FxMasterz:


The proofs on this thread are enough. Your unintelligent arguments make no sense to sane people.

FX Masterz, the Slave of Trinity said his fellow Trinitarians Biblehub are unintelligent because the same ghost leading all Trinitarians gave Biblehub the correct rendition of John 10:33 proven is "a god" in small letter.

Go & convince Biblehub your fellow Trinitarians & stop capping GIBBERISH.

Janosky:
In the screenshots of Colossians 1:1, did your Trinitarian translations inserted "From" (not in the Greek manuscripts) into that verse?
Emusan dunce , the LYING miscreant

Emusan dunce, the LYING miscreant deceiving himself.
@ Colossians 1:1 did your Trinitarian translations inserted "from ", (not in the Greek manuscripts) in brackets?
@ Colossians 1:1, did your Trinitarian translations inserted "the" (not in the Greek manuscripts) in brackets?
By your MUMU logic & IBERIBEISM, your Trinitarian translations (in screenshots) are "FRAUD & demonic."

Brackets dey for Greek manuscripts?
Dunce for life!
@ Colossians 1:15 did your Trinitarian translations inserted "OVER" into that verse in brackets (not in Greek manuscripts) ?
Emusan dunce, why do your demonic Trinitarian translations have to INSERT none existing word ("OVER" ) in manuscripts to change the meaning of Col 1:16-18?
Emusan dunce,Show me from any of your cherry pick source including Diaglott if the word "OVER" appears in Col 1:16-18.
Bury your dead head in the sand.
Emusan dunce, the LYING miscreant.

Janosky:


According to the screenshots,Will anyone who doesn't live by the standards of your gods of men make heaven?

Sparrow, the delusion begins and ends with you & your gods of men running their business franchises.

Janosky:


Yet you are WAILING about JW's.

Let the screenshot evidence sink into your empty brain.
MUMU WAILING WAILER.

Janosky:

In the screenshots of Colossians 1:1, did your Trinitarian translations inserted "From" (not in the Greek manuscripts) into that verse?

Emusan dunce , the LYING miscreant



Emusan dunce, the LYING miscreant deceiving himself.
@ Colossians 1:1 did your Trinitarian translations inserted "from ", (not in the Greek manuscripts) in brackets?
@ Colossians 1:1, did your Trinitarian translations inserted "the" (not in the Greek manuscripts) in brackets?

By your MUMU logic & IBERIBEISM, your Trinitarian translations (in screenshots) are "FRAUD & demonic."

Brackets dey for Greek manuscripts?
Dunce for life!

@ Colossians 1:15 did your Trinitarian translations inserted "OVER" into that verse in brackets (not in Greek manuscripts) ?

Emusan dunce, why do your demonic Trinitarian translations have to INSERT none existing word ("OVER" ) in manuscripts to change the meaning of Col 1:16-18?

Emusan dunce,Show me from any of your cherry pick source including Diaglott if the word "OVER" appears in Col 1:16-18.


Bury your dead head in the sand.
Emusan dunce, the LYING miscreant.

Janosky:
Ismael and Christ doesn't have something in common?

Is Matthew 5:20 in your Bible?

Emusan dunce for life!

Janosky:


FX Masterz, the Slave of Trinity said his fellow Trinitarians Biblehub are unintelligent because the same ghost leading all Trinitarians gave Biblehub the correct rendition of John 10:33 proven is "a god" in small letter.

Go & convince Biblehub your fellow Trinitarians & stop capping GIBBERISH.

Janosky:

In the screenshots of Colossians 1:1, did your Trinitarian translations inserted "From" (not in the Greek manuscripts) into that verse?

Emusan dunce , the LYING miscreant



Emusan dunce, the LYING miscreant deceiving himself.
@ Colossians 1:1 did your Trinitarian translations inserted "from ", (not in the Greek manuscripts) in brackets?
@ Colossians 1:1, did your Trinitarian translations inserted "the" (not in the Greek manuscripts) in brackets?

By your MUMU logic & IBERIBEISM, your Trinitarian translations (in screenshots) are "FRAUD & demonic."

Brackets dey for Greek manuscripts?
Dunce for life!

@ Colossians 1:15 did your Trinitarian translations inserted "OVER" into that verse in brackets (not in Greek manuscripts) ?

Emusan dunce, why do your demonic Trinitarian translations have to INSERT none existing word ("OVER" ) in manuscripts to change the meaning of Col 1:16-18?

Emusan dunce,Show me from any of your cherry pick source including Diaglott if the word "OVER" appears in Col 1:16-18.


Bury your dead head in the sand.
Emusan dunce, the LYING miscreant.

Emusan:


Just like I told FxMasterz, you can see him defending the fraudulent insertion of Watchtower but won't hesitate to call KJV fraud for the same thing Watchtower did.

achorladey:


He lacks integrity.

There was a day he said those of us in discussion with him are..... wicked or sinners, the company of mockers using Psalms 1:1

Then I asked him, MaxInDHouse are you happy? Psalms 1:1 up till today he is yet to answer.

Janosky:




That last reply on p351 was REMOVED & edited there to malign JW's, because the entire response to the cross examination had been tampered with, to deceive gullible folks.

JW'S reply:
"We (JW's) had made mistakes & we corrected ourselves?"

SAINT FX WAILER,did you read that statement in your screenshots?

What is your gods of men and pastorpreneurs doing in the screenshots selling the spirit of your deity in a bottle?

According to the screenshots, are they teaching the truth in your own Bible?


Your IBERIBEISM & Hypocrisy stinks.

FxMasterz:


KJV themselves confessed in all honesty that they have errors. That's not news to anyone. Meanwhile your NWT translators want us to believe that their translation is the most accurate, so much so that they gave it to you as your only reliable Bible. They never confessed their errors like KJV. Can you see that they're dishonest?

Now, mistakes in translations are not evil in themselves but they become evil when they're deliberately done as demonstrated by your NWT translators. The fact that they deliberately mistranslated scriptures has been proven beyond reasonable doubt. What are you even defending?

How many of your translators know Hebrew and Greek? Tell us their verifiable qualifications regarding these two languages. Courz has reported that one of your well admired translators was asked to translate a Greek verse to English in court. He failed woefully. He couldn't even attempt it.

Your organization is very dishonest. They love to deceive. And it's even annoying that you are here to overlook that deceit and defend it. Shame on you.

MightySparrow:




Check the Internet nah! Internet no dey lie nah!


https://pabook.libraries.psu.edu/literary-cultural-heritage-map-pa/bios/Russell__Charles_Taze

Not only that none of the current Governing Body members has any knowledge of either-or Greek or Hebrew languages.

https://www.quora.com/Do-Jehovahs-Witnesses-know-that-Charles-Russell-perjured-himself-in-court-under-oath-when-he-claimed-he-knew-Hebrew-and-Greek-but-couldnt-even-recognize-the-Greek-and-Hebrew-alphabet


These master deceivers.

MightySparrow:



Most of the minimized members will be saying wrong things confidently and be defending them.

C. T. Russell was once charged to court for manipulating scriptures.
During cross - examinatin, he was asked if he knew Greek language. He first admitted, he was proficient. When he was giving Greek text to read, he could not.


The cornerstone, foundation and the structure of the organization is based on lies and manipulation.


Most of the their members spewing gibberish here cannot identify Hebrew and Greek alphabets. And will be defending manipulated scriptures.


Deluded folks.

Aemmyjah:



The KJV did not mention that their translation has errors. It is other translation that said the KJV has errors but they did not remove all of them.
If KJV has to be accurate and respect God's words, they have to remove the errors. Could this be the reason why the OP who himself has been a malicious liar towards Jehovah's Witnesses think that we manipulated the Bible. Thank God we don't and we did not allow the fear of what people will say to stop us. You're not reasonable to use erroneous translation to judge our Bible.
You say KJV has errors and the admitted it (which they didn't but you don't know what you say with your nonsense) so which ones are the errors if I may ask
Mention any translator that say their own translation has errors.
We're the only translation that has profound respect for the Bible and return the Divine name in every place it was found cos we won't replace it with mere titles so the reader can know God's name. The only translation with the most widely translated Bible. The only translation where anyone today can get the the Bible in his own language for free. In Madagascar, if you want to buy KJV, you have to sacrifice your salary for that month. Whereas we give it free. Envy will not kill you

FxMasterz:


My dear, we used original Greek interlinear translations to judge your Bible and found it to be a fabrication of falsehood.

Again, do you justify your erroneous translations because KJV also has errors?

Did your organization not confess to be an organizer forcing its errors on people? What are you defending?

Did the KJV ever force itself on anyone. Is the use of KJV not by choice? Did they ever claim to be the most accurate Bible translation? Is that not what your satanic organization claims? Do they not force their errors on you? Don't you go about defending your errors? Did the KJV ever deny or defended themselves to be without errors?

Aemmyjah:



😂
I laugh at you
That statement is about some previous misunderstanding on dates
Not on the Bible translation

Now my question
1. Did the KJV say that their own translation has any error as you said? If yes, show it. If no, you're an ignorant liar

2. If other Bible translations said that their translation came up cos the KJV which was the most popular has errors, is it proper for their own version to have the same errors or they should remove it?

3. If a translator notices that certain words or verses were not in reliable original manuscripts but are in nearly 100% of all the modern Bibles. Should he allow those verses to be in the translation, or he should put them in italics (like some translations too) or he should remove them?

4. Is it proper to use the KJV which other translation says has errors as well as these same translations to judge what is written in the NWT? If not, how do you decide which is accurate

5. Without using Google,What are the general 3 criteria in Bible translation

6. Mention the most accurate translation or the most nearly accurate translation




Olodo
You say we're falsehood. Mention the group that has the truth, you can't mention
You say our Bible is incorrect, mention the correct one, you can't mention

Envy will keep you

MightySparrow:


Did Kumuyi say he was inspired in all these?
Did Oyedepo say he was inspired?

These are lies they have conditioned your minds to believe and to run down others. Kumuyi or Oyedepo have never given any prophecies concerning any government in Nigeria.



You claim not infallible on papers but behave as infallible. You are the only 'special imperfect ' organization as you prize yourselves as the only true organization .

This is delusion.

FxMasterz:


I asked you questions which you ignored. Answer my questions and stop playing hide and seek!

Your questions are useless because we already told you KJV is not our standard. We use several versions of scriptures together in Bible study to eliminate potential translation errors. We look up strong's concordance and interlinear bible to confirm correct translations. None of the various versions claim to be the most accurate!

Your Bible fails in all of the above and still goes ahead to force itself on its adherents. Answer my questions!

FxMasterz:


I asked you questions which you ignored. Answer my questions and stop playing hide and seek!

Your questions are useless because we already told you KJV is not our standard. We use several versions of scriptures together in Bible study to eliminate potential translation errors. We look up strong's concordance and interlinear bible to confirm correct translations. None of the various versions claim to be the most accurate!

Your Bible fails in all of the above and still goes ahead to force itself on its adherents. Answer my questions!

Aemmyjah:



J
If KJV is not your standard then I guess your standard is accurate. Kindly mention na... Only a foolish person will use the same language to judge a translation. If I translate something from Efik to English and other people seem to be different. Should you use the other English translation or from the original language?
That's what my brother Janosky is trying to do but your envy has made your head hot

Aemmyjah:



Have you first used it to eliminate or see the error in the King James and other translations
Will you use other translation that follow the KJV in it's errors to judge the NWT
See as u just de zuzu like small pikin

Now, list the several Bible accurate translation you use aa standard

FxMasterz:


That's how foolish your organization is to have used English versions as the basis for your translations.

Answer my questions or you want me to ask you again?

We use interlinear translations okay? We don't depend on any one version. Get that into you.

FxMasterz:


Will you stop this boring nonesense about KJV? Did KJV force themselves on you or ask you to get their version as the only accurate version? What's happening with your head? You've been so messed up!

We are readers and students of the Bible. We're not translators. Ours is to get the best out of every version.

It is human to have errors. But to force your errors on others and still claim to be error free is satanic! If your organization is not guilty of this sin, they would not be called out even though they have errors.

Answer the questions I asked. Stop dribbling.

Aemmyjah:



Liar
A big fat lie
The OP was trying to shame us but your folly has been revealed like sunshine and you're talking nonsense. OP was Trying to discredit the NWT not says that it was most accurate
Have you ever seen anyone or did the OP tell you that these interlinear translations acknowledge that KJV has errors but they still did not do anything
Does that make any sense?
We have never ever stopped anyone from using other translations. We have a lot of them even in our library
Personally, in my ministry, I encourage my students to read from their own Bible and we have used and printed other translations over the years.

You're not translators but you want to judge another translation shey?



Cos you have seen that it your own own interlinear translations that have fault by failing to remove errors cos of fear of public uproar, you now say it is human to make errors. This is just your level of intelligence and it's shameful on a old man like you

Now mention one translation that say it's not error free

Aemmyjah:


Here is a list of some common English Bible translations:

1. King James Version (KJV) - 1611
2. American Standard Version (ASV) - 1901
3. Revised Standard Version (RSV) - 1952
4. New American Standard Bible (NASB) - 1963
5. New International Version (NIV) - 1978
6. New King James Version (NKJV) - 1982
7. English Standard Version (ESV) - 2001
8. Christian Standard Bible (CSB) - 2017 (formerly Holman Christian Standard Bible, HCSB)
9. New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) - 1989
10. The Message (MSG) - 1993 (a paraphrased version)
11. Amplified Bible (AMP) - 1965
12. New Living Translation (NLT) - 1996
13. Contemporary English Version (CEV) - 1995
14. The Clear Word Bible (TCWB) - 1994
15. God's Word (GW) - 1995
16. International Standard Version (ISV) - 1998
17. New American Bible (NAB) - 1970
18. Revised English Bible (REB) - 1989
19. The Voice (VOICE) - 2012
20. Young's Literal Translation (YLT) - 1862


Which one(s) is accurate
A. One of some. Then mention
B. Some of them. Then mention
C. All of them. Do their translators agree that the KJV which is one of the oldest and most popular is accused of having errors. Where are the errors and what has been done to the errors in their own translation


If the correct ones are not listed above. Kindly mention or remain ignorant

FxMasterz:


Hypocrite, are you also a dullard like janosky?

No one is claiming complete accuracy. The fault of your organization is them claiming accuracy and forcing their manipulated and deliberately falsified Bible on their followers!

Aemmyjah:


Here is a list of some common English Bible translations:

1. King James Version (KJV) - 1611
2. American Standard Version (ASV) - 1901
3. Revised Standard Version (RSV) - 1952
4. New American Standard Bible (NASB) - 1963
5. New International Version (NIV) - 1978
6. New King James Version (NKJV) - 1982
7. English Standard Version (ESV) - 2001
8. Christian Standard Bible (CSB) - 2017 (formerly Holman Christian Standard Bible, HCSB)
9. New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) - 1989
10. The Message (MSG) - 1993 (a paraphrased version)
11. Amplified Bible (AMP) - 1965
12. New Living Translation (NLT) - 1996
13. Contemporary English Version (CEV) - 1995
14. The Clear Word Bible (TCWB) - 1994
15. God's Word (GW) - 1995
16. International Standard Version (ISV) - 1998
17. New American Bible (NAB) - 1970
18. Revised English Bible (REB) - 1989
19. The Voice (VOICE) - 2012
20. Young's Literal Translation (YLT) - 1862


Which one(s) is accurate
A. One of some. Then mention
B. Some of them. Then mention
C. All of them. Do their translators agree that the KJV which is one of the oldest and most popular is accused of having errors. Where are the errors and what has been done to the errors in their own translation


If the correct ones are not listed above. Kindly mention or remain ignorant

Aemmyjah:


Is the Bible accurate or not
Which translation is not claiming accuracy?
Why is every Bible translation today being revised
Where have our organization forced us to only study the NWT? You're a malicious liar
Till date, even in our publications, we still reference to the wordings of other translations including the KJV
If there's anyone that forcing people to accept their own Bible, it's the KJV cos they have the KJV MOVEMENT

Go to Wikipedia and check the List of New Testament verses not included in modern English translations
Compare to OP
then apologize to us later

Only a fool will believe everything na
Go and do that assignment
Or should I drop links for you?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament_verses_not_included_in_modern_English_translations?wprov=sfla1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the_New_Testament#List_of_major_textual_variants_in_the_New_Testament?wprov=sfla1

You were trying to invalidate us, now that you've seen how foolish you've become. You now say another lie that they force the NWT on us. Why not cite where we said that. I use 3 different Bibles in my ministry. Stupid liar

Courz:


Mumu. He has answered this question again and again. You don't rely solely on one Translation. This is why all the Bible verses I mentioned, I made sure to show as many translations as possible from Bible hub. I know that you know nothing about reading The Bible because Watchtower never teaches you how to. FxMasterz has said that other translations never made the claim of being accurate but your Cult has made that claim knowing fully well the manipulation they have done. Accuracy is left to the reader by comparing whatever translation you read with the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. I created this thread solely to show everyone how far your Manipulated Bible has deviated from the meaning of words and messages in the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. This is why we have websites you can use to make comparison to ensure you are reading the right message from the Bible directly from the interlinear.

The Grave sin your Watchtower Cult has committed is changing words in the Bible that don't align with your Doctrines in order to give a different message completely different from all that is in the Hebrew and Greek Manuscripts. I have shown Bible verses where Almighty God has shown his anger against this act. For you to continue to argue for Manipulation of Bible verses means you have made your choice to receive the anger from Almighty God on Judgement day.

Aemmyjah:



🎵 Liar liar, your pants are on fire
You gat a nose as long as a telephone wire 🎵

One translation is enough to judge another one of it is accurate
You used several but you cannot collectively say they are accurate
Shame on you
If you like, use a million interlinear translations, where there's an error which they refused to correct and there's changes in all of them , it is still inaccurate. It's like using lepers (some have several sores, some have just few) to judge if a man has leprosy or not

What should you use to shame a translation whether it is the Bible or another literature? Other versions or the ancient copies from which they were translated

Stupid liar

You say JWs will go to hell cos they are lying. I don't want to go to hell so tell me where they they teach the truth since there's thousands. You cannot mention since, according to you, where 2 or 3 are gathered, they are a cult
You say our Bible is fake and instead of using the Greek available manuscripts to invalidate us, you use other translations where they don't even agree on everything they say. See as you mumu. Now mention one true translation that is upholding God's word accurately, you cannot mention one. Just one but one has to use more than one according to you. Shame on you.
You try to illegitimise us but you will like and share comments of temple333 who says that watching porn is good for him. Maybe that is what both of you will practice in your imaginary heaven
Nonsense and ingredients

Aemmyjah:


Is the Bible accurate or not
Which translation is not claiming accuracy?
Why is every Bible translation today being revised
Where have our organization forced us to only study the NWT? You're a malicious liar
Till date, even in our publications, we still reference to the wordings of other translations including the KJV
If there's anyone that forcing people to accept their own Bible, it's the KJV cos they have the KJV MOVEMENT

Go to Wikipedia and check the List of New Testament verses not included in modern English translations
Compare to OP
then apologize to us later

Only a fool will believe everything na
Go and do that assignment
Or should I drop links for you?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament_verses_not_included_in_modern_English_translations?wprov=sfla1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the_New_Testament#List_of_major_textual_variants_in_the_New_Testament?wprov=sfla1

You were trying to invalidate us, now that you've seen how foolish you've become. You now say another lie that they force the NWT on us. Why not cite where we said that. I use 3 different Bibles in my ministry. Stupid liar