"From carbon dating controversies to the miraculous image on the cloth''
Have we all come to agree that the Shroud of Turin is the Real Image of Jesus? 🤔

Recent X-ray analysis has sparked new debates about the Shroud of Turin, a 2,000-year-old cloth believed by many to be the burial shroud of Jesus Christ.

In this video, we dive deep into the evidence, explore the historical significance, and discuss whether this could be the true face of Jesus of Nazareth.

From carbon dating controversies to the miraculous image on the cloth, join us as we unravel the mystery surrounding this ancient relic. Watch the full video and share your thoughts!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJK3HjWVfPQ?si=tw-DMxHTK0cQM195


*Link to video*

sunky97:

"From carbon dating controversies to the miraculous image on the cloth''
Have we all come to agree that the Shroud of Turin is the Real Image of Jesus? 🤔

Recent X-ray analysis has sparked new debates about the Shroud of Turin, a 2,000-year-old cloth believed by many to be the burial shroud of Jesus Christ.

In this video, we dive deep into the evidence, explore the historical significance, and discuss whether this could be the true face of Jesus of Nazareth.

From carbon dating controversies to the miraculous image on the cloth, join us as we unravel the mystery surrounding this ancient relic. Watch the full video and share your thoughts!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJK3HjWVfPQ?si=tw-DMxHTK0cQM195


*Link to video*

https://talesoftimesforgotten.com/2020/02/24/sorry-the-shroud-of-turin-is-definitely-a-hoax/

What’s even more interesting is that the arms of the figure on the Turin Shroud are also different lengths. The right forearm is noticeably longer than the left forearm. The fact that the arms aren’t the same length is almost a dead giveaway that we’re looking at an image created by an artist and not the exact likeness of a real human being. Real human beings virtually always have arms of the same length, but it is really easy for an artist to mess up and make arms that aren’t the same length.

Finally, we have a smoking gun: the front side of the figure on the shroud doesn’t match the back side of the figure. In fact, the two figures aren’t even the same length; the front side of the figure on the shroud is 1.95 meters long, but the figure on the back of the shroud is 2.02 meters long!

This is absolutely a dead giveaway that we’re looking at the work of an artist. It’s easy to see how an artist could have painted the figures separately and accidentally made the back side of the figure longer than the front side, but it is hard to see how, if the shroud were authentic, Jesus’s back could have been longer than his front. That in itself would take some kind of miracle.

I suggest that you do us all a favor. Go lie down on your back. Now, remember that you're a dead person, so keep your triceps (the back part of your upper arms) on the floor like a dead person.

Now cover your penis or your mons (the V of your thighs where your pubic hair grows) with your hands--without removing your arms from the floor. Remember, you're both dead, but also really, really prissy and don't want anyone to see your crotch.

Go on, we'll wait. Report back how you were able to cover your groin with your hands whilst dead and with your arms flopping around like fishes.

They may have (maybe, if you trust catholics) changed the "carbon dating" part, but there are still loads and loads of other problems with this silly thing. There's nothing to be afraid of.

More fun reading:

https://medium.com/@kylejohnson_40581/let-go-of-the-shroud-part-i-a89258494835

https://centerforinquiry.org/blog/the_fraud_of_turin/

The intellectually dishonest presentation even carried the unchallenged assertion that no artistic materials were found on the cloth. In fact, famed microanalyst Walter McCrone discovered that the body image (in contrast to off-image areas) had significant amounts of artist’s pigment. The show repeated the false assertion that the “blood” stains were “human” blood, when in fact they failed batteries of forensic serological tests for blood, and McCrone identified the suspiciously still-red substance as red ocher and vermilion tempera paint.