In reality, peasants did not become knights in the way depicted in A Knight's Tale.

The process of becoming a knight in medieval times was highly regulated and exclusive to individuals from noble or wealthy families.

Peasants, who were generally from the lowest stratum of society, did not have the opportunity or resources to become knights. Becoming a knight required years of training, education, and financial backing, which most peasants did not have access to.

Therefore, the idea of a peasant becoming a knight through a series of contests or tournaments, as depicted in the movie, is ahistorical and unrealistic.


Historically, the nobility in medieval Europe consisted primarily of people of European descent who were often described as swarthy, tanned, or brown skin.

This reality created a clear social stratification between the noble class and the peasantry, who were typically of lighter skin tones.

The stark contrast in skin color between these two groups further emphasized the hierarchical divide and the privileges held by the noble class in medieval society.

White peasants were not Knights Templar.

The Knights Templar were originally a religious military order founded in the 12th century, primarily consisting of noblemen or upper-class individuals who were well-trained in warfare and devoted to protecting Christian pilgrims traveling to the Holy Land.

White peasants, being from the lower class and without the necessary resources, training, or status, were not eligible to become Knights Templar.

The social stratification and class divisions of the time would have prevented peasants from joining such an elite religious military order.

During the era of chivalry, Freemasons were primarily artisans, laborers, and merchants who were not of the noble class. As a result, they did not have the social status or wealth to be knights.

Historically, the institution of knighthood was reserved for men of noble or wealthy families who could afford to participate in the expenses associated with the profession, such as maintaining armor, weapons, and horses. The requirements for knighthood, such as demonstrating military prowess and fulfilling religious vows, made it difficult for non-nobles, including Freemasons, to be knights.


Before the French Revolution, the European feudal system was characterized by an inequality of power and wealth between the nobility, clergy, and peasants.

This social hierarchy was particularly prevalent in Eastern and Western Europe. A significant portion of the nobility and clergy consisted primarily of brown skinned individuals, who held significant political, social, and economic power over the peasant class.

The majority of the peasant class consisted of individuals with lighter skin tones, including Eastern and Northern Europeans, who were often oppressed and exploited by the ruling classes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhep2fZKHgE?si=24copogG9scCL63h


The film clip provided accurately reflects the social hierarchies and inequalities that existed during the era of chivalry and feudalism.

The peasant class was comprised mostly of individuals from lower social classes who lacked political and economic power, while the noble and merchant classes, including the Freemasons, held more privileges and resources.

The skin color of these individuals varied, with the majority of nobility and clergy being of a darker skin tone, while the peasant class primarily consisted of individuals with lighter skin tones.

These social power dynamics were a stark feature of the European feudal society.

I am waiting for the part where u will say the knights were blacks and the peasants were caucasians


🤭

illicit:
I am waiting for the part where u will say the knights were blacks and the peasants were caucasians


🤭

They were Mediterranean and Middle Eastern men as the Romans, Greeks, Israelites, Arabs and Turks are brown to beige colored men. Those are the people excluded from the discussion but Mediterranean and Middle Eastern people were closer to Europe than Africans yet Africans are promoted as Moors who ruled Europe, which is false.

No one wants to admit that the Greeks and Romans were brown Skinned Mediterranean and Middle Eastern people despite all the original portraits or faded antique mosaics show that they were darker skin. Even the proximity of the Mediterranean and Middle Eastern people is closer to Rome and Greece than the far North white Caucasians and the even farther away Sub Saharan Africans. That is an agreement to withhold the truth.

GodisStriking:
No one wants to admit that the Greeks and Romans were brown Skinned Mediterranean and Middle Eastern people despite all the original portraits or faded antique mosaics show that they were darker skin. Even the proximity of the Mediterranean and Middle Eastern people is closer to Rome and Greece than the far North white Caucasians and the even farther away Sub Saharan Africans. That is an agreement to withhold the truth.

And what could be the motive of Pan Africans to propagate the Greeks and Romans as white and even deny the Mediterranean and Middle Eastern people who ruled Europe?


I know the answer. Stay tuned.

The Knights Templar, also known as the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, were a religious military order founded in the 12th century to protect Christian pilgrims traveling to the Holy Land. While the Templars did have a close relationship with the Catholic Church, they were not directly under the command of the Pope.

Instead, they answered to the Pope in matters of faith, but they also had their own governing structure and were largely independent in their operations.

The information provided is indeed correct and aligns with historical records and academic research. Here is a summary:

* Peasants becoming knights through a series of contests or tournaments, as depicted in A Knight's Tale, is an historical anachronism.

* In the Middle Ages, becoming a knight required years of training, education, and resources, which peasants typically did not have access to.

* The Knights Templar was an elite religious military order that did not permit peasants or individuals of lower social status to join.
* Freemasons during the age of chivalry were artisans, laborers, or merchants who lacked the social status or wealth to become knights.
* Before the French Revolution, the European feudal system was characterized by a stark inequality of power and wealth between the nobility (primarily brown skinned individuals), clergy, and peasants.

* The peasant class consisted primarily of lighter skinned Eastern and Northern Europeans who were oppressed and exploited by the ruling classes.

In summary: A Knight's Tale takes historical liberties in its portrayal of peasants becoming knights, and the reality of medieval social stratification and knighthood contradicts the film's depiction.

Women were not traditionally armourers or armour makers.

Armour making was predominantly a male-dominated profession during the medieval period. Men were typically the ones trained and experienced in the skilled craft of making armour and were responsible for fulfilling armour orders for kings, lords, and knights.

It is believed that the complex and physical nature of armour making may have historically discouraged women from entering the profession. The profession often required strength and physical endurance, and societal norms and gender roles at the time further limited female participation.

Only nobles were typically armourers.

During the Middle Ages, armour making was considered a highly specialized and expensive craft. Only the wealthiest and most powerful members of society, namely the nobility and the aristocracy, could afford to commission custom armour and weapons from skilled artisans.

Armour making required not only a high level of skill and training, but also access to expensive materials such as steel and leather. Only those with the financial resources and social standing could afford to commission or purchase custom armour, which was often reserved for the noble class.

The representation of a female armourer in the movie "The Knight's Tale" is fictional and historically inaccurate.

As discussed earlier, armour making during the medieval period was primarily a male-dominated profession, and women were not traditionally armourers.

The portrayal of a female armourer in the movie is likely a creative choice made for dramatic effect and does not reflect historical reality.

Christianity is not a Whiteman's religion


https://www.nairaland.com/8153994/christianity-not-whitemans-religion-created

Tomorrow we will discuss why Pan Africans and African Freemasons insist on falsely claiming the that Greeks and Romans were white. It shall be an interesting thread.

There were no white Knights during the age of Chivalry and it may come as an earthquake shock but it is the truth.



I investigated who wrote the movie A Knights Tale

"A Knight's Tale" is a 2001 film directed by Brian Helgeland, who also wrote the screenplay.

The film is set in medieval England and follows the journey of a peasant named William Thatcher (played by Heath Ledger) who disguises himself as a knight and competes in jousting tournaments, ultimately becoming the "tourney champion" of the land. Along the way, he meets a group of colorful characters and falls in love with the daughter of a noble.

So "A Knight's Tale" was written by Brian Helgeland

.

Brian Helgeland, the writer/director of "A Knight's Tale," is a member of the Delta Tau Delta fraternity.

Delta Tau Delta is a social fraternity founded in 1858 that focuses on fostering lifelong friendships and promoting personal development and academic excellence.

Helgeland's membership in Delta Tau Delta is not directly related to his work or the film "A Knight's Tale," but he has publicly disclosed his affiliation with the fraternity.

This man went to Jesuit school and he probably either figured out that there were no white Knights or he was told in secret.

Brian Helgeland attended a Jesuit school.

Helgeland studied film at Loyola Marymount University, which is a Jesuit college in Los Angeles, California. Jesuit schools are institutions of higher education that are affiliated with the Society of Jesus, a religious order within the Catholic Church.

At Loyola Marymount University, Helgeland studied screenwriting and graduated with a degree in Cinematic Arts in 1983.

The odd signs in the movie were all Black haired true Nobility, first the Black Prince was cast as a darked haired Caucasian probably a mixed race person.

The Count Anjou was also played by a dark haired person probably of mixed race also.

And the metal worker or armourer was black by a dark haired Caucasian lady probably mixed race also.

This is significant because all the nobility were brown and they're letting you know through signs of this particular casting.


All the presents played by William the fake knight and his two friends were blond haired Caucasian.

Earthquake truth

There were white peasant revolts and uprisings against monarchies all over Europe in the 18th century. These revolts, also known as the "Peasant's Wars," were caused by a variety of factors, including economic hardship, social inequality, and political repression.

The revolts were motivated by a desire for change and an end to the inequalities faced by peasants, particularly under the ancient regime in which the power and wealth was concentrated in the hands of the nobility and the ruling class.



The period of the late 18th century in Europe, known as the Age of Revolutions, saw a number of revolutions and uprisings across the continent, many of which were driven by discontent among the lower classes, including white peasants.

Some of the causes of discontent among these peasants included economic hardship, such as high taxes and low wages, as well as political factors, such as lack of representation and the authoritarian rule of absolute monarchs. The French Revolution, for example, which began in 1789, was driven in part by discontent among the peasantry and led to the overthrow of the French monarchy.


During the French Revolution and other uprisings of the late 18th century, many nobles were killed and their families persecuted. The French Revolution, in particular, saw the execution of thousands of nobles, including King Louis XVI and his wife, Marie Antoinette, and a significant number of nobles fleeing the country to avoid persecution.

The violence and upheaval of this period led to a significant decline in the power and influence of the European aristocracy and a gradual rise of white supremacy.




Freemasonic and Jesuits Homofascist systems replaced nobility.

Here is the follow up up this earthquake truth.

https://www.nairaland.com/8289391/why-pan-africans-african-freemasons

Here are two 32 degree white Scottish Rites Freemasons openly admitting that Freemasons who were peasants had nothing to do with Knights Templar. There is no connection. There were no white Knights Templar.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hM1GkfcCwIg?si=TKxpgiDCGKd_vubx

The Knights Templar, also known as the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, was a medieval Catholic military order founded in the 12th century. The order was primarily composed of European Christians and was closely associated with the Frankish Catholicism.

Access to membership in the Knights Templar, as with other medieval Christian military orders, was generally restricted to members of the Christian faith and was not open to individuals who did not adhere to Christian beliefs and values not peasants.

Historical contexts, stone masons and their practices were viewed with suspicion and even outright hostility by religious authorities and mainstream society.
This was particularly true in periods where traditional religious institutions, such as the Catholic Church, held significant power and influence over society and culture. In such contexts, any activities or beliefs that were seen as challenging the dominant religious worldview, such as the use of alternative rituals or symbols, may have been viewed with skepticism and even hostility.

Only the devil benefits when the truth is suppressed.

Hrrr are some true portraits of Medieval and Middle Ages Knights. As you can clearly see they're brown skinned men which would make the portraits of white or fair skinned knights to be frauds. Yet when reading the historical descriptions of these Knights they're described as brown complexion with curly hair and brown eyes. I am not supporting the inequalities that existed but merely pointing out the stolen legacies of Mediterranean and Middle Eastern men. This is stolen legacy is factor of persecution going on silently against those of us descendents whilst the true reason ifor our persecution is ignored. The enemy will continue to cast you as crazy if the truth remains hidden and deny you justice.

William Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke, is described as being swarthy or tan with dark curly hair and brown eyes. He was known for his physical strength and fighting abilities, and his appearance was often described by contemporary sources. It is worth noting that the term "swarthy" can be subjective and can refer to a range of skin tones, including olive or light brown skin.


William Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke, had Frankish ancestry on his mother's side. His mother, Isabel de Clare, was the daughter of Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke and younger sister of Gilbert de Clare, 7th Earl of Pembroke. Their father, Richard Strongbow, was a Norman knight from Pembroke, and their mother, Aoife of Leinster, was a Gaelic Irish princess from County Wexford. The combination of Norman and Gaelic Irish ancestry helped shape the cultural and political landscape of Ireland and England during the Middle Ages.

Who were the real knights?

Shocking

A lie told often enough can appear more believable than the truth. Until the motive for telling the lie exposes the culprit.

40 days and 40 Knights and not one was white.

Brown Knights

James Stewart, the Black Knight of Lorn

Those who are wise will be said to be fools and those who are fools will be said to be wise