Everyday365:


1st question: You can read.

2nd question: I used the term "probably" to signify speculation.

3rd question: spam question!

since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

1. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

2. what part of the story supports your claims?

3. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:

since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?
1. what does the heading say?
how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

What does the word "probably" mean?
When "probably" is used in a sentence what does it indicate?

2. what part of the story supports your claims?

Are you trying to force my speculation to become a claim?

3. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

Spammed question.

It seems that you don't understand how this conversation started.
Try to go through our discussion to understand it better.

Everyday365:
What does the word "probably" mean?
When "probably" is used in a sentence what does it indicate?
Are you trying to force my speculation to become a claim?
Spammed question.

It seems that you don't understand how this conversation started.
Try to go through our discussion to understand it better.

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?
2. what does the heading say?
how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?
3. what part of the story supports your claims?
4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

you did not answer my previous questions
You just copied and pasted your last quote with few modifications 👇

lexy2014:

since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?
1. what does the heading say?
how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?
2. what part of the story supports your claims?
3. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions
You just copied and pasted your last quote with few modifications 👇

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:

what are your previous questions?
did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?
1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?
2. what does the heading say?
how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?
3. what part of the story supports your claims?
4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

You're just spamming the exact same posts over and over again.

These are the people that want the rest of us to accept them the way they are yet they go around pulling guns on people. This is what Joseph Biden promoted in America. People living. Lie.

atiku4President:
Awesome. He that is in him is greater than he that's in the world. No weapon fashioned against him shall prosper, says the Word of God.

That's the difference between Christianity and our brothers across the alley.

This man pulled a gun on an unarmed preacher.

If it was a terrorist in an explosive vest could he do that?

Everyday365:
You're just spamming the exact same posts over and over again.

can you produce the spam you are referring to?

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:

can you produce the spam you are referring to?

This is serious. 👇👇👇

lexy2014:


why he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:




why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:


No. even if the story is too long for you to read, at least read the heading.



why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:


what does the heading say?

what part of the story supports your claims?



why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:


1. what does the heading say?
2. what part of the story supports your claims?
3. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

You are reposting the same thing with different wordings and you claim that you're not spamming. 😁

Kobojunkie will not be háppy with this news. Cuz she is among the àñtichrist parading on Nairaland. I pray God will déliver her from the spirit of darkness one day.

The write-up overdramatized the whole thing.

Babalola0920:


Like Hitler who burn 🔥 over 6,000,000 Jews ✡️

are u a terrorist creature or its supporter?

Everyday365:
This is serious. 👇👇👇You are reposting the same thing with different wordings and you claim that you're not spamming. 😁

if you say that I reposted the same thing with different wordings, how then is it spam?

now if you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details and not trying to deflect, then you should have no issues answering the following questions.

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:

if you say that I reposted the same thing with different wordings, how then is it spam?

What's the meaning of spam?

Or do you know what spam is?

Everyday365:
What's the meaning of spam?

Or do you know what spam is?

I dont know. could you tell me?

now if you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details and not trying to deflect, then you should have no issues answering the following questions.

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:

I dont know. could you tell me?

First you don't know the meaning of "probably" and now you don't know the meaning of "spam"?

See if you can learn the meaning of those words, our conversation can't proceed without it.

Everyday365:
First you don't know the meaning of "probably" and now you don't know the meaning of "spam"?

See if you can learn the meaning of those words, our conversation can't proceed without it.

now if you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details and not trying to deflect, then you should have no issues answering the following questions.

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

Everyday365:
First you don't know the meaning of "probably" and now you don't know the meaning of "spam"?

See if you can learn the meaning of those words, our conversation can't proceed without it.

now that you know the meaning of "spam" and "probably" and you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details and not trying to deflect, then you should have no issues answering the following questions.

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

I am no more a chosen. I'm a Kihara!

lexy2014:


now that you know the meaning of "spam" and "probably" and you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details

when you learn the meaning of spam and probably, get back to me.

Everyday365:
when you learn the meaning of spam and probably, get back to me.

still takes us back here...

now that you know the meaning of "spam" and "probably" and you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details and not trying to deflect, then you should have no issues answering the following questions.

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

Everyday365:
First you don't know the meaning of "probably" and now you don't know the meaning of "spam"?

See if you can learn the meaning of those words, our conversation can't proceed without it.

where is the conversation?

how are the questions below "conversation"?

now that you know the meaning of "spam" and "probably" and you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details and not trying to deflect, then you should have no issues answering the following questions.

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:


where is the conversation?

When you learn the meaning of probably and spam get back to me.

Everyday365:
When you learn the meaning of probably and spam get back to me.

Everyday365:
See if you can learn the meaning of those words, our conversation can't proceed without it.

where is the conversation?

how are the questions below "conversation"?

now that you know the meaning of "spam" and "probably" and you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details and not trying to deflect, then you should have no issues answering the following questions.

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:

where is the conversation?

When you learn the meaning of probably and spam, get back to me.

Everyday365:
When you learn the meaning of probably and spam, get back to me.

still brings us back here....

Everyday365:
See if you can learn the meaning of those words, our conversation can't proceed without it.

where is the conversation?

how are the questions below "conversation"?

now that you know the meaning of "spam" and "probably" and you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details and not trying to deflect, then you should have no issues answering the following questions.

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:
where is the conversation?

When you learn the meaning of the words Spam and probably, get back to me.

Everyday365:
When you learn the meaning of the words Spam and probably, get back to me.

Everyday365:
See if you can learn the meaning of those words, our conversation can't proceed without it.

where is the conversation?

how are the questions below "conversation"?

now that you know the meaning of "spam" and "probably" and you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details and not trying to deflect, then you should have no issues answering the following questions.

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

lexy2014:

where is the conversation?

When you learn the meaning of probably and spam get back to me.

Everyday365:
When you learn the meaning of probably and spam get back to me.

Everyday365:
See if you can learn the meaning of those words, our conversation can't proceed without it.

can you show me the conversation?

how are the questions below "conversation"?

now that you know the meaning of "spam" and "probably" and you could answer the question I asked you about spam with details and not trying to deflect, then you should have no issues answering the following questions.

Everyday365:
you did not answer my previous questions

what are your previous questions?

did you ask them before or after I asked you the following?

1. since you can read, what did you read before you came up with this?

Everyday365:
Probably a Transfer of aggression due to lost job as a result of change in political policy.

2. what does the heading say?

how does using "probably" make it any less a claim which you insisted was right several times?

Everyday365:
People transfer aggression to those who they feel aggrieved by. Go and watch videos of gun violence in America. It's not the first time someone has ever been threatened with a gun in the US.

Everyday365:
Does the "random preacher" not qualify as a "random person"?

Everyday365:
Never heard of mass shootings before?

3. what part of the story supports your claims?

4. why did he not transfer the aggression to just any random person on the street?

JASONjnr:
Nigerian pastor would've been there with paid police officers to guide them from any harm.... While selling handkerchief l, stickers and oil to it's gullible followers for protection......

You nailed it.