QuinQ:


Whenever I post a link I get banned. Here's his own man saying it - he said monies in the 10 accounts were "tax deductions"!🤣😂

OK, having 10 bank accounts is admittedly excessive to me, but that is not proof or Fact that he was or is a drugs dealer as you mischievously stated previously.

A lot of these accounts would have been opened to probably give him access to ovedraft facilities, nothing wrong or drug related with that.

Also, in the olden days, a lot of the ATM's were not linked so you couldn't use Chase bank cards at a Citibank machine and people I know opened multiple bank accounts and put small monies in each so that in the event of ATM network failure, they weren't stuck.

Per the tax deductions, I don't know their system well enough despite it being explained to me at various times to understand the implications.

My pont is you have no proof, circumstancial or concrete, that he deals in drugs so stop stating it and claiming it as fact.

aswani:


OK, having 10 bank accounts is admittedly excessive to me, but that is not proof or Fact that he was or is a drugs dealer as you mischievously stated previously.

A lot of these accounts would have been opened to probably give him access to ovedraft facilities, nothing wrong or drug related with that.

Also, in the olden days, a lot of the ATM's were not linked so you couldn't use Chase bank cards at a Citibank machine and people I know opened multiple bank accounts and put small monies in each so that in the event of ATM network failure, they weren't stuck.

Per the tax deductions, I don't know their system well enough despite it being explained to me at various times to understand the implications.

My pont is you have no proof, circumstancial or concrete, that he deals in drugs so stop stating it and claiming it as fact.

In that case you don't know the meaning of the word "circumstantial". It was NOT normal that a regular person had more than one bank account, talkless of ten! That alone is prima facie evidence of criminal activity. An attempt was made to tie it to his job at Mobile but failed. In the end there was only one possible explanation left - our boy was involved in drug dealing, heroine to be exact!

QuinQ:


In that case you don't know the meaning of the word "circumstantial". It was NOT normal that a regular person had more than one bank account, talkless of ten! That alone is prima facie evidence of criminal activity. An attempt was made to tie it to his job at Mobile but failed. In the end there was only one possible explanation left - our boy was involved in drug dealing, heroine to be exact!

So the mighty FBI with all their resources that have brought down multiple drug barons investigated him when he was a struggling student with zero influence and couldn't nail him, yet you are here claiming having ten bank accounts is proof he is involved with heroine dealing.

Please go to a public place and say this so his lawyers can get in touch. After all you have prima whatever proof.

What attempt was made to tie anything to his job at Mobil?

aswani:


So the mighty FBI with all their resources that have brought down multiple drug barons investigated him when he was a struggling student with zero influence and couldn't nail him, yet you are here claiming having ten bank accounts is proof he is involved with heroine dealing.

Please go to a public place and say this so his lawyers can get in touch. After all you have prima whatever proof.

What attempt was made to tie anything to his job at Mobil?

His lawyers should first go after Reno. He has posts and videos all over the place calling our boy a drug lord!
He was no longer a student. And if he was that'd even be worse - a student with over $1m!
See the squared below about Mobile. Grab yourself some education


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc6COWi65hU?si=rkFF3AKEkSMVkHN5

QuinQ:


His lawyers should first go after Reno. He has posts and videos all over the place calling our boy a drug lord!
He was no longer a student. And if he was that'd even be worse - a student with over $1m!
See the squared below about Mobile. Grab yourself some education


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc6COWi65hU?si=rkFF3AKEkSMVkHN5

What was he during the forfeiture and what year Wass this?

The squared about Mobil is what exactly in the context of what is being discussed.

aswani:


What was he during the forfeiture and what year Wass this?

The squared about Mobil is what exactly in the context of what is being discussed.

He was working at Mobile in October 1993 when all this went down, but his main money was from dealing heroine.
He tried to link the money to his job as treasurer at Mobile. Mobile debunked that

QuinQ:


He was working at Mobile in October 1993 when all this went down, but his main money was from dealing heroine.
He tried to link the money to his job as treasurer at Mobile. Mobile debunked that

So is all this proof he was dealing in drugs?

aswani:


So is all this proof he was dealing in drugs?

No, just as your typing this doesn't prove you're not a bot

Akhaz024:

But you can use your whole life to insult Islam.

I can't insult islam.
islam is an insult in itself.

Just as how you can't dirty a rag.
A rag is already dirty.

Peace bro.