https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5EKjif41J0?si=jvb7Xy13Lo5IlBGb

B

Yahaya Bello was a better governor than Tinubu was.

He achieved alot more with less FAAC allocation than Tinubu ever achieved in lagos

HNICEARTH:
Yahaya Bello was a better governor than Tinubu was.

He achieved alot more with less FAAC allocation than Tinubu ever achieved in lagos

Ok o

HNICEARTH:
Yahaya Bello was a better governor than Tinubu was.

He achieved alot more with less FAAC allocation than Tinubu ever achieved in lagos

You are on the wrong thread o

Umahi making noise about irrelevant things instead of working.

Aku ruo ulo, dimkpa aju

This is the problem of Nigerian journalists - a bunch of uninformed people. The owner of Landmark argued that before he acquired the land, he was aware of that coastal road. As a result, he acquired his land in a way that the road would run behind his resort.

Now, this government came aboard and changed the course of the project in a way that it runs through Landmark's beach front. If that road runs through its beach front, with cars and trucks speeding on that expressway, that $200 million investment is totally ruined because that beach significantly contributes to its beauty and splendour.

The question these journalists didn't ask Umahi is, "Why was the course of the project tilted?" Imagine lounging on a beach just to be watching speeding cars and trucks making a cacophony of noise. I just pity the man. This project will mark the end of his business. He knows this.

SoNature:
This is the problem of Nigerian journalists - a bunch of uninformed people. The owner of Landmark argued that before he acquired the land, he was aware of that coastal road. As a result, he acquired his land in a way that the road would run behind his resort.

Now, this government came aboard and changed the course of the project in a way that it runs through Landmark's beach front. If that road runs through its beach front, with cars and trucks speeding on that expressway, that $200 million investment is totally ruined because that beach significantly contributes to its beauty and splendour.

The question these journalists didn't ask Umahi is, "Why was the course of the tilted?"

It can be tilted if demolition and cost of compensation will be more


Apparently there are more houses and structures behind land mark beach so it has to be brought in front of it

The road only affects his beach not his structure

Biodun556:



It can be tilted if demolition and cost of compensation will be more

I didn't ask you - you don't know the answer to that question. Stop defending everything indefensible! I won't reply you again!

Biodun556:



It can be tilted if demolition and cost of compensation will be more


Apparently there are more houses and structures behind land mark beach so it has to be brought in front of it

The road only affects his beach not his structure

The beach is not even part of his property

Paraman:
The beach is not even part of his property

Exactly

It belongs to the government just like road side

I wonder Umahi's percentage in this "coastal highway to fraud"??


What is his cut

Biodun556:


Exactly

It belongs to the government just like road side

He even break a law by stopping the public from having access to a public property(the beach front). He's lucky he was not sued

Paraman:
He even break a law by stopping the public from having access to a public property(the beach front). He's lucky he was not sued

🧐

Hmm

Can you imagine