garfield1:


The law says any witness not frontloaded will not be accepted by the registrar.it didn't say the whole petition will be dead but only those evidences not frontloaded.unfortunately it affected the entire case if nasarawa pdp...

The constitution in section 177 clearly stated that membership and sponsorship is a criteria for qualification which is legally sound.the apex court has stated that membership is internal to parties but has also clearly said that parties cannot act arbitrarily and recklessly and disobey their rules and that section 177 alongside section 134 and 77 has opened a door or window for parties to challenge the membership and sponsorship of another party

What is wrong with this boy. Is it your eyes that is paining you or your brain? Did you not see under "Further Particulars" that an evidence not initially listed can be called by leave of the Court to ensure fair hearing? Is a subpoenaed witness not a witness summoned by court? Stop playing daft boy. I don't like it!

Section 177 does not give a criteria to be a member of a party. It only says such individual must be a member of a party and must be sponsored as one. Has NNPP denied Abba Yusuf's membership? Have they denied sponsoring him? You are only bringing what is extraneous to the matter to defend a foul judgement

Kukutenla:
For the avoidance of doubt, here's the relevant section of EA that has to do with frontloading or not. You can clearly see the penalty and even remedy for it. The EA never prescribed that the documents should be trashed. As a matter of fact, paragraph 5 under "further particulars" gives the tribunal the leeway to call for and actor such evidence.

garfield1 and seunmsg the two APC bots take note
cc: IfnobeGod20

don't bother arguing,they are in Apc and they will defend their party,They will even defend the indefensible so forget we know the game. If someone from one of the opposition party can spend 2billon to get a ruling on Senate election in his favor then what are you going to expect from a ruling party.

Kukutenla:
For the avoidance of doubt, here's the relevant section of EA that has to do with frontloading or not. You can clearly see the penalty and even remedy for it. The EA never prescribed that the documents should be trashed. As a matter of fact, paragraph 5 under "further particulars" gives the tribunal the leeway to call for and actor such evidence.

garfield1 and seunmsg the two APC bots take note
cc: IfnobeGod20

garfield1 will have what to say in the midst of glaring document you posted, that's just who he is.

Judgement well served




And



It's a victory for democracy.

Kukutenla:
For the avoidance of doubt, here's the relevant section of EA that has to do with frontloading or not. You can clearly see the penalty and even remedy for it. The EA never prescribed that the documents should be trashed. As a matter of fact, paragraph 5 under "further particulars" gives the tribunal the leeway to call for and actor such evidence.

garfield1 and seunmsg the two APC bots take note
cc: IfnobeGod20

And the tribunal refused based on its discretion to sanction such and affirmed by the SC

Kukutenla:

What is wrong with this boy. Is it your eyes that is paining you or your brain? Did you not see under "Further Particulars" that an evidence not initially listed can be called by leave of the Court to ensure fair hearing? Is a subpoenaed witness not a witness summoned by court? Stop playing daft boy. I don't like it!

Section 177 does not give a criteria to be a member of a party. It only says such individual must be a member of a party and must be sponsored as one. Has NNPP denied Abba Yusuf's membership? Have they denied sponsoring him? You are only bringing what is extraneous to the matter to defend a foul judgement

Satan punish.when will you wean yourself of this childishness? I thought you had matured.tufiakwa.what an untrained and uncouth lout

IfnobeGod20:

garfield1 will have what to say in the midst of glaring document you posted, that's just who he is.

The court has settled this.i have nothing to say to that hopeless bastat

Bizibi:
don't bother arguing,they are in Apc and they will defend their party,They will even defend the indefensible so forget we know the game. If someone from one of the opposition party can spend 2billon to get a ruling on Senate election in his favor then what are you going to expect from a ruling party.

The court has settled this.move on

garfield1:


They did

sure with gayam and ciroma ward. A ward the size of the population of croatia

Bizibi:
don't bother arguing,they are in Apc and they will defend their party,They will even defend the indefensible so forget we know the game. If someone from one of the opposition party can spend 2billon to get a ruling on Senate election in his favor then what are you going to expect from a ruling party.

Well, we still need to inform innocent minds if not this APC bot will indoctrinate them. You will see them running out telling you to blame the opposition lawyers for not being smart when the judgement is clearly flawed. They'll tell you APC lawyers were simply brilliant. Imagine a SC judge saying the subpoenaed deposition of the CSU registrar is not admissible in court because it was not stamped by the court or notary public when the reference he read clearly said it must be "signed or stamped".
I find it disgraceful that the judges are pooh-poohing the sanctity of the electoral system. It is fundamental to our democracy.
Just look at this now. How did the registrar rejecting a petition get to become trashing evidence? Which road dem for meet?

garfield1:


The court has settled this.move on

I thought you were,it is not until it is finally over.

whippersnapper:
sure with gayam and ciroma ward. A ward the size of the population of croatia

Yes.even after the inflated results were cancelled,apc still won heavily

Bizibi:
I thought you were,it is not until it is finally over.

It is over in nasarawa

garfield1:


Satan punish.when will you wean yourself of this childishness? I thought you had matured.tufiakwa.what an untrained and uncouth lout

It is you satan needs to flog for being the defender of lies. The bible says woe to those who call good evil, and evil good. How can you be defending obvious daylight robbery just cause of political affiliation. You should be ashamed of yourself.

MightySparrow:


Yorubas are champions in any field. I am a proud Yoruba with heritage of champions and achievers.

Mr We
Good evening sir...How far

garfield1:


And the tribunal refused based on its discretion to sanction such and affirmed by the SC

And that is why people of good conscience frown at the shenanigan of the court for double standard judgements they are dishing out. Thy are not interpreting law but they are giving judgement to the highest bidder, no more, no less.

IfnobeGod20:

And that is why people of good conscience frown at the shenanigan of the court for double standard judgements thy are dishing out. Thy are not interpreting law but they are giving judgement to the highest bidder, no more, no less.

How? Give such examples of double standard

garfield1:


And the tribunal refused based on its discretion to sanction such and affirmed by the SC

It seems you don't know what subpoenaed witnesses mean. I'm shocked

Spicycat:


Shot your mouth, idiot nitwit always bringing religion into everything and anything.

That is the game. Too bad we tend to wanna hide the truth. If the governor openly said it, whom are you to deny it?

Kukutenla:

It seems you don't know what subpoenaed witnesses mean. I'm shocked

Swerve pdp e rat

MightySparrow:


Dey follow us joor.


Oya, mention anything, anyone is in Nigeria that yorubas are not more. Any Field.

Nice deflection....

Take this your Yoruba pride to market let's see how far.....I want to test the value
Otherwise You're doing fantastic sir

Kukutenla:

Well, we still need to inform innocent minds if not this APC bot will indoctrinate them. You will see them running out telling you to blame the opposition lawyers for not being smart when the judgement is clearly flawed. They'll tell you APC lawyers were simply brilliant. Imagine a SC judge saying the subpoenaed deposition of the CSU registrar is not admissible in court because it was not stamped by the court or notary public when the reference he read clearly said it must be "signed or stamped".
I find it disgraceful that the judges are pooh-poohing the sanctity of the electoral system. It is fundamental to our democracy.
Just look at this now. How did the registrar rejecting a petition get to become trashing evidence? Which road dem for meet?

it is what it is....... when my friend narrated how the judge in kaduna tribunal threw important evidences out of the window,I knew he was going to lose to the PDP guy at the appeal court infact I told him in the next election if na gun dey carry we go carry am, anything em wan do we go do am. That is the situation we have gotten to in Nigeria.

We are going back to prof iwu era,the next election won't be funny.

garfield1:


Yes.even after the inflated results were cancelled,apc still won heavily

sule scored 347,600 votes ombugadu scored 283,745 votes. Do you even know how many votes high neck wrote for gayam and chiroma. make you just they play

whippersnapper:
sule scored 347,600 votes ombugadu scored 283,745 votes. Do you even know how many votes high neck wrote for gayam and chiroma. make you just they play

It is over

garfield1:

It is over

thanks to APC wey do us PDP

Ikinternational:


Nice deflection....

Take this your Yoruba pride to market let's see how far.....I want to test the value
Otherwise You're doing fantastic sir

Okay o.

Ikinternational:


Mr We
Good evening sir...How far

I dey kampe

garfield1:

Swerve pdp e rat

You sound pained
I floored you yet again

akaahs:
APC ll surely rip what the sow in the near future. I hope their vultures here ll not cry.

hmmm

[quote author=seunmsg post=127127763]

Dwelling on the merit of the case will be an academic exercise and a waste of time since the evidences have been expunged already. As it is, it is as if the evidences were never presented.

As for Umahi, Akpabio and Lawan, it is settled law that only the political party can present candidates. The issue of who the party presents is an internal affair of the party ans as such, the court can't rule otherwise. The court used the same principle and law used to validate the candidacy of Lawan and co to validate the candidacy of Peter Obi, Alex Otti and other Labour Party candidates that joined the party after the submission of the party register. If the party is to interfere in the affairs of who the party presents, the candidacy of almost all LP candidates would have been invalidated. [/qkeep.

Kadoso Mutairu aka seunmsg, ati ri orun wo fun e di owo Olorun. Honestly.

Until Nigerians rise against all these politicians, our votes will never count. Until INEC and Judiciary stop giving winning to the highest bidder, our votes will never count. I think sooner or later, INEC and Judiciary will soon know how to run to an exile. Nigerians are coming for you.

seunmsg:


Dwelling on the merit of the case will be an academic exercise and a waste of time since the evidences have been expunged already. As it is, it is as if the evidences were never presented.

As for Umahi, Akpabio and Lawan, it is settled law that only the political party can present candidates. The issue of who the party presents is an internal affair of the party ans as such, the court can't rule otherwise. The court used the same principle and law used to validate the candidacy of Lawan and co to validate the candidacy of Peter Obi, Alex Otti and other Labour Party candidates that joined the party after the submission of the party register. If the party is to interfere in the affairs of who the party presents, the candidacy of almost all LP candidates would have been invalidated.

Kadoso Mutairu aka seunmsg, ati ri orun wo fun e di owo Olorun. Honestly.