3 John, and Revelation had not been written yet, as 2 Timothy was written around the time of Paul's execution by Nero, around 65-67 A.D. John's gospel and his writing did not come around until at least 2-3 decades later. So, to interpret "all scripture" as the 66 books of the Bible is not only a bad attempt at hermeneutics, but not all of them were even written yet. Therefore, that interpretation is false on the very face of it. And then, as I have mentioned before, different churches use different Bibles. I don't hear anyone calling [/b]them[b] out as being a cult or non-Christian. Don't believe it? The Roman Catholic Bible includes the Apocrypha, as do some Protestant Bibles. I happen to have one printed in 1867 that includes the Apocrypha, passed down through my family, and they weren't even close to being Roman Catholic. The Greek Orthodox Bible contains different books than that, and no one goes calling them out for being non-Christian. And then you have the 81 books of the Ethiopian Bible, but then, no one is accusing [/b]them[b] of being a cult. Face it, there is no such thing as a "standard canon" when it comes to Christianity. Anyone who says that there is such is deluding themselves and woefully uneducated as to the Bible. In fact, it wasn't even called the "Bible" until John Chrysostom coined the phrase in the late 4th century A.D, probably between 386-388 A.D. So, for the record, the argument that "the Bible only contained 66 books and that was all it ever contained" is a contrived fantasy by those "who have not studied to show themselves approved". |
Re: No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" by OLAADEGBU(m): 5:56am On Mar 29, 2024 |
Oyinbo1886: The Three Persons in Trinity witnessed the burning bush and thereby documented it in the holy Scriptures. The Holy Scriptures were written by holy men of God who were moved by the Holy Spirit who witnessed these events. Joseph Smith or Muhammad's experiences were not corroborated with any witness neither is there any evidence that it was written by the Holy Spirit who sees all things. Oyinbo1886: The 66 books of the Bible all passed the Canon test. They are the only ones that are God-breathed. All other books may be informational but not God-breathed. Oyinbo1886: There is a criteria (measuring stick) of measuring Scriptures that are God-breathed and it is only the 66 books (39 in the OT and 27 in the NT) that passed that test. The Jewish Bible are the same with our OT and there is a reason why the books you mentioned up there did not make it into the Jewish Torah, they did not pass the test. Oyinbo1886: Jesus Christ did not come to change the law but to fulfil it. He came to give us the proper interpretation of the Law and that is why He left us with the Holy Spirit who authored the Scriptures and it will do us good to go to Him for the proper application of what He wrote through the holy men of God. Oyinbo1886: God is triune. Oyinbo1886: The KJV is known as the authorised version. You will not find the word "Grandfather" there. Shall we conclude there are no grandfathers in the Bible? Oyinbo1886: The fact still remains that in the KJV there is no word for "Grandfather" and that does not mean there are no grandfathers in the Bible. The fact that the word Trinity cannot be found in the Bible does not mean that it does not exist in the Bible. Do you get my drift? |
Re: No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" by OLAADEGBU(m): 10:52am On Mar 31, 2024 |
The Doctrine of Christ SATURDAY, MARCH 30, 2024 "If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed." (2 John 1:10). This apparently harsh instruction seems at first to conflict with the many biblical exhortations to show hospitality, but it needs to be placed in context. The one-chapter epistle of 2 John was addressed to “the elect lady and her children” by John, who also extended greetings from “the children of thy elect sister” (vv. 1, 13). These unusual phrases, together with the general tone of the epistle, make it almost certain that John was not referring simply to two individual Christian women, but to two churches, symbolically personified as two noble ladies with the “children” being the new converts in the churches. The warning, then, is primarily against the danger of allowing a false teacher to come into the church, as a pastor or a teacher or even as a visiting speaker, who would not bring “this doctrine.” The doctrine mentioned is obviously “the doctrine of Christ” (v. 9). This doctrine of Christ is not, however, simply a set of doctrinal tenets about the person and work of Jesus Christ. It is not the doctrine about Christ, but of Christ—belonging to Him—His doctrine. The word “doctrine” is didache, meaning literally “teachings.” The meaning clearly is “the teachings of Christ,” that is, not just one or two least-common-denominator statements about Christ to which all nominal Christians could give assent, but the entire body of teachings that had come from Jesus. Further, since He taught that all the Old Testament is inspired and authoritative and also promised the same to the writers of the New Testament, this “doctrine of Christ” includes “all the counsel of God” (Acts 20:27), from Genesis through Revelation. How important it is not to allow false teaching to get a foothold in a local church. HMM BY: HENRY M. MORRIS, PH.D. |
Re: No Dallas Jenkins, Mormons Are NOT Our "Brothers And Sisters" by OLAADEGBU(m): 4:00pm On Apr 22, 2024 |
I was raised in a cult - the horrifying act they made us do as a child will haunt me forever Not to mention his parents being half siblings! 😱 DailyMail
|
(1) (Reply)
Meet The Only Man That Conquered Jesus And Christianity (pics) / "theory" Of Evolution / What Is This World Turnin Into
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2025 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 153 |