andrewbaba44:
That Bruno goal na pure offside sha

How? Rashford who was offside left it for him.

Or you mean because Rashy went for the ball first?

donstan18:
I have this feelings that KDB will be finished after this season.

Might be wrong thou

He's beginning to noticeably drift along in games more often.

Na just say him right leg ńa magic.

donstan18:
Arsenal winning EPL go so much pain me eh.

Gawd!!

Ndi I don’t rate Arsenal

andrewbaba44:
That Bruno goal na pure offside sha

Nope, didn't touch the ball and his position didn't affect/block the city defenders

donstan18:

How? Rashford who was offside left it for him.

Or you mean because Rashy went for the ball first?

Yes. If you're offside you shouldn't make an attempt to play the ball.

Everton had a goal denied against Manyoo for this.

Unlimited22:

Yes. If you're offside you shouldn't make an attempt to play the ball.

Everton had a goal denied against Manyoo for this.

Thought that rule was part of the modifications made recently?

Unlimited22:

Unfortunately I agree with this. Rashford makes a move towards the ball and clearly interferes, but I'd love to hear Dermot Gallagher m

We know the reason the goal was given. Before this weekend runs out you will see a similar move ruled offside

Unlimited22:

He's beginning to noticeably drift along in games more often.

Na just say him right leg ńa magic.

He’s getting tired to be very honest.

Unlimited22:

If you have quality midfielders you can carry bums in other positions.

Midfield is the most important part of the pitch and aside grevious errors and/or individual magic, games are won and lost there.

+5

United is now a better team without that selfish penaldo

Halland na another Juventus and last season ManU version of Ronaldo.

Unlimited22:

We had that kind of counter at least 4 times against Fulham and we passed sideways.

We had it against arsenal. This was also the way Graham Potter set us to play against Arsenal but we had stupid attacking midfielders most especially Kai Havertz.

Omo ETH na manager o.

Baba don win El Aparico and only 1 point behind City

popizaino:


We had it against arsenal. This was also the way Graham Potter set us to play against Arsenal but we had stupid attacking midfielders most especially Kai Havertz.

havertz again

Somehow every game, he is the only one that mattered

Was it also his fault that we lost to Newcastle?

Citey played better.
I need a meme for this please.

donstan18:

How? Rashford who was offside left it for him.

Or you mean because Rashy went for the ball first?

Hmm

If you say so

The biggest question is, did Rashford impede or affect the ball?

Pep needs to act before it’s too late.

Drop that Halland. He’s a big liability when he’s not tapping the ball in.

nihilistjnr:
Omo ETH na manager o.

Baba don win El Aparico and only 1 point behind City

You don mad finish, "El Aparico" laugh wan kill me for here.

Ballzproblem2:
that summer was bad , glad they are wise now,as for too four , please let them forget it ,focus on getting the medical department in other

Foolish people talking what everyone knows and could have told them in the summer

So they didn't know UCL is unlikely before lavishing £20m.for 6 months on Joao Felix?

andrewbaba44:
That Bruno goal na pure offside sha

Confirm
Rashford was all over it but serve city right , especially against Fulham

Roland17:
The biggest question is, did Rashford impede or affect the ball?

They changed the rule not long ago, If he is not preventing the opponent from getting to the ball and does not touch the ball he is not interfering with play.

donstan18:

Thought that rule was part of the modifications made recently?

It may be, that's why I said I want to hear the experts.

Roland17:
The biggest question is, did Rashford impede or affect the ball?

I think he interfered with play in that he affected the way City responded to the closest opposition player.

I think if Rashford stopped running immediately he knew he was offside, then Bruno doesn't reach the ball to score.

Chelsea 10 points from 4th place.

Not that bad sha.

Anything fit sup! So long as Silva and Kouli are permanently sold this January.

olabode89:


They changed the rule not long ago, If he is not preventing the opponent from getting to the ball and does not touch the ball he is not interfering with play.

According to PGMOL, it is a legit goal based on how the laws are written.

However, Rashford was interfering with the ball because of his positioning and continued run towards the ball, despite not making contact.

Consequently, should have been ruled offside!

Spurs Beat Arsenal Tommorow, and we win Beat them (Arsenal) and we are on the same points with Arsenal.

We are in the title race wow!!!

Chance creation 101 - you scan your surrounding before receiving the ball.

Does it mean we can have an offside decoy run now, more teams should do this

nateevs:


I think he interfered with play in that he affected the way City responded to the closest opposition player.

I think if Rashford stopped running immediately he knew he was offside, then Bruno doesn't reach the ball to score.

Correct...It also affected the position of the goalkeeper as he wouldn't want to commit to challenge for the ball and then get chipped...Should be offside, without rashford Bruno doesn't score that goal

donstan18:
Chelsea 10 points from 4th place.

Not that bad sha.

Anything fit sup! So long as Silva and Kouli are permanently sold this January.

particularly Silva, surprised that most don’t see his flaws

If you have any questions all Chelsea fans regarding this match please askoo. This is only chance you can get on how to beat man city. .