richmond500:
The governor also thanked Tinubu for his support? Saying without his support, they wouldn't have come this far this is the 2nd time in a month he is thanking Tinubu. Hand of Isau voice of Jacob abi na how ona deh talk am?

The voice is that of Jacob but the hand of Esau

highchief1:
truth be told.sim don win for this one.the best they can do is to wait for him in 2027.Even as a stubborn fighter I Dey like tell myself truth.

Very true

Please I want to ask a question--in the judiciary system, between the federal high court and Supreme court which of them has the highest jurisdiction and which one is subject to the other?

vowiski:
Court or Tribunal ?

4 years , this matter , dem never judge am finish .. by then 3 years tenure don elapse ..

lol 🤣

Ezennia101:
Please I want to ask a question--in the judiciary system, between the federal high court and Supreme court which of them has the highest jurisdiction and which one is subject to the other?

Supreme court is the highest na

Okoyeeboz:


After Fubara the IGP on Thursday, you want police to vacate on Monday.

Just dey look wetin go happen for Rivers state. Just fold your hand dey look.

Dem don vacate already

Okoyeeboz:


Who will give the LGs allocation for an election conducted in defiance of court orders?

The CTCs have been sitting under the mango trees, let the comedians who call themselves Chairmen and participated in Saturday's comedy show join them there. In the alternative, they can be operating from Chicken Republic in Port Harcourt.

The LG Secretariats will remain locked.

it's already opened Oga
U people keep losing

One thing God dey take pass this our greedy politicians is that they can never tell what tomorrow holds

And that's why they always get disgraced when they start forming God😂

Wike and court is like 5&6. I wonder the injunction he will be praying for this one that election and swearing in have been done.

No Champion forever.

chrisxxx:

Wike was in charge of his government because everyone that assisted him was carried along. He never reneged in whatever agreement reached with interested parties including Patience Jonathan.
Tell Fubara to honour agreement he entered before becoming the governor. He hadn't money to sponsor himself. He hadn't the capacity to contest. Wike chose him for a purpose which he accepted.
He won't win in this . Inam sure of that. I am also not sure Wike will win but definitely Fubara won't win.

Honor which agreement?

Wike has bn defeated🤣🤣🤣😜🤪🥱🤭🙆🙆

baralatie:

Na from odili e start

Tor..
They should be calming down ooo
Life has no spare.

senatordave1:


Very true

he’s a seating governor wike cannot win him hands down.Thats why they warn ppl to mind who they empower.Na God go save wike

highchief1:
he’s a seating governor wike cannot win him hands down.Thats why they warn ppl to mind who they empower.Na God go save wike

Wike will win in 2027

senatordave1:


Wike will win in 2027

Keep deceiving yourself

Noise makers..go to court.
Did you hear obaseki say anything after the kangaroo election won by APC ? So shut up and go to court.

clarocuzioo:
If they are not happy with the outcome of the elections, they should go to court and remain there.

The matter will be pursued till supreme court, by that time enough allocations must have come in for the next elections.

Who will release allocation to LGs with pending court case? I pray they win at court otherwise no allocation until another elections is conducted.

vowiski:
Court or Tribunal ?

4 years , this matter , dem never judge am finish .. by then 3 years tenure don elapse ..

Which Tribunal? They are not challenging the results. They are challenging the validity of the election with regards to the FHC Judgement.

The state govt appealed the matter, so make we dey see.

The strong statement that INEC made with regards to the Voters Register is one that must be considered also.

phemray:


Who will release allocation to LGs with pending court case? I pray they win at court otherwise no allocation until another elections is conducted.

LGAs allocation will be continously released pending the determination of the suit. Just like the case of governorship and presidential elections, allocations keep flowing pending determination of suit.

senatordave1:


Wike will win in 2027

yes

highchief1:
yes

Except fubara acts fast

clarocuzioo:


LGAs allocation will be continously released pending the determination of the suit. Just like the case of governorship and presidential elections, allocations keep flowing pending determination of suit.

Ok but remember the LG autonomy has not being fully implemented. If funds is to be send directly to the 774 constitutionally elected chairmen, are they to be recognised. State takes funds directly before now. Anyway.

Wike supporters will now turn to judicial commentators, they will know names of all corrupt Judges in Abuja, such as: lifu, omotosho etc. lifu need to go back to nursery school for him to know the meaning of jurisdiction.

tundegan:
Wike is the best minister of FCT we have ever had.

He will bring sanity to the place just like he did in Rivers state.

As usual, diversion tactics of APC supporter. Why not create a thread for that.

senatordave1:


Except fubara acts fast

there’s Nthg to act he’s a one term governor.

ZIAZI:


Which Tribunal? They are not challenging the results. They are challenging the validity of the election with regards to the FHC Judgement.

The state govt appealed the matter, so make we dey see.

The strong statement that INEC made with regards to the Voters Register is one that must be considered also.

The state government didn't appeal anything, they only asked for stay of execution of the order of the FHC, and the appeal court declined it. So, they have to go back to the FHC for the main suit. However, the suit has been overtaken by event as at today. The election has been conducted and the Rivers State government and RSIEC won't be needed the voters' register and the police and DSS any more for the election. Taking to consideration, the court never said election should not hold.
The only issue here now is, if sizeable number of people per ward can come out and claim that were disenfranchised because their names were not in the voters' register and they didn't vote, then, the election may be voided at the tribunal.
As at today, the order of the FHC were obeyed because INEC claimed they didn't give RSIEC 2023 voters' register and police said they didn't provide security for the election.
The only big issue here is the voters' register but large voters must come out to claim they were disenfranchised. Police giving security coverage during election is not a compulsion constitutionally.

Okoyeeboz:


Who will give the LGs allocation for an election conducted in defiance of court orders?

The CTCs have been sitting under the mango trees, let the comedians who call themselves Chairmen and participated in Saturday's comedy show join them there. In the alternative, they can be operating from Chicken Republic in Port Harcourt.

The LG Secretariats will remain locked.

😂 They never sat under any tree, allocations has been coming in the last three months, and to bust your bubbles the councils are open, shame on you all 😂😂

phemray:


Who will release allocation to LGs with pending court case? I pray they win at court otherwise no allocation until another elections is conducted.

No local government allocation would be seized because of court case. The supreme court had said in a landmark case between FG vs LSG, that the generality of the people cannot be punish because of few in a case of federal government seizing Lagos State LGA allocations.
President, governors and legislators are sworn in and receiving allocation and salaries and they will still be having pending cases in the court.

IfnobeGod20:
The state government didn't appeal anything, they only asked for stay of execution of the order of the FHC, and the appeal court declined it. So, they have to go back to the FHC for the main suit. However, the suit has been overtaken by event as at today. The election has been conducted and the Rivers State government and RSIEC won't be needed the voters' register and the police and DSS any more for the election. Taking to consideration, the court never said election should not hold.
The only issue here now is, if sizeable number of people per ward can come out and claim that were disenfranchised because their names were not in the voters' register and they didn't vote, then, the election may be voided at the tribunal.
As at today, the order of the FHC were obeyed because INEC claimed they didn't give RSIEC 2023 voters' register and police said they didn't provide security for the election.
The only big issue here is the voters' register but large voters must come out to claim they were disenfranchised. Police giving security coverage during election is not a compulsion constitutionally.

My friend, your analysis is flawed on many angles.

The legal question is 'Was the election conducted with due compliance to the laid down rules?"

Only the court can interpret this.

Again, what are they going back to the FHC for? That was a judgement and not an interlocutory ruling. What you do is simply to go on appeal.

Finally, you should understand that a stay of execution is one of the interim orders pending an appeal. In other words, it doesn't stand alone and must be accompanied by an appeal proper.

It is mainly used in issues where the res (property) is in issue. If Mr. A wins Mr. B in court over a land dispute, Mr. B will go on appeal and apply for a stay of execution to refrain Mr. A from selling the land since the earlier court by virtue of a declaration made him the bonafide owner.

I'm glad you said the COA didn't grant that order. So how on earth did they give the ruling without an appeal? The case is at the COA as we speak.

Graçias!

ZIAZI:



My friend, your analysis is flawed on many angles.

The legal question is 'Was the election conducted with due compliance to the laid down rules?"

Only the court can interpret this.

Again, what are they going back to the FHC for? That was a judgement and not an interlocutory ruling. What you do is simply to go on appeal.

Finally, you should understand that a stay of execution is one of the interim orders pending an appeal. In other words, it doesn't stand alone and must be accompanied by an appeal proper.

It is mainly used in issues where the res (property) is in issue. If Mr. A wins Mr. B in court over a land dispute, Mr. B will go on appeal and apply for a stay of execution to refrain Mr. A from selling the land since the earlier court by virtue of a declaration made him the bonafide owner.

I'm glad you said the COA didn't grant that order. So how on earth did they give the ruling without an appeal? The case is at the COA as we speak.

Graçias!

Mr. Man, if an election wasn't conducted by the laid down rules, do you go to FHC or tribunal that adjudicate on election matters?
Any flaw in an election, you go through a tribunal set up for the purpose and not FHC.
No doubt I just confirmed that order was a ruling of the FHC. I thought it was just an interlocutory injunction.

But the big question I want you to sincerely answer is, did the ruling says election should not be conducted?
The ruling or the order was very much emphatic.
INEC to give RSIEC 2023 voters' register
Police and DSS don't provide security for the election.
There was no portion of the order that says RSIEC don't conduct the election.
Now, if INEC didn't give RSIEC voters' register and they have their own voters' register that can be rely on, does that invalidate the election. Except you wish to tell the world that RSIEC is under INEC and cannot do their statutory duty without INEC's voters' register. If you claim, please quote the section of the constitution that says so.

IfnobeGod20:
Mr. Man, if an election wasn't conducted by the laid down rules, do you go to FHC or tribunal that adjudicate on election matters?
Any flaw in an election, you go through a tribunal set up for the purpose and not FHC.
No doubt I just confirmed that order was a ruling of the FHC. I thought it was just an interlocutory injunction.

But the big question I want you to sincerely answer is, did the ruling says election should not be conducted?
The ruling or the order was very much emphatic.
INEC to give RSIEC 2023 voters' register
Police and DSS don't provide security for the election.
There was no portion of the order that says RSIEC don't conduct the election.
Now, if INEC didn't give RSIEC voters' register and they have their own voters' register that can be rely on, does that invalidate the election. Except you wish to tell the world that RSIEC is under INEC and cannot do their statutory duty without INEC's voters' register. If you claim, please quote the section of the constitution that says so.

Chief! You must understand ooooh.
You're just speaking plenty grammar.

What is being challenged is not the result of the election but the process that led to the election.

There is pre-election and post-election matter, oga. You only approach a tribunal when you're contesting the result.

The FHC matter was instituted before the election. It has no business with the result.

Know the difference abeg!😂

ZIAZI:


Chief! You must understand ooooh.
You're just speaking plenty grammar.

What is being challenged is not the result of the election but the process that led to the election.

There is pre-election and post-election matter, oga. You only approach a tribunal when you're contesting the result.

The FHC matter was instituted before the election. It has no business with the result.

Know the difference abeg!😂

I asked you question but you have not answered it. I am reproducing it here again. I want your answer on it.
"But the big question I want you to sincerely answer is, did the ruling says election should not be conducted?
The ruling or the order was very much emphatic.
INEC don't give RSIEC 2023 voters' register
Police and DSS don't provide security for the election.
There was no portion of the order that says RSIEC don't conduct the election.
Now, if INEC didn't give RSIEC voters' register and they have their own voters' register that can be rely on, does that invalidate the election. Except you wish to tell the world that RSIEC is under INEC and cannot do their statutory duty without INEC's voters' register. If you claim, please quote the section of the constitution that says so.

I am aware of pre-election matter but your claim of flaw in the election was what made me to to say, if there were flaws in an election, you go through the normal channel. The grouse of the case, if in a normal setting where rule of law is paramount and the judiciary are up to their game, if the petitioner goes back to the court, the judge would give an order that the suit has been overtaken by events because the judge did not say don't conduct election.