zolajpower:

Thank God they re not touching color blue. Because color blue is next to white before master Jesus and that is why they can't go near it.
Im proud I represent color blue . See how mancity is winning anyhow

It’s Not the Equality Act, It’s The Pedophile Protection ActATTENTION:


BRYAN FISCHERFORMER STAFFMORE
The hideously misnamed “Equality Act” begins its journey through Congress this week. It’s designed “to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation.”

Now the 1964 Civil Rights Act already makes it illegal for discrimination to occur on the basis of “sex,” by which the authors of the bill meant “male or female.”

One significant thing to note in passing is that the authors of this bill evidently agree - whether they realize it or not - that the CRA of 1964 does NOT provide special protections based on “gender identity” or “sexual orientation,” because if the term “sex’” was expansive enough to include both, there would be no need for the Equality Act.

So we should all be able to agree that, while “sex” in the 1964 CRA referred to the division of humanity into males and females, protections were not extended to lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgenders. Hence the felt need for the “Equality Act,” to address this lacuna in civil rights law.

“Gender identity” contains a raft of problems all by itself, for the category seems limited only by the hyperthyroidal imaginations of gender activists. Facebook allows you to choose from no less than 71 - count ‘em - genders. The old “male and female” thing is so last century. Now you can adopt a veritable cornucopia of sexual identities, starting with “asexual,” “hermaphrodite,” or “intersex,” and working your way up to “gender variant” or “pangender.”

Mind you, there is no biological or genetic marker for these various departures from the norm - it’s all in your head. Which makes the whole concept enormously subjective and fluid, and allows you to slip into it just about anything you want.

But what is truly pernicious is that “sexual orientation” is nowhere defined in the bill. Now everyone has a working definition of “sexual orientation” in their heads, a definition that begins with “male” and ends with “transgender” or some such thing. But “sexual orientation” is not defined anywhere in the bill or anywhere else in federal law. Everyone, including off-the-reservation judges, will get to make up their own definition.

This means that “sexual orientation” will mean anything you want it to mean, INCLUDING PEDOPHILIA OR BESTIALITY.

On 5 May 2018, the University of Würzburg in Germany held a conference with the theme of “Future Societys” that featured a presentation by Mirjam Heine, a medical researcher. Here’s what she had to say (emphasis mine):

“According to current research, pedophilia is an unchangeable sexual orientation, just like for example heterosexuality. No one chooses to be a pedophile. No one can cease being one.”

Snopes investigated the report of her remarks and found it to be “True.” In fact, organizers admitted that “a speaker (at their conference) described pedophilia as a condition some people are born with.”

So now we have medical professionals saying pedophiles are born that way, God made them that way, they can’t stop being one no matter how hard they try, and if you’ve got a problem with that, your problem is not with the guy who wants to rape kids but with the God who made them that way.

If the “Equality Act” were to become law, pedophiles would have special privileges and protections under the law that you and I would not have. Because religious exemptions are specifically forbidden in the bill, pedophiles could not be prevented by Trail Life USA (the conservative Christian alternative to the Boy Scouts) from becoming leaders of small boys. And if you have a problem with that, you’re the one who is going to wind up in jail.

Churches could not prevent pedophiles from working with their children and their youth groups. The Roman Catholic Church could not prevent self-admitted pedophiles from becoming priests and working with altar boys.

It will not be long before bestiality (sex with animals) becomes a protected category. Prostitution will soon follow, as will incest and necrophilia (sex with dead people).

This is what the future holds if this law passes. If you want to keep our country from becoming the Disneyland of Deviancy, it’s time to bombard our men and women in Congress with phone calls urging them to vote against the “Equality Act.” Why? Because it, in reality, is the “Pedophile Protection Act.”

All narcissists are secretly homosexual and all homosexualls are narcissists. Slander has increased as normal just like Roman's chapter 1 says, sodomites love gossip, backbiting and slander. A woman can accuse a man of Sexual Assault 20 years ago without any evidence and not a witness but the media will sensationize the story. It all started with Bill Cosby then it just kept going to other celebrities helping the Whispering Campaign and none of the sexual assault cases end up criminal investigations just lawsuits? Why because the Sodomites that run our society, government and media love slander. This is how they frighten anyone from speaking out about any of their Gay New World Order agendas. The politicians and clergy will promote LGBT but if you say that they're sodomites they will put your name on the watchlist for you to be harassed by all the narcissists. We are living in the End Times of America where good people had become evil people and the villains are now heroes. Karmic people that are up to no good all day and night love to point the finger at anyone being good. Unless of course you're willing to be their bitch and help promote their agenda. If you are a godly man or woman you are in the minority and no one will speak up when the Sodomites gang up on you. Watch any prison movies it's the same type of society we are living in today. Gangstalking is everywhere against good people, whistle blowers are targeted, light workers are stalked and the courts will deny it if you report the abuse. Yes they will say that you are insane for speaking the truth.

EnvyandHate:
From Flip Wilson to Madea, Black male comedians in dresses are a Hollywood rite of passage
These characters can be funny, but also dangerous


They lie when it's said that White Hollywood puts Black men in dresses because they also put others in dresses too. Yet the timing of this lie is what is crucial to breaking down the truth, this occurred around the time Pres. Barack Obama was championing Gay Marriage as a human right. So sure Black people who are dirty and dishonest was looking to shift the blame unto White Supremacy although black men are the biggest transgenders in the world.


Dave Chappelle and Oprah Winfrey lying before the world about Hollywood putting black men in dresses. Below Dave Chappelle is in a dress as a female tarot card reader he even has on a woman's head price.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCahQtiEYb4?si=Cdafct3eg5AEQ0eT

The LGBTQ+ community and feminism have been closely intertwined throughout history, as both movements have sought to challenge traditional gender roles and norms.

One of the earliest connections between the two movements can be traced back to the suffrage movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when both women and gay men sought to gain political and social equality. Many of the early leaders in these movements came from similar social and economic backgrounds and faced similar challenges, such as not being able to vote or hold public office.

In the 1960s and 1970s, second-wave feminism emerged as a broader social movement, which included lesbian and bisexual women who were fighting for equality in the workplace, family, and society. Many of these women came out of the women's liberation movement and the anti-war movement, and saw the LGBTQ+ movement as a natural extension of their work for social justice.

In the 1990s, third-wave feminism emerged as a more diverse and inclusive movement that included the perspectives of women of color, transgender individuals, and members of the LGBTQ+ community. This movement sought to challenge traditional understandings of gender and sexuality, and to create a more inclusive and equitable society.

Today, feminism and the LGBTQ+ movement continue to work together to create a more just and equitable society, and to challenge traditional gender roles and expectations. The LGBTQ+ community has also been instrumental in the fight for gay and lesbian rights, and many LGBTQ+ individuals are also engaged in feminist activism.

PART 1 - FEMINISM AND PEDOPHILIA - EXPOSING A FEMINIST GUIDEBOOK TO CHILD SEX ABUSE.
The contents of this post are unsuitable for minors. Please, do not read this article if you are underage.

I have been researching feminism for about fifteen years. In these fifteen years I have come across a preponderance of feminist literature defending, celebrating and advocating for pedophilia, books worse than you can ever possibly imagine in your worst nightmares. This post is dedicated to one such book written by icon of feminism Pat Califia, a book containing a detailed guide for women to grooming and sexually abusing children.

If these posts manage to find an audience on this platform, I will carry on adding further parts to this series for so long as I am not banned. I will never run out of material. Such is the prevalence of pedophilia in feminism. You cannot swing a dead cat in feminism without hitting a pedophile or an advocate of pedophilia. Feminism is FULL of them.

Most of what you will read here is original. It is not anything that I have copied from other users on the internet. It is my own work, my own research. If you like what you will read here, consider supporting me by following me and please do cite me wherever you use this work on which I have expended many years of my life. What I am sharing with you here is nothing but the tip of the iceberg that is the information that I have on feminism. Help platform my voice. Help me expose, dismantle and depose this highly rotten, morally bankrupt ideology.

BRIEF BACKGROUND ON PAT CALIFIA

Pat is a renowned American, feminist, LGBTQ+ activist, an author, a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist and a sexual deviant of the highest order. She has authored articles and books in feminist pornography (Yes, there is such a thing) and sexual liberation. She owns a private practice as a therapist in California where she offers counselling services to persons of her inclinations. Her books are sold on all major online bookstores and her stories and articles have been published in some of the most celebrated mainstream feminist magazines for which she has received accolades from some of the biggest publishers in the world. She is a huge advocate of pedophilia and (hard as it is to believe) other sexual deviances just as bad if not worse.

Pat has throughout her life become more extreme in her sexuality. She identified as a heterosexual in her teens, before turning feminist and lesbian in her late teens then a female-to-male transexual in her forties.

THE BOOK - INFANTS ARE SEXUAL!

Patricia has published many books and articles promoting pedophilia in the feminist community, providing feminists with instructions on how they can groom and engage in sex with children.

‘Children are sexual. Infants in their cribs have frequently been observed exploring and stimulating their own genitals’ declared this mentally disturbed woman in Sapphistry, a book she devoted to lesbian sexuality published in 1988.

r/antifeminists - PART 1 - FEMINISM AND PEDOPHILIA - EXPOSING A FEMINIST GUIDEBOOK TO CHILD SEX ABUSE.
Lesbians, feminists and parents, she suggests in this book, can sexualise children by:

‘hugging, kissing, shared nudity, bathing together, back rubs... playful wrestling’ as well as masturbating or engaging in sex with other people in front of children.

She carries on to state:

‘the possibility of sex between a child and an adult sometimes arises’ adding that sex between adults and children can be an experience ‘enjoyable and pleasant for a child’ concluding that in a sexually liberated world, children would be free to choose their sexuality from ‘the complete spectrum of human sexual behaviour’.

Pedophilia is widespread in the lesbian feminist community.

‘An underage lesbian usually knows many more legally adult lesbians than other minors. Despite social barriers, romantic and sexual relationships are frequently formed between women of disparate ages’ wrote Califia, then a member of the lesbian feminist scene for roughly twenty years, in Sapphistry describing the prevalence of pedophilia in the lesbian, feminist community.

Paedophilic relationships, adds Califia, may be threatened from the outside world, by families of the children and authorities concluding that ‘lesbians in such relationships often feel that they would be happier and safer if age-of-consent laws were repealed’ adding ‘[t]he rewards for such a relationship come from the women involved and the feelings they have for each other. In a less homophobic and violent world, it might be taken for granted that adults would teach adolescents about the art of sexuality as well as other aspects of life. If adolescents were not stereotyped as irresponsible, immature and unreliable, adults might be less reluctant to engage in intimate relationships with them. It would be clearer that such a relationship is a mutual exchange rather than a hierarchical, one way arrangement.’

Point of interest: Feminism has since the early 1960s and the advent of its sexual revolution constantly campaigned for the removal of age-of-consent laws and the legalisation of pedophilia across the globe. Icon of feminism Simone de Beauvoir led numerous such campaigns alongside the biggest feminist icons of her time. These efforts have continued to this day. They are so great in number you can write volumes of books citing and detailing them, each volume consisting of thousands of pages. Such is the magnitude of the problem that is pedophilia in feminism, a problem about which many outside of feminism remain ignorant.

Pat’s depravity does not stop at promoting pedophilia. She carries on in her book to promote sex with animals, for adults and children, claiming that it is chauvinistic to look down on such types of sex, noting that fantasies about such behaviour are ‘very common’ going on to provide her feminist readers with instructions as to how they can sexually abuse animals. She is right in this claim of hers. Fantasies of this nature and other types far worse are extremely common in the world of feminism and they are often not limited to mere fantasies as you will come to see in future parts of this series on Feminism and Pedophilia.

‘Does it turn you on to pet your collie? Do you have a cat that insists on lying on your chest while you masturbate? Some experiences with animals are more clearly sexual. Children often explore the genitals of the family pet or allow an animal to smell and lick their genitals. If you have a pet, you may massage its genitals when it comes into heat and can’t be allowed to have sex with a member of its own species. You may allow your favourite animal to stay in the room while you masturbate or make love. Dogs become especially interested in sexual noises and smells and may want to taste sexual juices or perspiration on your skin and vulva without any encouragement from you…If you are not compelling the animal to accept your attentions and you are gentle, you will not harm it emotionally or physically. Concerns about hygiene can be alleviated by washing yourself or your non-human furry friend. Conception cannot occur as a result of sex between humans and animals or other species.’ Wrote Pat in Sapphistry.

It gets worse. She carries on in this book to promote the consumption of excrement, urine and menstrual blood to her readers, providing them with detailed advice on how to perform these acts, not only in adults but children as well.

‘Children often play with their urine or excrement or interpret eliminating waste as a pleasant, sexually stimulating experience. Playing with piss can be a playful, childlike experience. Urinating on someone or at her command involves a loss of control and inhibition that is often an exciting, liberating experience…Controlling your partner’s elimination of waste is an intimate experience that can make her feel helpless, accepted and cared for…Urine is sterile. It is possible to drink the urine of a healthy person without harmful effect…Excrement is not sterile…If ingesting shit is a sexual game you play, you should monitor your health and the health of your partners with great care…A good investment…is a rubber sheet to protect the floor or your bed…’ Wrote Patricia in Sapphistry of excrement and urine.

r/antifeminists - Front cover for a book full of pornographic stories depicting pedophilia promoted by Patricia and for which she wrote the forward. In her forward for the book, under the title Dirty Deeds for Dirty Boys (and Men) she writes ‘he gets exactly how thrilling it can be to push a weaker…
Front cover for a book full of pornographic stories depicting pedophilia promoted by Patricia and for which she wrote the forward. In her forward for the book, under the title Dirty Deeds for Dirty Boys (and Men) she writes ‘he gets exactly how thrilling it can be to push a weaker person down and suck them dry’ of the author of this book.
Pat opens up Sapphistry with many fantasies written by women in the feminist community, one of which reads as follows:

‘Most of my fantasies, oddly enough, involve men, Taboo situations - like the back seat of a car are my favourite, which is a gang rape situation in a field of grass at night - All young boys.’

Point of interest: Some of the most popular sexual fantasies in feminists are of themselves getting raped by men. I am not joking. I will be touching on this matter in future parts of this feminism and pedophilia series. Surprising for an ideology that claims to fight a rape culture where rape is justified and trivialised, no? The hypocrisy of feminism has no bounds.

In Sapphistry, Pat not only encourages women to have pedophilic fantasies, but also to act out on them. Many feminist do. As you will see in future parts of this series that exposes a side of feminism to you that feminists like to hide from the general public, a general public to whom feminists lie morning, day and night, claiming they only want equality. This movement, does not want equality. It wants things far worse than this that it hides behind a facade of euphemisms.

‘Trust yourself’. Writes Califia in Sapphistry of sexual fantasies adding ‘You will know when you are enjoying a fantasy for its own sake and when it represents something you may want to play around if an opportunity presents itself. Don't discount the variety of sexual fantasies quoted earlier. Given this variation in plot and characters, it would be unrealistic to label some fantasy content acceptable and other content unacceptable. In all sexual matters, diversity and individuality seem to be the norm, not conformity and homogeneity …The only solution is to go after what we enjoy and and forget about what we’ve heard we should enjoy’.

She goes on in this book, as many icons of feminism have done before and after her, to promote child pornography arguing that it is not harmful, neither to children nor to those who consume this type of pornography, but harmful to repress it.

‘Child pornography is another big issue with the anti-pornography movement. As in the case of rape, it is difficult to see how eliminating the image will eliminate the act. The coercive use of children goes on regardless of whether or not there are magazines which document the fantasy of sex between adults and young people. Historically, movements to protect children from the sexual depredations of adults have focused on gay men. They thus supplement rather than challenge enforcement of mandatory heterosexuality'.

Point of interest: One of the fundamental principles on which feminism is based is the idea that heterosexuality is an oppressive social contract imposed on women as to limit them to men and therefore slavery. One of the foremost goals of the feminist movement is to redefine sexuality. This is a huge topic in feminism outside of the remits of this post. I will not expand on it here. If you have any questions feel free to ask in the comment section below.

In 1991, she was awarded the Lambda Literary Award, an award funded by Antioch University, California and some of the largest book publishers in the world including Penguin Random House. She received this award for a pornographic story titled Doc and Fluff about a sexual relationship between an adult woman and a girl child. The story is composed entirely of violence and pedophilia. It includes vivid accounts of child molestation and rape.