Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,209,900 members, 8,007,461 topics. Date: Tuesday, 19 November 2024 at 11:59 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran (1782 Views)
Ezekiel Bible Prophecy And World War Iii-the Syrian, Turkey, Russia And Iran Con / PMB Will Win War Against Corruption – Kumuyi / UNDERSTANDING RESTITUTION ( Part III - The Concluding Part ) (2) (3) (4)
World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 1:44am On Dec 06, 2011 |
The launching of an outright war using nuclear warheads against Iran has been on the active drawing board of the Pentagon since 2005. If such a war were to be launched, the entire Middle East Central Asia region would flare up. Humanity would be precipitated into a World War III Scenario. World War III is not front-page news. The mainstream media has excluded in-depth analysis and debate on the implications of these war plans. The onslaught of World War III, were it to be carried out, would be casually described as a "no-fly zone", an operation under NATO's "Responsibility to Protect" (R2P) with minimal "collateral damage" or a "limited" punitive bombing against specific military targets, all of which purport to support "Global Security" as well as "democracy" and human rights in the targeted country. Public opinion is largely unaware of the grave implications of these war plans, which contemplate the use of nuclear weapons, ironically in retaliation to Iran's nonexistent nuclear weapons program. Moreover, 21st Century military technology is at an advanced stage of development combining an array of sophisticated weapons systems. We are at the crossroads of the most serious crisis in World history. The future of humanity is at stake. The present situation is one of advanced war planning by a formidable military force using nuclear warheads. The Pentagon’s global military design is one of world conquest. The military deployment of US-NATO forces is occurring in several regions of the World simultaneously. Militarization at the global level is instrumented through the US military's Unified Command structure: the entire planet is divided up into geographic Combatant Commands under the control of the Pentagon. According to (former) NATO Commander General Wesley Clark, the Pentagon’s military road-map consists of a sequence of war theaters: “[The] five-year campaign plan [includes], a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.” Military action is waged in the name of the "Global War on Terrorism" and Global Security. It has a stated "humanitarian" "pro-democracy" mandate. It is predicated on the notion that the West's arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons are (in contrast to those [nonexistent] of the Islamic Republic), according to expert scientific opinion on contract to the Pentagon, "harmless to the surrounding civilian population because the explosion is underground." Irresponsible politicians are unaware of the implications of their actions. They believe their own war propaganda: nuclear weapons are heralded as an instrument of peace and democracy. War is heralded as a peace-keeping making operation carried out with the support of the "international community". The victims of war are described as the perpetrators. Iran and Syria constitute a threat to Global Security thereby justifying pre-emptive military action. Global Warfare The concept of the "Long War" has characterised US military doctrine since the end of World War II. The broader objective of global military dominance in support of an imperial project was first formulated under the Truman administration in the late 1940s at the outset of the Cold War. We are dealing with a global military agenda, namely "Global Warfare". The 2000 Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which was the backbone of the NeoCon's agenda was predicated on "waging a war without borders". The PNAC's declared objectives were to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars" in different regions of the World as well perform the so-called military "constabulary" duties "associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions". Global constabulary implies a Worldwide process of military policing and interventionism, including covert operations and "regime change". (Project for a New American Century, Rebuilding Americas Defenses.pdf, September 2000) This diabolical military project formulated by the NeoCons was adopted and implemented from the very outset of the Obama administration. With a new team of military and foreign policy advisers, Obama has been far more effective in fostering military escalation than his predecessor in the White House, who has recently been condemned by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal for "Crimes against the Peace". In the present context, US military and intelligence actions are been undertaken in different part of the the World. Ongoing war plans within the broader Middle East Central Asian region would involve coordinated actions against Iran, Syria and Pakistan leading to an extended regional war theater. The three existing and distinct war theaters (Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine) would merge into a broad regional war extending from the Lebanese-Syrian East Mediterraean coastline to the Afghanistan-Pakistan border with Western China (See map below). Israel, Lebanon and Turkey would be engulfed in the conflict. [img]http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/Middle-East-map1.gif[/img] It is important to address the history of this military agenda including the slated role of Israel. The main coalition partners, including the US, UK, Israel and Turkey have been in "an advanced stage of readiness" since 2005. The Combatant Command structure of a military operation against Iran is centralized and controlled by the Pentagon. In 2005, USSTRATCOM was identified as "the lead Combatant Command for integration and synchronization of DoD-wide efforts in combating weapons of mass destruction." This Combatant Command integration also included coordination with America's allies including NATO, Israel and a number of frontline Arab states, which are members of NATO's Mediterranean dialogue. To implement USSTRATCOM's mandate, a new command unit entitled Joint Functional Component Command Space and Global Strike, or JFCCSGS was created. JFCCSGS was granted the mandate to oversee the launching of a nuclear attack against Iran in accordance with the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review, approved by the US Congress in 2002. The NPR underscores the pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons not only against "rogue states" (i.e. Iran) but also against China and Russia. The operational implementation of the "Global Strike" was labelled CONCEPT PLAN (CONPLAN) 8022. The latter is described as "an actual plan that the Navy and the Air Force translate into strike package for their submarines and bombers,' CONPLAN 8022 is 'the overall umbrella plan of the pre-planned strategic scenarios involving nuclear weapons.' Rebuild the Antiwar Movement. SAY NO to World War III The antiwar movement is in crisis: civil society organizations are misinformed, manipulated or co-opted. A large segment of "progressive" opinion is supportive of NATO's R2P "humanitarian" mandate to extent that these war plans are being carried out with the "rubber stamp" of civil society. There is a definite need to rebuild the antiwar movement on entirely new premises. The holding of mass demonstrations and antiwar protests is not enough. What is required is the development of a broad and well organized grassroots antiwar network, across the land, nationally and internationally, which challenges the structures of power and authority. People must mobilize not only against the military agenda, the authority of the state and its officials must also be challenged. Central to an understanding of war, is the media campaign which grants it legitimacy in the eyes of public opinion. A good versus evil dichotomy prevails. The perpetrators of war are presented as the victims. Public opinion is misled: “We must fight against evil in all its forms as a means to preserving the Western way of life.” Breaking the "big lie" which upholds war as a humanitarian undertaking, means breaking a criminal project of global destruction, in which the quest for profit is the overriding force. This profit-driven military agenda destroys human values and transforms people into unconscious zombies. It should be understood that whatever its justification, War is a "Crime against the Peace" under Nuremburg. George W. Bush and Anthony L. Blair have been condemned by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal for waging a criminal war of aggression against Iraq. War crimes, however, are not limited to the former US president and British Prime Minister. There are, so to speak, "New War Criminals on the Block" including the president of the United States of America Barack Hussein Obama, among others. The acting heads of state and heads of government which support US-NATO-Israel wars of aggression under an R2P pretext are war criminals under international law. This proposition, which consists in unseating the war criminals in high office, is central to the waging of an effective antiwar movement. This war can be prevented if people forcefully confront their governments, address the issue of war crimes, pressure their elected representatives, organize at the local level in towns, villages and municipalities, spread the word, inform their fellow citizens as to the implications of a global war, initiate debate and discussion within the armed forces. Nuclear War against Iran Below are excerpts from my January 2006 article (emphasis added) which outlines the process of military deployment including the use of tactical nuclear weapons against Iran. To read the complete article click here: Nuclear War against Iran. A more detailed analysis is contained in my book entitled Towards a World War III Scenario (see ordering details below): "Various military exercises have been conducted, starting in early 2005. In turn, the Iranian Armed Forces have also conducted large scale military maneuvers in the Persian Gulf in December in anticipation of a US sponsored attack. Since early 2005, there has been intense shuttle diplomacy between Washington, Tel Aviv, Ankara and NATO headquarters in Brussels. In recent developments [late 2005], CIA Director Porter Goss on a mission to Ankara, requested Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan "to provide political and logistic support for air strikes against Iranian nuclear and military targets." Goss reportedly asked " for special cooperation from Turkish intelligence to help prepare and monitor the operation." (DDP, 30 December 2005). In turn, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has given the green light to the Israeli Armed Forces to launch the attacks by the end of March [2006]: All top Israeli officials have pronounced the end of March, 2006, as the deadline for launching a military assault on Iran, The end of March date also coincides with the IAEA report to the UN on Iran's nuclear energy program. Israeli policymakers believe that their threats may influence the report, or at least force the kind of ambiguities, which can be exploited by its overseas supporters to promote Security Council sanctions or justify Israeli military action. (James Petras, Israel's War Deadline: Iran in the Crosshairs, Global Research, December 2005) The US sponsored military plan has been endorsed by NATO, although it is unclear, at this stage [December 2005], as to the nature of NATO's involvement in the planned aerial attacks. "Shock and Awe" The various components of the military operation are firmly under US Command, coordinated by the Pentagon and US Strategic Command Headquarters (USSTRATCOM) at the Offutt Air Force base in Nebraska. The actions announced by Israel would be carried out in close coordination with the Pentagon. The command structure of the operation is centralized and ultimately Washington will decide when to launch the military operation. US military sources have confirmed that an aerial attack on Iran would involve a large scale deployment comparable to the US "shock and awe" bombing raids on Iraq in March 2003: American air strikes on Iran would vastly exceed the scope of the 1981 Israeli attack on the Osiraq nuclear center in Iraq, and would more resemble the opening days of the 2003 air campaign against Iraq. Using the full force of operational B-2 stealth bombers, staging from Diego Garcia or flying direct from the United States, possibly supplemented by F-117 stealth fighters staging from al Udeid in Qatar or some other location in theater, the two-dozen suspect nuclear sites would be targeted. Military planners could tailor their target list to reflect the preferences of the Administration by having limited air strikes that would target only the most crucial facilities , or the United States could opt for a far more comprehensive set of strikes against a comprehensive range of WMD related targets, as well as conventional and unconventional forces that might be used to counterattack against US forces in Iraq (See Globalsecurity.org at http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-strikes.htm In November [2005], US Strategic Command conducted a major exercise of a "global strike plan" entitled "Global Lightening". The latter involved a simulated attack using both conventional and nuclear weapons against a "fictitious enemy". Following the "Global Lightening" exercise, US Strategic Command declared an advanced state of readiness. Consensus for Nuclear War No dissenting political voices have emerged from within the European Union. There are ongoing consultations between Washington, Paris and Berlin. Contrary to the invasion of Iraq, which was opposed at the diplomatic level by France and Germany, Washington has been building "a consensus" both within the Atlantic Alliance and the UN Security Council. This consensus pertains to the conduct of a nuclear war, which could potentially affect a large part of the Middle East Central Asian region. Moreover, a number of frontline Arab states [i.e. Arab League] are now tacit partners in the US/ Israeli military project. A year ago in November 2004, Israel's top military brass met at NATO headquarters in Brussels with their counterparts from six members of the Mediterranean basin nations, including Egypt, Jordan, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria and Mauritania. [Arabic league and Israel work hand in glove] A NATO-Israel protocol was signed. Following these meetings, joint military exercises were held off the coast of Syria involving the US, Israel and Turkey. and in February 2005, Israel participated in military exercises and "anti-terror maneuvers" together with several Arab countries. The media in chorus has unequivocally pointed to Iran as a "threat to World Peace". The antiwar movement has swallowed the media lies. The fact that the US and Israel are planning a Middle East nuclear holocaust is not part of the antiwar/ anti- globalization agenda. The "surgical strikes" are presented to world public opinion as a means to preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons. We are told that this is not a war but a military peace-keeping operation, in the form of aerial attacks directed against Iran's nuclear facilities. Mini-nukes: "Safe for Civilians" The press reports, while revealing certain features of the military agenda, largely serve to distort the broader nature of the military operation, which contemplates the preemptive use of tactical nuclear weapons. The war agenda is based on the Bush administration's doctrine of "preemptive" nuclear war under the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review. Media disinformation has been used extensively to conceal the devastating consequences of military action involving nuclear warheads against Iran. The fact that these surgical strikes would be carried out using both conventional and nuclear weapons is not an object of debate. According to a 2003 Senate decision, the new generation of tactical nuclear weapons or "low yield" "mini-nukes", with an explosive capacity of up to 6 times a Hiroshima bomb, are now considered "safe for civilians" because the explosion is underground. The following article published in January 2006 outlined the main features of this diabolical military agenda. In recent developments, following the threats by Britain and Israel, we have reached a major turning point. Space and Earth Attack Command Unit A preemptive nuclear attack [against Iran] using tactical nuclear weapons would be coordinated out of US Strategic Command Headquarters at the Offutt Air Force base in Nebraska, in liaison with US and coalition command units in the Persian Gulf, the Diego Garcia military base, Israel and Turkey. Under its new mandate, USSTRATCOM has a responsibility for "overseeing a global strike plan" consisting of both conventional and nuclear weapons. In military jargon, it is slated to play the role of "a global integrator charged with the missions of Space Operations; Information Operations; Integrated Missile Defense; Global Command & Control; Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance; Global Strike; and Strategic Deterrence, " In January 2005, at the outset of the military build-up directed against Iran, USSTRATCOM was identified as "the lead Combatant Command for integration and synchronization of DoD-wide efforts in combating weapons of mass destruction." To implement this mandate, a brand new command unit entitled Joint Functional Component Command Space and Global Strike, or JFCCSGS was created. JFCCSGS has the mandate to oversee the launching of a nuclear attack in accordance with the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review, approved by the US Congress in 2002. The NPR underscores the pre-emptive use of nuclear warheads not only against "rogue states" but also against China and Russia. CONCEPT PLAN (CONPLAN) 8022 JFCCSGS is in an advanced state of readiness to trigger nuclear attacks directed against Iran or North Korea. The operational implementation of the Global Strike is called CONCEPT PLAN (CONPLAN) 8022. The latter is described as "an actual plan that the Navy and the Air Force translate into strike package for their submarines and bombers,' (Ibid). CONPLAN 8022 is 'the overall umbrella plan for sort of the pre-planned strategic scenarios involving nuclear weapons.' 'It's specifically focused on these new types of threats -- Iran, North Korea -- proliferators and potentially terrorists too,' he said. 'There's nothing that says that they can't use CONPLAN 8022 in limited scenarios against Russian and Chinese targets.'(According to Hans Kristensen, of the Nuclear Information Project, quoted in Japanese economic News Wire, op cit) The mission of JFCCSGS is to implement CONPLAN 8022, in other words to trigger a nuclear war with Iran. The Commander in Chief, namely George W. Bush would instruct the Secretary of Defense, who would then instruct the Joint Chiefs of staff to activate CONPLAN 8022. CONPLAN is distinct from other military operations. it does not contemplate the deployment of ground troops. CONPLAN 8022 is different from other war plans in that it posits a small-scale operation and no "boots on the ground." The typical war plan encompasses an amalgam of forces -- air, ground, sea -- and takes into account the logistics and political dimensions needed to sustain those forces in protracted operations, The global strike plan is offensive, triggered by the perception of an imminent threat and carried out by presidential order.) (William Arkin, Washington Post, May 2005) http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28026 |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by bashydemy(m): 3:15am On Dec 06, 2011 |
and will this bring food on your table? |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 10:00am On Dec 06, 2011 |
No, but it will bring awareness to people. Do you know that just prior to world war 2, everything went on as normal , until it came upon them like a ton of bricks. In addition to my bible I also like to keep track of current affairs, so that people can be warned about the events that are coming to this world of ours and make adequate preparation. To put food on my table though I work Thanks. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by bashydemy(m): 10:24am On Dec 06, 2011 |
Alright, But i never pray for world war III cos that might be the end of the world |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by chiteny(m): 4:12pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
Very useful piece. Thank Frosbel |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by theseeker2: 6:04pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
Lets see how it goes |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by free123: 6:41pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
This impending war should be condemned by all cos it will affect everyone adversely even Israel that is clamouring for it. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 7:13pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
this is an inevitable war. It wont lead to WWIII . . . and you bet Iran will see weapons raining down on it before Nov next yr. Cant wait . . . time to teach those mullahs a harsh lesson. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by bashydemy(m): 7:51pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
If it where to be only Israel and Iran then we shall see but if NATO or US involve them self then its 3rd world |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 8:00pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
bashy_demy: Israel will wipe Iran off the face of the map dude. You must be living in allah land. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by bashydemy(m): 8:15pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
^^^ Lets wait till then, Even your so call America cannot dare Iran for now |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by theseeker2: 8:22pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
@Davidylan You understimate the iranians. Hope you heared they downed a US drone 3days ago. I cant wait for them to finish building their nuke |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 8:25pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
the_seeker: At least you admit they are building a nuke despite their continuous lies that they are not. Good, you are a bad muslim - you have no idea what al taqiyya means? By the way, i dont underestimate the Iranians, i think you on the other hand OVER-ESTIMATE the Iranians. It took Israel 6 days to route Egypt, Syria, Jordan . . . all without nukes. Sorry, you'll be here gnashing your teeth when pictures of dead mohammedan terrorists start gracing your TV. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 8:27pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
bashy_demy: huh? lol The Iranians are already surrounded by aircraft carriers and submarines ready to fire nuclear weapons + B2 spirits carrying 30,000 pound bunker bursting bombs recently delivered a few months ago precisely for destroying Iran's nuclear facilities. i cant wait for the usual whinning of "disproportional response" when you f00ls are forced to eat your words and lick your open sores. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by bashydemy(m): 8:32pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
Its only empty barrel that make sound, upon all the shouting Iran Face there Weapon direct to American incase they wanna intervene and remember Iran also has strong allies. Russia,China etc, if US decide to intervene then China will request for the Loan they are own them then we will see where they will get the money to Finance war am laughing in Advance. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 8:39pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
bashy_demy: what are the Iranians bringing? Al shabaab missiles? Gerrout of here! Saddam made the same noise . . . didnt Gaddafi tell us he would crush the Americans with his fists? Dudes were caught like gutter rats in holes! Where was russia and china? too busy drilling your oil to care about ur lives. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by LagosShia: 8:50pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
davidylan: I wont make any comment supporting the Islamic Republic of Iran,the nation of the 12th Imam,Imam Mahdi (ajtfs). I dont also wish for any war. but God forbid a war takes place,mark my word "Davidylan",I shall revisit your comment and watch you in shame.like the saying goes:"he who laughs last,laughs best". your support for war against islamic countries has no basis in what Jesus preached.it is only based on hatred for Islam and jealousy for Muslims and ignorance about them.this is the darkness christian missionaries and evangelicals are living. God willing,no harm can be done to Iran.and anyone that attempts to harm Iran,fire will swallow that person/country-be it israel,america or their arabian puppets like saudi arabia and the likes. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 9:01pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
LagosShia: which is it? Is Christ coming to defeat the anti-christ or the imam mahdi is coming? Why dont sunnis believe in the mahdi? Confused souls. LagosShia: 1. Muslim nations are always at war so what is new? Sudan, Somalia, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Lebanon . . . which of them isnt at war? We're used to it already bro. 2. lol i dont have to mark your words . . . you will be here seething in hatred after the Americans and the jews pulverize the Iranians. I can guarantee one thing, not a single Iranian missile will land on US soil . . . if that ever happens you can kiss Iran goodbye while the US airforce and Navy visit a rain of fire on your mahdi such as has never been seen before. LagosShia: That there is the problem . . . muslims are so full of hypocrisy and dishonesty it churns your stomach. When christian nations defend themselves against belligerent nations like Iran (which accounts for most of the road side bombs that decimated thousands of US soldiers in Iraq for no reason) . . . we start hearing bluster about what Christ preached. Meanwhile it is OK for muslim nations to continue visiting bloodshed on the innocent because allah hath decreed it right? It is OK for Ahmedinejad to constantly threaten to wipe out Israel and you keep quiet then invoke the "preaching of Jesus" when other nations decide to strike back? Sorry no escape here . . . believe me when i tell you that Iran will NEVER have a nuclear weapon, Tehran will be destroyed before that happens. Who hates muslims or is jealous of them? Even muslims would rather pick visas to the US than travel to Iran. Where do you nauseating hypocrite live? When are you leaving the UK to head over to your muslim meccas in the middle east? LagosShia: Doesnt seem as if your god cares or answers your prayers. Your muslim arab brothers are so dependent on the west to survive its unbelievable. lol save your curses . . . it didnt work for Gaddafi. Your god didnt seem to care about Saddam either. Ahmedinejad is next . . . if Assad of syria doesnt go before him. "god willing", "god willing" . . . until Bin Laden and Awlaki were hunted down and blown off the face of the earth like the ants they are. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 9:05pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
Trident nuclear missile fired from a nuclear submarine . . . coming to a belligerent Iranian nation near you today.
|
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by LagosShia: 9:12pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
i have made my statement and i will leave it at that.i see no need to debate the future which we are unsure of and tracing shadows.i can only voice what i believe and wish for for reasons best known to me.till then,time will tell. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 9:15pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
LagosShia: We are sure of one thing . . . Israel and the US will destroy Iran should it acquire a nuclear weapon. We dont need complex math to figure that out. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by bashydemy(m): 9:18pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
@Lagoshia Second till then i reserve my comment |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 9:20pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
bashy_demy: hehehe i wonder why Hassan Nasrallah is hiding in a hole. Afraid of Israeli fighter jets and bombers? Nasrallah Bin Laden Gaddafi Saddam . . . Common thread? blustering idi0ts whose "bravery" consisted of hiding in holes and making a whole lot of noise. Quite shameful, allah doesnt seem to care much as his folks die like flies all day. about 47 killed in Kabul today. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by LagosShia: 10:07pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
davidylan: Please don’t even try to categorise Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah with those criminals who were nothing but american puppet with the exception of Qaddafi who later on turned into a puppy! and besides,see wey God commot behind you! Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah made a public appearance today in Ashura procession in Beirut,commemorating the martyrdom of Imam Hussain (as),grandson and legitimate successor of the Prophet Muhammad (sa) and third Imam of Islam.
|
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 10:09pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
LagosShia: Nasrallah . . . just another pathetic blustering idi0t. why cant he catch a flight out of Beirut for once? Criminal just pops up like a scared weasel once in a while to make noise before scurrying into his hidey-hole. Read your own article you blind bat . . . Sheikh Nasrallah has rarely been seen in public since Hezbollah's 34-day war with Israel in 2006, which left more than 1,200 Lebanese dead, most of them civilians. Some 160 Israelis, mostly soldiers, were also killed. But on Tuesday, the hundreds of thousands of Hezbollah supporters gathered in the capital's southern suburb of Dahiya reacted with delight when he suddenly walked through the crowd, surrounded by bodyguards. 5 yrs in a hole is a long long time dude. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by LagosShia: 10:16pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
davidylan:that shows how treasured and valuable the man's life is.he must be very important.he has survived an israeli assasination attempt and the former leader of the party was assasinated by your criminal role models in israel.since the 2006 war when the israelis were taught the bitter lesson in lebanon by hezbollah,they became more blood thirsty to assasinate Sayyed Nasrullah. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 10:28pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
LagosShia: No that shows how much of a decietful and disgraceful coward he is. He pushes others to commit suicide attacks while preserving his own life hiding in a hole? You disgust me. Israel was "taught a bitter lesson" yet Israeli leaders walk around the world free of fear while nasrallah and his henchmen hide in earth bunkers? |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by LagosShia: 10:54pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
davidylan: firstly,Hezbollah has long stopped its "suicide" attacks since the armed resistance wing became stronger and there is no need for that. secondly,get your facts straight you deceptive ignorant christian missionary leaving no stone unturned in attacking muslims.the son of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah,Hadi Nasrallah was martyed by israeli occupation forces in lebanon on the battlefield.our Shia scholars are honorable men who took lessons from Imam Hussain (as) in Karbala, who sacrificed himself and his most beloved ones for the sake of justice and freedom.our scholars dont hide and keep their sons while the sons of others are sent to fight and get killed. |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 11:01pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
We should not pray for war, rather we should pray against it. Iranians are generally a lovely people, God forbid that there should be mass loss of life. The Iranian people are hostage to the mad Mullahs, but hopefully soon their regime will collapse by some other less-violent methods. America is a warmongering nation. As for IRAN's leadership , it is difficult to make peace with people who love WAR !!! |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by Nobody: 11:07pm On Dec 06, 2011 |
LagosShia: LagosShia: nasrallah, haniyeh . . . all desperate cowards in hiding. Osama bin Laden caught hiding behind the skirts of his wife . . . what is new? |
Re: World War III: The Launching Of A Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran by somtookeke(m): 11:17am On Jan 05, 2020 |
In a series of tweets, President Donald Trump has reiterated his warning to Iran not to retaliate in the aftermath of Friday's deadly strike on Qasem Soleimani. Claiming the US had "just spent Two Trillion Dollars on Military Equipment," Trump added in an early Sunday tweet: “If Iran attacks an American Base, or any American, we will be sending some of that brand new beautiful equipment their way...and without hesitation!” Read More: https://speakersden2..com/2020/01/us-deploying-troops-to-iran-video.html
|
(1) (Reply)
Roman Catholicism, Christian Or Pagan? (churchianity Without Christianity) / Being In Heaven Can Be Compared With Being In Bed With The Woman You Love / Why I Believe Islam And Islamic Beliefs Are False
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 111 |